Re: [Mono-list] Maintainers of Gtk#?
I recommend reposting this to the gtk-sharp-list http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list Cheers, Stephen On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Baltasar García Perez-Schofield < baltas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Who is maintaining Gtk#? How can I contact them? Do they accept > collaborations? > > I'm the author, in the Gtkmm world (the C++ binding of Gtk+), of > ListViewText, a simplified Gtk+'s TreeView version, oriented to text only. > > https://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm/stable/classGtk_1_1ListViewText.html > > Since I started to develop with Gtk#, I missed that simple table of > string's, and developed it again for Gtk# (all managed code). > > http://github.com/baltasarq/gtkutil > > I wonder if this is of interesting enough to include it in Gtk# itself. > > -- baltasar > > > ___ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Proposed changes to mono/mcs/class/corlib/Mono/DataConverter.cs
I can't comment on the code changes themselves, but it would be helpful to
fork mono on github and then create a Pull Request (PR) with your changes.
Cheers,
Stephen
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Michael McGlothlin
mike.mcgloth...@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't figure out how to get Xamarin Studio to create an actual patch
file after trying, and failing, to push a change with git. It appears this
is the correct place to post this?
I usually put most of my code in PCL and then call it from platform
specific code so I'm trying to make DataConverter happy as PCL.
To make DataConverter compile as PCL I had to change Encoding.UTF7 to
Encoding.GetEncoding ( utf-7 ) and the numeric calls to 12000 and 12001
on GetEncoding() to the string-based utf-32 and uff-32BE. These three
changes had to be made twice as there are two variants using this same
code. I also changed ArrayList to Listobject to make PCL happy.
case '7':
e = Encoding.GetEncoding (utf-7);
n = 1;
break;
case '3':
e = Encoding.GetEncoding (utf-32);
n = 4;
break;
case '4':
e = Encoding.GetEncoding (utf-32BE);
n = 4;
break;
static public IList Unpack (string description, byte[] buffer, int
startIndex)
{
DataConverter conv = CopyConv;
var result = new Listobject ();
int idx = startIndex;
bool align = false;
int repeat = 0, n;
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-list] Open source .NET and Mono.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com wrote: Xamarin Studio for Linux is comming soon!!! Technically Xamarin Studio is already on Linux under monodevelop :) Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] [Mono-dev] Open source .NET and Mono.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com wrote: Xamarin Studio for Linux is comming soon!!! Technically Xamarin Studio is already on Linux under monodevelop :) Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] SerialPort
It should be in there. Here is the source code: https://github.com/mono/mono/tree/master/mcs/class/System/System.IO.Ports Cheers, Stephen On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Daniel Piloco dpil...@ditco.net wrote: Thank you for the response, I will have to check this again at my work PC tomorrow morning. However, I'm nearly sure I'm including the System assembly.. and System.IO.Ports.SerialPort isn't detected by monodevelop. Daniel - Original Message - From: Miguel de Icaza mig...@xamarin.com To: Daniel Piloco dpil...@ditco.net Cc: mono-devel mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Sent: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] SerialPort It is part of the System assembly. On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Daniel Piloco dpil...@ditco.net wrote: Hello Everyone, I'm new to mono/monodevelop and linux. I have lots of experience with C# on windows however. Mono provides almost everything I need. Except there's no assembly (or whatever its called) for System.IO.Ports. Specifically, I'd like my program to be able to use the System.IO.Ports.SerialPort class. How can I use this class? Here's what I'm running: MonoDevelop 3.0.3.2 Installation UUID: 71724472-0276-43db-8786-c4a8cda87fef Runtime: Mono 2.10.8.1 (Debian 2.10.8.1-8) (64-bit) GTK 2.24.10 GTK# (2.12.0.0) Build information: Git revision: 7bf6ac0ca43c1b12703176ad9933c3484c05c84c-dirty Build date: 2012-06-22 20:57:52+ Operating System: Linux Linux VirtualHostDebian 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.57-3+deb7u1 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thank you, Daniel ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Debian CI PPA for Ubuntu/Debian
