Re: MQ Trigger Monitor - Load Balancing?
Hi, In a few words, we use the following configuration : We have special CICS region for MQ : called MOR for MQ-owning region. Trigger monitors are running in the MOR. The triggered transaction is defined as dynamic in MOR and as static in AOR. In this configuration, triggered transaction are routed dynamically to the AOR. So, the best practice is compute by WLM (CICS choose the region, MQ stay independant). For high availability, we have 2 MOR reading the same shared initiation queue. Hope this help you. Denis -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MQA Sent: mardi 5 octobre 2004 19:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MQ Trigger Monitor - Load Balancing? Dear MQA, We are studying on sharing of a single queue manager by multiple CICS regions. If we use CICS trigger monitor (i.e. CTKI), can the trigger monitor distribute workload equally among the two CICS regions? If otherwise, which component (MQ, CICS or else) can govern the workload distribution. Besides, if one of the CICS regions fails, can all the incoming messages be distributed to the remaining one for processing. TIA. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Dexia Bank disclaimer : http://www.dexia.be/maildisclaimer.htm -- Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: Buffer pool storage
Rick, It concern a qmgr with a lot of pagesets and a lot of queues. We increase size of buffer pool for delay the number of swap in pageset. (the original reason of this intervention is some hardware problem on random space volumes). But you have right, this large size is not really required. After increasing the size of the bufferpools (we reach than at least 1,5Gb), applications using the qmgr began to have security access problem (Abend 878-00C DURING RACINIT PROCESSING - There is not enough virtual local system queue area (LSQA)). After investigation, we see that there is a lot of multiple getmain without freemain in extended private area. So the conclusion was that these getmain overide the memory where was cached the RACF informations. The global conclusion was that we have to consider that the total size of bufferpool can not reached more than 1,5gb, otherwise, you can expect this kind of problem. We don't find any recommendation from IBM about this before. Posted here for information... -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Tsujimoto Sent: mardi 11 mai 2004 17:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Buffer pool storage Denis, Out of curiosity, why are you using so much bufferpool space, and not letting most of the data flow to disk? Blondiaux Denis (DBB) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Denis.Blondiaux cc: @DEXIA.BE Subject: Re: Buffer pool storage Sent by: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] en.AC.AT 05/11/2004 01:22 AM Please respond to MQSeries List Hi, About this point, does anyone know if IBM has planned to implement bufferpool in dataspace, like in DB2 ? A few month ago, we had memory problem after increasing bufferpool because we already take at least 1,6Gb in extended private area. Denis -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John M Hammond Sent: mardi 11 mai 2004 6:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Buffer pool storage Yes, it's in the MSTR and it's above the line private storage. There should be plenty of that to go around :) John M Hammond Data Center - Middleware (630) 521-4339 Ronald Weinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Buffer pool storage List [EMAIL PROTECTED] .AT 05/10/2004 09:45 AM Please respond to MQSeries List Does anyone know where in z/OS the bufferpool storage is allocated? Is is within the MQ Master address space? The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information, or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Dexia Bank disclaimer : http://www.dexia.be/maildisclaimer.htm -- Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Dexia Bank disclaimer : http://www.dexia.be/maildisclaimer.htm -- Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
WMQ client application on W2K (MO71) connect to multiple qmgr having different certificate.
Hi, I try to configure a WMQ client application for permitting multiple qmgr connection where each qmgr has it own different certificat. The application (MO71 sysadmin in fact) should run on my W2K workstation. Let me explain with the exemple : QM_TEST is a WMQ5.3 W2K qmgr installed on a Test machine. QM_TEST has it own certificat PKCS12 based on our TEST certification. QM_PROD is a WMQ5.3 W2K qmgr installed on a Production machine. QM_PROD has it own certificat PKCS12 based on our PROD certification. I've install WMQ 5.3 client on my W2K workstation. To allow connection to QM_TEST, I've create a svrconn channel 'protected by SSL' On my W2K workstation, I've create a key repository C:\TEST_key.sto where I've imported my TEST certificat by doing this : SET MQSSLKEYR=C:\TEST_key amqmcert -a -p certificatfile.p12 -z password to add certificat to TEST_key store amqmcert -l to see the handle of added certificat amqmcert -d the_handle to assign certificat to WMQ client amqmcert -d the_handle If I don't repeat this, no certificate was assigned to WMQ client. amqmcert -l to check that certificat was well assigned In the application, I set value for SSL SYPHERSPEC and SSL key repository c:\TEST_key.sto, the connection works perfectly. via MO71 on my workstation, I can work on qmgr MQ_TEST. If I do the same for PROD, creating c:\PROD_key in the same way (importing PROD certificate), it works well too for qmgr MQ_PROD. But the problem is that since that, the TEST key repository has no longer Certificate assigned for WMQ client. I receive following error : C:\amqmcert -l Using CURRENT_USER for default system stores. AMQ4809: No certificate has been assigned to this WebSphere MQ client. I have to redo again the command amqmcert -d the_handle for c:\TEST_key.sto bu this cause PROD key repository have the same problem. I don't understand because MO71 doesn't use env var MQSSLKEYR for key repository, there is a special separate field for each qmgr connection. I try different combination of command amqmcert -a -k MY and all you can imagine, but it give always the same problem ! The problem is probably because the private key is stored in the same place in the CURRENT_USER protected registry key. So, it's seems that it's not possible to configure a WMQ client application (so MO71) to connect to differents qmgr having different certificate) Could you please tell me if I understand well the mecanism of key repository on W2K (I'm not a SSL specialist and I don't find any documentation about this problem.) Do you see any solution to permit MO71 using SSL client channel to connect to qmgr having different certificate ? Thank you in advance. Denis -- The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not use, alter, copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. No responsibility is accepted by Dexia Bank for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dexia Bank or any of its affiliates. Therefore this email does not constitute a commitment by Dexia bank unless it contains an express statement to the contrary from an authorised representative. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: Batch Trigger Monitor
Hi, First of all, I would like to apologize for my previous mail. I was very surprised by some reaction, because I was thinking that this mail would be understand like an 'humour fed up mail'. (thank you Paul R. Mitchell). But know, I understand that it was a stupid reaction against a lot of little contrariety. This mailing list was the easy victim permitting my bad fury to decrease. What a bad guy am I ! I would understand that since now, most of people of this list could hate me so much. I would like to say that I'm probably the first one whose need the help from this list. I've never consider a person who asking a question like a stupid guy. On the contrary. I hope that next time, I will be more wise before sending mail like this one. Have a nice Friday th13. Denis -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bruce Baxter Sent: jeudi 12 février 2004 17:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Batch Trigger Monitor I have to chime in here to say the issue as I see it is that an Honest Question is NOT SPAM, whether it's being asked for the first or the thousandth time. I made an effort to find things myself, made an admitted honest mistake (having searched the CICS SupportPac site rather than the MQ Support pac site) which has been corrected and the issue is resolved. Mr. Blondiaux's comments were unmerited, unwelcome and off base. But that's just my opinion. There's no such thing as an unopinionated System Programmer. Lets put an end to this thread. |-+-- | | Potkay, Peter M | | | (PLC, IT) | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | RTFORD.COM| | | Sent by: MQSeries | | | List | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | AC.AT | | | | | | | | | 02/12/2004 10:23 AM| | | Please respond to | | | MQSeries List | | | | |-+-- --| | | |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |cc: | |Subject: Re: Batch Trigger Monitor | --| The problem, Denis, is that lot of people use email to send and receive responses. If someone posts, there is lag time. For some reason, the lag time can be significant for some people some of the time. So even though people have already answered, their posts have not shown up in everyone's InBox. So they then also send a reply. The problem shows itself when the question can easily and quickly be answered; A lot of people all respond, because they can easily help, not because they find their name being published exciting. www.mqseries.net is another source of MQ info, and because of its format, avoids this problem. -Original Message- From: Blondiaux Denis (DBB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 2:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Batch Trigger Monitor Hi all, If I'm not hallucinating, it's probably the 20th same answer to this question. Why ??? Why so such of spamming ??? Please, tell me. Is it so difficult to check if nobody gave the answer before ? Or perheaps, having his name published on this list is so exciting ? In this case : Argh !! Denis ps. Do you know MA12 ?? -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eileen Duchane Sent: mercredi 11 février 2004 21:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Batch Trigger Monitor There's a support pac (MA12) that provides a sample Batch Trigger Monitor. Eileen Duchane - ext. 13638 Meijer, I.T.S. Middleware [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/11/04 02:20PM I remember reading somehwhere (I think) that there was a sample or some sort of paper from IBM that documented how to do a batch trigger monitor for MQ Series. I can't find anything on the support site for MQ. Am I hallucinating? Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Re: Batch Trigger Monitor
Hi all, If I'm not hallucinating, it's probably the 20th same answer to this question. Why ??? Why so such of spamming ??? Please, tell me. Is it so difficult to check if nobody gave the answer before ? Or perheaps, having his name published on this list is so exciting ? In this case : Argh !! Denis ps. Do you know MA12 ?? -Original Message- From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eileen Duchane Sent: mercredi 11 février 2004 21:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Batch Trigger Monitor There's a support pac (MA12) that provides a sample Batch Trigger Monitor. Eileen Duchane - ext. 13638 Meijer, I.T.S. Middleware [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/11/04 02:20PM I remember reading somehwhere (I think) that there was a sample or some sort of paper from IBM that documented how to do a batch trigger monitor for MQ Series. I can't find anything on the support site for MQ. Am I hallucinating? Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not use, alter, copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. No responsibility is accepted by Dexia Bank for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dexia Bank or any of its affiliates. Therefore this email does not constitute a commitment by Dexia bank unless it contains an express statement to the contrary from an authorised representative. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
MQ53 - PF4 prompt
Hi Dave, (list server for any other help) We have always the same little problem. Putting the new library in steplib of our logon procedure didn't resolve the problem. Have you solve this problem and how ? Does it correspond to a ptf ? We didn't understand why putting THLQUAL.SCSQTBLE library in sysproc concatenation (reserved for clist) can help for this problem. thanks in advance for your help. Denis -Original Message- From: Blondiaux Denis (DBB) Sent: lundi 2 juin 2003 11:34 To: 'Williams, Dave (Systems Management)' Subject: RE: Re: MQ53 - PF4 prompt Dave, Yes it is. It's when we press PF4 on the first panel (CSQOPRIA). so, if we press PF4 on Object Type field, we fall down in panel CSQOVOQA where we can see only 7 queue types selection. as the panel specify : Select one of the following, or press F8 to see other object types. if we press PF8, we fall back on panel CSQOPRIA did you solve this problem ? What is the answer from IBM ? Anyway, thanks a lot for your help. Denis -Original Message- From: Williams, Dave (Systems Management) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 28 mai 2003 15:34 To: Blondiaux Denis (DBB) Subject: RE: Re: MQ53 - PF4 prompt Denis Is this where you're not getting a complete lists of objects from which to choose? Thanks, Dave W. -Original Message- From: Blondiaux Denis (DBB) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 7:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MQ53 - PF4 prompt Hi, We have the same problem but it seems that this bypass (adding THLQUAL.SCSQTBLE) in the SYSPROC concatenation doesn't works for us. After investigation, we've seen that the problem seems to be due to a pfkeys profile mismatch. Anyone have the solution to solve this ? We have not found anything about this problem on IBM site. Wat is the status of your PMR 16704, now ? thanks a lot for help. Best Regards, Denis Denis Blondiaux Dexia Banque Belgium +32 2 222 6703 -Original Message- From: Andrew Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: jeudi 19 décembre 2002 14:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MQ53 - PF4 prompt I raised PMR 16704 raised with IBM due to problems with new panels. The solution to this in short was to add SYS1.SCSQTBLE to the ISPF SYSPROC concatenation. I have asked that a DOC APAR be raised at very least as this came out of the blue. HTH Windy On 16/12/2002 16:42:21 MQSeries List wrote: A couple of months ago we installed 5.3 (MQ OS/390), but just recently noticed that PF4 (used to give a full list of objects from the CSQ0REXX menu) is presenting only the first seven object types?. The screen indicates that a PF8 would give you More, yet it just takes you back to the main menu ? Has anyone else seen this, or perhaps it's something we had to do w/the rexx exec? Any ideas? Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information on Standard Life, visit our website http://www.standardlife.com/ The Standard Life Assurance Company, Standard Life House, 30 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH1 2DH, is registered in Scotland (No. SZ4) and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Tel: 0131 225 2552 - calls may be recorded or monitored. This confidential e-mail is for the addressee only. If received in error, do not retain/copy/disclose it without our consent and please return it to us. We virus scan and monitor all e-mails but are not responsible for any damage caused by a virus or alteration by a third party after it is sent. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Visit our websites http://www.dexia.be - http://www.axionweb.be The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not use, alter, copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. No responsibility is accepted by Dexia Bank for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dexia Bank or any of its affiliates. Therefore this email does not constitute a commitment by Dexia bank unless it contains an express statement to the contrary from an authorised representative. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Visit our websites http://www.dexia.be - http://www.axionweb.be The information
Re: Local language problem on Windows 2000 server
Hi Jonas, It's because when MQ retrieve language from regional settings, windows api return language of last logged on user. IBM provide a solution to force the language of log files : Create an environment variable MQS_FORCE_NTLANGID and set it to value 1033 (1033 is for English). I can't find again this information in any MQ manual. Regards, Denis Blondiaux Dexia Bank Belgium -Original Message- From: Jonas Nyberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 15 septembre 2003 11:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Local language problem on Windows 2000 server Hi, We have a small problem with a MQSeries 5.3 installation on a Windows 2000 server. The problem is that when we run MQ on this server some of the information is in English and some in German. I.e the log files is in German. The OS is installed with English and MQ is also installed with English. The server is located in Germany. Can anyone explain why this happen and how to solve it? Regards Jonas Nyberg Electrolux IT Solutions - Sweden Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Visit our websites http://www.dexia.be - http://www.axionweb.be The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not use, alter, copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. No responsibility is accepted by Dexia Bank for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dexia Bank or any of its affiliates. Therefore this email does not constitute a commitment by Dexia bank unless it contains an express statement to the contrary from an authorised representative. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Re: Local language problem on Windows 2000 server
