Re: [Mono-dev] How can I build mono-2.6 under Centos5 / RHEL5?
mono-2.4.3 is also failed. make[8]: Entering directory `/root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mcs/class/corlib' MCS [net_1_1] mscorlib.dll System.Reflection/Assembly.cs(454,56): warning CS0168: The variable `ex' is declared but never used System.Reflection/Assembly.cs(481,56): warning CS0168: The variable `ex' is declared but never used System/AppDomain.cs(67,24): warning CS0169: The private field `System.AppDomain._mono_app_domain' is never used System/Environment.cs(561,44): warning CS0169: The private method `System.Environment.internalBroadcastSettingChange()' is never used System/Variant.cs(268,24): warning CS0169: The private field `System.BRECORD.pvRecord' is never used System/Variant.cs(269,24): warning CS0169: The private field `System.BRECORD.pRecInfo' is never used System.Diagnostics/StackFrame.cs(59,32): warning CS0649: Field `System.Diagnostics.StackFrame.internalMethodName' is never assigned to, and will always have its default value `null' System.Globalization/RegionInfo.cs(71,24): warning CS0169: The private field `System.Globalization.RegionInfo.currencyEnglishName' is never used System.Reflection.Emit/ILGenerator.cs(67,21): warning CS0169: The private field `System.Reflection.Emit.ILExceptionInfo.len' is assigned but its value is never used System.Reflection.Emit/SignatureHelper.cs(61,34): warning CS0649: Field `System.Reflection.Emit.SignatureHelper.modreqs' is never as signed to, and will always have its default value `null' System.Reflection.Emit/SignatureHelper.cs(62,34): warning CS0649: Field `System.Reflection.Emit.SignatureHelper.modopts' is never assigned to, and will always have its default value `null' System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels/CrossAppDomainChannel.cs(53,32): warning CS0169: The private field `System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.CrossAppDomainData._ContextID' is assigned but its value is never used System.Runtime.Remoting.Contexts/Context.cs(69,22): warning CS0649: Field `System.Runtime.Remoting.Contexts.Context.frozen' is never assigned to, and will always have its default value `false' System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging/AsyncResult.cs(60,22): warning CS0169: The private field `System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.AsyncResult.message_ctrl' is assigned but its value is never used System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging/ReturnMessage.cs(47,21): warning CS0169: The private field `System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.ReturnMessage._outArgsCount' is assigned but its value is never used Compilation succeeded - 15 warning(s) Assembly mscorlib.dll signed. AOT [net_1_1] mscorlib.dll /bin/sh: line 1: 25887 Aborted MONO_PATH=./../../class/lib/net_1_1/ /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/runtime/mono-wrapper --aot=bind-to-runtime-version ../../class/lib/net_1_1/mscorlib.dll net_1_1_aot.log 21 make[8]: *** [../../class/lib/net_1_1/mscorlib.dll] Error 134 [r...@xen-727057^10.227 mono24]# cat ./BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mcs/class/corlib/net_1_1_aot.log ** ERROR **: file aot-compiler.c: line 3058 (emit_and_reloc_code): assertion failed: (code [i] == 0xe8) aborting... Mono Ahead of Time compiler - compiling assembly /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mcs/class/lib/net_1_1/mscorlib.dll Stacktrace: Native stacktrace: /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mono/mini/mono [0x47fd13] /lib64/libpthread.so.0 [0x3b5440e7c0] /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35) [0x3b53830265] /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x110) [0x3b53831d10] /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_log+0) [0x3b55834eb0] /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_log+0x83) [0x3b55834f33] /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_assert_warning+0x76) [0x3b55834fb6] /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mono/mini/mono [0x46dfe4] /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mono/mini/mono [0x46e132] /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mono/mini/mono [0x4757b9] /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mono/mini/mono(mono_main+0x13ea) [0x4669ba] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4) [0x3b5381d994] /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mono/mini/mono(realloc+0x3b9) [0x414e29] Debug info from gdb: [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x2b3241ae2d40 (LWP 25887)] [New Thread 0x40e32940 (LWP 25898)] [New Thread 0x40f33940 (LWP 25897)] 0x003b5440d5cb in read () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 3 Thread 0x40f33940 (LWP 25897) 0x003b5440de71 in nanosleep () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 2 Thread 0x40e32940 (LWP 25898) 0x003b5440c9b1 in sem_wait () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 * 1 Thread 0x2b3241ae2d40 (LWP 25887) 0x003b5440d5cb in read () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 Thread 3 (Thread 0x40f33940 (LWP 25897)): #0 0x003b5440de71 in nanosleep () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x0056166f in collection_thread (unused=value optimized out) at collection.c:34 #2 0x003b544064a7 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #3 0x003b538d3c2d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 Thread 2 (Thread 0x40e32940 (LWP 25898)): #0 0x003b5440c9b1 in
Re: [Mono-dev] How can I build mono-2.6 under Centos5 / RHEL5?
