Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Windows version 0.36
frigging mailing lists responding to wrong places unquote On 8/31/07, J Decker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I happen to now know a bit about what sqlite does with locking. If you just do prepare( select blah from somewhere ); step and this does not either get unmade - err destroyed? I forget exactly what the close is or if't snot at the end of the result set.. followed by an insert creates an externally locked condition. Clean up your freaking queries! /unquote On 8/30/07, Derek Scherger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: J Decker wrote: This is only new as of 0.36... previously any locks were unlocked... this is more like a sign that some query is left hanging instead of being completed. It's not that I'm attempting to use it at the same time, but, again previously, I could push/pull from the database and then check out with the server process still running. (Not that it was serving anything at the same time which definately resulted in a database locked condition) I don't know of anything that changed regarding database locks in the 0.35 - 0.36 timeframe but I haven't been following all that closely. If this did work previously it might just have been luck, it's not designed to as far as I know. i.e. I don't *think* there's any code that says close the database after this netsync connection is finished with it. I've replied to the list as well in case someone else knows differently though. Cheers, Derek ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Windows version 0.36
J Decker wrote: This is only new as of 0.36... previously any locks were unlocked... this is more like a sign that some query is left hanging instead of being completed. It's not that I'm attempting to use it at the same time, but, again previously, I could push/pull from the database and then check out with the server process still running. (Not that it was serving anything at the same time which definately resulted in a database locked condition) I don't know of anything that changed regarding database locks in the 0.35 - 0.36 timeframe but I haven't been following all that closely. If this did work previously it might just have been luck, it's not designed to as far as I know. i.e. I don't *think* there's any code that says close the database after this netsync connection is finished with it. I've replied to the list as well in case someone else knows differently though. Cheers, Derek ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Windows version 0.36
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:09:09PM -0600, Derek Scherger wrote: I don't know of anything that changed regarding database locks in the 0.35 - 0.36 timeframe As a minimum, sqlite itself was upgraded. -- Dan. pgpOTU02KhuJ1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Windows version 0.36
J Decker wrote: This really IS a problem will it be sorted out? Are you trying to use a single database for interactive work as well as the server process? If so, this never did work properly and is not currently supported. You must have separate databases for the server process and any client processes. Cheers, Derek ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
