Re: Win ME, moz starting/window opening hangs

2001-03-10 Thread Orrin Edenfield

Have you tried deleting the file mozreg.dat, which is probably somewhere 
in your C:\Windows (maybe C:\Windows\System) folder?  Search for it with 
Find All Files, and see what you find, if you get rid of it, I think it 
is rebuilt, and if not, you might have to install Mozilla again.

Tony Shepps wrote:

 Faithful, long-time moz advocate with half a clue here.
 
 I have seen a degrading condition on two different WinME systems.  Starting 
 moz from scratch, I either get the splash or nothing, more likely nothing.  
 If I open the Close Program box with ctrl-alt-del, Mozilla is there, is not 
 listed as "not responding", but is not in the taskbar either, nor can it be 
 opened with alt-tab.  If I try to start it again, all I get is more 
 instances in the Close Program box.  Closing them out one-by-one, once in a 
 while one of them "comes to life", shows the splash and then operates 
 normally.  Once in a while they can't even be closed out.
 
 Once up and running, if I try to open a new window, either by right-clicking 
 and selecting "open in new window" on a link, or by hitting ctrl-N, the new 
 window takes about 30 seconds to open.
 
 This has happened on the latest nightly builds as well as some older 
 builds.  Starting with -ProfileManager does not have any impact on the 
 problem.  Deleting anything in \windows relating to Moz and reinstalling 
 from scratch seemed to help for a day, but then degraded.
 
 In previous incarnations I had different themes running but after reading 
 about the problems they might cause, I switched back to Modern in the last 
 reinstall and the problem is still here.
 
 
 -= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-
 http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
 -==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-


-- 
Orrin Edenfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://orrinrule.com





Re: Idea: Download History log file/button

2001-03-10 Thread Orrin Edenfield

If there isn't enough support for this feature at mozilla.org (because 
people want to get a product out...  I've heard something about wanting 
0.9 to be feature complete?) then you could start a project at 
mozdev.org.  There are a couple other Mozilla projects there.

Greg Breland wrote:

 XUL should really help implement a lot of browser "helper" tools like this.
 I think just making a download tab on the sidebar that shows all files that
 are currently being downloaded as well as all files that were downloaded in
 the past X days would be a great feature.  I hate having 4 extra apps in my
 task bar for file downloads.  
 
 I think the screen shot from icab look great.  Is there already an
 enhancement bug on this?
 
 
 There has been a Download Manager in the Mac version of IE 
 since version 
 4.0, or maybe even earlier.  Other browsers I've used with a 
 "download 
 history"/"download manager" include iCab and Opera.  Take a 
 look at the 
 existing implementations, and see what you like and don't like...
 

-- 
Orrin Edenfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://orrinrule.com





Re: NS6 vs Moz0.8 CPU usage

2001-03-10 Thread Robert Ennis

I agree with you.

Mama Cass Elliot?? Don't choke on your lunch.

See ya, would definitely not wanna be ya...

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mama Cass Elliot)
 Organization: Beautiful Thing - Jamie loves Ste.
 Newsgroups: netscape.public.mozilla.general
 Date: 10 Mar 2001 07:15:20 GMT
 Subject: Re: NS6 vs Moz0.8 CPU usage
 
 In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard NeTDeMoN say these
 wise words: 
 
 Why don't you upgrade to NS6.01?
 
 Err...
 
 That's not an upgrade from Mozilla 0.8 .
 
 Moz 0.8 is superior to anything currently available from Netscape. Netscape
 6.01 isn't worth the download. Best bet is to stay with N4.76 until Mozilla
 is released as 1.0, and then use Mozilla - as it doesn't have all the
 commercial detritus that N6 has.
 
 
 seeya - wouldn't wanna be ya.
 
 Mama Cass
 
 -- 
 For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.





Re: Win ME, moz starting/window opening hangs

2001-03-10 Thread Tony Shepps

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Orrin Edenfield) wrote
Have you tried deleting the file mozreg.dat, which is probably somewhere 
in your C:\Windows (maybe C:\Windows\System) folder?  Search for it with 
Find All Files, and see what you find, if you get rid of it, I think it 
is rebuilt, and if not, you might have to install Mozilla again.

Yes.  There is no such file on my system!


-= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-




Layout

2001-03-10 Thread Mexaner

I have a small problem:

I installed Netscape 6 this version of Netscape is sponsored by Lycos. Now 
up left is standing "Lycos Europe". I have already searched in the 
registry.
How can I remove this? 

Thanks





Gamble Online! Highest Payouts!

2001-03-10 Thread casinoman

Loosest play around
 
MEGA FUN

http://www.luckystudcasino.com/luckystud/links/14885.html

PLAY ONLINE

All the best games are here NO DOWNLOADS required Private and secure*cash payouts 
Don't be fooled by 
imitators. We are the one! FEMALE FRIENDLY with LIVE CUSTOMER SUPPORT 24/7 

http://www.luckystudcasino.com/luckystud/links/14885.html

All the best games at your fingertips.  Win big money right from home.
FAST PAYOUTS

http://www.luckystudcasino.com/luckystud/links/14885.html






Re: NS6 vs Moz0.8 CPU usage

2001-03-10 Thread Byron Miller

are rather pathetic since even KDE's Konquorer, IE 5.x and Opera are much
more capable and stable at this point.  2 1/2 years later i would have
expected much more then just another browser.

Would have been much nicer if they had released v 1.0 2 years ago, 1.5
with new features 1 year ago and 2.0 buy now with all the glory it claims to
have.

See ya, wouldn't wanna beee yaaa

"Mama Cass Elliot" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard NeTDeMoN say these
 wise words:

 Why don't you upgrade to NS6.01?

 Err...

 That's not an upgrade from Mozilla 0.8 .

 Moz 0.8 is superior to anything currently available from Netscape.
Netscape
 6.01 isn't worth the download. Best bet is to stay with N4.76 until
Mozilla
 is released as 1.0, and then use Mozilla - as it doesn't have all the
 commercial detritus that N6 has.


 seeya - wouldn't wanna be ya.

 Mama Cass

 --
 For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.






Re: Mozilla as server?

2001-03-10 Thread Gedeon Herschberg

What I Mozilla?
I installed netscape 6, and I think I remember seeing a directory called 
Mozilla under which my mail would have been listed. However I decided to 
reinstall the netscape 6 program in another drive directory (partitioned 
from my only hardware drive as D). Here there was no Mozilla directory 
but netscape 6 works - sort off.

I have trouble getting all the news groups from my ISP news server. Yet 
I can get all of these using Netscape 4x! - so my iSP server has them. 
One example is alt.photography which becomes available with nerscpae 4x 
but not with netscape 6. What is the explanation, and is it anything to 
do with "Mozilla", and the fact that I do not have netscape all on drive 
C. This makes no sense as my netscape 4x files are also on drive D and 
work OK. Similarly there is another problem: With netscape 4x, I am 
informed if I have new mail by a sound and a green arrow on the mail 
icon, but with netscape 6 I can only ask it to automatically download 
every so often which it does only after I first 'get" my mail initially 
and there is no sound and if I do not download my mail initially I may 
not be informed I have any. If I set it to inform me bu not to 
automatically download , then I do not get informed at all. Do I have to 
set both the inform and also the keep on server options?

In summary, there are mail and news problems with netscape 6 that do not 
occur with netscape 4x - what can be done?

Regards,
Gedeon