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Johnnie Odom jo...@escambia.k12.fl.us wrote: Presumably that means SuSE as well? This really is excellent news, as Mono is fantastic for cross-platform sysadmin scripting and good Linux support is key to tha. There are some more up to date SuSE (openSUSE) packages in Mono:Factory on build.opensuse.org. I don't have much time to make them 100%, but any testing/help would be appreciated. Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] Problem with Xamarin reference
What's your project type? On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Borneq borucki.andr...@gmail.com wrote: I am Xamarin beginner. I try using NUnit. In reference list are: nunit.core, nunit.core.interfaces and nunit.framework. I check all three nunit.*. But I can't add using NUnit.Framework; ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] ms .net source updated and license modified
I'm curious. What does this actually mean for the mono project? Cheers, Stephen On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Chris Ball qha...@gmail.com wrote: Related, I believe: http://www.hanselman.com/blog/AnnouncingTheNewRoslynpoweredNETFrameworkReferenceSource.aspx Sent from my iPhone On 25.02.2014, at 18:50, \Andrés G. Aragoneses\ kno...@gmail.com wrote: On 25/02/14 18:11, theUser BL wrote: »Um die Arbeit mit dem Quellcode noch einfacher zu machen, hat Microsoft auch die Lizenzbestimmungen klarer gefasst. Denn bisher mussten beispielsweise die Entwickler von Open Source-Klonen aufpassen, dass sie nur Erkenntnisse aus dem Reverse Engineering verwenden und nicht aus dem Studium des originalen Quellcodes. Denn in vielen Fällen würde dann die Gefahr drohen, dass man sich verschiedener Rechteverletzungen schuldig macht. Die Microsoft Reference Source License wurde daher nun so angepasst, dass beispielsweise die Entwickler des Mono-Teams problemlos die .Net-Sourcen anschauen und das Framework dann unter Linux klonen können. « GoogleTranslate output is: To make the work with the source code even easier, Microsoft has also the license terms clarified. Because so far had For example, the developers of open source clones careful that they only use insights from the reverse engineering and not from the study of the original source code. Because in many cases would then the danger threatening that one different in rights violations guilty. The Microsoft Reference Source License was therefore now adapted so that for example, the developer of the mono-teams easily see the. Net sources and the framework then in Linux can clone. If this translation is (kind of) correct, it still is very confusing because that license (MS-RSL [1]) is not opensource. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source#Microsoft_Reference_Source_License_.28Ms-RSL.29 ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Shipping NuGet with MonoDevelop/Xamarin
I was just pointing out why it might not be included. As far as using it... I love it. I have it installed on all of my installs of monodevelop/xamarin studio. And recommend it :) cheers, Stephen On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:08 AM, David Schmitt da...@dasz.at wrote: On 2014-01-24 06:10, Stephen Shaw wrote: I can't speak for the monodevelop project, but one of the problems with nuget is it has a heavy dependency on powershell which is only available on windows. Having said that there is an addin, but as I understand it it has a custom nuget.exe binary in it that just simply ignores all powershell calls. For example, if you install something like entity framework (I think) it has a bunch of powershell script stuff. It would add the dlls, but not run any of the scripts. That said, using nuget to get packages already installed into a solution works flawlessly. Regards, David ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Shipping NuGet with MonoDevelop/Xamarin
I can't speak for the monodevelop project, but one of the problems with nuget is it has a heavy dependency on powershell which is only available on windows. Having said that there is an addin, but as I understand it it has a custom nuget.exe binary in it that just simply ignores all powershell calls. For example, if you install something like entity framework (I think) it has a bunch of powershell script stuff. It would add the dlls, but not run any of the scripts. Cheers, Stephen On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Arthur Grimnirsen grimnir...@gmail.comwrote: Hi list, what do you think about shipping Monodevelop/Xamarin with NuGet add-in included? As you may know Visual Studio does that from version 2012 at least. Installing NuGet is easy but I think having IDE ready out of the box, is far more convenient. Best Regards, Arthur. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Shipping NuGet with MonoDevelop/Xamarin
