Re: Print Preview

2001-12-23 Thread Øyvind Berg

Bert Garcia wrote:


 Same thing here, locked up tight, cache gone.

See it here too, both milestone and latest nightly. Running w2k

-- 
MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
  [icq#:123433   ||  ElaCin@EFNet  ]





Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla

2001-10-30 Thread Øyvind Berg

 
 Also, for the curious (like me), I already tried the 6.2 spellchecker 
 and it doesn't work so dont even bother installing.


Works excellent for me. And also, 6.2 seems very polished, but i might as well just 
throw it out because there's no tabs :-(

Or wait a minute! does multizilla work?
*checking*



-- 
MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
  [icq#:123433   ||  ElaCin@EFNet  ]





Re: Profile sharing between 6.2 and Mozilla

2001-10-30 Thread Øyvind Berg

Øyvind Berg wrote:


 Works excellent for me. And also, 6.2 seems very polished, but i might 
 as well just throw it out because there's no tabs :-(
 
 Or wait a minute! does multizilla work?
 *checking*


Nah, too bad. doesnt work :-/



-- 
MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
  [icq#:123433   ||  ElaCin@EFNet  ]





New CompuServe may ship without IE

2001-10-18 Thread Øyvind Berg

Wel,, some of you ppl may have seen this by now, but check 
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-7573837.html?tag=mn_hd

this have to be a good thing =)

-- 
MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
  [icq#:123433   ||  ElaCin@EFNet  ]





Re: Mozilla 0.9.4 broken with Windows XP

2001-09-15 Thread Øyvind Berg

Bill Lee wrote:

 
 
 Warren Bell wrote:
 
 I just downloaded and did a clean install of the 0.9.4 release for win32
 on WinXP Pro.  I run a straight connection to the net through my home
 network.  The machine in question always has a connection.  When
 starting up Mozilla I always get the Connection refused or can find the
 site error message.  It can't connect to any sites.

 If anyone wants to file a bug on it, feel free.  I'm reporting it here
 because I don't have time to file bugs.

 If you've ever filed one, you see that it takes just about as long to 
 write your email...
 
 
 bl
 
 

I too have had a bunch of problems running Moz under WinXP. no nightly 
from the last month or so has worked perfectly, but try and fiddle 
around with the compatibilty mode. Setting it to Win2k seems to solve it 
(most of the times, anyway).

-- 
MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[icq#:123433   ||  ElaCin@EFNet  ]





oh! Mozilla 0.9.4!

2001-09-14 Thread Øyvind Berg

This release is great, keep up the excellent work guys!

but.. ehrm, somethings screwed up with the toolbar in mail/news, the 
icon to the left is missing. Dunno if its something i have done to the 
config files (not very unlikely), but it was OK in yesterdays nightly...

-- 
MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[icq#:123433   ||  ElaCin@EFNet  ]





MS surrenders! IE not integrated with WinXP after all!!

2001-07-11 Thread Øyvind Berg

Microsoft hooked the rotting corpse of Netscape to a drip feed today by 
almost - shock, horror - agreeing with a court that said it had done Bad 
Things. The company statement simply repeats what the appeals court said 
rather than saying the appeals court was right, but a whole bunch of 
stuff it had previously insisted was non-negotiable and technically 
impossible is now going to roll with XP.

And it'll apply to previous operating systems, not that previous 
operating systems will survive much beyond December, if Redmond has its 
way. Today's statement essentially (and cynically) splits Internet 
Explorer out from Windows again. Exquisitely, you'll recall, the very 
appeals court that Microsoft is now doing obeisance to is the one that 
ruled that Microsoft did have the right to integrate IE with Windows. If 
Microsoft hadn't insisted that it could do this very thing, the DoJ 
antitrust action might very well not have hit it with quite the enraged 
velocity it did. This is a very, very weird legal action, and it's 
getting weirder.


-- 
MVH / Greets, Øyvind Berg ~ ËlaC|n
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[   icq#:123433  ||ElaCin@EFNet  ]