Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Quality problem reencoding

2002-11-14 Thread B. Streamin
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Haas Wernfried wrote:

 maybe you could switch to ogg vorbis, it is designed to be able to peel
 a stream, which means reducing bitrate without reencoding, but afaik
 the tools for peeling are quite experimental / not available for the public
 yet. if you already have mp3s and not the original wav files, ogg would
 not help you anyway, as reencoding mp3 to ogg is a very bad idea, too.
 hope no one's annoyed because im advertising ogg here, i personally like
 both lame/mp3 and ogg vorbis.

Switching to ogg vorbis isn't a solution.  The problem is within lame.
I can use these files on a windows machine and not have the artifacts.
I can use toolame and not have the artifacts.  The problem with using
either is that 1) this is a unix installation, 2) toolame's lowpass
filter isn't controllable and doesn't sound that great and 3) I'd have
to incorporate toolame into this heavily modified version of ices whereas
lame already is.  The artifacts also show up on live broadcasts so there's
no mp3-mp3 conversion even going on.

Once again here's the original problem:

  I have a number of files created with lame 3.92 using the --r3mix
  preset.  They all sound great.  The problem is when I reencode them down
  for streaming.  It doesn't matter if I reencode on the fly or reencode
  first.  The effect reminds me of a phase shifter commonly used on a
  guitar.  You can actually hear it here with winamp, xmms or whatever
  you like here:  http://caroline.pop4.net:8004   The stream is 56k @
  44.1KHz - which should sound good.
 ...

The OS is FreeBSD v4.7 and I've tried installing lame from both the
straight sources and from FreeBSD's ports.  No difference.

Vince.
-- 
   http://www.meanstreamradio.com   http://www.unknown-artists.com
 Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.



___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder



Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Quality problem reencoding

2002-11-14 Thread Gabriel Bouvigne
   I have a number of files created with lame 3.92 using the --r3mix
   preset.  They all sound great.  The problem is when I reencode them
down
   for streaming.  It doesn't matter if I reencode on the fly or reencode
   first.  The effect reminds me of a phase shifter commonly used on a
   guitar.  You can actually hear it here with winamp, xmms or whatever
   you like here:  http://caroline.pop4.net:8004   The stream is 56k @
   44.1KHz - which should sound good.
  ...

I listened to the file, and what I hear is typical of very high mp3
compression. This might be coming from the fact that you are forcing output
to 44.1kHz. At 56kbps there are not enough bits available to preserve full
bandwith. You have to accept some compromise, that is trading some bandwidth
against artefacts.
I would suggest you to try lame --alt-preset cbr 56. Listen to the result,
it is very likely to be way better...


Regards,


Gabriel Bouvigne
www.mp3-tech.org
personal page: http://gabriel.mp3-tech.org

___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder



Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Quality problem reencoding

2002-11-13 Thread Haas Wernfried
hi,
there's a recent thread about reencoding mp3, you can find it in the
archives at:
http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/mp3encoder/2002-August/005028.html
to sum it up in short terms: reencoding is generally not a very 
good idea.
maybe you could switch to ogg vorbis, it is designed to be able to peel
a stream, which means reducing bitrate without reencoding, but afaik
the tools for peeling are quite experimental / not available for the public
yet. if you already have mp3s and not the original wav files, ogg would
not help you anyway, as reencoding mp3 to ogg is a very bad idea, too.
hope no one's annoyed because im advertising ogg here, i personally like
both lame/mp3 and ogg vorbis.

regards,
wernfried

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:22:45AM -0500, User BS wrote:
 I have a number of files created with lame 3.92 using the --r3mix
 preset.  They all sound great.  The problem is when I reencode them down
 for streaming.  It doesn't matter if I reencode on the fly or reencode
 first.  The effect reminds me of a phase shifter commonly used on a
 guitar.  You can actually hear it here with winamp, xmms or whatever
 you like here:  http://caroline.pop4.net:8004   The stream is 56k @
 44.1KHz - which should sound good.
...

-- 
- Fppmpppffpppmpfpffmffmppmpm Mfpmmfmm
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- mfpfmpfmppfm://fpfppffpmmpppff.ppmfmfmpm.mmmfmp/~mmmppmpppmpmffppfppp
- http://www.namesuppressed.com/kenny/
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder