Re: [mp3encoder] q0

2003-06-14 Thread Takehiro Tominaga
From: Paul Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [mp3encoder] q0
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:25:26 +0100

 I read that LAMEs -q0 is broken from 3.90 onwards, which seems to be 
 born out by listening tests.
 
 3.88 q0 sounded very good to me. Is there a way of reproducing what 
 that was doing in later LAMEs? 

-q0 on 3.88 is almost same with -q2 on LAME3.90 to LAME3.93.1,
and -q3 on LAME3.94 alphas.

And they are the default setting of each of them.
-- 
Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder


[mp3encoder] q0

2003-06-10 Thread Paul Roberts
I read that LAMEs -q0 is broken from 3.90 onwards, which seems to be 
born out by listening tests.

3.88 q0 sounded very good to me. Is there a way of reproducing what 
that was doing in later LAMEs? 
___
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder