Re: [MOSAIC] picture books and comprehension strategies

2009-11-17 Thread Lois Adams
There are great lists in the Keene and Zimmerman book, 7 Keys to
comprehension, as well as in Mosaic of Thought,, and Harvey and
Goudvais's book Strategies That work.  We used these to select the books
that we have in our baskets for teacher use as mentor texts with our
work here at the school on reading comprehension and strategies.  You
will find that many can be used to teach more than one strategies, and
the important thing is always to model, model, model for kids.
We also found the website 'Into the Book' very helpful for staff,
students and parents.
Good luck.
Lois

>>> rr1...@aol.com 11/16/2009 7:59 PM >>>
I am looking for a list of picture books and the comprehension 
strategies that I could teach from the book.  There must be a list 
somewhere.  Thanks!

Rosie


-Original Message-
From: suzie herb 
To: mosaic@literacyworkshop.org 
Sent: Mon, Nov 16, 2009 5:57 am
Subject: [MOSAIC] reading schemes










I am in a new school that does not have everyone teaching reading in 
the same
way.  The curriculum coordinator is looking at bringing in a reading 
scheme to
ensure that instruction is more consistent across grade levels.  We 
have
classroom libraries but there is concern that implicit teaching of 
strategies is
not really happening.   What do you think about taking this approach 
with
getting into a reading scheme which still has the leveled books but is

more
directed about how to teach what and when?  Experience with a good 
program or
the name of a school or district I could visit to see it first hand 
would also
be appreciated.   Thank you for your help with this one.


   
_
_
Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to Yahoo!7.
Enter now: http://au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/ 
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org 
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.






___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org 
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


-
Statement of Confidentiality
This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged 
information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this 
email from your entire computer system.




___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



Re: [MOSAIC] Running Record/Reading Level Question(s)

2009-06-24 Thread Lois Adams
Jennifer
The fiction/non-fiction split was definitely seen as an advantage by
our teachers too!  Particularly for some of our boys, this allowed a
clearer picture to emerge. 
In the Grade 6 class that I share with the VP, we made the students
aware of what their level was, worked with the teacher librarian to
identify books we had at the various level, and she challenged the kids
to read at their level, and try to improve for each reporting period. 
The students enjoyed this, and found it helpful for taking books out of
the library!
Lois

>>> cnjpal...@aol.com 06/24/09 9:12 AM >>>
 
Lois
Our district assessment committee looked at all the available running 

record kits last summer and decided that Fountas and Pinnell was the
best of the 
 group...more tools for less money...we also liked how there was
fiction 
and  non-fiction in each level.
Jennifer
In a message dated 6/24/2009 5:54:41 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
lmad...@edu.pe.ca writes:

Fountas  and Pinnell have a wonderful assessment kit.  The first one
is
for K -  2, and then there is one for 3 - 8.  We had been using the 
PM
Benchmark kits, but our teachers love the F&P kits because they give 
a
more comprehensive picture.  Some of our teachers even use  the
assessments for reporting to parents, and we have gotten good 
feedback
from this.  Our District is now trying to purchase these kits  for
teachers as the response has been so good.  The District is  looking
to
provide training for a couple of teachers in each school on  these
kits
and they will become the 'resident experts' for each  school.  Our
school
had already purchased 2 kits for each level, so we  have been using
them
for a couple of years.  They do provide a very  comprehensive picture
of
student growth which our teachers  like.
Lois


 
**Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the web.
 
Try the new Email Toolbar now! 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/mail/download.html?ncid=txtlnkusdown0027)
___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org 
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


-
Statement of Confidentiality
This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged 
information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this 
email from your entire computer system.

D?claration de confidentialit?
Le pr?sent message (y compris les annexes) peut contenir des renseignements 
confidentiels ? l'intention d'une personne ou d'un organisme particulier. Si 
vous avez re?u la pr?sente communication par erreur, veuillez en informer 
l'exp?diteur imm?diatement. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire pr?vu, vous 
n'avez pas le droit d'utiliser, divulguer, distribuer, copier ou imprimer ce 
courriel ou encore de vous en servir, et vous devriez l'effacer imm?diatement 
de votre syst?me informatique.
-


___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



Re: [MOSAIC] Running Record/Reading Level Question(s)

2009-06-24 Thread Lois Adams
Fountas and Pinnell have a wonderful assessment kit.  The first one is
for K - 2, and then there is one for 3 - 8.  We had been using the PM
Benchmark kits, but our teachers love the F&P kits because they give a
more comprehensive picture.  Some of our teachers even use the
assessments for reporting to parents, and we have gotten good feedback
from this.  Our District is now trying to purchase these kits for
teachers as the response has been so good.  The District is looking to
provide training for a couple of teachers in each school on these kits
and they will become the 'resident experts' for each school.  Our school
had already purchased 2 kits for each level, so we have been using them
for a couple of years.  They do provide a very comprehensive picture of
student growth which our teachers like.
Lois

>>> ledouxsm...@embarqmail.com 06/23/09 11:36 PM >>>
It sounds to me like the levels you've been given are not necessarily
DRA levels. It's been a few years since I've used the Rigby Benchmark
kit, but I think the levels are different from DRA. The first clue is
that there is no level 32 in the DRA kit. The DRA level for 4th grade
would be a level 40. There is no distinction between beginning of year
4th grade and end of year 4th grade. It's just a 40 for 4th, 50 for 5th,
60 for 6th - you get the idea. It will go up to a level 80. The lower
levels are broken down because there is more development happening at
those levels. The growth you would hope to see for 4th grade would be
moving across the scoring guide (intervention, instructional,
independent, advanced). Of course, going up to level 50 would also be
good, but be careful not to move kids too easily. There is a reason they
don't want you to go on (as directed on the protocol) until the student
is advanced. By 4th grade and on up, deep comprehension is the goal -
you know the saying: In K-3 students learn to read, after that they read
to learn. This is hard for some of our teachers to grasp - they want to
assign a student a level and be done with it. If you don't use the
information from the assessment there is really no point in giving it -
just give the end-of-year state assessments and record those mysterious
lexile scores for parents (they won't know what they mean anyway).

And to answer another one of your questions, I think it is absurd that
there is not a common tool - whether it be Rigby or DRA or any other
measure - it should be the same for all grade levels. If the teachers
are this confused, how can the parents be getting any consistent reports
on their children's' progress What is the purpose of the assessments
you are asked to give 3 times a year? They should be used to guide
instruction - and I would ask the literacy facilitator to provide the
necessary in-service so that can happen. 

All of our teachers give the DRA 3 times a year - I meet with grade
level teams to help them evaluate their results (the DRA has forms and
checklists to help with this). We maintain an assessment wall for all
grades and I also keep a spreadsheet to track each student's progress.
This info is very helpful when our CARE team (that's what we call it -
team that meets to provide assistance to teachers for individual
students who may be struggling) meets on a kid and when a student
qualifies for RtI services. 

Wow - didn't mean for this to get so long - I get a little passionate
about the DRA and its purpose :)

Oh yeah, the DRA 2 kit (4-8) also has bridge level texts for students
reading below grade level.

-Original Message-
From: mosaic-boun...@literacyworkshop.org
[mailto:mosaic-boun...@literacyworkshop.org] On Behalf Of
quin...@comcast.net 
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:06 PM
To: Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Running Record/Reading Level Question(s)





Angela- 



It certainly sounds like your adminster & Literacy Fac. wereextremely
confused. I'm a third grade teacher and I use DRA as an assessment three
times a year. I test in October (i'm looking for level 30, which would
be on level if they did so successfully in the independent category),
March (i'm looking for 34), and June (38). Any number above would be
considered above level and below-below level. Hopefully this helps. The
fifth grade teacher should have a training DVD that came with her kit.
Check it out... 



Gwen 

Original Message - 
From: "Angela Almond"  
To: mosaic@literacyworkshop.org 
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:54:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [MOSAIC] Running Record/Reading Level Question(s) 

I apologize in advance for this very lengthy and somewhat rookie
question. 

I have been teaching for 6 years. My first year I was told I needed to

complete running records on each student. That was it. No kit (didn't 
even know there was such a thing at the time) and no benchmarks or
goals 
as to what fourth grade students should be reading at. I went into the

Literacy Lab and made my own kit, pulling books f

Re: [MOSAIC] On-line Writing Classes

2009-06-16 Thread Lois Adams
Our Grade one teachers are using Lucy Caulkins' primary units of study
and loving them.  It's not on-line, but they do find it user friendly.
Lois

"Commitment with accountability closes the gap between intention and
results."

Sandra Gallagher






Lois M. Adams, 
Principal
LM Montgomery School
lmad...@edu.pe.ca (e-mail)
69 MacWilliams Road
Ch'town, PE
902-368-4150(phone)
902-368-4155(fax)
>>> twestmorel...@redlands.nsw.edu.au 06/16/09 8:49 PM >>>
Can anyone recommend any good on-line writing classes for teachers-
about how to teach Writing to First Graders?
Thanks!


