Re: Bus Driver Beating

2001-01-08 Thread ferma001

My eldest daughter is a new bus driver.  She is just 5'2" and 110 lbs - 
guess how big of a person she could physically handle?

I suppose there is a certain amount of security gained by the presence of a
bus or LRT operator. However, bus drivers are usually pretty busy paying
attention to their driving to have a whole lot of time for security duties.
To what extent are operators trained for, capable of, or expected to perform
security duties? I was thinking more along the lines of security measures,
like real, trained security personnel, used to protect both riders and
operators. Just curious and posing the question.

Dave Stack
Harrison





John Ferman
Harriet Avenue
Kingfield Neighborhood
Minneapolis
Ward 10 Pct 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bus Driver Beating

2001-01-05 Thread ferma001

Thursday, during daylight hours, an MTC bus driver was severely beaten by 
a young man in south Minneapolis.  Television carried the story (thank 
you WCCO) and KNOW ran a 15-second sound bite on the arrest.  But our 
wonderful Star Tribune carried not even one word.  Doesn't that just make 
one wonder how much is not thought important enough to report either.

Jack Ferman
Minneapolis, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Bad DFL caucus rules

2001-01-05 Thread ferma001

As a practical matter - unless some delegate can convince a majority of 
delegates that the caucus system is sorely broken I doubt constitutional 
fiddling would get to first base.  This years city convention has much 
business to conduct and given the pre-convention rhetoric going around it 
could be a long one.  Any one remember the convention when Sharon Sayles 
Belton was endorsed for the first time - it adjorned at around 2 or 2:30 
am.

   Dennis Hill's response is essentially correct: the change that David
Brauer suggests would take an amendment to the Minneapolis DFL Party's
constitution.  There are three ways to go about proposing such an amendment:

   First, through the existing Constitution Commission, which is
currently reviewing the constitution with a view toward a comprehensive
overhaul.  That Commission can propose an amendment for consideration at the
upcoming City Convention in May, but it is more likely that it will identify
multiple possible solutions to each problem identified, and then seek input
from delegates at this year's Convention without a formal vote, so that the
new Commission that takes office at the Convention can frame proposals based
on that input.  Those proposals would then be circulated for comment through
the senate-district organizations, and offered for a vote at a special City
Convention this year or next year or at the regular biennial Convention in
2003.

   Second, through the incoming Constitution Commission, whose members
will be elected at the upcoming ward conventions and will take office when
the upcoming City Convention adjourns.  Any amendment proposed through the
new Commission can be considered at the regular biennial City Convention in
2003, or at a special City Convention before then.

   Third, by a motion from the floor at the Convention, if the Central
Committee indicates in issuing the call that the constitution may be
considered.  The Central Committee will be meeting on Monday the
twenty-second, and I will be preparing the agenda today and tomorrow,
including a proposed call.  I will be happy to work with anyone who is
interested in proposing an amendment so that it can be brought before the
Central Committee.

BRM

Brian Melendez (Ward 3), Chair,
  Minneapolis DFL Organization
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph. 612.336.3447
Fax 612.336.3026


-Original Message-
From: David Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Bad DFL caucus rules


Lots of meat in Fredric's recent post, but I'm only going to touch on a
couple of things:

First, the item about Barb's list mishap is toward the bottom of:
http://checksandbalances.com/MN/players-page/pp001221.htm. There is also an
interesting item on Lisa McDonald gunning for union support via city
low-voltage wiring inspection...see "Over Extending Authority" at
http://checksandbalances.com/MN/players-page/pp001227.htm.

Second, Fredric hits on a longstanding major gripe of mine: that the DFL
locks in its 2001 delegates at its 2000 (presidential or legislative year)
caucuses. This means any candidate not organized two years before election
day (i.e., many non-incumbents) can't influence the party endorsing process
by getting their grass-roots supporters to become delegates. (St. Paul, on
the other hand, picks new delegates during the city election year.)

