RE: [Mono-devel-list] OASIS XSLT tests converted to nunit
Ok. Agree. rafi -Original Message- From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:46 AM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: 'Andrew Skiba'; 'Oved'; 'mono-devel mailing list' Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] OASIS XSLT tests converted to nunit Hi Rafi, It's not only for automatic test runners. --with-test-config will still not be enough since there are several possibile conbination of flags for manual testing. And if it forces developers to create such possible configurations every time, or having several configuration files, it messes developers (at least I don't want to do that). Beauty should not precede real usability. Atsushi Eno RafaelMizrahi wrote: Atsushi, We strive for unity. We don't want to have different approaches across frameworks. See Ben Maurer response to Environment Variables: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2005-June/012619.html It should not mess testers by forcing them edit application config files every time As I know developers/testers, their first solution will be to hijack the file, so it's just a question of which file will they hijack? The makefile or the App.config file. Non of the answers is good. rafi -Original Message- From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:24 AM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: 'Andrew Skiba'; Oved; 'mono-devel mailing list' Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] OASIS XSLT tests converted to nunit This time no. It should not mess testers by forcing them edit application config files every time, rather than just setting environment variables in their command line (including make command line options such as make BLAH=yes run-test). Atsushi Eno RafaelMizrahi wrote: Andrew, You should use ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings with an App.Config file, instead of using Environment variables. Vladimir already used this approach in the System.Web NUnit Test suite we contributed to mono, which also utilizes the NUnit [Suite] attribute. rafi Mainsoft SDE/T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Skiba Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:38 PM To: Atsushi Enomoto Cc: mono-devel mailing list Subject: [Mono-devel-list] OASIS XSLT tests converted to nunit Hi Eno. I did what we talked about 2 days ago. So I converted the standalone testsuite to be an NUnit [Suite]. I did not want to support few entry points, so I made dll instead of exe (exactly as in W3C xmlconf). To create reference results on dotnet I made a separate module, generate.cs. So to avoid code duplication, I took the common code from xslttest.cs and generate.cs into XsltTestUtils.cs. Another thing one may ask is why did I introduced all these env variables. The answer is - I could not parse command line anymore, so I made the simpliest change. More elegant way was to make few fixtures for every possible combination of whitespace and DOM flags, but I'm not sure it's worth the effort right now. Another problem with this idea is that generation and the testing would have different flags. Some more info can be found in README file (after patching it, of course). Thank you. Andrew. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-devel-list] SqlClient Tests - CS0234 errors
Hi Suresh, I started integrating Mainsoft testing framework with mono SVN, And when I compile the NUnit tests of System.Data I get 3 occurrences of the error: error CS0234: The type or namespace name 'DBNull' does not exist in the class or namespace 'MonoTests.System.Data' (are you missing an assembly reference?) I have changed the 3 lines so I will be able to compile with csc. 1) Can I commit ? (be kind ;) this is my first Commit ;) 2) Or, do I have an alternative way to build this NUnit assembly using CSC ? 3) I guess that since we use the namespace convention foo1.System.foo2, this is not the first time that CS0234 error appears. - Mizrahi Rafael Mainsoft SDE/T Team Leader SqlClientTests.patch Description: Binary data ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite
Hi Gonzalo, Any news regards the System.Web test suite? I will be at Out Of the Office at Microsoft TechEd for 4-8 July, So you can ask Vladimir (has no SVN write) for any help you need. rafi Mainsoft SDE/T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RafaelMizrahi Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 5:03 PM To: 'Gonzalo Paniagua Javier' Cc: 'Vladimir Krasnov'; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com; 'Oved' Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite Hi Gonzalo, Here it is ! System Web Harness integrated with NUnit and tested it on mono. How can I send you the zip files? Since it is approximately 11MB, ximian mail server rejects the email. Client-side test framework SystemWebTestSuite.zip - Web Harness integrated with NUnit Server-side web application System_Web_dll.zip - 479 System.Web tests + empty System.Web tests templates GHTWebControls.zip - web test control container GHTWebUtils.zip - web tests base and helper functions TODO Roadmap: * Transfer the files to your computer ;) * Waiting for your review. * Insert into SVN, and we will proceed the work from there. I left this task to you, so you can decide where to put each component, and how to integrate it with build and XSP. * Mainsoft will abandon its previous harness, and will start using this harness from the SVN. May the 'source' be with you. - Mizrahi Rafael SDE/T Team Leader Mainsoft -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RafaelMizrahi Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:49 PM To: 'Gonzalo Paniagua Javier' Cc: 'Vladimir Krasnov'; 'Oved'; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite Should we just use regular NUnit for those? Well, I guess so. The web testing framework targets two needs: * Testing the rendering of web elements. * Running tests under web context. * Automate IE and post back. But we currently excluded this feature. Although, it can be used for testing any class. In fact, we are using this framework for testing other assemblies which we want to test in web context (e.g. globalization, reflection). I have looked into the 479 tests and about 50 tests are non rendering tests, for example: HttpSessionState, HttpApplicationState, but must be tested in the context of a web application, so they cannot be used in NUnit. So, let's agree that classes which can be used outside of ASP.NET (web context), will be tested using NUnit tests. rafi -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 7:52 PM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com; Oved; Vladimir Krasnov Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:03 +0300, RafaelMizrahi wrote: Hi Gonzalo, * We are doing some last cleanups on the web test suite and the tests base classes, I hope to send it (along with 479 tests! ;) for your review in few days. * The same harness is used for two scenarios: * Generating expected xml files (ASP.NET on IIS). Scenario is in use only once, every .NET Service Pack. * Getting xml files from web server (Tomcat, xsp, ...) and comparing with expected xml files. * XHTML - We replaced the usage of SGMLReader with htmlagilitypack. * XMLDiff - If we wish to replace the XMLDiffPath , we can use XMLUnit,java XMLDiff or in-house developed XMLDiff component. Nice. What about some classes such as HttpUtility that can be used from outside of an asp.net application? Should we just use regular nunit for those? -Gonzalo ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite
Hi gonzalo, I have set an FTP account for mono ftp :ftp.mainsoft.co.il user:mono password:'I have disclosed with you' You can share this FTP account with more mono hackers, and use this ftp for other large binary transactions ;) between mono and mainsoft. The web test suite zip files are at the directory: web_test_suite (you need all the zip files) * Notice: files are automatically deleted after 2 weeks. rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RafaelMizrahi Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 5:03 PM To: 'Gonzalo Paniagua Javier' Cc: 'Vladimir Krasnov'; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com; 'Oved' Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite Hi Gonzalo, Here it is ! System Web Harness integrated with NUnit and tested it on mono. How can I send you the zip files? Since it is approximately 11MB, ximian mail server rejects the email. Client-side test framework SystemWebTestSuite.zip - Web Harness integrated with NUnit Server-side web application System_Web_dll.zip - 479 System.Web tests + empty System.Web tests templates GHTWebControls.zip - web test control container GHTWebUtils.zip - web tests base and helper functions TODO Roadmap: * Transfer the files to your computer ;) * Waiting for your review. * Insert into SVN, and we will proceed the work from there. I left this task to you, so you can decide where to put each component, and how to integrate it with build and XSP. * Mainsoft will abandon its previous harness, and will start using this harness from the SVN. May the 'source' be with you. - Mizrahi Rafael SDE/T Team Leader Mainsoft -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RafaelMizrahi Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:49 PM To: 'Gonzalo Paniagua Javier' Cc: 'Vladimir Krasnov'; 'Oved'; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite Should we just use regular NUnit for those? Well, I guess so. The web testing framework targets two needs: * Testing the rendering of web elements. * Running tests under web context. * Automate IE and post back. But we currently excluded this feature. Although, it can be used for testing any class. In fact, we are using this framework for testing other assemblies which we want to test in web context (e.g. globalization, reflection). I have looked into the 479 tests and about 50 tests are non rendering tests, for example: HttpSessionState, HttpApplicationState, but must be tested in the context of a web application, so they cannot be used in NUnit. So, let's agree that classes which can be used outside of ASP.NET (web context), will be tested using NUnit tests. rafi -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 7:52 PM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com; Oved; Vladimir Krasnov Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:03 +0300, RafaelMizrahi wrote: Hi Gonzalo, * We are doing some last cleanups on the web test suite and the tests base classes, I hope to send it (along with 479 tests! ;) for your review in few days. * The same harness is used for two scenarios: * Generating expected xml files (ASP.NET on IIS). Scenario is in use only once, every .NET Service Pack. * Getting xml files from web server (Tomcat, xsp, ...) and comparing with expected xml files. * XHTML - We replaced the usage of SGMLReader with htmlagilitypack. * XMLDiff - If we wish to replace the XMLDiffPath , we can use XMLUnit,java XMLDiff or in-house developed XMLDiff component. Nice. What about some classes such as HttpUtility that can be used from outside of an asp.net application? Should we just use regular nunit for those? -Gonzalo ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite
Hi Gonzalo, Here it is ! System Web Harness integrated with NUnit and tested it on mono. How can I send you the zip files? Since it is approximately 11MB, ximian mail server rejects the email. Client-side test framework SystemWebTestSuite.zip - Web Harness integrated with NUnit Server-side web application System_Web_dll.zip - 479 System.Web tests + empty System.Web tests templates GHTWebControls.zip - web test control container GHTWebUtils.zip - web tests base and helper functions TODO Roadmap: * Transfer the files to your computer ;) * Waiting for your review. * Insert into SVN, and we will proceed the work from there. I left this task to you, so you can decide where to put each component, and how to integrate it with build and XSP. * Mainsoft will abandon its previous harness, and will start using this harness from the SVN. May the 'source' be with you. - Mizrahi Rafael SDE/T Team Leader Mainsoft -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RafaelMizrahi Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:49 PM To: 'Gonzalo Paniagua Javier' Cc: 'Vladimir Krasnov'; 'Oved'; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite Should we just use regular NUnit for those? Well, I guess so. The web testing framework targets two needs: * Testing the rendering of web elements. * Running tests under web context. * Automate IE and post back. But we currently excluded this feature. Although, it can be used for testing any class. In fact, we are using this framework for testing other assemblies which we want to test in web context (e.g. globalization, reflection). I have looked into the 479 tests and about 50 tests are non rendering tests, for example: HttpSessionState, HttpApplicationState, but must be tested in the context of a web application, so they cannot be used in NUnit. So, let's agree that classes which can be used outside of ASP.NET (web context), will be tested using NUnit tests. rafi -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 7:52 PM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com; Oved; Vladimir Krasnov Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:03 +0300, RafaelMizrahi wrote: Hi Gonzalo, * We are doing some last cleanups on the web test suite and the tests base classes, I hope to send it (along with 479 tests! ;) for your review in few days. * The same harness is used for two scenarios: * Generating expected xml files (ASP.NET on IIS). Scenario is in use only once, every .NET Service Pack. * Getting xml files from web server (Tomcat, xsp, ...) and comparing with expected xml files. * XHTML - We replaced the usage of SGMLReader with htmlagilitypack. * XMLDiff - If we wish to replace the XMLDiffPath , we can use XMLUnit,java XMLDiff or in-house developed XMLDiff component. Nice. What about some classes such as HttpUtility that can be used from outside of an asp.net application? Should we just use regular nunit for those? -Gonzalo ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite
Hi Gonzalo, * We are doing some last cleanups on the web test suite and the tests base classes, I hope to send it (along with 479 tests! ;) for your review in few days. * The same harness is used for two scenarios: * Generating expected xml files (ASP.NET on IIS). Scenario is in use only once, every .NET Service Pack. * Getting xml files from web server (Tomcat, xsp, ...) and comparing with expected xml files. * XHTML - We replaced the usage of SGMLReader with htmlagilitypack. * XMLDiff - If we wish to replace the XMLDiffPath , we can use XMLUnit,java XMLDiff or in-house developed XMLDiff component. Rafi Mainsoft SDE/T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RafaelMizrahi Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite Hi Gonzalo, Vladimir has finished the prototype of the System.Web test suite engine. The same framework will be used to generate the expected xml (html) results and to verify them. We have 2 problematic components that I need your help with: = 1. The SGMLReader XHTML component = 1.a. Has a serious bug which is reproducible in Mainsoft and in mono. The bug: Only one attribute from each tag (that has more than one attributes) processed to the output. 