Hi Here is the configuration I used to compile mono 2.6 under CentOS 5.2: Default CentOS packages: Development/development tools Development/X software development Kernel headers and devel Perl XML parser bzip2 devel inttool Other packages: tiff v3.9.2 jasper v1.900.1 jpegsrc v7 hicolor-icon-theme v0.11 PCRE v8.00 pkg-config v0.23 glib v2.22.2 libpng v1.2.40 pixman v0.16.2 freetype v2.3.11 libxml2 v2.7.6 fontconfig v2.7.3 cairo v1.8.8 atk v1.28.0 pango v1.26.0 gtk+ v2.18.3 libglade v2.6.4 giflib v4.1.6 libgdiplus v2.6 mono v2.6 I also add to update the following environment variables to take into account the new installed packages: PKG_CONFIG_PATH PATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH PANGO_RC_FILE Hope this helps Y. Kirby Zhou wrote: mono-2.4.3 is also failed. [r...@xen-727057^10.227 mono24]# cat ./BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mcs/class/corlib/net_1_1_aot.log ** ERROR **: file aot-compiler.c: line 3058 (emit_and_reloc_code): assertion failed: (code [i] == 0xe8) aborting... Mono Ahead of Time compiler - compiling assembly /root/extrpms/mono24/BUILD/mono-2.4.3/mcs/class/lib/net_1_1/mscorlib.dll -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-can-I-build-mono-2.6-under-Centos5---RHEL5--tp27143162p27159405.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] illegal instruction
ya, I saw your post and you are getting the same posix error Im getting . It would really nice to know if anyone has been able to compile it on redhat but its been quite a while and I still havnt heard anything?? scott Kirby Zhou wrote: I have encounted the same problem with both mono-2.4.3 and mono-2.6.1 My OS is RHEL-5.4 srf wrote: Further to this I found if I just run this : MONO_PATH=./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH /disk2/mono-2.6.1/mono-2.6.1/runtime/mono-wrapper ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/msc.exe I get the same error, it seems that just running msc.exe will generate the illegal instruction error. is there any way I can get the msc.exe it give more information on whats wrong? is there something os specific given IM running it on redhat 5.1?? thanks scott srf wrote: Im trying to mbuild mono 2.6.1 but I keep getting this build error(note: I turned on all debuging information): [r...@localhost System]# MONO_PATH=./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH /disk2/mono-2.6.1/mono-2.6.1/runtime/mono-wrapper --verbose --debug=casts,mdb-optimizations --trace ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -optimize -d:NET_1_1 -d:ONLY_1_1 -debug /noconfig -d:XML_DEP -r:System.Xml.dll -target:library -out:../../class/lib/net_1_1/tmp/System.dll @System.dll.sources converting method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) Method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) emitted at 0x40a13050 to 0x40a1318a (code length 314) [mcs.exe] [0x2aace680: 0.0 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.OutOfMemoryException:0x2eda2f00], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4aa2b0, ) [0x2aace680: 0.00018 0] LEAVE: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)[OBJECT:(nil)] [0x2aace680: 0.00024 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.NullReferenceException:0x2eda2ea0], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4a3030, ) [0x2aace680: 0.00026 0] LEAVE: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)[OBJECT:(nil)] [0x2aace680: 0.00031 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.StackOverflowException:0x2eda2e40], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4aafc0, ) converting method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) Method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) emitted at 0x40a13190 to 0x40a132c3 (code length 307) [mcs.exe] [0x2aace680: 0.00055 1] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.ExecutionEngineException:0x2eda2de0], (nil), (nil), 0x2e49a830, ) Illegal instruction I for the life of me cannot figure out whats wrong. I can build every previous version of mono but not mono 2.6 . Im trying to build on redhat 5.1 , could there be some new issue with redhat? And why is it useing .net 1.1?? is there anything else I can do to get more information on what the problem is? thanks scott -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/illegal-instruction-tp27063839p27169448.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] illegal instruction
FYI I recently compiled mono-2.6.1 on RHEL 5.2 32-bit client which works, albeit I do have some tests fail when doing a 'make check', may report that separately later. I can supply a list of packages I had to install if required, but someone else in the other thread already did this. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:20, srf scott.fl...@cmgl.ca wrote: ya, I saw your post and you are getting the same posix error Im getting . It would really nice to know if anyone has been able to compile it on redhat but its been quite a while and I still havnt heard anything?? scott Kirby Zhou wrote: I have encounted the same problem with both mono-2.4.3 and mono-2.6.1 My OS is RHEL-5.4 srf wrote: Further to this I found if I just run this : MONO_PATH=./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH /disk2/mono-2.6.1/mono-2.6.1/runtime/mono-wrapper ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/msc.exe I get the same error, it seems that just running msc.exe will generate the illegal instruction error. is there any way I can get the msc.exe it give more information on whats wrong? is there something os specific given IM running it on redhat 5.1?? thanks scott srf wrote: Im trying to mbuild mono 2.6.1 but I keep getting this build error(note: I turned on all debuging information): [r...@localhost System]# MONO_PATH=./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH /disk2/mono-2.6.1/mono-2.6.1/runtime/mono-wrapper --verbose --debug=casts,mdb-optimizations --trace ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -optimize -d:NET_1_1 -d:ONLY_1_1 -debug /noconfig -d:XML_DEP -r:System.Xml.dll -target:library -out:../../class/lib/net_1_1/tmp/System.dll @System.dll.sources converting method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) Method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) emitted at 0x40a13050 to 0x40a1318a (code length 314) [mcs.exe] [0x2aace680: 0.0 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.OutOfMemoryException:0x2eda2f00], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4aa2b0, ) [0x2aace680: 0.00018 0] LEAVE: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)[OBJECT:(nil)] [0x2aace680: 0.00024 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.NullReferenceException:0x2eda2ea0], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4a3030, ) [0x2aace680: 0.00026 0] LEAVE: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)[OBJECT:(nil)] [0x2aace680: 0.00031 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.StackOverflowException:0x2eda2e40], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4aafc0, ) converting method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) Method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) emitted at 0x40a13190 to 0x40a132c3 (code length 307) [mcs.exe] [0x2aace680: 0.00055 1] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.ExecutionEngineException:0x2eda2de0], (nil), (nil), 0x2e49a830, ) Illegal instruction I for the life of me cannot figure out whats wrong. I can build every previous version of mono but not mono 2.6 . Im trying to build on redhat 5.1 , could there be some new issue with redhat? And why is it useing .net 1.1?? is there anything else I can do to get more information on what the problem is? thanks scott -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/illegal-instruction-tp27063839p27169448.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] [PATCH] Add XAttribute's missing DateTimeOffset operators, with tests
[Resending with one attachment compressed, due to mailing-list's size restrictions.] This is probably again for Atsushi: Similar to the last round with XElement, but now for XAttribute, the attached patch adds the latter's missing DateTimeOffset operators. The extra tests only compile under Mono after applying the patch and now include test-cases for XAttribute that are similar to those for XElement; all pass under .NET, but some of the code underlying the casting operators may still need fixing for Mono. The tests also expand on what was previously testable under Mono, and there is one particularly interesting case where about 1 of every 8 DateTime values would lose a tick: it looks like a weird rounding-error and can now be reproduced reliably with these tests. Atsushi's patches from earlier this week already made a huge difference, and getting the new tests to work should make for an even more robust LINQ-to-XML implementation. Please commit the patches and investigate the new tests that fail. Thank you, Tiaan. System-Xml-Linq-XAttribute_DateTimeOffset-operators_mcs-class-trunk.patch Description: Binary data MonoTests-System-Xml-Linq_type-cast-operators_mcs-class-trunk.patch.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] illegal instruction
I have rechecked the problem on several PCs. OS is RHEL-5.3 x86_64 or RHEL-5.4 x86_64 . CPU is Xeon E5310 or Xeon E5520. 2.4.2.3 can be built on all my boxes. 2.4.3.x, 2.6.0, 2.6.1 can be built on some box, and failed on others. Maybe there is a big bug introduced between 2.4.2.3 and 2.4.3 Brendan Gordon wrote: FYI I recently compiled mono-2.6.1 on RHEL 5.2 32-bit client which works, albeit I do have some tests fail when doing a 'make check', may report that separately later. I can supply a list of packages I had to install if required, but someone else in the other thread already did this. On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:20, srf scott.fl...@cmgl.ca wrote: ya, I saw your post and you are getting the same posix error Im getting . It would really nice to know if anyone has been able to compile it on redhat but its been quite a while and I still havnt heard anything?? scott Kirby Zhou wrote: I have encounted the same problem with both mono-2.4.3 and mono-2.6.1 My OS is RHEL-5.4 srf wrote: Further to this I found if I just run this : MONO_PATH=./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH /disk2/mono-2.6.1/mono-2.6.1/runtime/mono-wrapper ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/msc.exe I get the same error, it seems that just running msc.exe will generate the illegal instruction error. is there any way I can get the msc.exe it give more information on whats wrong? is there something os specific given IM running it on redhat 5.1?? thanks scott srf wrote: Im trying to mbuild mono 2.6.1 but I keep getting this build error(note: I turned on all debuging information): [r...@localhost System]# MONO_PATH=./../../class/lib/net_1_1:$MONO_PATH /disk2/mono-2.6.1/mono-2.6.1/runtime/mono-wrapper --verbose --debug=casts,mdb-optimizations --trace ./../../class/lib/net_1_1/mcs.exe /codepage:65001 -optimize -d:NET_1_1 -d:ONLY_1_1 -debug /noconfig -d:XML_DEP -r:System.Xml.dll -target:library -out:../../class/lib/net_1_1/tmp/System.dll @System.dll.sources converting method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) Method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) emitted at 0x40a13050 to 0x40a1318a (code length 314) [mcs.exe] [0x2aace680: 0.0 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.OutOfMemoryException:0x2eda2f00], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4aa2b0, ) [0x2aace680: 0.00018 0] LEAVE: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)[OBJECT:(nil)] [0x2aace680: 0.00024 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.NullReferenceException:0x2eda2ea0], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4a3030, ) [0x2aace680: 0.00026 0] LEAVE: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)[OBJECT:(nil)] [0x2aace680: 0.00031 0] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this___object (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.StackOverflowException:0x2eda2e40], 0x7fff471490f0, (nil), 0x2e4aafc0, ) converting method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) Method (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) emitted at 0x40a13190 to 0x40a132c3 (code length 307) [mcs.exe] [0x2aace680: 0.00055 1] ENTER: (wrapper runtime-invoke) object:runtime_invoke_void__this__ (object,intptr,intptr,intptr)([System.ExecutionEngineException:0x2eda2de0], (nil), (nil), 0x2e49a830, ) Illegal instruction I for the life of me cannot figure out whats wrong. I can build every previous version of mono but not mono 2.6 . Im trying to build on redhat 5.1 , could there be some new issue with redhat? And why is it useing .net 1.1?? is there anything else I can do to get more information on what the problem is? thanks scott -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/illegal-instruction-tp27063839p27169448.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/illegal-instruction-tp27063839p27172366.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
deb http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/Ubuntu_9.10_standard/ ./ don't work for you ? Are you using x86_64, as i said is broken ? At least you can took the source files who are ok and use it in lunchpad ppa of ubuntu 2010/1/14 Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com: Totally agree with @daniel except that I am not agree the part where said we not thanks/appreciate Ubuntu team. I don't know about the rest of the world but for me and the people that I introduce to /talk with them about Ubuntu they all appreciate the great afford and policing put into get this excellent distro for us. Perhap using Window develop in .NET Framework with just click and get thing work make me junior coder a lazy labor. However to abandon Windows camp and join Linux my option is to pick popular Linux distro and can do my job on it that how I feel having mono ready and up to date on the Ubuntu (official support :D) would be a big plus. Build one run every where ! ~~~ Chorn Sokun +855 12 222718 http://chornsokun.wordpress.com http://twitter.com/csokun On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, daniel tramps...@gmail.com wrote: The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released between OS versions. Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which is supplied by the developers (not the ubuntu devs) The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono and include it in its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank them? no, you just expect more of them. I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be. So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing applications, how is this different from on any other operating system? It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a PPA. The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop linux distribution to the mono project. At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their are lots of other people out there with similar stories. Those of us who use ubuntu feel a little bit like second class citizens. B.R. wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Bálint Kardos kardosbal...@gmail.com mailto:kardosbal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Fact 1: the provider decides on the virtualized platforms, not me. They have Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian systems ready. Fact 2: I've used Debian and Fedora for a decade, so I'm more familiar with Ubuntu as with SuSe. Fact 3: I've started working on merging all my sites/servers back to Windows 2008. It is a sad story, but the lack of real features on mono (Web Services still has bugs for years, the LINQ implementation is a horror etc.) makes it more and more hard to use it as a real Production (not a toy playground) platform. üdvözlettel with regards Kardos Bálint ___ http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben If there are web services bugs, file bugs--if nobody knows about them, they can't get fixed. Also, clarify what you mean by LINQ? LINQ to Objects is pretty simple and there's only so many ways to implement that, so I'm not sure how you can lay claim to that being a horror. LINQ to SQL is a different story, and a huge effort that is only now beginning to be integrated into Mono properly. You could also file bugs for those--once again, if nobody knows about them, they can't get fixed. --B.R. ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
Are we talking about a commercial build of Mono for Ubuntu? If not this is very simple, if you are needing business support you need to purchase a commercial build, which if you are using this for a commercial project is not too much to ask. If you are not using it for business and you are having problems report the problem and move on. If you think it can be better then help the kind people who work everyday to make Mono. This is how non-commercial Linux works if you don't like it you are politely invited to help, this is no different than anything else done in non-commercial Linux. If you don't mind I'll just say think you to the people who work on Mono (non-commcial) for me to use and the nice people at Ubuntu who work had bringing us Ubuntu. If I have a problem I'll report the bug in the correct bug reporting manner. Giving the non-commercial developers and packagers a hard time via email list doesn't help. Sorry the first thing I said on this list is negative but someone need to stand up for those who work hard everyday. Andy York (aka Spoody Goon) On 1/14/2010 3:25 AM, Petit Eric wrote: deb http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/Ubuntu_9.10_standard/ ./ don't work for you ? Are you using x86_64, as i said is broken ? At least you can took the source files who are ok and use it in lunchpad ppa of ubuntu 2010/1/14 Chorn Sokunchornso...@gmail.com: Totally agree with @daniel except that I am not agree the part where said we not thanks/appreciate Ubuntu team. I don't know about the rest of the world but for me and the people that I introduce to /talk with them about Ubuntu they all appreciate the great afford and policing put into get this excellent distro for us. Perhap using Window develop in .NET Framework with just click and get thing work make me junior coder a lazy labor. However to abandon Windows camp and join Linux my option is to pick popular Linux distro and can do my job on it that how I feel having mono ready and up to date on the Ubuntu (official support :D) would be a big plus. Build one run every where ! ~~~ Chorn Sokun +855 12 222718 http://chornsokun.wordpress.com http://twitter.com/csokun On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, danieltramps...@gmail.com wrote: The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released between OS versions. Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which is supplied by the developers (not the ubuntu devs) The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono and include it in its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank them? no, you just expect more of them. I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be. So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing applications, how is this different from on any other operating system? It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a PPA. The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop linux distribution to the mono project. At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their are lots of other people out there with similar stories. Those of us who use ubuntu feel a little bit like second class citizens. B.R. wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Bálint Kardoskardosbal...@gmail.com mailto:kardosbal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Fact 1: the provider decides on the virtualized platforms, not me. They have Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian systems ready. Fact 2: I've used Debian and Fedora for a decade, so I'm more familiar with Ubuntu as with SuSe. Fact 3: I've started working on merging all my sites/servers back to Windows 2008. It is a sad story, but the lack of real features on mono (Web Services still has bugs for years, the LINQ implementation is a horror etc.) makes it more and more hard to use it as a real Production (not a toy playground) platform. üdvözlettel with regards Kardos Bálint ___ http://skaelede.hu 10
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
If the ubuntu devs are happy with installing one giant tarball as supplied my Novell, then it's amazingly simple to supply them with new packages every time Novell releases a new version of Mono. However, they are not happy. They have their own strict packaging guidelines and do a lot of extra work splitting the standard install into dozens of small individual packages. This is one of the reasons why Ubuntu/Debian lags behind. It's not up to Novell, or any project, to create packages for every distro under the sun (whether it be the most popular distro or least popular distro) when each distro has its own specific packaging policies which essentially means one unique package will have to be created using different rules for every distro. If you wish to employ someone to do that, feel free. Your examples with Chrome and gnome do aren't quite the same as mono though. Mono is a core framework. Changing that will affect multiple applications and can (potentially) cause things to stop working in strange and unusual ways if an application relies on a bug which was fixed. If you install a broken Chrome, all that's broken is Chrome. You don't end up with a dozen broken apps on your system. Alan. On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:58 AM, daniel tramps...@gmail.com wrote: The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released between OS versions. Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which is supplied by the developers (not the ubuntu devs) The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono and include it in its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank them? no, you just expect more of them. I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be. So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing applications, how is this different from on any other operating system? It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a PPA. The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop linux distribution to the mono project. At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their are lots of other people out there with similar stories. Those of us who use ubuntu feel a little bit like second class citizens. B.R. wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Bálint Kardos kardosbal...@gmail.com mailto:kardosbal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Fact 1: the provider decides on the virtualized platforms, not me. They have Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian systems ready. Fact 2: I've used Debian and Fedora for a decade, so I'm more familiar with Ubuntu as with SuSe. Fact 3: I've started working on merging all my sites/servers back to Windows 2008. It is a sad story, but the lack of real features on mono (Web Services still has bugs for years, the LINQ implementation is a horror etc.) makes it more and more hard to use it as a real Production (not a toy playground) platform. üdvözlettel with regards Kardos Bálint ___ http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben If there are web services bugs, file bugs--if nobody knows about them, they can't get fixed. Also, clarify what you mean by LINQ? LINQ to Objects is pretty simple and there's only so many ways to implement that, so I'm not sure how you can lay claim to that being a horror. LINQ to SQL is a different story, and a huge effort that is only now beginning to be integrated into Mono properly. You could also file bugs for those--once again, if nobody knows about them, they can't get fixed. --B.R. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
B.R, I always file the bugs I found. I'm always downloading the official mono build for windows, and test my applications written for the ms framework 3.5. my dream would be to have a real Linq2Sql implementation in mono (plus dynamic data), DBlinq has a lng way to go. üdvözlettel with regards Kardos Bálint ___ http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben If there are web services bugs, file bugs--if nobody knows about them, they can't get fixed. Also, clarify what you mean by LINQ? LINQ to Objects is pretty simple and there's only so many ways to implement that, so I'm not sure how you can lay claim to that being a horror. LINQ to SQL is a different story, and a huge effort that is only now beginning to be integrated into Mono properly. You could also file bugs for those--once again, if nobody knows about them, they can't get fixed. --B.R. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Alan McGovern alan.mcgov...@gmail.comwrote: If the ubuntu devs are happy with installing one giant tarball as supplied my Novell, then it's amazingly simple to supply them with new packages every time Novell releases a new version of Mono. Hey that sound pretty awesome if Novell could just provide a package that allow us to install mono into /opt/mono (like mention in the parallel doc) that would be awesome. Frankly speaking just to build libgdiplus-2.6 is killing me already :) feel like I need to learn all these little thing instead ready to say Hello World !, HELP ! PLEASE However, they are not happy. They have their own strict packaging guidelines and do a lot of extra work splitting the standard install into dozens of small individual packages. This is one of the reasons why Ubuntu/Debian lags behind. You don't have to worry about that I download the package off mono-project I am ready to take responsibility as long as the installation I allow me to it in a parallel maner (I hope I am talking the right term) It's not up to Novell, or any project, to create packages for every distro under the sun (whether it be the most popular distro or least popular distro) when each distro has its own specific packaging policies which essentially means one unique package will have to be created using different rules for every distro. If you wish to employ someone to do that, feel free. Your examples with Chrome and gnome do aren't quite the same as mono though. Mono is a core framework. Changing that will affect multiple applications and can (potentially) cause things to stop working in strange and unusual ways if an application relies on a bug which was fixed. If you install a broken Chrome, all that's broken is Chrome. You don't end up with a dozen broken apps on your system. Alan. On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:58 AM, daniel tramps...@gmail.com wrote: The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released between OS versions. Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which is supplied by the developers (not the ubuntu devs) The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono and include it in its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank them? no, you just expect more of them. I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be. So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing applications, how is this different from on any other operating system? It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a PPA. The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop linux distribution to the mono project. At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their are lots of other people out there with similar stories. Those of us who use ubuntu feel a little bit like second class citizens. B.R. wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Bálint Kardos kardosbal...@gmail.com mailto:kardosbal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, Fact 1: the provider decides on the virtualized platforms, not me. They have Fedora, Ubuntu or Debian systems ready. Fact 2: I've used Debian and Fedora for a decade, so I'm more familiar with Ubuntu as with SuSe. Fact 3: I've started working on merging all my sites/servers back to Windows 2008. It is a sad story, but the lack of real features on mono (Web Services still has bugs for years, the LINQ implementation is a horror etc.) makes it more and more hard to use it as a real Production (not a toy playground) platform. üdvözlettel with regards Kardos Bálint ___ http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben If there are web services bugs, file bugs--if nobody knows about them, they can't get fixed. Also, clarify what you mean by LINQ? LINQ to Objects is pretty simple and there's only so many ways to implement that, so I'm not sure how you can lay claim to that being a horror. LINQ to SQL is a
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
Chorn Sokun wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Alan McGovern alan.mcgov...@gmail.com mailto:alan.mcgov...@gmail.com wrote: If the ubuntu devs are happy with installing one giant tarball as supplied my Novell, then it's amazingly simple to supply them with new packages every time Novell releases a new version of Mono. Hey that sound pretty awesome if Novell could just provide a package that allow us to install mono into /opt/mono (like mention in the parallel doc) that would be awesome. Frankly speaking just to build libgdiplus-2.6 is killing me already :) feel like I need to learn all these little thing instead ready to say Hello World !, HELP ! PLEASE Hm... did you try: sudo apt-get build-dep libgdiplus After this it should be as easy as ./configure; make; make install. -- Cheers, Alex ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
Hey, I may have phrased that last email slightly incorrectly. My point was that debian/ubuntu is slower than opensuse because they require multiple changes to the released tarball to generate their packages. Opensuse does not require these changes so opensuse is faster and easier to make releases for. I wasn't trying to imply that novell can and will start creating a generic installer which can be used on any system, nor was I implying that novell would consider creating their own PPA and releasing up to date mono packages for debian/ubuntu. There was a time when there was a generic mono installer which worked for all linux distros. The problem is that people would frequently corrupt their system mono by using that generic installer and found it very hard to fix things later. A similar issue would happen if Novell tried to make a generic mono package for ubuntu/debian using a PPA. Unless the generic package was completely synced with the standard system package, you could easily end up corrupting your install by having libraries from two different mono versions. If you really really want up to date unstable packages for $INSERT_DISTRO_HERE, then you'll have to either motivate someone to create them or try to do it yourself. Alan. On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Alan McGovern alan.mcgov...@gmail.comwrote: If the ubuntu devs are happy with installing one giant tarball as supplied my Novell, then it's amazingly simple to supply them with new packages every time Novell releases a new version of Mono. Hey that sound pretty awesome if Novell could just provide a package that allow us to install mono into /opt/mono (like mention in the parallel doc) that would be awesome. Frankly speaking just to build libgdiplus-2.6 is killing me already :) feel like I need to learn all these little thing instead ready to say Hello World !, HELP ! PLEASE However, they are not happy. They have their own strict packaging guidelines and do a lot of extra work splitting the standard install into dozens of small individual packages. This is one of the reasons why Ubuntu/Debian lags behind. You don't have to worry about that I download the package off mono-project I am ready to take responsibility as long as the installation I allow me to it in a parallel maner (I hope I am talking the right term) It's not up to Novell, or any project, to create packages for every distro under the sun (whether it be the most popular distro or least popular distro) when each distro has its own specific packaging policies which essentially means one unique package will have to be created using different rules for every distro. If you wish to employ someone to do that, feel free. Your examples with Chrome and gnome do aren't quite the same as mono though. Mono is a core framework. Changing that will affect multiple applications and can (potentially) cause things to stop working in strange and unusual ways if an application relies on a bug which was fixed. If you install a broken Chrome, all that's broken is Chrome. You don't end up with a dozen broken apps on your system. Alan. On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:58 AM, daniel tramps...@gmail.com wrote: The ubuntu devs package and deploy for their release which happens every 6 months. it is insane to say its up to them to package version released between OS versions. Ubuntu comes with a packaged version on gnome do, which is fine, however I choose to use a more recent version of gnome do so I use a PPA which is supplied by the developers (not the ubuntu devs) The fact that ubuntu/devian developers package mono for you for its OS releases is a bonus, did Microsoft package up mono and include it in its Windows 7? NO! did Apple package up mono and include it in snow leopard? no. So ubuntu is helping you guys out hugely but do you thank them? no, you just expect more of them. I also use Chrome in ubuntu. Its not in the repros at all, when I wanted to install chrome did google say... O sorry its up to ubuntu/debian to package chrome for you, its not our fault if they don't. No, they packaged it themselves and even provided different channels so I can decide exactly how cutting edge I want to be. So you have to worry about a newer version breaking existing applications, how is this different from on any other operating system? It's not up to the ubuntu devs to package new versions of mono for exist OS releases, its up to the mono project to do this and provide it as a PPA. The question you need to ask is, how important is the largest desktop linux distribution to the mono project. At my work we started to port a .net application to mono, however it need to run on ubuntu (8.04) do you know what version of mono is in 8.04 its 1.2.6, everything for our app was supported in mono 2.4 but mono 1.2.6? not even close. So we abandoned our efforts, I'm sure their are
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
C'mon! Installing mono 2.6 compiling it from sources in Ubuntu isn't so hard. I do it all the time in different machines in my personal projects. Mike Christensen published a good step by step tutorial with our help in this list, some time ago. You could take a look. Regards. 2010/1/14 Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com Chorn Sokun wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Alan McGovern alan.mcgov...@gmail.com mailto:alan.mcgov...@gmail.com wrote: If the ubuntu devs are happy with installing one giant tarball as supplied my Novell, then it's amazingly simple to supply them with new packages every time Novell releases a new version of Mono. Hey that sound pretty awesome if Novell could just provide a package that allow us to install mono into /opt/mono (like mention in the parallel doc) that would be awesome. Frankly speaking just to build libgdiplus-2.6 is killing me already :) feel like I need to learn all these little thing instead ready to say Hello World !, HELP ! PLEASE Hm... did you try: sudo apt-get build-dep libgdiplus After this it should be as easy as ./configure; make; make install. -- Cheers, Alex ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
simply took my spec and source from my OBS repository and dpkgbuild -s 2010/1/14 Daniel Soto daniel.sot...@gmail.com: C'mon! Installing mono 2.6 compiling it from sources in Ubuntu isn't so hard. I do it all the time in different machines in my personal projects. Mike Christensen published a good step by step tutorial with our help in this list, some time ago. You could take a look. Regards. 2010/1/14 Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com Chorn Sokun wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Alan McGovern alan.mcgov...@gmail.com mailto:alan.mcgov...@gmail.com wrote: If the ubuntu devs are happy with installing one giant tarball as supplied my Novell, then it's amazingly simple to supply them with new packages every time Novell releases a new version of Mono. Hey that sound pretty awesome if Novell could just provide a package that allow us to install mono into /opt/mono (like mention in the parallel doc) that would be awesome. Frankly speaking just to build libgdiplus-2.6 is killing me already :) feel like I need to learn all these little thing instead ready to say Hello World !, HELP ! PLEASE Hm... did you try: sudo apt-get build-dep libgdiplus After this it should be as easy as ./configure; make; make install. -- Cheers, Alex ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list -- Cordially. Deploy your softwares for all platforms and finally update them in 3 clicks. Try now the OpenSource MonoOSC tool http://monoosc.sourceforge.net/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/ windows take you more($), Linux give you more!! Political Power cannot be wisdom! Small Eric Quotations of the days: --- I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
Hm... did you try: sudo apt-get build-dep libgdiplus After this it should be as easy as ./configure; make; make install. Hooray ! this work perfect now libgdiplus-2.6 waiting for mono to finish it make install Thanks @Alex -- Cheers, Alex ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
Hmm, seem like I ran into another problem I can't I tried to build gtk-sharp running ./configure --prefix=/opt/mono yield the following error checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... no checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK. How can I pass this error? On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com wrote: Hm... did you try: sudo apt-get build-dep libgdiplus After this it should be as easy as ./configure; make; make install. Hooray ! this work perfect now libgdiplus-2.6 waiting for mono to finish it make install Thanks @Alex -- Cheers, Alex ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
Chorn Sokun wrote: Hmm, seem like I ran into another problem I can't I tried to build gtk-sharp running ./configure --prefix=/opt/mono yield the following error checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... no checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK. How can I pass this error? Assuming you've installed mono to /opt/mono successfully, try this: PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/mono/lib/pkgconfig ./configure -- Alex On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com mailto:chornso...@gmail.com wrote: Hm... did you try: sudo apt-get build-dep libgdiplus After this it should be as easy as ./configure; make; make install. Hooray ! this work perfect now libgdiplus-2.6 waiting for mono to finish it make install Thanks @Alex -- Cheers, Alex ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com wrote: Chorn Sokun wrote: Hmm, seem like I ran into another problem I can't I tried to build gtk-sharp running ./configure --prefix=/opt/mono yield the following error checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... no checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK. How can I pass this error? Assuming you've installed mono to /opt/mono successfully, try this: PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/mono/lib/pkgconfig ./configure Now I got one more check pass but still problem checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... yes checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
would you like i upload somewhere all mono 2.6 and libgdiplus x86_64 ubuntu deb ? 2010/1/14 Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com wrote: Chorn Sokun wrote: Hmm, seem like I ran into another problem I can't I tried to build gtk-sharp running ./configure --prefix=/opt/mono yield the following error checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... no checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK. How can I pass this error? Assuming you've installed mono to /opt/mono successfully, try this: PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/mono/lib/pkgconfig ./configure Now I got one more check pass but still problem checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... yes checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list -- Cordially. Deploy your softwares for all platforms and finally update them in 3 clicks. Try now the OpenSource MonoOSC tool http://monoosc.sourceforge.net/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/ windows take you more($), Linux give you more!! Political Power cannot be wisdom! Small Eric Quotations of the days: --- I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Mono Brasil na MSDN - 1 Semana de WEBCast AO VIVO !!!
