Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as threads or processes

2003-03-17 Thread Robert Broderick 
I have heard that the RUNMQLSR has been much improved for 5.3 so it is
SUPPOSEDLY as good asd INETD over 500 connections. This statement is not
from experience or anyone else who has experience with it.
   bobbee






From: Tim Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND
channels as threads or processes
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:47:36 +1100
Inetd for more than a couple of hundred connections is usually more
reliable. Runmqlsr and threads uses less resources. As for your second
question its determined by which type of listener you use. To quote from
the manual.
You can use inetd or the Run Listener (RUNMQLSR) command to define a TCP/IP
connection on a UNIX systerm server, . If you use inetd, a process sis
started for each connection you define. If you use the RUNMQLSR command, a
thread is started for each connection. This method can therefore be more
efficient.
I have seen both working well on small systems, however for systems that
have several thousand client connections we use inetd.
Regards
Tim A


  Stephan C. Moen
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent by: MQSeriescc:
  List Subject:  SWOT Analysis
with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] threads or processes
  N.AC.AT
  15/03/2003 16:03
  Please respond to
  MQSeries List




MQSeries Experts,





I am inquiring from the vast array of knowledge within the MQSeries
community on two simple topics. Please respond to the strengths and
weaknesses of the following.




   1) Choice of listener: inetd or runmqlsr process.

   2) Choice of channel: start as a thread or process.





Ib  m not looking for book responses, just REAL-LIFE experiences,
especially
from a performance, reliability, scalability, and MQSeries Version (5.3,
5.2 and below) perspective.  Thank you.




Steve Moen













_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive

Re: SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as threads or processes

2003-03-16 Thread Tim Armstrong 

Inetd for more than a couple of hundred connections is usually more
reliable. Runmqlsr and threads uses less resources. As for your second
question its determined by which type of listener you use. To quote from
the manual.

You can use inetd or the Run Listener (RUNMQLSR) command to define a TCP/IP
connection on a UNIX systerm server, . If you use inetd, a process sis
started for each connection you define. If you use the RUNMQLSR command, a
thread is started for each connection. This method can therefore be more
efficient.

I have seen both working well on small systems, however for systems that
have several thousand client connections we use inetd.

Regards
Tim A



   

  Stephan C. Moen

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   

  Sent by: MQSeriescc: 

  List Subject:  SWOT Analysis with listeners 
as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] threads or processes  
 
  N.AC.AT 

   

   

  15/03/2003 16:03 

  Please respond to

  MQSeries List

   

   




MQSeries Experts,





I am inquiring from the vast array of knowledge within the MQSeries
community on two simple topics. Please respond to the strengths and
weaknesses of the following.





   1) Choice of listener: inetd or runmqlsr process.


   2) Choice of channel: start as a thread or process.





Im not looking for book responses, just REAL-LIFE experiences, especially
from a performance, reliability, scalability, and MQSeries Version (5.3,
5.2 and below) perspective.  Thank you.





Steve Moen











žËk¹Ëb¢{¢¹š¨ž¨º¹šŠX§‚X¬¶±Ê⦝ªº/‰Š{ax¸¬¶¼g§z¶¥R°k¢uæ¯j)ZnWš¶m§ÿðÃ
 l¡û\¢`+r¯zm§ÿ!Â'§iüÄz¸ž±ª+Þ

SWOT Analysis with listeners as inetd or runmqlsr AND channels as threads or processes

2003-03-14 Thread Stephan C. Moen 








MQSeries Experts,



I am inquiring from the
vast array of knowledge within the MQSeries community on two simple topics.
Please respond to the strengths and weaknesses of the following.



1)
Choice of listener:
inetd or runmqlsr process.

2)
Choice of channel:
start as a thread or process.



Im not looking for book
responses, just REAL-LIFE experiences, especially from a performance,
reliability, scalability, and MQSeries Version (5.3, 5.2 and below) perspective. Thank you. 



Steve Moen