Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile
Joaquin, Have you thought of using Audacity? For a simple conversion from one format to another Lame is very good, but if I'm going to alter the files in any way (including combining files) I use Audacity... Just a thought... David J. Barnes -Original Message- From: mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org [mailto:mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org] On Behalf Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM To: MP3 encoders development list Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some other posibility I'll be waiting. Thank you very much. Joaquín 2009/8/3 Hans Meine hans_me...@gmx.net Hi again! On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote: Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in just one mp3 file. More files concatenated, more the total time error I have. I think that some method should exist to avoid this. Indeed with MP3s this is not so easy. It is probably simply impossible to do so after encoding, even when re-packing the MP3 files (i.e. not using file concatenation, but copying data selectively, using the bit reservoir and what else there is), due to the fundamental nature of the encoding (being frequency- and not time sampling-based). So in your case I would agree with Aleksandar, that .wav concatenation is the way to go. Best, Hans ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile
Goldwave is also very good and usses lame_enc.dll which works better than the command line version. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, BARNES, DAVID J, ATTOPS djbar...@att.comwrote: Joaquin, Have you thought of using Audacity? For a simple conversion from one format to another Lame is very good, but if I'm going to alter the files in any way (including combining files) I use Audacity... Just a thought... David J. Barnes -Original Message- From: mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org [mailto: mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org] On Behalf Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM To: MP3 encoders development list Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some other posibility I'll be waiting. Thank you very much. Joaquín 2009/8/3 Hans Meine hans_me...@gmx.net Hi again! On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote: Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in just one mp3 file. More files concatenated, more the total time error I have. I think that some method should exist to avoid this. Indeed with MP3s this is not so easy. It is probably simply impossible to do so after encoding, even when re-packing the MP3 files (i.e. not using file concatenation, but copying data selectively, using the bit reservoir and what else there is), due to the fundamental nature of the encoding (being frequency- and not time sampling-based). So in your case I would agree with Aleksandar, that .wav concatenation is the way to go. Best, Hans ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder -- Best Regards George Web Site: http://sites.google.com/site/electricfarm/Home George Steeves 799 Route 990v Gilboa, NY 12076 Phone: 607-588-6324 ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile
I'm developing and application where the concatenation and encoding have to be automatically following a list of parameters. I can´t use audicity for my porpouse. 2009/8/3 BARNES, DAVID J, ATTOPS djbar...@att.com Joaquin, Have you thought of using Audacity? For a simple conversion from one format to another Lame is very good, but if I'm going to alter the files in any way (including combining files) I use Audacity... Just a thought... David J. Barnes -Original Message- From: mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org [mailto: mp3encoder-boun...@minnie.tuhs.org] On Behalf Of Joaquin Dario Gonzalez Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 7:58 AM To: MP3 encoders development list Subject: Re: [mp3encoder] Lame changes the duration time of the resultingfile OK, I was already doing in that way using sox. Anyway if you encounter some other posibility I'll be waiting. Thank you very much. Joaquín 2009/8/3 Hans Meine hans_me...@gmx.net Hi again! On Monday 03 August 2009 14:32:13 Joaquin Dario Gonzalez wrote: Thanks Hans, I supposed the same that you tell me about lame includes aditional information. The problem is that I'm converting several small wav files into mp3 individual files, and then I concatenate all together in just one mp3 file. More files concatenated, more the total time error I have. I think that some method should exist to avoid this. Indeed with MP3s this is not so easy. It is probably simply impossible to do so after encoding, even when re-packing the MP3 files (i.e. not using file concatenation, but copying data selectively, using the bit reservoir and what else there is), due to the fundamental nature of the encoding (being frequency- and not time sampling-based). So in your case I would agree with Aleksandar, that .wav concatenation is the way to go. Best, Hans ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder ___ mp3encoder mailing list mp3encoder@minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