Jonas, I suppose that you have to set MQS_FORCE_NTLANGID as global environment variable and reboot the server. I remember that IBM tell someting about this, but it's not clear in my memory (we've detect this problem two years ago with v5.2) MQ Explorer is probably not yet ready to use this environment variable, because of specificity of DCOM architecture. I suppose that IBM is aware of that, but the correction is not yet available. If you need it, perheaps could you open an pmr to IBM (We don't use MQ snap-in and so, we haven't insist to have this modification) Best regards, Denis -Original Message- From: Jonas Nyberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 15 septembre 2003 12:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Local language problem on Windows 2000 server Hi Denis, Thanks for the info. I'll try this. Do you know if this also change the language in the MQ explorer because some of the headings in the MQ explorer also is in German while some is in English. /Jonas -Original Message- From: Blondiaux Denis (DBB) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:05:42 +0200 Subject: Re: Local language problem on Windows 2000 server Hi Jonas, It's because when MQ retrieve language from regional settings, windows api return language of last logged on user. IBM provide a solution to force the language of log files : Create an environment variable MQS_FORCE_NTLANGID and set it to value 1033 (1033 is for English). I can't find again this information in any MQ manual. Regards, Denis Blondiaux Dexia Bank Belgium -Original Message- From: Jonas Nyberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 15 septembre 2003 11:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Local language problem on Windows 2000 server Hi, We have a small problem with a MQSeries 5.3 installation on a Windows 2000 server. The problem is that when we run MQ on this server some of the information is in English and some in German. I.e the log files is in German. The OS is installed with English and MQ is also installed with English. The server is located in Germany. Can anyone explain why this happen and how to solve it? Regards Jonas Nyberg Electrolux IT Solutions - Sweden Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Visit our websites http://www.dexia.be - http://www.axionweb.be The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not use, alter, copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. No responsibility is accepted by Dexia Bank for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dexia Bank or any of its affiliates. Therefore this email does not constitute a commitment by Dexia bank unless it contains an express statement to the contrary from an authorised representative. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Visit our websites http://www.dexia.be - http://www.axionweb.be The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not use, alter, copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. No responsibility is accepted by Dexia Bank for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dexia Bank or any of its affiliates. Therefore this email does not constitute a commitment by Dexia bank unless it contains an express statement to the contrary from an authorised representative. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http
Re: MQ53 - PF4 prompt
Hi, We have the same problem but it seems that this bypass (adding THLQUAL.SCSQTBLE) in the SYSPROC concatenation doesn't works for us. After investigation, we've seen that the problem seems to be due to a pfkeys profile mismatch. Anyone have the solution to solve this ? We have not found anything about this problem on IBM site. Wat is the status of your PMR 16704, now ? thanks a lot for help. Best Regards, Denis Denis Blondiaux Dexia Banque Belgium +32 2 222 6703 -Original Message- From: Andrew Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: jeudi 19 décembre 2002 14:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MQ53 - PF4 prompt I raised PMR 16704 raised with IBM due to problems with new panels. The solution to this in short was to add SYS1.SCSQTBLE to the ISPF SYSPROC concatenation. I have asked that a DOC APAR be raised at very least as this came out of the blue. HTH Windy On 16/12/2002 16:42:21 MQSeries List wrote: A couple of months ago we installed 5.3 (MQ OS/390), but just recently noticed that PF4 (used to give a full list of objects from the CSQ0REXX menu) is presenting only the first seven object types?. The screen indicates that a PF8 would give you More, yet it just takes you back to the main menu ? Has anyone else seen this, or perhaps it's something we had to do w/the rexx exec? Any ideas? Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more information on Standard Life, visit our website http://www.standardlife.com/ The Standard Life Assurance Company, Standard Life House, 30 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH1 2DH, is registered in Scotland (No. SZ4) and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Tel: 0131 225 2552 - calls may be recorded or monitored. This confidential e-mail is for the addressee only. If received in error, do not retain/copy/disclose it without our consent and please return it to us. We virus scan and monitor all e-mails but are not responsible for any damage caused by a virus or alteration by a third party after it is sent. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive -- Visit our websites http://www.dexia.be - http://www.axionweb.be The information contained in this message is intended for the addressee only and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights. If you are not the addressee, please delete this message and notify the sender; you should not use, alter, copy or distribute this message or disclose its contents to anyone. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. No responsibility is accepted by Dexia Bank for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Dexia Bank or any of its affiliates. Therefore this email does not constitute a commitment by Dexia bank unless it contains an express statement to the contrary from an authorised representative. Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