This email (including attachments) is intended for the addressee(s)
named above. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or transmitted
without the sender's consent. It is confidential, subject to copyright
and may be subject to legal or other privilege. None of these rights, or
any other rights, are waived if you have received this email in error or
without permission. If you have received this email in error, please let
the sender know by reply email, delete it from your system, destroy all
copies and do not disclose, use or forward this email. Unless explicitly
attributed, the opinions expressed in this message may not represent the
official position or opinions of SCECGS Redlands Limited and should not
be relied upon. Whilst this email has been scanned by a virus scanner
and all care has been taken, recipients should check this email and any
attachments for the presence of viruses. SCECGS Redlands Limited
disclaims all liability for loss or damage caused by viruses tr
 ansmitted by this email.

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



-
Statement of Confidentiality
This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged 
information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this 
email from your entire computer system.

D?claration de confidentialit?
Le pr?sent message (y compris les annexes) peut contenir des renseignements 
confidentiels ? l'intention d'une personne ou d'un organisme particulier. Si 
vous avez re?u la pr?sente communication par erreur, veuillez en informer 
l'exp?diteur imm?diatement. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire pr?vu, vous 
n'avez pas le droit d'utiliser, divulguer, distribuer, copier ou imprimer ce 
courriel ou encore de vous en servir, et vous devriez l'effacer imm?diatement 
de votre syst?me informatique.
-


___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



Re: [MOSAIC] Do we really need to teach explicit strategies?

2009-06-15 Thread Lois Adams
I would love if you could share that list too.
thanks
Lois

>>> ojen...@sbcglobal.net 06/15/09 7:29 AM >>>
Heather, I would love to see the list your principal came up with. Please 
share. Jennifer

--- On Sat, 6/13/09, Jan Sanders  wrote:


From: Jan Sanders 
Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Do we really need to teach explicit strategies?
To: "Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group" 

Date: Saturday, June 13, 2009, 2:06 PM


Heather-
I have read the first 2 chapters of Readicide on-line and thought I would
share...
This past year (school is out already for me) my principal took on homework
and the idea of getting kids to read.  In the past teachers had the typical
homework -read for 30 minutes and respond in writing, and a math or spelling
or social studies assignment.  Well, after reading Homework Without Tears
and The Homework Myth (I think those are the titles), my principal decided
(with teacher collaboration and agreement) that homework would be "just
read".  That's it.  No written response -unless the child wanted to.  They
had a homework journal to jot notes in, make comments, note the title of a
loved book, etc.  But, it wasn't a requirement.  What was a requirement was
that they have a conversation about what they read, at home, and then come
back to school the next day ready to talk about what they read with a
partner.  In my class they chose their own partner each day.   The principal
even made up a list of comprehension questions that could be used to
generate a conversation.

I taught 3rd grade this year.  It was sketchy at first, the kids telling
their parents they had no homework, not being prepared to have a discussion
the next day, etc...
So, I read a few books aloud and generated a conversation about them using
the questions or sentence starters from the principal's list.  I even
modeled making a few notes in my journal so I would be ready to talk about
the book the next day -sort of like reminders.
And boy did things change!  I had them share their reading the first 10
minutes of each day.  Now they came in ready to talk!  They would find a
partner and share their reading experiences.  There was a bustle of activity
and discussion.  Students were starting to read books other students talked
about.  Students were forming their own book clubs or partnerships.  They
would read the same book and come back ready to talk.  I had a group of boys
(3 of them) each read a sci-fi/fantasy book then come back and share about
how they were the same and different.  None of this was assigned by me.
They just did it because they were interested and excited.  It made the
world of difference for 2 of my students who hated reading and became
"reading animals".  It increased the time spent reading on nearly all my
students.  Reading had become fun and enjoyable, not a task to do.

Many teachers were concerned about the accountability piece.  What about the
child that doesn't read, but pretends they do?  They wanted parent
signatures each night.  I have been down that road, and parents will sign
whether the kid read or not.   In my class, I walked around during the
discussion.  It was easy to figure out who had not read.  I had individual
conferences with them to find out why.  Sometimes there is a valid reason.
By a month into it, all but 1 or 2 were reading every night.  That was much
better than the return rate of worksheet homework.  When we gathered
together for the first lesson of the day, I would often call on one or two
students to share what their partner had said about reading.  This made them
accountable listeners.  They had to be able to share what was said to them.
It also made them active listeners in that if they didn't understand
something, they asked questions so they could share with others what was
said.

I loved this homework and it made many students love reading once again.