1.b The license does not look promising. We need to decide on an alternative component. I should remind that we previously used the COM version tidy (which is just a wrapper on-top of tidy library) and it was pretty immature. I will assign Vladimir to check the htmlagilitypack which contains no license. Maybe we should mail the author [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? http://blogs.msdn.com/smourier/archive/2003/06/04/8265.aspx = 2. The XMLDiff component. = The Microsoft XMLDiffPath component seems to work as expected on GH and on mono. If we will have license (or functional) problems we can always replace it (maybe with XMLUnit). Any progress with Atsushi on having our own XMLDiff? Rafi SDE/T Team Leader -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RafaelMizrahi Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 10:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite Hi Gonzalo, Mono.WebServer Remember that Mainsoft does not use Mono.WebServer, we use Tomcat or other Application Server, and I prefer that we will choose components that both of us will use. Don't we need a POST too I rather postpone this to a secondary phase. We need to lobby Atsushi Atsushi can own the XMLDiff/XMLAssert component. If we want to get things started: * Our tests already written in VB, is this a problem ? * You can start creating the NUnit helper classes. * I will start writing a small Expected Results Generator (xml files) * I will do some cleanups in our web tests helper classes. So we can put them in SVN. Rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Paniagua Javier Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:29 PM To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 12:55 +0300, RafaelMizrahi wrote: Hi Gonzalo, Using NUnit as the harness and the tests as a web application, is indeed one of the options. Moreover, to avoid the need for running xsp externally, we could just use Mono.WebServer. The NUnit (acting as a System.Net client), need to have the following components: * GET a web page (use System.NET) Don't we need a POST too? For example, sometimes we might want to emulate a button pressed... * Extract the elements which participate in the test (we used DIV with ID starting with a known prefix (for example TESTxxx)). You don't need the whole BODY. * XHTML in order to transform the HTML into a well formed XML. (we used SGMLReader) * Customized Clean the XML. To remove elements which can fail the test. For example, ID attributes that are generated by the server, that can be different on every GET. * XMLDiff the result with an expected result generated previously using IIS. We used Microsoft XMLDiffPatch. We can evaluate the XMLUnit project, and/or create some sort of XMLAssert. We need to lobby Atsushi and get a tool similar to that one that works with mono }:-). -Gonzalo ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite
Should we just use regular NUnit for those? Well, I guess so. The web testing framework targets two needs: * Testing the rendering of web elements. * Running tests under web context. * Automate IE and post back. But we currently excluded this feature. Although, it can be used for testing any class. In fact, we are using this framework for testing other assemblies which we want to test in web context (e.g. globalization, reflection). I have looked into the 479 tests and about 50 tests are non rendering tests, for example: HttpSessionState, HttpApplicationState, but must be tested in the context of a web application, so they cannot be used in NUnit. So, let's agree that classes which can be used outside of ASP.NET (web context), will be tested using NUnit tests. rafi -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 7:52 PM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com; Oved; Vladimir Krasnov Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:03 +0300, RafaelMizrahi wrote: Hi Gonzalo, * We are doing some last cleanups on the web test suite and the tests base classes, I hope to send it (along with 479 tests! ;) for your review in few days. * The same harness is used for two scenarios: * Generating expected xml files (ASP.NET on IIS). Scenario is in use only once, every .NET Service Pack. * Getting xml files from web server (Tomcat, xsp, ...) and comparing with expected xml files. * XHTML - We replaced the usage of SGMLReader with htmlagilitypack. * XMLDiff - If we wish to replace the XMLDiffPath , we can use XMLUnit,java XMLDiff or in-house developed XMLDiff component. Nice. What about some classes such as HttpUtility that can be used from outside of an asp.net application? Should we just use regular nunit for those? -Gonzalo ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Preview of release notes.
Miguel, The link is broken. rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mono-devel-list] Preview of release notes. Here is a preview of the release notes, please send me updates before the release: http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.1.8/ -- Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Preview of release notes.
Damn IE, DNS error, I tried on FireFox and it works fine. Beware Microsoft, I might convert ;) Sorry for the noise. rafi -Original Message- From: Gary M. Smithrud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:36 PM To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Cc: RafaelMizrahi; 'Miguel de Icaza'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] Preview of release notes. I was able to get to the link fine, so there is some other issue. On Tuesday 14 June 2005 10:30, RafaelMizrahi wrote: Miguel, The link is broken. rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel de Icaza Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mono-devel-list] Preview of release notes. Here is a preview of the release notes, please send me updates before the release: http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.1.8/ ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] xslttest patch
I cannot find 'should', either ;) http://www.mono-project.com/Special:Search?search=shouldfulltext=Search rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Skiba Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:37 AM To: Atsushi Eno Cc: mono-devel mailing list Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] xslttest patch Atsushi Eno wrote: The purpose of the patch is to make this suite as similar as possible to w3c suite. Please explain what it exactly means. It accepts now the same files, like knownFailures, fixme, etc., as the W3C testsuite. The output is also unified with w3c. It's easier to use testsuites with similar input-output conventions. In addition, it fixes the bug with too many open files, and provides much more information about which testcases were fixed, which regressed, which tests took more time to perform, and the summary at the end, with number of testcases that passed, failed, regressed, etc. Again, all those things already present in W3C, now I added them to this testsuite, too. Just run the testcase before and after the patch, the difference is obvious. BTW, please use the patch I attached now, it fixes a typo. At least I will fix those messages (unless you fix by yourself) The messages I just copied from w3c testsuite, as they are. So if you want to fix them, let's fix in both places. To understand why, I hope the link below would help you. http://www.mono-project.com/Special:Search?search=mustfulltext=Search Do you mean that mono project never uses word must? Please, tell me how would you write those messages. Regards, Andrew. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] System.Drawing Tests - image recognitionsimilarities
Hi Jordy, I have a first proposal for automatic testing of System.Drawing: 1. Use W3C SVG conformance test suite test files http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test 2. Use SVG# library in order to convert SVG files into a picture. And SharpVectorGraphics (aka SVG#): http://sourceforge.net/projects/svgdomcsharp http://www.gotdotnet.com/workspaces/releases/viewuploads.aspx?id=8bcf7f55-ac 4f-4778-9792-37d3e69ecf5c 3. Compare the SVG image with the expected image using MSE. ImageMagick is also using MSE for image comparison. http://www.imagemagick.org/script/compare.php If MSE is not fine enough, we will add more compare algorithms to the process. - Mizrahi Rafael Mainsoft SDE/T -Original Message- From: Jordi Mas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 10:44 PM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: Oren Gurfinkel; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] System.Drawing Tests - image recognitionsimilarities El dl 30 de 05 del 2005 a les 11:05 +0300, en/na RafaelMizrahi va escriure: Hi Jordi, (and mono devs) Hi Rafael. Mainsoft wish to invest some effort in testing System.Drawing. We wish to enhance the test suite with an image compare component which will compare the difference between the expected .NET image and the mono image. The comparer (which we just started prototyping it) will be customized and produce a result according to several algorithms: * Prior to compare: format, size, colors, resolution * Color - strip boarders; compare histograms to get top colors and areas. * Edge Detect - edge detection, and line generation, compare line lists. * Histogram to detect shapes * FFT (or cosine transform) of sub-regions or the whole image. * Tangent space Vectors * I appreciate your inputs? We never devoted to much time to create a System.Drawing testing suite, as a matter of fact that it hast just been included as part of the build testing procedure very recently. We appreciate any effort to enhance the current test suite. As Ben point out, most of drawing functions test should be validated manually and then use the value obtained to do regression testing in the future. I mean, we run the test manually, we make sure that we look as Microsoft, and then we write the value down and the test use that value in the future for regression testing. The manual part needs to be done just once. Since we are hacking System.Drawing a lot, regression tests have become more important. Also we depend very heavily on libgdiplus and how future releases of this library may break things that were testing and working on the past. * Do you recommend on a curtain GPL library? My personal preference will be to use the same license that the class library, but you better check with Miguel. * Does anyone have such task in his TODO list? Right now, we are focused on finishing Managed.System.Forms and nobody is looking into enhancing the System.Drawing tests. If you have any questions, feel free to write to the list or me directly. Thanks Rafael, Jordi, Note: Just as word of warning: text drawing in libgdiplus does not have advanced I18N support. Regarding codecs, some of them do not support all the features that Microsoft does. -- Jordi Mas i Hernàndez - Mono development team - http://www.mono-project.com Homepage and LiveJournal at http://www.softcatala.org/~jmas ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite
Hi Gonzalo, Mono.WebServer Remember that Mainsoft does not use Mono.WebServer, we use Tomcat or other Application Server, and I prefer that we will choose components that both of us will use. Don't we need a POST too I rather postpone this to a secondary phase. We need to lobby Atsushi Atsushi can own the XMLDiff/XMLAssert component. If we want to get things started: * Our tests already written in VB, is this a problem ? * You can start creating the NUnit helper classes. * I will start writing a small Expected Results Generator (xml files) * I will do some cleanups in our web tests helper classes. So we can put them in SVN. Rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Paniagua Javier Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 2:29 PM To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Contributing Mainsoft System.Web test suite On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 12:55 +0300, RafaelMizrahi wrote: Hi Gonzalo, Using NUnit as the harness and the tests as a web application, is indeed one of the options. Moreover, to avoid the need for running xsp externally, we could just use Mono.WebServer. The NUnit (acting as a System.Net client), need to have the following components: * GET a web page (use System.NET) Don't we need a POST too? For example, sometimes we might want to emulate a button pressed... * Extract the elements which participate in the test (we used DIV with ID starting with a known prefix (for example TESTxxx)). You don't need the whole BODY. * XHTML in order to transform the HTML into a well formed XML. (we used SGMLReader) * Customized Clean the XML. To remove elements which can fail the test. For example, ID attributes that are generated by the server, that can be different on every GET. * XMLDiff the result with an expected result generated previously using IIS. We used Microsoft XMLDiffPatch. We can evaluate the XMLUnit project, and/or create some sort of XMLAssert. We need to lobby Atsushi and get a tool similar to that one that works with mono }:-). -Gonzalo ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-devel-list] System.Drawing Tests - image recognition similarities
Hi Jordi, (and mono devs) Mainsoft wish to invest some effort in testing System.Drawing. We wish to enhance the test suite with an image compare component which will compare the difference between the expected .NET image and the mono image. The comparer (which we just started prototyping it) will be customized and produce a result according to several algorithms: * Prior to compare: format, size, colors, resolution * Color - strip boarders; compare histograms to get top colors and areas. * Edge Detect - edge detection, and line generation, compare line lists. * Histogram to detect shapes * FFT (or cosine transform) of sub-regions or the whole image. * Tangent space Vectors * I appreciate your inputs? * Do you recommend on a curtain GPL library? * Does anyone have such task in his TODO list? - Mizrahi Rafael Dev/QA Team Leader Mainsoft ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] Test policy proposition
Atsushi, I did not suggest to convert or to run them as NUnit, I just suggest that it is better to have their output as NUnit report. - Mizrahi Rafael -Original Message- From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 5:12 PM To: RafaelMizrahi Cc: 'Andrew Skiba'; 'mono-devel mailing list' Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] Test policy proposition Hi, We will never add those massive standalone tests into NUnit test (note that they are going to be separate module). But it still sounds nice to develop such integration as long as it is *optional* run. Note that the discussion also applies to the whole standalone test things BTW. Atsushi Eno RafaelMizrahi wrote: Hi Andrew and Atsushi, I suggest that all stand_alone test suites will output NUnit report. This way they can be included in build, regression reports etc' . ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-docs-list] RE: Mono-docs-list digest, Vol 1 #250 - 1 msg
Hi duncan,
I think I also alerted about a same problem at
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-docs-list/2004-March/001011
.html
take a look at
$monodoc\class\System.Data\en\System.Data\ConstraintCollection.xml
and you can see that the member Item, appear without parameters.
MemberSignature Language=C# Value=public virtual Constraint Item {
get; }; /
--
Mizrahi Rafael
Dev/QA Team Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mainsoft Corporation. - Cross Platform Software Development Company
Ofek 2 Bld., North Industrial Area
Lod 71293, Israel
Direct: (+972) 8 9781300 ext. 381 Fax: (+972) 8 9219389
Mobile: (+972) 0507-296305
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mono-docs-list digest, Vol 1 #250 - 1 msg
Send Mono-docs-list mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Mono-docs-list digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Indexer signatures in the docs. (Miguel de Icaza)
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Novell, Inc.
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:57:42 -0400
Subject: [Mono-docs-list] Indexer signatures in the docs.
Hey Folks,
I think we have miss-generated the Item [...] signature on the docs,
for example, we show:
public Gtk.Widget Item { get; }
In Glade.XML, instead of:
public Gtk.Widget Item [string index] { get; }
This is not too bad, but we are going to do another pass at fixing
things ;-(
--__--__--
___
Mono-docs-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list
End of Mono-docs-list Digest
___
Mono-docs-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list
