Re: mozilla 0.9.6 -- a step back?
Christian Biesinger wrote: - the print preview function has no undo (besides doing a reload) ... why not opening a separate (browser-)window for the preview? http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109121 It was decided that a undo isn't necessary. That was a bad descision. I too had difficulties figuring out how get out of print preview. This should be reconsidered - maybe a *discoverable* button should appear during print previwe called Close Print Preview (or similar). -- Regards, Peter Lairo
Re: mozilla 0.9.6 -- a step back?
I support this requirement. It is logical to just open a new browser window to display the Print Preview. This will fix all the issues raised in the bug. - Navneet On 11/22/2001 3:01 PM, Peter Lairo wrote: Christian Biesinger wrote: - the print preview function has no undo (besides doing a reload) ... why not opening a separate (browser-)window for the preview? http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109121 It was decided that a undo isn't necessary. That was a bad descision. I too had difficulties figuring out how get out of print preview. This should be reconsidered - maybe a *discoverable* button should appear during print previwe called Close Print Preview (or similar).
WARNING: BrowserG could destroy your Mozilla Profile!
I suggest to *not* test or use BrowserG until this serious issue is resolved. I have posted a description of this serious problem in the bug shown below: Installing BrowserG causes Regular Mozilla Profile to Stop Functioning http://mozdev.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=676 -- Regards, Peter Lairo
Re: mozilla 0.9.6 -- a step back?
Navneet Karnani wrote: I support this requirement. It is logical to just open a new browser window to display the Print Preview. This will fix all the issues raised in the bug. maybe a *chromeless* window ;) -- Regards, Peter Lairo
Re: mozilla 0.9.6 -- a step back?
Peter Lairo wrote: maybe a *chromeless* window ;) ...with only a *Close* and a *Print* button. -- Regards, Peter Lairo
Isn't it time you stopped the snoring in your house?
Title: SnoreRX The problem of snoring is more frequent in males and overweight persons, and it usually grows worse with age.A 100% natural product which can markedly reduce or eliminate snoring. This unique combination of digestive enzymes and natural herbs metabolizes excess drainage and shrinks nasal and respiratory membranes, thereby opening air passages to eliminate snoring. * Snore Rx provides an all-natural herbal remedy to relieve symptoms of snoring. * This formulation of highly effective natural herbs and enzymes work gently together to relieve snoring. * You will breathe, sleep and feel better. * Snoring can be dangerous to your health, and annoying to our loved ones. * Safe and effective with no known side effects! SNORERX CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION Snoring is a major problem for many people. In fact, in the U.S. alone, over 85 million people suffer with snoring. This figure doesn't take into consideration the needless suffering of the loved ones living with them. Sleep deprived nights lead to irritation, tiredness, and a possible growing division or alienation between partners. Give the gift of Snore Rxnot only to yourselfbut to the one you love! Click Here for More Information Snore Rx has been sold to over 350,000 satisfied customers over the last year. Please take the time to browse our web site to learn more for yourself about this highly unique remedy. You and your loved ones will be glad you did. Thank you! To be removed from any further mailings please visit us here.
Quiz Your Students Online
Title: eQuizPro V2 Promotion To Be Removed Off Our List Goto End Of Document. If you have difficulty viewing this email click here DYNAMIC web based generation of quizzes. No need for designing or programming any web pages. FULL ADMINISTRATION for quiz creation. UNLIMITED number questions and with 5 possible answers on each question. UNLIMITED number of quizzes that can be created. UNLIMITED number of students. UNLIMITED number of courses. UNLIMITED number of classes. SECURE coding. FULL SOURCE CODE INCLUDED Click To Be Removed Off Our Mailing ListClick To Be Added To Our Mailing List
Re: mozilla 0.9.6 -- a step back?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geraint Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter Lairo wrote: Peter Lairo wrote: maybe a *chromeless* window ;) ...with only a *Close* and a *Print* button. You should also have a 'page setup' button. Currently you can change to landscape, modify margins, select printer etc. only when you actually print. In fact I couldn't figure out how to set up a preview in landscape mode at all :-(. Couldn't agree more. The only way to get a landscape preview, is to print the page in landscape, and then do a preview... I also believe there should be some sort of print scaling. The preview often show some of the content beyond the edge of the paper, and then what do you do? Steinar Kaarø
yahoo privacy
Hi, does anyone know how I can get mozilla to store my login info for mail.yahoo.com I know it can cause the first time I switched from NS4.7x to Mozilla 0.9.x (can't remember the 'x's), it used to do it. However, I've never been able to replicate this. Any ideas? HL
Mozilla 0.9.6 Java Plug-in 1.3.1_01 no go?
I downloaded the latest Java Plugin from Sun http://java.sun.com/getjava/download.html It's version 1.3.1_01 but it does not work in Mozilla 0.9.6. So I had to install the 1.3.1 and now I got 2 java installs and 2 control panel applets. Is there a way to get version 1.3.1_01 to work? /VH
Re: Favicon spam
Greg Miller wrote: Last I heard, the industry averages were supposed to be something like 3:1 pageviews-to-users ratio and 50% repeat visitors. So the number of favicon 404s would be approximately 1/6 of the total number of pageviews. That would only be true if every site consisted of just a single page, which is clearly untrue. From what I've read so far, the current implementation requests the favicon once for each domain. Erm, no. It would be *untrue* if each site consisted of a single page. Yeah, sorry, I misread what you'd written. Is this per web site, or per domain name? I'm not sure how relevant those figures are anyway, they certainly don't gell with the patterns I've seen on sites on which I have access to the statistics. There are few sites these days on which you can navigate to what you what by visiting just three pages, and those on which you can are likely to be part of a number of sites hosted on a single domain (i.e. geocities.com). I imagine the above industry averages are largely influenced by behemoths like AOL and MSN. account the average number of images/stylesheets/javascript appearing in external files. As this should be based on resources requested, not pageviews as that is misleading. I thought I was quite clear about the fact that this was only a matter of pageviews. I don't know of any good web-wide stats for requests or bandwidth, and I suspect no useful stats could be determined since things vary too widely. Personally I think in this case specific examples would be far more useful than industry averages anyway, as they are far to swayed by huge hosts. You should probably also take into account the % of /favicon.ico associated with domains, as those wouldn't appear as 404s (i.e. Netscape Enterprise Server seems to come with one as default). From a bandwidth perspective, those are even worse than 404s. As I mentioned before, averages are no consolation to the people getting hit with worst-case scenarios. But I thought part of your argument was about 404 errors in weblogs, these wouldn't occur when favicons already exist, so in that case its no more a bandwidth problem than any other image. The 404 issue is the major problem with this, requesting resources that don't exist, rather than the bandwidth. ian.
Re: yahoo privacy
Try Edit/Preferences/Privacy Security/Web Passwords/View Stored Passwords/Passwords Never Saved and clear mail.yahoo.com from the list :-) Hilkiah Lavinier wrote: Hi, does anyone know how I can get mozilla to store my login info for mail.yahoo.com I know it can cause the first time I switched from NS4.7x to Mozilla 0.9.x (can't remember the 'x's), it used to do it. However, I've never been able to replicate this. Any ideas? HL -- Vizimarks - the Internet Scrapbook! Visual Bookmarks, Online Favorites, and an Online Scrapbook. Visit http://www.vizimarks.com today.
Re: Favicon spam
Greg Miller wrote: That's not a terrible increase in bandwidth (the exact figures would depend on protocol overhead and such), but web hosts have a nasty habit of charging for disk space, which often includes the space for those log files that shoot up by over 20% if everyone adopts this favicon practice or 7% with the hypothetical 30% marketshare that was mentioned earlier. It might be going out on a limb, but it sounds as though the real bandwidth problem is the collection of logfiles to generate statistics... I've encountered this, the logfiles tend to take up far more space than the websites they cater for and quickly eat up gigabytes of space, but this is really a different issue that argues for better management of logfiles. If your site is small I see little point in collecting anything but minimal filtered statistics, a summary rather than lots of raw data. As a user I've found the feature quite useful, especially when using tabbed browsing, and I can't see that either Mozilla, Konqueror or even Netscape, have the clout to get people to put link's to a favicon on every page of their site. Whereas I've been surprised by how many sites do have them... Though, as useful as I find this, I think that checking for favicons when: 1) bookmarking 2) visiting a bookmarked site without a cached 404 for the favicon would be a better compromise than the current one. The reason being that you'd get a favicon for you most visited sites. Why would I want an icon cached for any old site I just happened to visit? They're only really useful for sites I visit regularly. 2) is for sites I already haved bookmarked which may not yet have acquired a favicon. It may cause a bit of noise in logs, but a far more acceptable amount, takes advantage of the caching of favicon status and only comes from visitors who care enough to bookmark your pages. You could also have a pref use favourite icons for bookmarks to let this be turned on or off. ian.
Re: [Fwd: ] you can try this mail
Travis Crump wrote: It displays perfectly though I can't read Chinese I can pick out that they are all valid characters... The subject doesn't display correctly in the title bar on Windows, but this is a known limitation and as I understand it very hard to fix since the look of it is controlled internally by windows. The subject comes out fine in both the header pane and the mailbox content's list pane... exactly ! btw, since both the header pane and the content pane display correctly, i wonder why he wants to check the title ? i know i never ...
Re: delete mail
If netscape 6 / Mozilla works with this as Communicator - and you haven't emptied the trash in N6 / Mozilla choose view messages all you should be able to see all your mail. If you have emptied the trash and the folder has been compacted then the mail is gone. Also with Imap you need to go to Mail set up locate the command remove mail from mail server when removed locally or something equiv. Be sure to check this on periodically or else you imap provider will be an unhappy camper. lambliu wrote: apparently, Netscape marked this mail instead remove it but can you tell me what mark netscape used? I want get my mail back. thanks. Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote: Garth Wallace wrote: lambliu wrote: Hi, When I delete a mail from imap server or local folder, it seems that netscape dose not really delete it, in stead, it delete something so I can not see that mail in netscape but my mailbox become larger and larger. How can netscape delete the mail really for me? Compact Folders Should that not be a bug? In Communicator everytime you empty the trash within communicator it automatically Compacts the folders. Just asking. Not trying to start a fight. -- --- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:275-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet --- If it's fixed, don't break it! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/america/default.htm http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/message/default.htm
Re: Can't get to Hotmail
[posted and mailed]
And it came to pass that CSM Dave wrote:
Using Win98 and Netscape 4.7.5, for the past few days each
time I try to access Hotmail.com, I get the message no data
found. I can access Hotmail using IE 5.5. Why can't I get
to Hotmail? TIA
Communicator 4.7 is off topic here. This group is for
discussion of the new Mozilla browser package, which is
unrelated to Communicator.
SEE snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
Any given program, when running, needs debugging. Any debugged
program is obsolete.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
Re: Moz mail
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], n@a says... alpha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 20 Nov 2001: I see that you think that I'm a idiot who can't set up a mail account. But after been using alot of difftrent mail clients and when using mozilla mail and when I cannot set it up in the normal time (WITH THE CORRECT) L/PW,mail smtp servers and it still does not work. Then who is it to blame, me or... maybe is this to difficult to setup. You are to blame: Edit, ...Account Settings, Add Account: ISP or Email provider, Name Email address, POP/IMAP, server name, Username, account name. Why is this hard? After really diggin into mozilla I did finaly last night get moz mail to work!. But the problems have not had anyhting to do with the tips I have been given here!.
Re: Finding talkback incident data
Michael Gratton wrote: Is there anyway to get at the stack trace reported in a Talkback incident? I clicked Send accidently before looking at the trace and I'd really like to see where the thing is crashing. The talkback client itself does not give a stack trace anyway. The only way to get it would be to file a bugzilla bug, give the talkback id there and then somebody can get the stack trace and attach it to the bug.
Re: Permission denied to get property Window.scriptglobals
I was wondering if anyone ever found a solution for this error. I am encountering the same problem, however it is when I try an change a location of a frameset using JavaScript. Thanks, Jeff Yatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:9rh2dk$ltv$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Can someone tell me what this means, or rather what (generally) triggers this? I recall getting this error when trying to use javascript to fillin a form in a different frame, on a different site. This shouldn't be possible, should it? Asking too many questions again :) - William
Printing page setup
Hi, in NS 4.x there was an option to set the border and the includes on the printout. I miss this option in mozilla 0.9x / NS6. Can anybody help me? thanks a lot
Re: mozilla 0.9.6 -- a step back?
Andrea Monni wrote: Peter Lairo wrote: maybe a *chromeless* window ;) ...with only a *Close* and a *Print* button. ... and a button for choosing how many pages show in the screen, a' la MS Office. Andrea I use FinePrint http://www.fineprint.com .. It installs as a Printer and has all the features of print preview, multiple pages, etc . This of course isn't a fix but rather a nice alternative. -- Jay Garcia - Netscape Champion Novell MCNE-5/CNI-Networking Technologies-OSI UFAQ - http://www.UFAQ.org
Re: Printing page setup
And it came to pass that ZZT wrote:
Hi,
in NS 4.x there was an option to set the border and the
includes on the printout. I miss this option in mozilla 0.9x
/ NS6. Can anybody help me?
thanks a lot
JAy just posted this in re: mozilla 0.9.6 - a step back?;
I use FinePrint http://www.fineprint.com .. It installs as a
Printer
and has all the features of print preview, multiple pages, etc
.
This of course isn't a fix but rather a nice alternative.
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
A sweater is a garment worn by a child when his mother feels
chilly.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
is there any way to get past this script?
A website (www.canadasportswear.com) is using this script to ban all
Netscape and Mozilla branded browsers from their site, or rather the
webdesigner they hired to do their web design did so. I've managed to
get into pages beyond the frontpage, and for the most part Mozilla
handles it perfectly (there are a couple IE Only features, but nothing
integral to the functionality or appearance of the site) - but I can't
figure out how to get into the site through the front door using Moz,
changing the UA string doesn't seem to work - is there anything else
that might do the trick?
If anyone wants to pull an Evangelism trip, his phone number is on the
website.
/script
csbrowser href=netscape.html ns=0,0,0,0,0 ie=0,0,1,1,1
script!--
var skipPage = true; bAgent = window.navigator.userAgent; bAppName =
window.navigator.appName; bMozIdx = bAgent.indexOf(Mozilla/);
if ((bAppName.indexOf(Explorer) = 0) (bAgent.indexOf(Mozilla/4)
= 0)) skipPage = false;
if ((bAppName.indexOf(Explorer) = 0) (bAgent.indexOf(Mozilla/5)
= 0)) skipPage = false;
if ((bAppName.indexOf(Explorer) = 0) (bMozIdx = 0)
(parseInt(bAgent.substring(bMozIdx+8, bMozIdx+10)) = 6)) skipPage =
false;
if (skipPage) { location = /*URL*/'netscape.html'; }
//--/script
Patrick
Re: mozilla 0.9.6 -- a step back?
Yes but this does not work other than windows --
Mozilla 0.9.6, ummmm
I have upgraded to 0.9.6 from 0.9.5. Things work pretty nice, but about:plugins seems to not like plugger.so. The page just shows plugger.so and then it stops; it does not show any other plugins. If I remove plugger.so then it shows all plugins in the system. What if more curious is that plugins seems to work even if they are not displayed in about:plugins. Anyone has the same problem?. --
Re: is there any way to get past this script?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Patrick Gallagher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A website (www.canadasportswear.com) is using this script to ban all Netscape and Mozilla branded browsers from their site In addition, it has got: * a Flash intro * a script that makes the window cover the entire screen * meta name=generator content=Adobe GoLive 5 Anyway, the site works in Opera if the UA string is spoofed. Apparently, they want document.all in addition to the browser name. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
Re: is there any way to get past this script?
Will do :) Christopher Jahn wrote: And it came to pass that Ryan wrote: I sent them an e-mail message, If you hear back, I'd love to read their response.
Updated Spel checker faq
Does Mozilla have a spell checker? Yes, but the only copy is on my computer, send me your emails and I will check them for you. I mean does it include one with the distribution No. I alreedy no how to spel. Will Version 1.0 of Mozila include a spel cheker? No, version 1 will only include a telnet client for mail. You may telnet to the smtp port you wish to send an email and type your email. I don't need to recieve mail so thats all I'm programming. Version 2 will include a copy of Pine but we will remove the spell checker to saave space. Remember, open source code must alway use the least lines of code even if critial features are missing. Version 3 will include an arabic only spel checker. The mail reader in mozilla is such a piece of shit only people in third world countries will use it anyway. I wont use Mozilla if it doesn't have a spel checker. Good, we don't want anyone to use it. The only reason I wrote a mail client was to pass my highschool BASIC programming class. Well I am your customer and the customer is alway right. Mozilla does not have customers, users and hardly any developers. In fact, we are suprised the web site is still up. Couldn't someone post a reasonable explaination of why there isn't a spel checker on mozilla's web site insead of these dumb faqs? Look, I hardly have enough time get to school and code the mail class. After programing class I only have 10 minutes to get changed for gym class. If I'm late the basketball team will give me another atomic wedgy. -Gerv
Re: Updated Spel checker faq
Gerv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 22 Nov 2001: Does Mozilla have a spell checker? -Gerv I dunno, I think the last one was more sarcastic... -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