I'm not sure pash is to the point that it qualifies as having powershell on platforms outside of windows. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Arsen Shnurkov arsen.shnur...@gmail.comwrote: powershell which is only available on windows. it exists for linux, and is called pash https://github.com/Pash-Project/Pash On 01/24/2014 09:10 AM, Stephen Shaw wrote: I can't speak for the monodevelop project, but one of the problems with nuget is it has a heavy dependency on powershell which is only available on windows. Having said that there is an addin, but as I understand it it has a custom nuget.exe binary in it that just simply ignores all powershell calls. For example, if you install something like entity framework (I think) it has a bunch of powershell script stuff. It would add the dlls, but not run any of the scripts. Cheers, Stephen On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Arthur Grimnirsen grimnir...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, what do you think about shipping Monodevelop/Xamarin with NuGet add-in included? As you may know Visual Studio does that from version 2012 at least. Installing NuGet is easy but I think having IDE ready out of the box, is far more convenient. Best Regards, Arthur. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] Alleged MonoDevelop.Refactory addin
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Kendall Shaw ks...@kendallshaw.com wrote: Does this addin exist: http://monodevelop.com/Developers/Articles/Refactoring MonoDevelop defines the refactoring system in the MonoDevelop.Refactoring addin. If so, where can I find it? Kendall I'm not sure if this addin really exists anymore. There are a ton of refactoring tools built right into monodevelop now. If you go to preferences - Source Analysis and enable source analysis of open files you can even get some resharper style features. Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Afallon: open source WPF implementation
Do you have the code published somewhere? Cheers, Stephen PS. good luck on this big task. On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Jonathan Lima greenbo...@gmail.com wrote: In my view, WPF is the most complex and powerful UI system ever created(the layout and the composing system are amazing) and I really need an opensource implementation of the Presentation Framework to use it on other platforms and to have more control about it(rendering it into an OpenGL window maybe). I know that this will be a long road and that maybe it would never be 100% complete, but I'm starting to develop Afallon(it's another way to write Avalon :D), an opensource implementation of the current version of WPF. I'll develop it aiming in a good platform abstraction and a good performance. I already have a good base done, I think. Now I want to ask: Is there someone that would want to help in the development? It's a fairly large project and I need all help possible x.x Thanks for your time, Jonathan Lima ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] WPF in Mono
There was some windowsbase stuff and a couple other things checked into mono if I remember right. There is also the uia2atk project that has the UIA stuff in it. Other than that there has only really been people that have mentioned that they want to work on it. I'm guessing its a case of patches are welcome, but official support is very unlikely to happen. There is XWT that might be worth looking into. Cheers, Stephen On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Abhinav Jangda abhijan...@hotmail.comwrote: Hello Everyone, I'm very much interested in Mono and will want to work on implementing Windows Presentation Foundation in Mono. I browsed the mono-olive google group and found that no post after 2009. Is the project dead? Whats the current status about it? I would like to work on it. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] Pash - Open Source PowerShell - is back!
Can you give us a report on the current state of the project as far as how much has been completed and maybe where you'd like help? Cheers, Stephen Shaw On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jay Bazuzi j...@bazuzi.com wrote: Hi All, Miguel suggested I announce this here. In 2008, Igor Moochnick published Pashhttp://sourceforge.net/projects/pash/, an Open Source reimplementation of Windows PowerShell, to run on Mono. There was a lot of enthusiasm around the internet, but when development ceased, the enthusiasm became disappointment. In the fall of 2012, I took over, and have been making steady progress on the project. It's fun to see the pieces coming together. Follow development on GitHub: https://github.com/Pash-Project/Pash/ And on Twitter: https://twitter.com/PashProject Should I also post about progress here on this mailing list? -J ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] What is the latest stable release of Mono?
That is the latest stable release, however 3.0.1 is the current beta release. Cheers, Stephen On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Frank Cohen frankensp...@gmail.comwrote: I am running 2.10.9, but I see other builds available, I am having problems with 2.10.9, so trying to figure out what build to move to for a production server. Thanks, Frank ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Propose renaming fprintf to g_message
As I understand it, fprintf doesn't work on all platform or at least on android. I've been looking specifically at the sgen code and as I'm trying to figure out what exactly is happening on the heap. From what I understand in some places there are #define statements, but that seems really messy and essentially just a hack :) I'm proposing that where ever there are fprintf statements such as (mono/metadata/sgen-gc.c): DEBUG (4, fprintf (gc_debug_file, Need to cleanup object %p\n, start)); be rewritten like this: DEBUG (4, g_message (gc_debug_file, Need to cleanup object %p\n, start)); similar to code found in mono/metadata/threads.c: HREAD_DEBUG (g_message (%s: ignoring main thread %G_GSIZE_FORMAT, __func__, (gsize)thread-tid)); Thanks, Stephen Shaw ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] ubuntu support
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 21:43, Daniel Hughes tramps...@gmail.com wrote: Currently all my volunteer time is going into Wide Margin. And I foresee it taking up all my time in the near future. However my suggestion is that the mono project drops open suse and instead supports ubuntu. This would require no extra effort. And would get the latest mono to a larger user base. I don't think you fully understand what you are asking for. Having done both RPM and DEB packaging I'll take RPM (both openSUSE and fedora) packaging especially in OBS (OpenSUSE Build Service) any day over debian packaging. In fact, if the debian guys don't pick up the packages I put together I'll most likely not support ubuntu. Just isn't worth my extremely limited free time that I have. Ignoring the large amount of complexity that comes with packaging for debian/ubuntu, they package mono differently than on openSUSE and even fedora for that matter. Add in all of the different components, this isn't about just packaging mono. Its about all of the packaging that are required/connected to mono. They are generating and packaging an entire developer platform/ecosystem not just some libraries. Its very impressive what these guys do. It'd be unfair to not mention the amount of time that ajorg puts into all of this. Cheers, Stephen PS. As an openSUSE user (Disclaimer) I'd be sad to see the support drop. What strikes me as odd is your request to drop support for an entire distro and its users. Coming from someone that is writing a bible study application that doesn't seem very christian. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] ubuntu support
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 22:54, Daniel Hughes tramps...@gmail.com wrote: How many of the mono team will want to continue to use an operation system from the company which has treated them so badly? Just to clarify, it wasn't openSUSE or SUSE that laid off the mono team. And to be technical, it wasn't Novell either. In case you missed it, Attachemate recently bought Novell, split SUSE off and canned the mono team. Since you mention Attachemate one would have to ask if your are just trolling at this point? Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] ubuntu support
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:58, David Harper dahar...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Stephen, I apologize, I lacked clarity in my previous post. The Ubuntu issue mentioned by Daniel is a real problem, we're always versions behind and it's frustrating. In light of the recent changes, it is worth considering if an opportunity existed to address some of these issues. It would be great to have the ability to install the latest Mono across multiple platforms, ie. Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, Windows, etc. Bringing Mono up to date in Ubuntu would be awesome, for Mono and for Ubuntu. From the feedback to Daniel's initial post, it has been made manifest to me that there is a lot more work that goes into the packaging of Mono than I realized, and there are other issues such as distribution policies, application installation base compatibilities, etc. I am very grateful to you and everybody else who makes Mono available to us. I'm not sure anyone truly understands all the effort especially the initial effort it takes to get stuff packaged and pushed out :) Even though I'm not a debian/ubuntu user I think it would be great to have mono up to date on there as well. You can ask meebey and directhex, I've bugged them enough :) It certainly makes packaging easier with the latest stuff. That has been one of the biggest headaches for me and the packages I was trying to package on ubuntu. Not to mention the policy stuff. It took me longer to get the debian licensing stuff done than it took me to package my stuff on openSUSE and fedora. Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] openSUSE upgrade to 2.6+
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 14:52, Greg Robinson gregarobin...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying out openSUSE to compare it to Ubuntu. I installed openSUSE 11.2 and then installed Mono 2.4 from the Software Installer in openSUSE. I want to upgrade to Mono 2.6+. When doing the following in a terminal window I get an error that the ftp site cannot be found or connected to: zypper addrepo http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/download-stable/openSUSE_11.2 mono-stable zypper ar http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/download-stable/openSUSE_11.2/ mono-stable zypper ref -r mono-stable zypper dup -r mono-stable zypper refresh --repo mono-stable zypper dist-upgrade --repo mono-stable I just tested with this and it worked for me. Is there something like blocking it? Also see inline comments for shorter commands. (much less typing) Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 2.6 for Ubuntu
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 14:47, Bálint Kardos kardosbal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, my problem is that I'm only using mono for web services on my servers (I've never used Ubuntu or Linux as a desktop). I'm renting virtual machines, so I can't compile from source on the server - and I simply don't know anything about re-packaging and all stuff - basically I can't update all nodes easily for a version change. I think a for webservers only build for Ubuntu would be a good solution. Without it, I'm aliening the rpms from the SuSe distribution. b. üdvözlettel with regards Kardos Bálint For someone that hasn't really used linux before and your reason for using it now is to host a .NET based app I don't understand why you are using ubuntu? (unless that's all they provide). Nothing against ubuntu, but a lot of the development and testing is done on openSUSE. Cheers, Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] mono 2.4.1 release?
if you are feeling adventurous I have *some* of the 2.4.1/svn rpms in a repo [0]. They are there for testing iFolder. I'm not sure what state they are in, but if you need them to test something they are there. They seemed to be just fine on my machine, but not willing to make any promises... The rpms are for openSUSE 11.0/1 and SLE11 Cheers, Stephen http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Mono://UIA://iFolder/ On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Maxim mak...@yandex.ru wrote: Hello! +1 I'm waiting for 2.4.1 too. It should be some fixes, that I need a lot. All the best, Maxim Karavaev Peter Hagen wrote: Hi are there any plans on releasing the 2.4.1 officially with the 'inotify fix'? I think I need to upgrade my 2.0.1 to 2.4.1 to get a remoting problem fixed, but I don't want to do this with a svn version With kind regards Peter Hagen ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - mono-l...@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Where is the mono-core.spec file for mono-2.4 stable?
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Ray Womack memphis...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot find the spec files for the Mono 2.4 sources, can someone please help? I have looked high and low in the anonsvn and the nearest thing I see are snapshotsreleases in /trunk/release/packaging/rpm_defs/mono-core/mono-core.spec which don't work. Why not posted them with the source at http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/sources-stable/ Thanks Ray You should also be able to find them in the openSUSE Build Service under the Mono project. Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Updating mono/monodevelop from fedora 10 repos problems...
2009/3/18 Paul Johnson pjohns...@uclan.ac.uk: Hi, -- Paul F. Johnson Lecturer in Science and IT FoundatiONCampus buhochil...@gmail.com buhochil...@gmail.com 18/03/2009 16:32 Trying to update monodevelop on fedora 10 using fedora 11 rawhide repos I get this kind of errors: file /usr/bin/mod from install of mono-core-2.4-9.RC1.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from package monodoc-2.0-5.fc10.i386 Also installing dependencies this kind of errors...: Updating : gtk-sharp2 1/17 Error unpacking rpm package gtk-sharp2-2.12.7-4.fc11.i586 error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/libatksharpglue-2.so;49c107f3: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch I think you might need gtk-sharp2-2.12.8. I'm not sure if that is in koji or not? Stephen monodoc will conflict as there is a problem with it being removed from koji currently. I'm not sure why gtk-sharp2 is failing, all I can think of is that there is some form of interuption on your connection which corrupted the file. As for everything else, well there isn't much that can be done. What may be of more use is to download the mono family srpms from rawhide and build them from scratch. Just a suggestion TTFN Paul ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] mono 2.2 on ubuntu?
