Re: [good] Re: [Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?
My thinking and choice to use Mono is just the opposite of (below), I use it for web servers (not deployed), running on my own servers (hosting customers web sites), as if in years to come there is a licensing issue, it effects only a few of my "web servers", if i was making a app. that could have a wide commercial audience, then i'd be a bit more worried, so I believe Mono is a very safe choice for web services based on a worst case licensing scenerio, and if that issue ever came to pass, hopefully I could jump to a different class stack for those services. -tl Melinda wrote: On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:23, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote: The question was not about how good the asp.net support on mono is right now. The question, a valid one, was what's the recommended approach to write web applications since asp.net is not covered by the ECMA spec, in other words, what's the equivalent piece of technology in the mono stack? I guess the answer is that right now we don't have one. That is what I mean. That is what keep me away from Mono. Mono is good to write desktop applications with GTK# but for web services :( all the best, Rodrigo Em Qui, 2004-06-10 às 21:54, Cory Nelson escreveu: ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes. The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha. Mono's ASP.NET support is actually very good. On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this: The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux. Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono. So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe PHP.NET? :) ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 08:23, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote: > The question was not about how good the asp.net support on mono is right > now. The question, a valid one, was what's the recommended approach to > write web applications since asp.net is not covered by the ECMA spec, in > other words, what's the equivalent piece of technology in the mono > stack? > > I guess the answer is that right now we don't have one. That is what I mean. That is what keep me away from Mono. Mono is good to write desktop applications with GTK# but for web services :( > > all the best, > Rodrigo > > Em Qui, 2004-06-10 às 21:54, Cory Nelson escreveu: > > ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes. > > > > The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha. Mono's > > ASP.NET support is actually very good. > > > > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this: > > > The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms > > > subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility > > > with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono > > > platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux. > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for > > > Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono. > > > > > > So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe > > > PHP.NET? :) > > > > > ___ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 22:23 -0300, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira wrote: > The question was not about how good the asp.net support on mono is right > now. The question, a valid one, was what's the recommended approach to > write web applications since asp.net is not covered by the ECMA spec, in > other words, what's the equivalent piece of technology in the mono > stack? > > I guess the answer is that right now we don't have one. > There are some ports of some Java stuff already and some in progress. For example spring.net, but I am not really sure if those are the equivalent of ASP.NET, etc. http://www.springframework.net/ ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?
The question was not about how good the asp.net support on mono is right now. The question, a valid one, was what's the recommended approach to write web applications since asp.net is not covered by the ECMA spec, in other words, what's the equivalent piece of technology in the mono stack? I guess the answer is that right now we don't have one. all the best, Rodrigo Em Qui, 2004-06-10 às 21:54, Cory Nelson escreveu: > ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes. > > The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha. Mono's > ASP.NET support is actually very good. > > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this: > > The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms > > subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility > > with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono > > platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux. > > > > > > > > Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for > > Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono. > > > > So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe > > PHP.NET? :) > > ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?
ASP.NET is mainly just a collection of classes. The hack they call PHP doesn't even compare to it haha. Mono's ASP.NET support is actually very good. On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:39:35 +0700, Melinda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this: > The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms > subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility > with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono > platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux. > > I understand if Windows.Forms is controversial because to implement it, > you have to use emulation so why bother. Just use something like Gtk#. > > What about Web services? ASP.NET is controversial according to the FAQ > page. And it said: are not required for the open source Mono > platform, nor > > Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for > Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono. > > So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe > PHP.NET? :) > > ___ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
[Mono-list] Is ASP.NET safe?
Ok, in FAQ page of go-mono website, there are statements like this: The controversial elements are the ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms subsets. Those are convenient for people who need full compatibility with the Windows platform, but are not required for the open source Mono platform, nor integration with today's Mono's rich support of Linux. I understand if Windows.Forms is controversial because to implement it, you have to use emulation so why bother. Just use something like Gtk#. What about Web services? ASP.NET is controversial according to the FAQ page. And it said: are not required for the open source Mono platform, nor Ok, it said ASP.NET is just for people who need full compatibility for Winblows platform, but not required for the open source Mono. So what is the alternative for ASP.NET in open source platform? Maybe PHP.NET? :) ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
