Re: Comparing IBM MQSeries to other products

2003-08-15 Thread Jim Nuckolls
I just couldn't let this one pass:-)

:soapbox on
My experience with those comparisons when I was in a
marketing situation is that they were anything but "good."
Those products are pure JMS brokers (w/o any of the depth of
the MQI) and are nowhere near the "industrial strength" that
belongs to WebSphere MQ. They furnish the "least common
denominator" if you will in the messaging world. The
benchmarks they ran used MQ "out-of-the-box" configurations
with no tuning for that environment whatsoever. If that
sounds like a little blue bias, you're right:-)
:soapbox off
Cheers...
Jim Nuckolls


Bob Kasischke wrote:
Check out Sonic Software's (http://www.sonicsoftware.com) and Fiorano's
(http://www.fiorano.com/) websites.  They have good comparisons between
themselves and MQSeries.
bob k



-Original Message-
From: Madsen, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 6:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Comparing IBM MQSeries to other products
Hello,
We use MQSeries for our application.  This application gets sold to our
customers.  Sometimes the customers question our choice of technology.


Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive


Re: Comparing IBM MQSeries to other products

2003-08-15 Thread Bob Kasischke
Check out Sonic Software's (http://www.sonicsoftware.com) and Fiorano's
(http://www.fiorano.com/) websites.  They have good comparisons between
themselves and MQSeries.

bob k


> -Original Message-
> From: Madsen, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 6:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Comparing IBM MQSeries to other products
>
>
> Hello,
> We use MQSeries for our application.  This application gets sold to our
> customers.  Sometimes the customers question our choice of technology.

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive


Comparing IBM MQSeries to other products

2003-08-15 Thread Madsen, Timothy
Hello,
We use MQSeries for our application.  This application gets sold to our
customers.  Sometimes the customers question our choice of technology.

I have been asked to provide some answers in regards to our choice for using
MQSeries.  (Currently we use MQSeries V5.2.1 for WinNT/2k with our
application - and our application then connects via MQSeries to other
partner systems who could be on whatever platforms they feel like using.)

" Would like explanations of the varying environments (UNIX, Windows, etc.)
in which it works, how it compares to other options and its overall
business, marketing position.  " is the request I have been given.

So, if anybody has any good links...

I think in addition to other things - the maturity of the product is also
important - but have been unable to find the date which IBM released the
first version of MQ.  I think if a software company just released a
messaging product last year and IBM has had it around for 10 years - that is
a big deal - no?

Anyway - thanks.

Tim.

Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive