Re: 128-bit encryption not supported by Mozilla 1.3 ?
Michael Lefevre wrote: > it seems that is what they do. what's really silly is that if you go on > to their browser check page - > http://home.da-us.citibank.com/da/whatdo/index.htm and choose "check > encryption", then it says the browser encryption is ok. This is very convincing evidence that my installation of Mozilla 1.3 does support 128-bit encryption and they cannot deny it. I reported the problem to them. Thanks! -kuro
Re: 128-bit encryption not supported by Mozilla 1.3 ?
Michael Lefevre wrote: After I upgraded Mozilla from 1.2.1 to 1.3, I tried accessing https://home.da-us.citibank.com/signin/indexkiosk.htm with Mozilla 1.3 but the site returned an error page stating: To use Direct Access, you need a browser that supports strong encryption (128-bit) t seems that is what they do. what's really silly is that if you go on to their browser check page - http://home.da-us.citibank.com/da/whatdo/index.htm and choose "check encryption", then it says the browser encryption is ok. Same behaviour with Beonex Communicator 0.8.2, based on Moz 1.0.2. Someone please give them a whack.
Re: 128-bit encryption not supported by Mozilla 1.3 ?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, KUROSAKA Teruhiko wrote: > Hogarth wrote: > >>>After I upgraded Mozilla from 1.2.1 to 1.3, I tried accessing >>>https://home.da-us.citibank.com/signin/indexkiosk.htm >>>with Mozilla 1.3 but the site returned an error page stating: >>> To use Direct Access, you need a browser that supports >>> strong encryption (128-bit) >> >> >> I believe the silly webmaster forgot to future-proof his web browser >> checking cgi script as 1.3 does infact support 128bit keys. > > They might be guilty. But I still don't understand > why Mozilla 1.2.1 had no problem with their site. > Do they simply check the browser name and versions > against their hard-coded list, rather than checking > the encription strenth through a dedicated API? it seems that is what they do. what's really silly is that if you go on to their browser check page - http://home.da-us.citibank.com/da/whatdo/index.htm and choose "check encryption", then it says the browser encryption is ok. -- Michael
Re: 128-bit encryption not supported by Mozilla 1.3 ?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:16:27AM -0800, KUROSAKA Teruhiko wrote: > They might be guilty. But I still don't understand > why Mozilla 1.2.1 had no problem with their site. > Do they simply check the browser name and versions > against their hard-coded list, rather than checking > the encription strenth through a dedicated API? Mostlikely. Like I said, their brwoser checker is poorly written and not future proof. -- Hogarth http://mozilla.weebeastie.net/ RAR!
Re: 128-bit encryption not supported by Mozilla 1.3 ?
Hogarth wrote: After I upgraded Mozilla from 1.2.1 to 1.3, I tried accessing https://home.da-us.citibank.com/signin/indexkiosk.htm with Mozilla 1.3 but the site returned an error page stating: To use Direct Access, you need a browser that supports strong encryption (128-bit) I believe the silly webmaster forgot to future-proof his web browser checking cgi script as 1.3 does infact support 128bit keys. They might be guilty. But I still don't understand why Mozilla 1.2.1 had no problem with their site. Do they simply check the browser name and versions against their hard-coded list, rather than checking the encription strenth through a dedicated API? -kuro
