[Mono-list] ASP .NET in Mono
I just have a question regarding ASP .NET. Are the features in the current release of Mono ASP .NET comparable to the features in Microsoft's IIS, or does Mono have a long way to go? I haven't tested 1.0 of Mono out, so I don't know if it's improved, but when I used it last (about a month ago), simple tutorials from www.asp.net did not work on XSP.
Re: [Mono-list] Trying to run XSP
Ah ok, thanks for all your guys' help. One thing I've noticed is how slow XSP is (or is it ASP .NET with Mono), in terms of server pages, especially ASP pages. Is this a problem with my build, or is this the way things are as of now? - Original Message - From: Chris Turchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Trying to run XSP you can configure linux to run them automatically using binfmt_misc, see this post for more information: http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2002-April/005179.html regards, --chris On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, A Rafael D Teixeira wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 10:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello- I configured XSP with ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/xsp, ran make and make install, and everything appeared to run smoothly. However, when I run any of the executables in my bin folder in /usr/local/xsp/bin, it says ./xsp.exe - Cannot execute binary file. Have you first installed Mono? And are you running with mono runtime? You have to issue commands like: mono xsp.exe ... to run .net exes in linux. I am running RH 9 on a Celeron 2.0 ghz. Thanks. Hope it helps, -- Rafael Monoman Teixeira Mono Hacker since 16 Jul 2001 - http://www.go-mono.org/ Mono Brasil Founding Member - http://monobrasil.redesolbrasil.org/ English Blog: http://monoblog.blogspot.com/ Brazilian Portuguese Blog: http://monoblog.weblogger.terra.com.br/ ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Getting ASP .NET Apache module to work with 1.3.29
Sorry. But as I saw about a month ago in the docs (maybe they changed?) it said something like Currently only Apache 2.0.48 is supported. So... I'm not sure. - Original Message - From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:03 AM Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Getting ASP .NET Apache module to work with 1.3.29 El mar, 27-04-2004 a las 23:39, Robert Geller escribió: Yes, yes, I know Apache 2.0.48 is the only documented and supported version for the ASP .NET module, but I use 1.3.29, as it is currently more stable, and better developed and tested than 2.0.48, and I don't plan on switching for a while. You're wrong. The apache module also supports apache 1.3. I guess you should read the INSTALL file. -Gonzalo ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
RE: [Mono-list] Getting ASP .NET Apache module to work with 1.3.29
Hmm, so I should just follow the documentation for compilation of Mono, and mod-mono? Is there any better tutorial for getting mod_mono to work from start to finish? As I said, it seems like the mono documentation is a bit out of date. Hello Robert, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-list- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Geller Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:40 PM Is there ANY way at all I could get the ASP .NET module to work with Apache 1.3.29? I have it running with Apache 1.3.27 and a CVS version of last week. mod_mono recognizes the Apache version during compilation. My http.conf entries look like: LoadModule mono_module /usr/lib/apache/mod_mono.so MonoRunXSP True MonoExecutablePath /usr/local/bin/mono MonoServerPath /usr/local/bin/mod-mono-server.exe MonoApplications /xsptest:/usr/local/share/xsp/doc/test Alias /xsptest /usr/local/share/xsp/doc/test Directory /usr/local/share/xsp/doc/test SetHandler mono IfModule mod_dir.c DirectoryIndex index.aspx /IfModule Order allow,deny Allow from all /Directory HTH, Joerg. --Robert Geller Creative Director Works of Magic Productions 3403 St. Pauls Fairfax, VA 22031 703.279.1637 Fax: 703.279.1607 ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
RE: [Mono-list] Getting ASP .NET Apache module to work with 1.3.29
Why do you need the Apache-Dev package? Hello Robert, -Original Message- From: Robert Geller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 2:40 PM Hmm, so I should just follow the documentation for compilation of Mono, and mod-mono? Is there any better tutorial for getting mod_mono to work from start to finish? As I said, it seems like the mono documentation is a bit out of date. I've compiled them without problems on Suse 8.2. The only thing I needed additionally was the development package for Apache. Joerg. ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list --Robert Geller Creative Director Works of Magic Productions 3403 St. Pauls Fairfax, VA 22031 703.279.1637 Fax: 703.279.1607 ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Getting ASP .NET Apache module to work with 1.3.29
Yes, yes, I know Apache 2.0.48 is the only documented and supported version for the ASP .NET module, but I use 1.3.29, as it is currently more stable, and better developed and tested than 2.0.48, and I don't plan on switching for a while. So... Is there ANY way at all I could get the ASP .NET module to work with Apache 1.3.29? ALSO The mono documention seems severely outdated, at least the last time I checked. For example, after downloading the mono source and compiling it and doing make install, it does NOT put the mono installation where the documentation says it puts it, it puts it wherever you did make... Just my input, and if someone could help me that'd be great.