If you are doing a lot with mono, is it worth looking at just using openSUSE as the packages are always up to date for both released and future. Right now you can get mono 2.0.1, 2.2, 2.4preview for 11.1 Stephen On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Bálint Kardos bal...@cardos.hu wrote: Hi, thanks for the answer; it's always a pain working on ubuntu with mono :/ anyway, I've alien-ed up the 1.9.x RedHot packages, will the OpenSuse version work for with it? I can't test it anywhere, i just have a development a production environment currently. Any hints? thanks, b. üdvözlettel with regards Kardos Bálint ___ http://skaelede.hu 10 (0xA) év a magyar weben On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 21:29, Stephen Shaw ss...@decriptor.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Bálint Kardos bal...@cardos.hu wrote: Hi, does anyone know a repository where i can find the latest mono for ubuntu? thanks, They are currently working on mono 2.0.1. I think they were talking about skipping 2.2 and going straight to 2.4 once they finish 2.0.1 Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] mono 2.2 on ubuntu?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Bálint Kardos bal...@cardos.hu wrote: Hi, does anyone know a repository where i can find the latest mono for ubuntu? thanks, They are currently working on mono 2.0.1. I think they were talking about skipping 2.2 and going straight to 2.4 once they finish 2.0.1 Stephen ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-dev] mono-ui?
2009/1/10 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk: Hi, I'm trying to get uiautomationwinforms into fedora rawhide, but it's complaining that mono-ui is not available. What package is mono-ui available from? TTFN Paul here is the tagged code. UIAutomation is the mono-uia stuff. The order that I build stuff in is UIAutomation, UiaAtkbridge, UIAutomationWinforms http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc/tags/uia2atk-0.9.1/ hope that helps. I was trying to setup a koji env. to help you out with that. Thanks, Stephen ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] UIA and olive
I was wondering what the future of olive is? Reason for asking is that UIA has stuff in there as well as depending on WindowsBase. This makes our release dependent on olive. Are things going to move from olive to mono? Our will olive stabilize and get released? Do we need to release a slimmed down version of olive with just the uia stuff and windowsbase? Thanks, Stephen Shaw ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] UIA and olive
Stephen, On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 11:42 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote: I was wondering what the future of olive is? Reason for asking is that UIA has stuff in there as well as depending on WindowsBase. This makes our release dependent on olive. Are things going to move from olive to mono? Our will olive stabilize and get released? Do we need to release a slimmed down version of olive with just the uia stuff and windowsbase? Sorry, I don't clearly understand the problem here. The UIA stuff wants a release schedule and is tied to olive because of WindowsBase? Sorry, in a way we are looking for a release schedule or at least figure out the plan for olive as we have stuff in there and depend on another dll. Because of these our release schedule/time table is completely dependent on what happens to olive. We also have 3 dlls in there. UIAutomationProvider.dll UIAutomationTypes.dll UIAutomationBridge.dll If thats the case I can see two options, but miguel and eno should probably weigh in: #1: Mirror WindowsBase into the UIA trees for release #2: Move WindowsBase into the Mono release cycle #2 would be ideal. #1 is probably preferable for now so that you can release outside of the mono release schedule which may not conincide with yours? Please advise, -g Hope that helps? Thanks, Stephen ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] UIA and olive
For reference, we have somewhat similar things: System.Management.dll, System.EnterpriseServices.dll and System.Messaging.dll. Atsushi Eno The problem here is that the dependency WindowsBase.dll has never been worked on (actually I'm even unsure what kind of work this dll needs) and hence never treated as stable. Though, for the sake of UIA releases, we could make this dll as API stable (if we aren't, we could do it within not a long time) and move from olive to mcs, marking almost everything as MonoTODO. Sandy mentioned that toshok said that most of WindowsBase.dll is stubbed out. Stephen The same kind of trouble will happen once get complete WCF application assemblies such as System.ServiceModel.Web.dll. It is almost API complete, but cannot be released without System.ServiceModel.dll which has a lot of unimplemented annoyance such as WS-*. Astoria in .NET 3.5 would likely run into the same problem too. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