Jan
Unless we reach into our students¹ hearts, we have no entry into their
minds.
-Regie Routman


On 6/12/09 6:02 PM, "Heather Green"  wrote:

> I am reading through the responses now-- very interesting. Thanks for
> sharing that link.
> So, I just can't stop thinking about this now.  This year in my 1st grade
> room we kind of did Daily 5, but since we switch classes for reading, we
> only got an hour of daily 5 time in a day.  I split the hour into two
> sessions where they could choose either Read to Self or Work on Writing. At
> the end of each session I would give some students time to share what they
> were reading.  I think this was the BEST thing I could have ever done.  The
> kids like to hear each other talk about books, especially ones that kept
> coming up again and again.  There were always about 10 kids waving their
> hands in the air to be the next to read the book.
> I think this created an atmosphere where kids loved reading.  I had a few
> parents say to me at the end of the year "thank you for helping so-and-so
> love reading again".  I never gave much thought to why this occurred until
> th

Re: [MOSAIC] possible weekly study of strategies?

2009-06-07 Thread Lois Adams
Hi Sharon,
   We did some work on this as part of our school development plan, and
I would be more than willing to share what resources we used, and to
learn from everyone else, as we are continuing to do this in the fall.
Lois - Primary Guided reading and Grade 6 

"Commitment with accountability closes the gap between intention and
results."

Sandra Gallagher






Lois M. Adams, 
Principal
LM Montgomery School
lmad...@edu.pe.ca (e-mail)
69 MacWilliams Road
Ch'town, PE
902-368-4150(phone)
902-368-4155(fax)
>>> lh...@cinci.rr.com 06/07/09 8:37 PM >>>
I am fairly new to this group and now that I'm out for the summer I feel
like I have time to really think about how to use the different
strategies
as well as research more information.  Forgive me if this has been done,
but
would anyone be interested in doing a weekly study of each of the
strategies
- for example, one week on questioning, the next on visualizing, etc? 
Each
week we could talk about different resources you use, books, strategies
for
teaching and sharing any materials you have created.  I'd be willing to
create a website linking anything shared so that we could all have ready
access to the materials.

 

If this has been done already or you know of somewhere with all of this
information, please let me know.  If you are interested in doing a
weekly
strategy study, please respond and perhaps we can set something up.

 

Sharon

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



-
Statement of Confidentiality
This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged 
information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this 
email from your entire computer system.

D?claration de confidentialit?
Le pr?sent message (y compris les annexes) peut contenir des renseignements 
confidentiels ? l'intention d'une personne ou d'un organisme particulier. Si 
vous avez re?u la pr?sente communication par erreur, veuillez en informer 
l'exp?diteur imm?diatement. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire pr?vu, vous 
n'avez pas le droit d'utiliser, divulguer, distribuer, copier ou imprimer ce 
courriel ou encore de vous en servir, et vous devriez l'effacer imm?diatement 
de votre syst?me informatique.
-


___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.



Re: [MOSAIC] Social Studies Leveled Books

2009-01-14 Thread Lois Adams
Hi Rachel,
   I am writing from Canada, but we have used books with our struggling
students in this area from McGraw-Hill Wright Group and from Nelson. 
Just google either and you should get their American distributor, and an
on-line catalogue.
Hope this is helpful
Lois

The real winners in life are the people who look at every situation
with an expectation that they can make it work or make it better."

Barbara Pletcher





Lois M. Adams, 
Principal
LM Montgomery School
lmad...@edu.pe.ca (e-mail)
69 MacWilliams Road
Ch'town, PE
902-368-4150(phone)
902-368-4155(fax)

>>> Rachel Radojevic  01/14/09 5:30 PM >>>
Hello

I have been asked by my principal to supplement the third grade Social
Studies curriculum with leveled readers for struggling students.  The
current textbook that these struggling readers are using is way too
difficult for them.  Does anyone know of any companies that have a
variety
of leveled readers?
 
Thanks for your help!
 
Rachel Radojevic
rradoje...@d123.org 


___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org 
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.


-
Statement of Confidentiality
This message (including attachments) may contain confidential or privileged 
information intended for a specific individual or organization. If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, and should promptly delete this 
email from your entire computer system.

D?claration de confidentialit?
Le pr?sent message (y compris les annexes) peut contenir des renseignements 
confidentiels ? l'intention d'une personne ou d'un organisme particulier. Si 
vous avez re?u la pr?sente communication par erreur, veuillez en informer 
l'exp?diteur imm?diatement. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire pr?vu, vous 
n'avez pas le droit d'utiliser, divulguer, distribuer, copier ou imprimer ce 
courriel ou encore de vous en servir, et vous devriez l'effacer imm?diatement 
de votre syst?me informatique.
-

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Adams, Lois
TEL;WORK:368-4150
ORG:;L.M. Montgomery Elementary
TEL;PREF;FAX:368-4155
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:lmad...@edu.pe.ca
N:Adams;Lois
TITLE:Teacher
END:VCARD

___
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.