so for distribued transaction with rollbac capability, its not possible?
i say just that because in exploitation or industry, this point is very important !
and its a bad poin nto mono if it cant implement it!
however keep on good work!
regards
Daniel Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Mono does not support COM/OLE2/ActiveX/DCOM/MTS/COM+.
>
> COM+ distributed transactions are in the .NET API
> System.EnterpriseServices. However, Mono only has
> System.EnterpriseServices stubbed.
>
> It would be very difficult to implement COM+ transaction capability in
> Mono.
>
> There are alternative technologies, such as, Remoting.Corba, which could
> be modified to provide transaction support. I am only guessing here
> since I never done CORBA stuff before.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of KiOrKY
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 3:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Mono-list] COM+,mono, and transaction
>
>
> Hi,
> i want to know if the actually state of mono support COM+ distribued
> transactions ( transaction disribuées en francais). It meaans if we make
> robusts mutibase transaction with a rollback possibility. Sorry,
> sometimes my english is poor, especially in the early morning ;) !
> regards
> --
>
> - Gloire au monde libre-
>
> I{ i () r |{ Y
> Debian User
> -
> -- Mathieu PASQUET
> -- Testeur Debian SID
> -- irc: #debian-fr / irc.freenode.net port: 6667
> -- Site: www.fr.debian.org
> -
>
>
> ___
> Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
--
- Gloire au monde libre-
I{ i () r |{ Y
Debian User
-
-- Mathieu PASQUET
-- Testeur Debian SID
-- irc: #debian-fr / irc.freenode.net port: 6667
-- Site: www.fr.debian.org
-
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