Although at the major-office level, the DFL endorsement process is wheezing
like a dying man, it still has great influence at the council level. It has
always seemed to me a violation of the DFL's alleged grass-roots ethos to
lock in its selectors so far in advance. I suppose the argument FOR doing so
is that attendance is higher during even-numbered years. But in a state
that's justifiably proud of its same-day voter registration, it seems
ridiculous to shut down city council delegate selection 11 months before a
city election year even begins, and 21 months before the election itself.
(I've always hoped some new Democratic voter who just hit town arrival would
sue the party for disenfranchisement, since the rule is also in effect a
residency requirement mandating that you live here in February 2000 to
decide the party's nominee in 2001. But I admit this is only symbolic, since
the party has wide latitude to make its own rules.)

I've always believed these restrictive rules exist to protect incumbents and
insiders who show up annually. I think it is one reason the DFL is not as in
touch with the electorate as it should be.

I'm pondering offering a resolution at my local caucus to change the
practice. Of course, one resolution at one caucus won't do much. Anyone have
advice about how to make a bigger impact?

David Brauer
King Field - Ward 10






John Ferman
Harriet Avenue
Kingfield Neighborhood
Minneapolis
Ward 10 Pct 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Chief Olson

2001-01-05 Thread ferma001

Tim -- Thanks for commenting on the posts of Rich McMartin and Jack
Ferman. What really scares me is that there are probably many others in
Minneapolis who would echo their sentiments. 

So what is the problem - if no one likes Olson and he is dumped what 
makes anyone confident the next chief would be any better.  My point is 
the MPD has come a long way.  Did I infer anywhere that the MPD is 
perfect - I do not believe so.


And the sad truth is that I
might have been among them if it hadn't been for my move this past year
to the Phillips neighborhood. Prior to that move I lived in SW Mpls. and
didn't have a clue as to what was coming down in "poorer" neighborhoods
in Mpls. From that sheltered vantage point I simply couldn't 'connect
the dots,' so to speak. CODEFOR is just the sort of Orwellian policy
that we must be vigilant about because of the legitimacy it lends to
police actions that are abusive -- which have, and do, occur, regardless
of whether Charlie Stenvig -- or Charlie McCarthy in St. Paul, now THERE
was a character who loved taking the law into his own hands! -- or Chief
Olson is on the watch. There is a young black "salesman" who stands on
the corner of 16th Av. and 25th St., near where I live, almost every day
-- late at night and in the early morning hours -- looking for and
waving down those who look the most likely to be interested in his
product(s). Because I've seen him and his associates on or near that
corner for many months now, I'm perplexed as to how he continues to get
away with what he's doing without getting busted. I assume that either
a) he's an undercover cop, b) he has bought off the neighborhood MPD
patrols, and/or c) he has bought protection from someone else in the
MPD. Yet, right down the block from my home, there is a single mother
with 5 daughters ranging in age from toddlerhood to teenager, whose home
was literally broken into by five MPD cops who refused to show their
badges, and who, in fact, claimed they did not have their badges with
them because they were doing CODEFOR work, nor would they show a search
warrant when asked for one. They said they had received an anonymous
call about the home at this address being a front for drug dealers --
simply not true. They ransacked this woman's home for over an hour, all
the while making terroristic threats, terrifying her and her children.
And I want to assure you that this sort of action by the MPD is not rare
in my part of town. Why does this happen in Phillips? Why does it NOT
happen in the Linden Hills or East Harriet neighborhoods? Connect the
dots... poverty = powerlessness = easy prey. These people, for many of
whom English is a second language, are the least likely to understand
the U.S. justice system, least likely to know their rights as citizens,
and least likely to have the financial means to go to court to sue their
case against an organization that claims to "serve and protect" them.
Needless to say cynicism abounds in my part of town regarding the agents
of civic obedience. Wake up my fellow citizens of Minneapolis: the truth
is that ALL of us have seen a steady erosion of our civil rights over
the last decade, but it has been in small enough increments and in
"other parts of town" so perhaps we have not noticed like we would if
there are had been an all-out assault. AND, it's taking place in
neighborhoods that many people find easy to ignore. Am I saying that
real crime does not exist in Minneapolis? No. Am I saying that a
consortium of actions and services need to be brought to bear against
the underlying causes of a lot of this crime? Yes. Is one of those
actions CODEFOR? A resounding NO is my answer. My urgent, my fervent
hope, is that enough of us will wake up, in time, in all the various
racial communities, in all the various faith communities, in all of the
various social service communities, to help our neighbors, and
ourselves, reclaim not only our rights, but our dignity, and our lives.

Jenny Heiser
East Phillips
Ward 6-8

timothy connolly wrote:

 A couple comments relative to posting by Rich McMartin
 and Jack Ferman.

 I too remember the days of Charle Stenvig. Just
 another evening I ran into the Police Chaplain, Terry
 Hayes, at GJ's on Hennepin. I was surprised to see him
 there with some officers. I would have thought he was
 long since retired.

 I remember that he used to hang out around midnight at
 the old Fair Oaks Motel with the guys from the
 infamous TActical Squad soaking up free coffee and
 pie. They never paid much attention to me. I was just
 the guy who cleaned the kitchen and cafe. But I paid
 attention to them or rather the things they said. A
 cruder, more racist bunch of knuckle draggers...well
 you get the picture.

 I remember how they laughed telling stories of how
 their dogs, Rex or Caesar,etc., took bites out of this
 and that niggers ass down at Lake Calhoun. Mind you
 this was on 4th of July night. Ah, America! Ain't it
 great. Some things don't change much.

 

Re: Electric Car Shuttle System

2000-12-27 Thread ferma001

Methinks we already have the system envisioned below - they are called 
taxicabs.

Perhaps we need a system of cars that are available for people to move
across town once they are at work: 
 Does anybody know of such a system in the world?

-Original Message-
snip

Jack Ferman
Minneapolis, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Property Taxes

2000-11-16 Thread ferma001

One of the things that annoys me more than anything else whenever the 
taxes subject comes up, be it income property or sales, is that the 
debaters seldom, if ever, equate taxes with services expected.  Some 
folks want nice pathways around the lakes to walk, jog, bike, or blade on 
- other folks want clean well-swept streets - still others want well-lite 
alleys - the list goes on and on. So lets see the tax issue and the 
services issue intertwined in an intelligient manner.  

Now for my property tax beef - it lies in the way the city assessor 
establishes property market values.  In the olden days (before their new 
shiny computers, anyhow) the assessors had to go look at properties, 
building improvement permits, and other comerable properties with eyes in 
order to have a basis for market value.  Nowadays, it is all computerized 
to such an extent that if the house up the block from you sells (for an 
inflated price, say) the valuation of all other houses are upped within 
milliseconds from the time the sale hits the recording entry.  Is this 
bad?  My suspicion - during the past two market value cycles the 
properties the assessor used to judge our house were different - 
secondly, on the last cycle my personal windshield inspection revealed 
that two of the comparison properties had had building improvements which 
may have driven their sales at increased prices.  These two instances, 
suggest to me that the 'process' is unfair, that objective standards are 
nedded, that the assessor had too much lattitude.  Of lesser gripe - when 
I asked the assessor exactly how their 'system' worked I got much mumbo 
gumbo.  Were I a shrewd accountant or money lawyer I suppose the mumbo 
gumbo would have been intelligible.


Adam writes:

I'm really tempted to vent on these admitted liberals writing in to
complain about the property tax increases.  Your votes and your support
have served to amplify an ongoing problem - I would say crisis.  As
Steve Minn pointed out, we haven't even seen the bill for the new
library.

Actually, it was this admitted liberal who pointed that out.

It's good to restrain one's gloating - for I think that lust to gloat is
what has kept city Republicans an (electorally) endangered species. As I
admitted in my original post, I'd always love my tax bill to be lower - that
doesn't make me a hypocrite, just human. But unlike most Republicans whose
rhetoric I hear/read, I consider what we get with taxes - you don't always
go with the low bidder and you don't always prosper in a low-tax climate.
(Sorry, I don't equate my tax level with "freedom," as many GOPers do.)

That's not to say there isn't much stupid spending I wish my DFL council
hadn't done - you all know about those silly TIF deals. However, I have yet
to see conservatives such as Adam make a convincing case that they could
both restrain spending and intelligently encourage city development through
reasonable public investments. Simply put, the city GOP hasn't even come
close to offering a palatable alternative - instead, we get mini-Rod Gramses
clearly not in tune with city voters. It's no fun having to vote for
reckless spenders, but the GOP in the last several years has only offered
the alternative of feckless social conservatives and fiscal unsophisticates
even more out of touch with the city public than the institutional DFL is.

There's a reason the last two non-DFL council members have been
independents, not Republicans.

David Brauer
King Field - Ward 10








Jack Ferman
Minneapolis, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Street Leaves Again

2000-11-15 Thread ferma001

A day or so ago RTB posted a message about leaves and algae blooms in the 
lakes.  Offline, I corresponded with RTB and promised I would examine a 
storm sewer outfall during my next walk.  This afternoon I examined the 
outfall on the north side of Lake Harriet.  At the time a park board was 
working to reinforce the shoreline berm against washout and had been 
dredging around the outfall.  I asked whether a big slug of leaves had 
been there and the crews answer was 'no.'  So, if leaves have been 
entering the storm sewers during the past leaf fall, it appears that not 
many have reached the lakes.  I suspect the leaves that have entered the 
storm sewers are sitting down there rotting away - next spring when the 
snow melt-off and rains flush the sewers I would expect that juicy, 
nutrient-rich brew to enter the settling ponds.  Look for lush growth.  
Would it be against any rules to sprinkle some of my surplus Gray 
Conehead wildflower seeds (year 2000 harvest from my front yard) around 
the edges of the settling ponds.  They make for heavy masses of yellow 
flowers from August through September.

Jack Ferman
Minneapolis, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: storm water run-off

2000-11-15 Thread ferma001

I think this might be my second post but if not blame it on my 'senior 
moment.'  I want to add to Dean's post.  Runoff from the streets, parking 
lots and gasoline stations includes automobile fluids such as 
anti-freeze, lubricating oil, fuel, and deicing salts.  All of these are 
especially harmful because the natural biodegrading processes of the 
natural materials are substantially quenched.  It is a matter of 
chemistry.

We have two sewer systems.   A Storm sewer system.  And a sanitary sewer
system.

The sanitary sewer is a closed system that carries everything from your home
or business (toilet, bathtub, laundry, sinks, etc) to processing plants (the
largest, by far, in the Pigs Eye/Greycloud Island area south of South St
Paul) where it is treated before being released into the Mississippi.

The storm sewer  system is really nothing more that a rerouting of the
streams, brooks, rills, (that would otherwise carry away rain water) into
underground tubes that then deposit the water into the nearest stream, lake,
river or wetland. As you walk along a lake, river, creek, stream or
wetland look for these concrete tubes and wonder about what has been flushed
off of the streets and is now coming out into our precious water bodies.

Roofs, parking lots, driveways and streets are really part of the storm
sewer system, for they collect and channel rain and snow melt into the storm
drains and thus into the concrete tubes and thus into our precious bodies of
water.   (Unless, like the Green Institute, where the parking lot is
designed to channel all water to where it will sink into the ground.)  In an
Urban area such a large percentage of the surface area is roofs, parking
lots, driveways and streets that lots and lots of rain just runs off into
the storm sewers and steams causing flooding while at the same time not
allowing enough water to sink into the earth, so as a result, we have a much
lower water table than before the urban build up.

Leaves that in years past fell at the base of a tree and decayed now fall
onto a driveway and are washed into the street and into the storm sewer and
into the nearest lake, steam, river or wetland.

Sincerely,
Dean Zimmermann
Commissioner Mpls Park Board. Dist 3

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-722-8768

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Pam Blixt
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 6:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: storm water run-off

I have been out of town for several days and missed out on the leaf
discussion but...

Barb Lickness wrote:
 Can somebody out there talk about what areas of the
 city are connected to the sewer system and which ones
 are not. And maybe how when and why that happened?

and Greg Riedesel wrote:
I know that St. Paul had interconnecitons between their run-off
systems and their sewer systems, such that when it rained a heckovalot,
raw sewage was ending up in the Mississippi.  They've spent a heckovalot
to remove the interconnections.

Mpls. spent the same gajillions to separate their sewer system and finished
several years ago.  The storm sewer map for the City of Minneapolis is an
intricate and (only for those of us in water management) endlessly
fascinating thing.  If you volunteer to spray paint your storm sewers with
the image "Don't Dump! Drains to ...) the city will give you a map of your
local area so you can spray paint the correct water body on the grate.
Various storm sewers drain to the Mississippi, Shingle, Minnehaha or Bassett
creeks, or the various lakes and ponds.  It all depends on which watershed
you are in and it can change, depending on where the city needs to route
water due to flooding problems.  The system is heavily dependent upon
gravity so if you follow your storm sewer down hill you will probably arrive
at its final destination.

Pam Blixt
Nokomis East






John Ferman
Harriet Avenue
Kingfield Neighborhood
Minneapolis
Ward 10 Pct 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Nader and the list

2000-11-01 Thread ferma001

Very well said and it is about time someone did.  All of those political 
thingies belong on either mn-politics-discuss or mn-politics-announce, I 
am surprised the mple-issues list meister permits it when earlier this 
year one knowledgeable guy was kicked off for raising global warming 
issue.

I can't believe Annie Young.  She and Cam Gordon and Holle  Brian have 
virtually turned this list into a Nader bulletin board and now she is 
complaining 
when Myron Orfield and Catherine Shreeve post anti-Nader messages.  It is 
ridiculous to argue that multiple - and breathless - announcements about 
every Nader meeting and rally that attracts three people are relevent to 
Minneapolis, but Myron's thoughtful analysis is not.  Either eliminate all 
discussion of the Presidential race or make it apply equally to everyone.  
 Allan Spear



Jack Ferman
Minneapolis, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Library referendum question

2000-10-27 Thread ferma001

I don't think this is correct.  To pass, a minimum number of all ballots 
cast (yese, noes,  blanks) are required.  I think the minimum is 50% + 1 
.  If Keith Ford is reading here, please correct.

The Library referendum is counted on the number of people who check yes or
no.  Blanks don't count.

Carol Becker
Longfellow


- Original Message -
From: Rosalind Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 7:19 AM
Subject: Library referendum question


 A friend asked, if someone leaves the library referendum item blank, is
 this counted as a No vote or just not counted?  Does anyone know the
answer
 to this?

 Rosalind Nelson
 Bancroft





Jack Ferman
Minneapolis, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Not too busy are ya....................

2000-10-21 Thread ferma001

Regarding small charter schools vs larger k-8 elementary schools there 
are a few points to keep in mind.  One has to do with collateral 
educational support services.  The school library, media center, music 
instruments, gymnasium equipment, and janitorial services.  Consider the 
library: each school must have a minimum set of books regardless of 
student body size - so the library is not arithmetically proportional to 
student body.  One could go on to dissect the other things in the list, 
but you get the point.  The problem some people have with the schools are 
that some people perceive that the schools are failing in their mission.  
What frequently gets left out of the discourse is that the schools are 
not in total control of the students.  Has a child had a good nights 
sleep and a good breakfast.  Have the parents been fully supportive of 
their childs homework environment - do they take the child to the 
library, do they participate.  A child is in school for about 6 hours and 
somewhere else for 18 hours.  Well, I could wax on and repeat what other 
have said numerous times.  From my catbird seat, I can say the schools 
are doing a good job with the raw material they have been given.

Although I don't have all the data in the world at my fingertips, I do know
that atleast one child out of the 19 in my daughter's first grade last year
at Ramsey was held back.

As a parent I don't know exactly precisely what the concrete benefits of a
small school are (besides being able to be closed down conveniently)
separate from small classrooms. There is the community feel, the "knowing
everyone" thing, but I mean in terms of the academic experience. Charter
schools have a lot going for them, including that they are chosen by
parents who took the time to find out about them in the first place. But
there are a number of resource difficulties that come up as you go below
various plateau's in school size. Also charter schools have one distinct
cost that regular schools don't (in general) - leasing their space. And so
on - I think it's just like anything else - there are a number of groups of
kids who are best served by charter schools, and I'm really glad our
greater community includes a huge number of them (and 20 more or so new
each year, lately). But for many of us the huge behemoths are just fine,
thank you: with their diverse range of people and programs and learning
opportunities.

The school system prohibits discrimination, and the boy scouts have
mandated discrimination. They are responding by tolerating but not
promoting that organization, in the hopes of putting pressure on them
(along with many other school systems and other groups across the country)
so that the boy scouts will cease this amazingly hurtful policy and become
open again to all who would benefit from them.

And as far as the making change comment, I remember working at McDonalds
while I was in High School - I'm sure I didn't always make the best
argument for my school either, due to exhaustion, preoccupation, annoyance,
boredom. Now the schools have to not only respond to populations affected
by every societal ill but also guarantee the performance of its
participants in every facet of their lives 24/7? Geesh! No but really,
generalizations are hard to respond to effectively.

Claire Stokes
Hiawatha

(imagine if you try shutiing down a
1000 student behemoth that allows failing students to
pass..).

jon kelland
bryant



John Ferman
Harriet Avenue
Kingfield Neighborhood
Minneapolis
Ward 10 Pct 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: library referendum

2000-10-16 Thread ferma001

My problem with the library referendum runs like this.  For the past 
10-15 years the downtown business interested have been getting tax 
breaks, year by year and nibble by nibble.  We are now at a point where 
it will be the neighborhood tax payers who will bankroll the downtown 
library improvements, meant to benefit downtown businesses primarily.  
Does everyone know that a skyway to a commercial building is in the 
design?  Whenever we in the neighborhoods cry out for something, the 
downtown business interests lose no time in telling the neighborhoods 
that there is no free lunch.  So I say no free lunch downtown, too and 
will vote No on the library referendum.  Let the downtown interests pay 
for their new library.  The downtown library is hard to get to, there is 
no parking to speak of, so it can't be said to be of much benefit to the 
people in the neighborhoods.

John Ferman
Harriet Avenue
Kingfield Neighborhood
Minneapolis
Ward 10 Pct 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: library referendum -- VOTE yes 11/7 --

2000-10-16 Thread ferma001



A new downtown library has the potential to benefit all the residents of
the metro area. 
People outside of Minneapolis have either the Hennepin County, Ramsey 
County, or St Paul libraries.  Those folks do not help with the costs.




John Ferman said, among other things:
 So I say no free lunch downtown, too and will vote No on the library 
referendum.  Let the downtown interests pay 
for their new library.  The downtown library is hard to get to, there is
no parking to speak of, so it can't be said to be of much benefit to the
people in the neighborhoods.
END QUOTE

Not only is this not true, it is incredibly shortsighted. It is not
THEIR new library, it is our library. Right now, books from the Downtown
Library circulate to every part of Minneapolis and beyond. The Downtown
Library is a great and easy treat for our family when we drive or ride
the bus there. We have never had a probelm parking in the lot right
outside the Hennepin Avenue entrance. It provides us --people in the
neighborhoods-- with one the greatest benefits of all, books. 

I just recently tried to use the downtown library, because they would not 
send certain of their books to a branch library for examination.  This is 
service.  I took the bus (round trip fare was $3.00) and looked at their 
full postage-stamp sized parking lot and also noted the meter rate.

My statements about property tax reductions for businesses is very true - 
in fact the Strib a while back noted that fact as one of the reasons 
dwelling property taxes are skyrocketing.  Let business pay their fair 
share of any library improvements or do without like so many neighborhood 
needs have.

What no one has proposed is two new libraries: one small 
business/commercial branch downtown and one major repository outside of 
downtown, like east of Chicago but west of Cedar.


Jack Ferman
Minneapolis, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re:

2000-10-16 Thread ferma001

I think this is wrong.  The University received its Charter from Congress 
several years before Minnesota gained statehood.  I haven't actually 
checked the dates, but I do not think there was a state prison too much 
before 1900.  The first prison might have been St Cloud with Stillwater 
coming in much later.  Anyone remember the story of what precipitated the 
legislative action to ban executions?  It seems Minneapolis had convicted 
and sentenced a guy to death by hanging.  When the time came to spring 
the trap-door the rope either slipped or stretched so the guy landed on 
his feet under the platform.  The officials noting the miscue ordered the 
sheriff to haul up on the rope and finish the job.  There was widespread 
revulsion all the way to the Capitol.  How about the story as to why the 
capitol is St Paul and not St Peter.  ;nuf already.

to continue andy's history, (warning, this may be for folklore than
history) stillwater got to pick between the prison and the university as a
consolation prize--it took the prison--more jobs.  mpls, being third on the
list, got the leftovers--the university.



John Ferman
Harriet Avenue
Kingfield Neighborhood
Minneapolis
Ward 10 Pct 10
[EMAIL PROTECTED]