*Ola a todos.. * *Feliz ano novo.. e estamos começando fervendo!* *Gostaria de convida-los a participar da Semana de Interoperabilidade na MSDN , onde estaremos fazendo 5 WebCast Ao Vivo!!!* *Por favor divulguem !!!* *Estou recebendo ja emails de toda parte do brasil Impressionante!!!* ** * * *MSDN* - *O Projeto Mono: Aplicaçõs .NET para sistemas não Windows* Palestrante: Alessandro Binhara Dia/Hora: 18/01, 17:00 Link para inscrição: http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/EventDetail.aspx?EventID=1032439615Culture=pt-BR - *Moonlight : Silverlight para sistemas não Windows* Palestrante: Alessandro Binhara Dia/Hora: 19/01, 17:00 Link para inscrição: http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/EventDetail.aspx?EventID=1032439617Culture=pt-BR - *Desenvolvimento de games multi-plataforma com .NET* Palestrante: Alessandro Binhara Dia/Hora: 20/01, 17:00 Link para inscrição: http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/EventDetail.aspx?EventID=1032439619Culture=pt-BR - *Desenvolvendo aplicativos ASP.NET http://asp.net/ para Linux * Palestrante: Alessandro Binhara Dia/Hora: 21/01, 17:00 Link para inscrição: http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/EventDetail.aspx?EventID=1032439621Culture=pt-BR - *Trabalhando com IronPython* Palestrante: Alessandro Binhara Dia/Hora: 22/01, 17:00 Link para inscrição: http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/EventDetail.aspx?EventID=1032439623Culture=pt-BR -- Alessandro Binhara - binh...@monobrasil.org Projeto Brasil http://www.monobrasil.org ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 14:40 +0100, Bálint Kardos wrote: my dream would be to have a real Linq2Sql implementation in mono (plus dynamic data), DBlinq has a lng way to go. While DbLinq has a long way to go, it could use more help, more test cases, more demo sites showing lacking problems. NerdDinner runs; are there any other Linq to SQL sites that you're interested in and can be readily tested against and made to work w/ DbLinq? Lamenting that there's more work to do won't help in fixing it. :-) - Jon ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com wrote: Chorn Sokun wrote: Hmm, seem like I ran into another problem I can't I tried to build gtk-sharp running ./configure --prefix=/opt/mono yield the following error checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... no checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK. How can I pass this error? Assuming you've installed mono to /opt/mono successfully, try this: PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/mono/lib/pkgconfig ./configure Now I got one more check pass but still problem checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... yes checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK PATH=/opt/mono/path:$PATH See http://www.mono-project.com/Parallel_Mono_Environments for a more complete list of environment variables needed for a parallel install. -- Michael Hutchinson http://mjhutchinson.com ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Petit Eric surfz...@gmail.com wrote: would you like i upload somewhere all mono 2.6 and libgdiplus x86_64 ubuntu deb ? 2010/1/14 Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com: Wow, that would be great. Maybe on ubuntu ppa. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
+1 @Petit On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Petit Eric surfz...@gmail.com wrote: would you like i upload somewhere all mono 2.6 and libgdiplus x86_64 ubuntu deb ? 2010/1/14 Chorn Sokun chornso...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Alex Shulgin alexander.shul...@yessoftware.com wrote: Chorn Sokun wrote: Hmm, seem like I ran into another problem I can't I tried to build gtk-sharp running ./configure --prefix=/opt/mono yield the following error checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... no checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK. How can I pass this error? Assuming you've installed mono to /opt/mono successfully, try this: PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/mono/lib/pkgconfig ./configure Now I got one more check pass but still problem checking for MONO_DEPENDENCY... yes checking for gacutil... /usr/bin/gacutil checking for al... no configure: error: No al tool found. You need to install either the mono or .Net SDK ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list -- Cordially. Deploy your softwares for all platforms and finally update them in 3 clicks. Try now the OpenSource MonoOSC tool http://monoosc.sourceforge.net/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu/ http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/surfzoid:/DebianUbuntu:/Mono/ windows take you more($), Linux give you more!! Political Power cannot be wisdom! Small Eric Quotations of the days: --- I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
