Re: [Mpls] Electing city DFL delegates the same year as the

2001-01-23 Thread Dennis Hill

I'm happy to hear my DFL brothers  sisters in the Mill City are making progress on  
the same year precinct caucus constitutional ammendent. 
However be careful what you wish for!  

This change has been attempted a number of times in Mpls and always gets shot done.  
The present system  favors incumbents and  makes uprisings 
harder to organize.  The   people seating in the  delegate seats and voting on the 
ammendment  at this years  city convention  will be people who are  supportive  and 
beholden to the  present city power structure to a certain degree.  That doesn't mean 
it can pass, it just means it is going to take an organized effort.   


In the Saintly City  there is still  a lot of debate  about reforming our 
caucus/convention process and even though we  elect city delegates in  
odd numbered  years   to  paraphrase Yogi Berra,   if people don't want to come to the 
precinct caucuses nobody's  gonna stop them.  ;-)  

This year the  City of St. Paul DFL has really outdone itself by  combining the caucus 
/ convention meeting and holding them on the same day, and moving that day from March 
to  one of three days in April,  Tuesday the 17th, Saturday the 21st or Sunday 22nd.   
 The   "official" reasoning  for this change was that it would  increase participation 
by reducing the level of time commitment needed to participate.  I'm still one very  
sceptical  old guard DFL'er that believes we  never should  have  combined the  caucus 
convention meetings  or moved the date but  I'm currently   in the minoirty over here 
on this issue.  

So, as you prepare to  advocate for the change, be prepared to address some of these 
issues.   Will the caucus and convention  meetings be on the same day or be held  on 
different dates. Who will decide the dates, Ward organizations or the city 
organization?  What will the dates be, March, April or later?

Dennis Hill
Ward 2 DFL Co-coordinator 
St. Paul 
 

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/23/01 11:51AM 
This is a brief update for those who are interested in this issue.  My motion 
to consider at the City DFL Convention an amendment to the City DFL 
Constitution providing for odd year caucuses passed at the City DFL CentralC
 ommittee meeting last night.  Amendments to the constitution will be 
considered under "other business" which will provide for discussion of andv
 oting on the amendment while ballots are being counted in the Mayoral race.  
Hopefully, this will assure that a quorum is maintained for consideration of 
the amendment.

Scott Benson
Chair, 5th Congressional District DFL







**
This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for viruses.
NDIS/ADCS University of Minnesota 
**



Re: [Mpls] Electing city DFL delegates the same year as the

2001-01-23 Thread Tim Bonham

I would certainly oppose a mail-in or online vote for endorsement.  This 
would undercut the speeches, question-and-answer periods, seconding 
speeches by people I know, discussion with other delegates, and the rest of 
the personal interaction that goes on in a caucus endorsement 
system.  Delegates at these events learn a lot about the candidates there, 
and I think it helps them make better decisions.
 This personal interaction of the caucus endorsement system, vs. 
the TV sound bites of a primary system, is the main reason I support a 
caucus endorsement system.  I think allowing mail-in or online voting would 
just make this into an in-party primary system.  If you want that, just 
join all the news media in trying to kill the caucus system and go directly 
to a primary system.  (Note that they all would make money off a straight 
primary system.)

  Why not a city-wide mail-in/online vote from party members for
  endorsement?  You could add in ranking per the fairvote people.
 
  Everyone from the past precinct caucus could vote and you could add an
  additional party membership process for others.  The process would
  actually build the local party instead of narrowing the window for
  paticipation.
 
  Steven Clift
  Carag Resident




Re: [Mpls] Electing city DFL delegates the same year as the

2001-01-23 Thread Tim Bonham

I would certainly oppose a mail-in or online vote for endorsement.  This 
would undercut the speeches, question-and-answer periods, seconding 
speeches by people I know, discussion with other delegates, and the rest of 
the personal interaction that goes on in a caucus endorsement 
system.  Delegates at these events learn a lot about the candidates there, 
and I think it helps them make better decisions.
 This personal interaction of the caucus endorsement system, vs. 
the TV sound bites of a primary system, is the main reason I support a 
caucus endorsement system.  I think allowing mail-in or online voting would 
just make this into an in-party primary system.  If you want that, just 
join all the news media in trying to kill the caucus system and go directly 
to a primary system.  (Note that they all would make money off a straight 
primary system.)
 Tim Bonham, Ward 12
  Why not a city-wide mail-in/online vote from party members for
  endorsement?  You could add in ranking per the fairvote people.
 
  Everyone from the past precinct caucus could vote and you could add an
  additional party membership process for others.  The process would
  actually build the local party instead of narrowing the window for
  paticipation.
 
  Steven Clift
  Carag Resident