Re: Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
Chris Hoess wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, DeMoN LaG wrote: > >>JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Dec 2001: >> >>>Five months an counting for a *one line patch*. Holy Christ. >>> >>So fix it then. Duh. >> >> > > Uh, it has a patch. Why it hasn't been applied (it's limited to the front > page template) is anyone's guess. > Let me take a stab: ever been an AOL customer? 'Nuff said.
Re: Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, DeMoN LaG wrote: > JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Dec 2001: >> >> Five months an counting for a *one line patch*. Holy Christ. > > So fix it then. Duh. > Uh, it has a patch. Why it hasn't been applied (it's limited to the front page template) is anyone's guess. -- Chris Hoess
Re: Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10 Dec 2001: > > Five months an counting for a *one line patch*. Holy Christ. So fix it then. Duh. -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
Re: Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
Pratik wrote: > > Colin Thefleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<9v0ock$5qo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > I noticed that the website mozilla.org does not have a document type > > declaration. I thought this where a html or standart requirement. > > If someone (the webmaster) knows, let me know, just for curiosity. > > > > Ciao > > Colin > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89885 > > This bug really needs to get fixed. An organisation that creates a > browser that claims the most standards compliance should have a home > page that can be validated on w3.org. Whats the point of directly > people who say "This website doesn't display right in Mozilla" to > validator.w3.org when mozilla.org's own home page does not validate. > > Pratik. Five months an counting for a *one line patch*. Holy Christ.
Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
I noticed that the website mozilla.org does not have a document type declaration. I thought this where a html or standart requirement. If someone (the webmaster) knows, let me know, just for curiosity. Ciao Colin
Re: Why no document type declaration in mozilla.org?
Colin Thefleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<9v0ock$5qo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I noticed that the website mozilla.org does not have a document type > declaration. I thought this where a html or standart requirement. > If someone (the webmaster) knows, let me know, just for curiosity. > > Ciao > Colin http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89885 This bug really needs to get fixed. An organisation that creates a browser that claims the most standards compliance should have a home page that can be validated on w3.org. Whats the point of directly people who say "This website doesn't display right in Mozilla" to validator.w3.org when mozilla.org's own home page does not validate. Pratik.
