Re: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
I don't think that LAME will decode a Windows Media file, only WAV files. You could use several different audio ripping software though to convert WMA to something else. For instance: http://www.rogueamoeba.com/audiohijack/ Once the WMA is in WAV or AIFF format, you can use LAME to encode your MP3. If audio quality is not a priority, you'd probably be better off doing this in iTunes though - the iTunes decoder is faster than LAME. If you have any specific questions about LAME, why don't you ask them so that we don't have to write you a complete manual? On May 12, 2005, at 7:51 PM, recutecu wrote: H.. double hm. it seems that nobody actually is reading my message I just need a little tiny help Subject: help please Hello there, I just downloaded iTunes-LAME Encoder for Mac and have no idea how it works. The only thing I want to do is convert a .wma file to .mp3 or AAC audio file. Thank you very much. On 5/12/05, Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmmm... When I run: lame --abr 56 -s 22.05 oldfile.wav newfile.mp3 The output indicates that it is ignoring my request to encode at 22.05kHz and is encoding at 24Khz anyway. Is there something wrong with this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments? On May 12, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Takehiro Tominaga wrote: From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500 How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much older version of Lame, or is there a fix with the new version? LAME3.93 uses 22.05kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. LAME3.96 uses 24.00kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. check "-s 22" option with lame 3.96.1. If the problem is solved, the player you used may have a problem with 24kHz mp3. If not, I have no idea. -- Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you! ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Re: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
H.. double hm. it seems that nobody actually is reading my message I just need a little tiny help Subject: help please Hello there, I just downloaded iTunes-LAME Encoder for Mac and have no idea how it works. The only thing I want to do is convert a .wma file to .mp3 or AAC audio file. Thank you very much. On 5/12/05, Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmm... > > When I run: > > lame --abr 56 -s 22.05 oldfile.wav newfile.mp3 > > The output indicates that it is ignoring my request to encode at > 22.05kHz and is encoding at 24Khz anyway. Is there something wrong > with this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments? > > > On May 12, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Takehiro Tominaga wrote: > > > From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect > > Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500 > > > > > >> How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much > >> older version of Lame, or is there a fix with the new version? > >> > > > > LAME3.93 uses 22.05kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. > > LAME3.96 uses 24.00kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. > > > > check "-s 22" option with lame 3.96.1. > > If the problem is solved, the player you used may have a problem > > with 24kHz mp3. > > > > If not, I have no idea. > > -- > > Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you! > > > > ___ > mp3encoder mailing list > mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org > http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder > ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Re: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
Hmmm... When I run: lame --abr 56 -s 22.05 oldfile.wav newfile.mp3 The output indicates that it is ignoring my request to encode at 22.05kHz and is encoding at 24Khz anyway. Is there something wrong with this syntax, or does lame 3.96.1 also ignore sample rate arguments? On May 12, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Takehiro Tominaga wrote: From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500 How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much older version of Lame, or is there a fix with the new version? LAME3.93 uses 22.05kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. LAME3.96 uses 24.00kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. check "-s 22" option with lame 3.96.1. If the problem is solved, the player you used may have a problem with 24kHz mp3. If not, I have no idea. -- Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you! ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Re: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect
From: Joe Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [mp3encoder] lame 3.96.1 and the "chipmunk" effect Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 01:08:39 -0500 > How is Lame 3.93 different than 3.96.1? Am I stuck using this much > older version of Lame, or is there a fix with the new version? LAME3.93 uses 22.05kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. LAME3.96 uses 24.00kHz as sampling rate when --abr 56. check "-s 22" option with lame 3.96.1. If the problem is solved, the player you used may have a problem with 24kHz mp3. If not, I have no idea. -- Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you! ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
