Re: HTML -> XHTML in Mozilla's help files

2004-01-11 Thread Margaret Moser
I've been looking for a way to help with the Mozilla documentation. I 
have been a tech writer (though I haven't done too much software doc) 
and I know Perl pretty well. Please let me know here or at

margaret -at- oddpost . com

if I can help.

cheers,
Margaret


R.J. Keller wrote:
Ricardo Palomares Martinez wrote:

Yes, it would be the best solution. Even more, if people at 
mozilla.org is using any specific tool to manage the HTML -> XHTML 
conversion, it would be fine if they told us which and how, in order 
for us to follow the same process in the translated help files.

Regards.


I am responsible for the HTML->XHTML conversion, and I used TidyGUI 
(http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ablavier/TidyGUI) and I manually went through 
and updated the anchors.

I apologize for all the work I'm probably putting you guys through. It 
is beneficial though. The mail help docs (when I converted them) were 
about a third smaller than before. The new system is also easier for 
working with anchors in previous docs, too.

I'm hoping to get a Perl script working that will fix all of the anchors 
correctly, but I don't know much Perl so it'll be slow :(.

--R.J.

___
mozilla-documentation mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation


Re: HTML -> XHTML in Mozilla's help files

2004-01-01 Thread Ricardo Palomares Martinez
R.J. Keller escribió:
I am responsible for the HTML->XHTML conversion, and I used TidyGUI 
(http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ablavier/TidyGUI) and I manually went through 
and updated the anchors.


Thanks a lot! I'll download it and play with mail_help.html, which is, 
you know, a bit long. :-)


I apologize for all the work I'm probably putting you guys through. It 
is beneficial though. The mail help docs (when I converted them) were 
about a third smaller than before. The new system is also easier for 
working with anchors in previous docs, too.


Yep, and it allows better styles applying. It's just that we weren't 
prepared in advance for that, but I realize it's neccessary. :-)

Thanks for the info, and happy new year.

--
"Software is like sex. It's better when it's free" (Linus Torvalds)
___
mozilla-documentation mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation


Re: HTML -> XHTML in Mozilla's help files

2003-12-30 Thread R.J. Keller
Ricardo Palomares Martinez wrote:

Yes, it would be the best solution. Even more, if people at 
mozilla.org is using any specific tool to manage the HTML -> XHTML 
conversion, it would be fine if they told us which and how, in order 
for us to follow the same process in the translated help files.

Regards.


I am responsible for the HTML->XHTML conversion, and I used TidyGUI 
(http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ablavier/TidyGUI) and I manually went through 
and updated the anchors.

I apologize for all the work I'm probably putting you guys through. It 
is beneficial though. The mail help docs (when I converted them) were 
about a third smaller than before. The new system is also easier for 
working with anchors in previous docs, too.

I'm hoping to get a Perl script working that will fix all of the anchors 
correctly, but I don't know much Perl so it'll be slow :(.

--R.J.

___
mozilla-documentation mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation


Re: HTML -> XHTML in Mozilla's help files

2003-12-30 Thread Ricardo Palomares Martinez
Martijn Ras escribió:
Heya Folks,

Translationwise this html -> xhtml conversion is a pain in the neck ...


:-) Yes, I agree. Despite this, it's fair to admit that more changes 
had come in past releases due just to updates in the content itself.


This leads me to the following questions:

Who's in charge of the conversion to xhtml?

Would it be possible to split work on the file into a couple of updates 
instead of one gigantic like currently happens?

Suggested update scheme:

1) html -> xhtml conversion (leaves text intact only brushes tags)
2) Apply anchor/link naming convention
3) Rearrange text if needs be


Yes, it would be the best solution. Even more, if people at 
mozilla.org is using any specific tool to manage the HTML -> XHTML 
conversion, it would be fine if they told us which and how, in order 
for us to follow the same process in the translated help files.

Regards.

--
"Software is like sex. It's better when it's free" (Linus Torvalds)
___
mozilla-documentation mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation


Re: HTML -> XHTML in Mozilla's help files

2003-12-29 Thread Martijn Ras
Heya Folks,

Translationwise this html -> xhtml conversion is a pain in the neck ...

In itself the conversion (which is a good thing) shouldn't really need 
cause huge differences in the files. Rearranging the text, updating all 
anchors and links within the file at the same time is causing a shitload 
of work for translators.

Here's my practice at the moment:

1) Take a diff of the original html and upgraded xhtml file.

2) Rid the diff of all tags, both html and xhtml.

3) Compare the text that's left in the diff.

4a) If 3) didn't show too many differences, copy the upgraded xhtml into
the translation and merge translated contents of the html file.
4b) If 3) shows no comparison, discard the translated html file, copy
the xhtml file and translate it (again).
This leads me to the following questions:

Who's in charge of the conversion to xhtml?

Would it be possible to split work on the file into a couple of updates 
instead of one gigantic like currently happens?

Suggested update scheme:

1) html -> xhtml conversion (leaves text intact only brushes tags)
2) Apply anchor/link naming convention
3) Rearrange text if needs be
Mazzel,

Martijn.
___
mozilla-documentation mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation