RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

[Raphael @ Perez.net.br]

I know...but last e-book you did the same and did not get the same attraction…

Maybe people decided to learn ConfigMgr now 

Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: 03 March 2017 12:19
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

Looks like it was picked up...

http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2017/03/01/free-ebook-system-center-configuration-manager-administration/

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 3:32 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

Lol but to be honest….i would not expect the amount of downloads it is getting

Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: 02 March 2017 20:14
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

It was so popular they have to restock.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Nemec, Dale
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:14 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

Same here.

Dale Nemec | Global Architecture & Technology Ops (ESS) | Tektronix
Email: dale.ne...@tektronix.com  | Web: 
www.tektronix.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 11:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

I signed up this morning to get the book and never received an email.  Can you 
help?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] FREE SCCM e-book

Hi All,

After long time, my new e-book about SCCM is ready, you can download it FREE 
from 
https://goo.gl/xBwn3b

The e-book has 197 pages, 33 chapters and over 160 PowerShell scripts, so you 
can automate (almost) all SCCM tasks

Regards,


Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael





Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the 
sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this 
email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; 
provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any 
digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included 
in any attachment.

[mssms] RE: Azure Information Protection Client Dogfood Tool

[J v D]

https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/enterprisemobility/2017/02/21/azure-information-protection-ready-set-protect/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWcnZFMPcnE=youtu.be


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 8:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Azure Information Protection Client Dogfood Tool

Occasionally, I look through the products available to synchronize and I 
noticed today a new one I hadn't seen before called "Azure Information 
Protection Client Dogfood Tool" - never heard of it and Google returns no 
results. Anyone know what this is?

[cid:image001.png@01D2946B.02B84D10]

James Beardsley | Digital Technology Services Group
Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

[cid:8644FC49-D5C9-45AE-B387-04FAFC0CC7A5]



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.

[mssms] Azure Information Protection Client Dogfood Tool

[Beardsley, James]

Occasionally, I look through the products available to synchronize and I 
noticed today a new one I hadn't seen before called "Azure Information 
Protection Client Dogfood Tool" - never heard of it and Google returns no 
results. Anyone know what this is?

[cid:image001.png@01D29427.96C16DA0]

James Beardsley | Digital Technology Services Group
Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

[cid:8644FC49-D5C9-45AE-B387-04FAFC0CC7A5]



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.

Re: [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

[Adam Juelich]

Unfortunately, that does not appear to have worked.

We had two DP's.  We didn't really need the second one but I kept it there
for redundancy until we decided how to re-design the environment.  Found
out the content storage for DP1 was 2TB and 300GB on the second.  I just
removed the second DP and there hasn't been a change.  There were errors a
few weeks back in regards to distributing larger SUG Packages but that was
due to the low storage amount on DP2.



On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Pewterbaugh, Josiah P. <
jpewterba...@mcguirewoods.com> wrote:

> I had a similar issue. If you ‘retire’ the application and run policy
> updates does that fix it?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Josiah P. Pewterbaugh*
> T: +1 804 775 7657 <(804)%20775-7657>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Juelich
> *Sent:* Friday, March 3, 2017 1:08 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center
>
>
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
>
> On ConfigMgr CB 1610 on Server 2012 R2.
>
>
>
> I'm seeing a weird issue where Applications are remaining in Software
> Center long after the deployment has been deleted.  This is applying to
> both Device and User-Based Deployments.
>
>
>
> Looking under Site Status I do have a 'Critical' for 'Application Catalog
> web service point.'
>
>
>
> This is the error I see there:
>
>
>
> *Microsoft SQL Server reported SQL message 547, severity 16:
> [23000][547][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0][SQL Server]The
> INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint
> "Intel_AMT_ConfigurationInfo_RootCertificates_Certificate_3_DATA_FK". The
> conflict occurred in database "CM_KSD", table "dbo*
>
>
>
> SQL is currently on a different Server than the Site Server, which is
> something I need to change but it is what it is right now.
>
>
>
> Any recommendations on what I can look further into?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> *This e-mail from McGuireWoods may contain confidential or privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise by return
> e-mail and delete immediately without reading or forwarding to others.*
>
>

RE: [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

[Pewterbaugh, Josiah P.]

I had a similar issue. If you ‘retire’ the application and run policy updates 
does that fix it?

Thanks,

Josiah P. Pewterbaugh
T: +1 804 775 7657

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Juelich
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 1:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

Hello Everyone,

On ConfigMgr CB 1610 on Server 2012 R2.

I'm seeing a weird issue where Applications are remaining in Software Center 
long after the deployment has been deleted.  This is applying to both Device 
and User-Based Deployments.

Looking under Site Status I do have a 'Critical' for 'Application Catalog web 
service point.'

This is the error I see there:

Microsoft SQL Server reported SQL message 547, severity 16: 
[23000][547][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0][SQL Server]The INSERT 
statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint 
"Intel_AMT_ConfigurationInfo_RootCertificates_Certificate_3_DATA_FK". The 
conflict occurred in database "CM_KSD", table "dbo

SQL is currently on a different Server than the Site Server, which is something 
I need to change but it is what it is right now.

Any recommendations on what I can look further into?

Thanks!


This e-mail from McGuireWoods may contain confidential or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise by return 
e-mail and delete immediately without reading or forwarding to others.

[mssms] Applications stuck in Software Center

[Adam Juelich]

Hello Everyone,

On ConfigMgr CB 1610 on Server 2012 R2.

I'm seeing a weird issue where Applications are remaining in Software
Center long after the deployment has been deleted.  This is applying to
both Device and User-Based Deployments.

Looking under Site Status I do have a 'Critical' for 'Application Catalog
web service point.'

This is the error I see there:

*Microsoft SQL Server reported SQL message 547, severity 16:
[23000][547][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0][SQL Server]The
INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint
"Intel_AMT_ConfigurationInfo_RootCertificates_Certificate_3_DATA_FK". The
conflict occurred in database "CM_KSD", table "dbo*

SQL is currently on a different Server than the Site Server, which is
something I need to change but it is what it is right now.

Any recommendations on what I can look further into?

Thanks!

Re: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

[Sherry Kissinger]

My guess would be "no", it's not covered.  there's no technical reason to
have a replica database, it's got nothing to do with the functionality of
CM itself; so I don't see how you could swing the argument to say it's
covered.  I would guess you'd need an additional SQL license.

Of course, your best bet is to work with whomever it is that does licensing
in your company, to discuss options.  None of us here are licensing
experts, and every company seems to have a different agreement with
Microsoft; so what may be true "in general" or for "my company" may be
completely different for your company.

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Enley, Carl  wrote:

> Thanks but after a little research it looks like power BI will not use
> Express…so if I want to create a solution to solve all of my needs it will
> have to be the Full Sql version.
>
>
>
> Any idea if it would be covered under the CM license?
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Wendell Hutchison
> *Sent:* Friday, March 3, 2017 11:12 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice
>
>
>
> Use Express. It is free and if you are only storing/sharing data it will
> work for your purpose.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com ] *On Behalf Of *Enley, Carl
> *Sent:* Friday, March 3, 2017 5:55 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice
>
>
>
> Another question – If I stand up another SQL server to host a replica of
> the CM database would the SQL license be covered by CM or would I need to
> buy another SQL license? I would only host the replica copy of the CM
> database on this second SQL install.
>
>
>
> I can think of a few good reasons to have the replicated CM database but
> need to understand if there is a cost involved. My thought is I could use
> this extra CM database to allow others to query against it as suggested in
> this thread. I also thought I may be able to use it for the test DB upgrade
> routine before I update CM versions. The final thought I had was we were
> looking at the SCCM power BI templates and it appears to require a second
> SQL server either local or Azure to pull its data from.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com ] *On Behalf Of *Enley, Carl
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2017 1:25 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice
>
>
>
> Thanks for all of the replies, I was thinking the same thing about not
> letting them in. Hopefully it is not an impossible fight to win with
> management.
>
>
>
> Assuming I go down the replica database route what would be the suggested
> way to set that up? Is there a specific replication task that can be setup
> from within configuration manager or is this a SQL task that needs to be
> created? I assume I will need another server running the same version of
> SQL that I currently run and I either need to automate the replication or
> manually / script the database files over on some type of schedule. Would
> this secondary SQL server be required to have the Config Mgr client
> installed
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com ] *On Behalf Of *Sherry
> Kissinger
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:29 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice
>
>
>
> I agree with Troy--setup a replica database.  We have two "classes" of
> people that desperately feel they need access to our data.  For 1 set, the
> replica is what they get, and it works perfectly for their needs.  There's
> another set of people who, through mainly political maneuvering, convinced
> the powers-that-be that only direct read-only access to the CM database
> would be acceptable.  And guess what... sure, MOST of those people with
> direct access know sql and can craft a query that doesn't bring CM to it's
> knees.  But about once a quarter some doofus who isn't as awesome in
> querying as he or she thinks they are... manage to craft something that
> blocks SQL from doing things like, say... processing hinv, or ddrs, or
> colleval, or... until whatever-it-is gets manually killed by us.  And then
> we have to spend a few emails and/or meetings explaining to those people
> why they can't do that.  (and then what I've seen them do--I've SEEN
> IT--they instead wait until 1am and run their cr@p when they think no one
> will notice their cr@p).
>
>
>
> So... don't let them in.  Do whatever you can to keep them out.  A whole
> new server, with a replica database, is the best way to keep your
> production database doing what it's supposed to be doing--managing 

Re: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

[Sherry Kissinger]

"when we went from SCCM2012 to SCCM CB back in December"
I suspect you deployed the 1610 client prior to the hotfix that fixed the
issue of ccmsetup.exe which would orphan content.  Go look at the
description of KB3214042, and you'll see its for that exact issue.

"After clients upgrade to Configuration Manager, version 1610, the contents
of the CCM Cache folder (%windir%\ccmcache by default) are orphaned.
Although the files are still present on disk, they are not available for
application installations and will not be managed or deleted by the client.

Installing this update prevents the cache issue on future client upgrades.
Previously upgraded clients will redownload applicable content, and any
expired content can be manually deleted as needed.
"
You won't be able to tell from "client version" which ones used the
ccmsetup which was flawed.. the client version itself did not change.
thankfully, for us, we only deployed the before-the-hotfix ccmsetup.exe
client in the lab, not production.

But yeah, in the lab what I ended up doing was stole http://
rzander.azurewebsites.net/sccm-config-item-to-cleanup-ccmcache/ and stuck
it in a ConfigItem, with a detect and remediation script.
and sent that out to everyone.  I figured it "couldn't hurt" to do cleanup
anyway.  and it's the lab.  So I don't care all that much.  For you, for
production... you might want to do a bit more pilot and testing than I did
in the lab.  :)

Way more info than you wanted to know...

#
#Detection, script, Boolean result value expected



#get CCMCache path
$Cachepath = ([wmi]"ROOT\ccm\SoftMgmtAgent:CacheConfig.ConfigKey='Cache'"
).Location

#Get Items not referenced for more than 30 days
$OldCache = get-wmiobject -query "SELECT * FROM CacheInfoEx" -namespace
"ROOT\ccm\SoftMgmtAgent" | Where-Object { ([datetime](Date) -
([System.Management.ManagementDateTimeConverter]::
ToDateTime($_.LastReferenced))).Days -gt 30  }

#report old Items
if($OldCache) { $false } else { $true }

#
 ### This is the Remediation Script part#
#
#
#get CCMCache path
$Cachepath = ([wmi]"ROOT\ccm\SoftMgmtAgent:CacheConfig.ConfigKey='Cache'"
).Location

#Get Items not referenced for more than 30 days
$OldCache = get-wmiobject -query "SELECT * FROM CacheInfoEx" -namespace
"ROOT\ccm\SoftMgmtAgent" | Where-Object { ([datetime](Date) -
([System.Management.ManagementDateTimeConverter]::
ToDateTime($_.LastReferenced))).Days -gt 30  }

#delete Items on Disk
$OldCache | % { Remove-Item -Path $_.Location -Recurse -Force -ea
SilentlyContinue }
#delete Items on WMI
$OldCache | Remove-WmiObject

#Get all cached Items from Disk
$CacheFoldersDisk = (Get-ChildItem $Cachepath).FullName
#Get all cached Items from WMI
$CacheFoldersWMI = get-wmiobject -query "SELECT * FROM CacheInfoEx"
-namespace "ROOT\ccm\SoftMgmtAgent"

#Remove orphaned Folders from Disk
$CacheFoldersDisk | % { if($_ -notin $CacheFoldersWMI.Location) {
remove-item -path $_ -recurse -force -ea SilentlyContinue} }

#Remove orphaned WMI Objects
$CacheFoldersWMI| % { if($_.Location -notin $CacheFoldersDisk) { $_ |
Remove-WmiObject }}

the end of scripts

Setting rule for what means compliant:
Value Equals “TRUE”






On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Kent, Mark  wrote:

> I’d really like to know the answer to this.  It seems like when we went
> from SCCM2012 to SCCM CB back in December, I see a number of clients with
> orphaned content in their cache folders.  New items don’t seem to push out
> the old.  When I run a cache clearing option from the Now Micro right click
> tools, it doesn’t delete that old content.  I have to do so manually.  I
> think in one instance the client still thought the cache was full even
> though it was completely empty.
>
>
>
> Mark Kent
>
> Manager, Client Systems Engineering
>
> Technology Support Services
>
> Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
>
> http://rite.buffalostate.edu
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Ratliff
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 11:21 AM
>
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings
>
>
>
> Posted on UV for the docs team to update.
>
>
>
> https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-
> ideas/suggestions/18395980-client-cache-documentation-appears-incorrect
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com ] *On Behalf Of *Beardsley,
> James
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 10:37 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings
>
>
>
> I think you’re right. I don’t think this is documented correctly unless
> something has changed with the way it works in CB. I will have to test this
> to confirm.
>
>
>
> Anyone else know this for 

RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

[Enley, Carl]

Thanks but after a little research it looks like power BI will not use 
Express…so if I want to create a solution to solve all of my needs it will have 
to be the Full Sql version.

Any idea if it would be covered under the CM license?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Wendell Hutchison
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 11:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

Use Express. It is free and if you are only storing/sharing data it will work 
for your purpose.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 5:55 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

Another question – If I stand up another SQL server to host a replica of the CM 
database would the SQL license be covered by CM or would I need to buy another 
SQL license? I would only host the replica copy of the CM database on this 
second SQL install.

I can think of a few good reasons to have the replicated CM database but need 
to understand if there is a cost involved. My thought is I could use this extra 
CM database to allow others to query against it as suggested in this thread. I 
also thought I may be able to use it for the test DB upgrade routine before I 
update CM versions. The final thought I had was we were looking at the SCCM 
power BI templates and it appears to require a second SQL server either local 
or Azure to pull its data from.

Thanks

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 1:25 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

Thanks for all of the replies, I was thinking the same thing about not letting 
them in. Hopefully it is not an impossible fight to win with management.

Assuming I go down the replica database route what would be the suggested way 
to set that up? Is there a specific replication task that can be setup from 
within configuration manager or is this a SQL task that needs to be created? I 
assume I will need another server running the same version of SQL that I 
currently run and I either need to automate the replication or manually / 
script the database files over on some type of schedule. Would this secondary 
SQL server be required to have the Config Mgr client installed

Thanks

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:29 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

I agree with Troy--setup a replica database.  We have two "classes" of people 
that desperately feel they need access to our data.  For 1 set, the replica is 
what they get, and it works perfectly for their needs.  There's another set of 
people who, through mainly political maneuvering, convinced the powers-that-be 
that only direct read-only access to the CM database would be acceptable.  And 
guess what... sure, MOST of those people with direct access know sql and can 
craft a query that doesn't bring CM to it's knees.  But about once a quarter 
some doofus who isn't as awesome in querying as he or she thinks they are... 
manage to craft something that blocks SQL from doing things like, say... 
processing hinv, or ddrs, or colleval, or... until whatever-it-is gets manually 
killed by us.  And then we have to spend a few emails and/or meetings 
explaining to those people why they can't do that.  (and then what I've seen 
them do--I've SEEN IT--they instead wait until 1am and run their cr@p when they 
think no one will notice their cr@p).

So... don't let them in.  Do whatever you can to keep them out.  A whole new 
server, with a replica database, is the best way to keep your production 
database doing what it's supposed to be doing--managing systems.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Garth Jones 
> wrote:
Before making any suggestions, I have several questions


1.  What version of CM are you using?

2.  Do you use RBA? Aka will queries need to be RBA compliant?

3.  What version of SQL are you using?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 9:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SQL Query question / best practice

I am curious is anyone has any thoughts / suggestions surrounding 3rd party 
applications / tools running 

RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

[Kent, Mark]

Very interesting thank you.  Yes, we did do the upgrade a couple days before 
this revised version came out.  I thought I took all the proper steps to 
address things based on this article but I will go over it once again.  
Appreciate it!

Mark Kent
Manager, Client Systems Engineering
Technology Support Services
Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
http://rite.buffalostate.edu

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Chobeaux, Sebastien
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 9:13 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

You may have been impacted by this
https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/3214042/interoperability-update-for-system-center-configuration-manager-version-1610

“After clients upgrade to Configuration Manager, version 1610, the contents of 
the CCM Cache folder (%windir%\ccmcache by default) are orphaned. Although the 
files are still present on disk, they are not available for application 
installations and will not be managed or deleted by the client.

Installing this update prevents the cache issue on future client upgrades. 
Previously upgraded clients will redownload applicable content, and any expired 
content can be manually deleted as needed.”

Notice the “can be manually deleted as needed”
I’ve used this script to cleanup the orphaned cache 
http://rzander.azurewebsites.net/sccm-config-item-to-cleanup-ccmcache/.
Hope that helps
--
Sébastien Chobeaux


De : listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] De la part de Kent, Mark
Envoyé : vendredi 03 mars 2017 08:50
À : mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Objet : RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

I’d really like to know the answer to this.  It seems like when we went from 
SCCM2012 to SCCM CB back in December, I see a number of clients with orphaned 
content in their cache folders.  New items don’t seem to push out the old.  
When I run a cache clearing option from the Now Micro right click tools, it 
doesn’t delete that old content.  I have to do so manually.  I think in one 
instance the client still thought the cache was full even though it was 
completely empty.

Mark Kent
Manager, Client Systems Engineering
Technology Support Services
Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
http://rite.buffalostate.edu

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:21 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Posted on UV for the docs team to update.

https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/18395980-client-cache-documentation-appears-incorrect

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

I think you’re right. I don’t think this is documented correctly unless 
something has changed with the way it works in CB. I will have to test this to 
confirm.

Anyone else know this for sure… one or way another?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 7:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

My understanding as well. It orphans the cache element in WMI. Seems like it is 
misdocumented?

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 4:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Also about client cache but different question… I noticed on the link you 
posted, it says this:

Note
The cache folder is a regular Windows folder, so you can automate deletion of 
the folder contents using a script, a utility, or with the PowerShell cmdlet 
Remove-Item.

In the “old’n days” of ConfigMgr (2007-2012), I always heard (maybe 
incorrectly) it was a no-no to delete folders from ccmcache because they were 
tied to WMI so closely and if you deleted a cache folder and then tried to run 
the deployment again from Run Advertised Programs/Software Center, WMI would 
think the content still existed in ccmcache and would just fail to run. It 
wasn’t smart enough to know that it had to be downloaded again.

Doesn’t sound like that’s true anymore…? Or did I misunderstand it in previous 
versions of 

RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

[Wendell Hutchison]

Use Express. It is free and if you are only storing/sharing data it will work 
for your purpose.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 5:55 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

Another question – If I stand up another SQL server to host a replica of the CM 
database would the SQL license be covered by CM or would I need to buy another 
SQL license? I would only host the replica copy of the CM database on this 
second SQL install.

I can think of a few good reasons to have the replicated CM database but need 
to understand if there is a cost involved. My thought is I could use this extra 
CM database to allow others to query against it as suggested in this thread. I 
also thought I may be able to use it for the test DB upgrade routine before I 
update CM versions. The final thought I had was we were looking at the SCCM 
power BI templates and it appears to require a second SQL server either local 
or Azure to pull its data from.

Thanks

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 1:25 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

Thanks for all of the replies, I was thinking the same thing about not letting 
them in. Hopefully it is not an impossible fight to win with management.

Assuming I go down the replica database route what would be the suggested way 
to set that up? Is there a specific replication task that can be setup from 
within configuration manager or is this a SQL task that needs to be created? I 
assume I will need another server running the same version of SQL that I 
currently run and I either need to automate the replication or manually / 
script the database files over on some type of schedule. Would this secondary 
SQL server be required to have the Config Mgr client installed

Thanks

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:29 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: SQL Query question / best practice

I agree with Troy--setup a replica database.  We have two "classes" of people 
that desperately feel they need access to our data.  For 1 set, the replica is 
what they get, and it works perfectly for their needs.  There's another set of 
people who, through mainly political maneuvering, convinced the powers-that-be 
that only direct read-only access to the CM database would be acceptable.  And 
guess what... sure, MOST of those people with direct access know sql and can 
craft a query that doesn't bring CM to it's knees.  But about once a quarter 
some doofus who isn't as awesome in querying as he or she thinks they are... 
manage to craft something that blocks SQL from doing things like, say... 
processing hinv, or ddrs, or colleval, or... until whatever-it-is gets manually 
killed by us.  And then we have to spend a few emails and/or meetings 
explaining to those people why they can't do that.  (and then what I've seen 
them do--I've SEEN IT--they instead wait until 1am and run their cr@p when they 
think no one will notice their cr@p).

So... don't let them in.  Do whatever you can to keep them out.  A whole new 
server, with a replica database, is the best way to keep your production 
database doing what it's supposed to be doing--managing systems.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Garth Jones 
> wrote:
Before making any suggestions, I have several questions


1.  What version of CM are you using?

2.  Do you use RBA? Aka will queries need to be RBA compliant?

3.  What version of SQL are you using?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 9:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SQL Query question / best practice

I am curious is anyone has any thoughts / suggestions surrounding 3rd party 
applications / tools running queries directly against the SCCM SQL database.

In my organization depending upon the company we have a few different asset 
management systems some are home brewed and others are 3rd party (manage 
engine) vendors. One of our biggest challenges is keeping all of our inventory 
/ asset management systems in “sync” so to speak. I have been approached by a 
few different departments / companies that would like to run queries directly 
against the SCCM SQL instance rather than use any type of built in reports / 
queries. They would like to automate 

RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

[Kent, Mark]

OK I have that installed already.   Can I just run the remediation script on 
Zander’s page?

Mark Kent
Manager, Client Systems Engineering
Technology Support Services
Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
http://rite.buffalostate.edu

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Chobeaux, Sebastien
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 9:13 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

You may have been impacted by this
https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/3214042/interoperability-update-for-system-center-configuration-manager-version-1610

“After clients upgrade to Configuration Manager, version 1610, the contents of 
the CCM Cache folder (%windir%\ccmcache by default) are orphaned. Although the 
files are still present on disk, they are not available for application 
installations and will not be managed or deleted by the client.

Installing this update prevents the cache issue on future client upgrades. 
Previously upgraded clients will redownload applicable content, and any expired 
content can be manually deleted as needed.”

Notice the “can be manually deleted as needed”
I’ve used this script to cleanup the orphaned cache 
http://rzander.azurewebsites.net/sccm-config-item-to-cleanup-ccmcache/.
Hope that helps
--
Sébastien Chobeaux


De : listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] De la part de Kent, Mark
Envoyé : vendredi 03 mars 2017 08:50
À : mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Objet : RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

I’d really like to know the answer to this.  It seems like when we went from 
SCCM2012 to SCCM CB back in December, I see a number of clients with orphaned 
content in their cache folders.  New items don’t seem to push out the old.  
When I run a cache clearing option from the Now Micro right click tools, it 
doesn’t delete that old content.  I have to do so manually.  I think in one 
instance the client still thought the cache was full even though it was 
completely empty.

Mark Kent
Manager, Client Systems Engineering
Technology Support Services
Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
http://rite.buffalostate.edu

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:21 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Posted on UV for the docs team to update.

https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/18395980-client-cache-documentation-appears-incorrect

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

I think you’re right. I don’t think this is documented correctly unless 
something has changed with the way it works in CB. I will have to test this to 
confirm.

Anyone else know this for sure… one or way another?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 7:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

My understanding as well. It orphans the cache element in WMI. Seems like it is 
misdocumented?

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 4:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Also about client cache but different question… I noticed on the link you 
posted, it says this:

Note
The cache folder is a regular Windows folder, so you can automate deletion of 
the folder contents using a script, a utility, or with the PowerShell cmdlet 
Remove-Item.

In the “old’n days” of ConfigMgr (2007-2012), I always heard (maybe 
incorrectly) it was a no-no to delete folders from ccmcache because they were 
tied to WMI so closely and if you deleted a cache folder and then tried to run 
the deployment again from Run Advertised Programs/Software Center, WMI would 
think the content still existed in ccmcache and would just fail to run. It 
wasn’t smart enough to know that it had to be downloaded again.

Doesn’t sound like that’s true anymore…? Or did I misunderstand it in previous 
versions of CM.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys

RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

[Chobeaux, Sebastien]

You may have been impacted by this
https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/3214042/interoperability-update-for-system-center-configuration-manager-version-1610

“After clients upgrade to Configuration Manager, version 1610, the contents of 
the CCM Cache folder (%windir%\ccmcache by default) are orphaned. Although the 
files are still present on disk, they are not available for application 
installations and will not be managed or deleted by the client.

Installing this update prevents the cache issue on future client upgrades. 
Previously upgraded clients will redownload applicable content, and any expired 
content can be manually deleted as needed.”

Notice the “can be manually deleted as needed”
I’ve used this script to cleanup the orphaned cache 
http://rzander.azurewebsites.net/sccm-config-item-to-cleanup-ccmcache/.
Hope that helps
--
Sébastien Chobeaux


De : listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] De 
la part de Kent, Mark
Envoyé : vendredi 03 mars 2017 08:50
À : mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Objet : RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

I’d really like to know the answer to this.  It seems like when we went from 
SCCM2012 to SCCM CB back in December, I see a number of clients with orphaned 
content in their cache folders.  New items don’t seem to push out the old.  
When I run a cache clearing option from the Now Micro right click tools, it 
doesn’t delete that old content.  I have to do so manually.  I think in one 
instance the client still thought the cache was full even though it was 
completely empty.

Mark Kent
Manager, Client Systems Engineering
Technology Support Services
Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
http://rite.buffalostate.edu

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:21 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Posted on UV for the docs team to update.

https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/18395980-client-cache-documentation-appears-incorrect

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

I think you’re right. I don’t think this is documented correctly unless 
something has changed with the way it works in CB. I will have to test this to 
confirm.

Anyone else know this for sure… one or way another?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 7:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

My understanding as well. It orphans the cache element in WMI. Seems like it is 
misdocumented?

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 4:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Also about client cache but different question… I noticed on the link you 
posted, it says this:

Note
The cache folder is a regular Windows folder, so you can automate deletion of 
the folder contents using a script, a utility, or with the PowerShell cmdlet 
Remove-Item.

In the “old’n days” of ConfigMgr (2007-2012), I always heard (maybe 
incorrectly) it was a no-no to delete folders from ccmcache because they were 
tied to WMI so closely and if you deleted a cache folder and then tried to run 
the deployment again from Run Advertised Programs/Software Center, WMI would 
think the content still existed in ccmcache and would just fail to run. It 
wasn’t smart enough to know that it had to be downloaded again.

Doesn’t sound like that’s true anymore…? Or did I misunderstand it in previous 
versions of CM.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 4:50 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Nice find Russ – it would make too much sense to actually put that on the page 
that client setting page in the documentation. Guess I’ll add it ☺

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:34 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client 

RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

[Kent, Mark]

I’d really like to know the answer to this.  It seems like when we went from 
SCCM2012 to SCCM CB back in December, I see a number of clients with orphaned 
content in their cache folders.  New items don’t seem to push out the old.  
When I run a cache clearing option from the Now Micro right click tools, it 
doesn’t delete that old content.  I have to do so manually.  I think in one 
instance the client still thought the cache was full even though it was 
completely empty.

Mark Kent
Manager, Client Systems Engineering
Technology Support Services
Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
http://rite.buffalostate.edu

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:21 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Posted on UV for the docs team to update.

https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/18395980-client-cache-documentation-appears-incorrect

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

I think you’re right. I don’t think this is documented correctly unless 
something has changed with the way it works in CB. I will have to test this to 
confirm.

Anyone else know this for sure… one or way another?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 7:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

My understanding as well. It orphans the cache element in WMI. Seems like it is 
misdocumented?

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 4:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Also about client cache but different question… I noticed on the link you 
posted, it says this:

Note
The cache folder is a regular Windows folder, so you can automate deletion of 
the folder contents using a script, a utility, or with the PowerShell cmdlet 
Remove-Item.

In the “old’n days” of ConfigMgr (2007-2012), I always heard (maybe 
incorrectly) it was a no-no to delete folders from ccmcache because they were 
tied to WMI so closely and if you deleted a cache folder and then tried to run 
the deployment again from Run Advertised Programs/Software Center, WMI would 
think the content still existed in ccmcache and would just fail to run. It 
wasn’t smart enough to know that it had to be downloaded again.

Doesn’t sound like that’s true anymore…? Or did I misunderstand it in previous 
versions of CM.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 4:50 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

Nice find Russ – it would make too much sense to actually put that on the page 
that client setting page in the documentation. Guess I’ll add it ☺

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:34 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/clients/manage/manage-clients#BKMK_ClientCache

“Cache is adjusted to whichever size is less.”

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Sanders
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 12:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Client Cache Settings

In ConfigMgr CB, these options exist for controlling cache size in client 
settings:

[Inline image 1]

Which setting takes precedence, size or percentage? For instance, if I have a 
100GB hard drive and I set the size to 10,000MB, but set the percentage to 1% 
(1,000MB), which wins? I can't find anything in the documentation that gives a 
clear answer.

--
Andrew Sanders | Manager, Client Computing Architecture
Systems & Networks | Information Technology Services | The University of North 
Carolina at Greensboro
(336) 334-5028 (p) | (336) 334-5932 (f)
107A McNutt Center | 1400 Spring Garden Street | Greensboro, NC | 27403
apsan...@uncg.edu | http://its.uncg.edu
Microsoft 

RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

[Rod Trent]

Looks like it was picked up...

 

http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2017/03/01/free-ebook-system-center-configu
ration-manager-administration/ 

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 3:32 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

 

Lol but to be honest..i would not expect the amount of downloads it is
getting

 

Raphael Perez

System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP

E-mail:   raph...@perez.net.br

Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

 

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
  www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: 02 March 2017 20:14
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com  
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

 

It was so popular they have to restock.

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Nemec, Dale
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:14 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com  
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

 

Same here.

 

Dale Nemec | Global Architecture & Technology Ops (ESS) | Tektronix

Email:   dale.ne...@tektronix.com  | Web:
 www.tektronix.com

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 11:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com  
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

 

I signed up this morning to get the book and never received an email.  Can
you help?

 

Sol

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com  
Subject: [mssms] FREE SCCM e-book

 

Hi All,

 

After long time, my new e-book about SCCM is ready, you can download it FREE
from https://goo.gl/xBwn3b
 

 

The e-book has 197 pages, 33 chapters and over 160 PowerShell scripts, so
you can automate (almost) all SCCM tasks

 

Regards,

 

 

Raphael Perez

System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP

E-mail:   raph...@perez.net.br

Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

 

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
 

www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael

 

 

 

  _  

Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to
the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of
this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any
agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding
effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature
that is included in any attachment. 

 

 

 

RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

[Raphael @ Perez.net.br]

Hi all,

Contact me off-line if you still haven’t received the e-mail.

Our team is working to get this fixed but seems that some servers (like 
office365/Hotmail) are blocking the email for some reason and gmail is taking 
longer to deliver it to the spam folder.

Regards,

Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: 02 March 2017 22:14
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

First thing I checked, but still nothing.

Sol

From:  on behalf of "Smith, Robert F [US] 
(ES)" 
Reply-To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 3:39 PM
To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

My email went to a spam folder I found it there .


Robert F. Smith
Enterprise Operations
Systems Management Infrastructure
Phone 703-949-2368
Cell 203-524-2172



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Nemec, Dale
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:14 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: EXT :[mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

Same here.

Dale Nemec | Global Architecture & Technology Ops (ESS) | Tektronix
Email: dale.ne...@tektronix.com  | Web: 
www.tektronix.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 11:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

I signed up this morning to get the book and never received an email.  Can you 
help?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] FREE SCCM e-book

Hi All,

After long time, my new e-book about SCCM is ready, you can download it FREE 
from 
https://goo.gl/xBwn3b

The e-book has 197 pages, 33 chapters and over 160 PowerShell scripts, so you 
can automate (almost) all SCCM tasks

Regards,


Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael





Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the 
sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this 
email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; 
provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any 
digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included 
in any attachment.

RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

[Raphael @ Perez.net.br]

Lol but to be honesti would not expect the amount of downloads it is getting

Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: 02 March 2017 20:14
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

It was so popular they have to restock.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Nemec, Dale
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:14 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

Same here.

Dale Nemec | Global Architecture & Technology Ops (ESS) | Tektronix
Email: dale.ne...@tektronix.com  | Web: 
www.tektronix.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kamerman, Sol
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 11:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: FREE SCCM e-book

I signed up this morning to get the book and never received an email.  Can you 
help?

Sol

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Raphael @ Perez.net.br
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 10:25 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] FREE SCCM e-book

Hi All,

After long time, my new e-book about SCCM is ready, you can download it FREE 
from 
https://goo.gl/xBwn3b

The e-book has 197 pages, 33 chapters and over 160 PowerShell scripts, so you 
can automate (almost) all SCCM tasks

Regards,


Raphael Perez
System Center Specialist  | Microsoft MVP
E-mail: raph...@perez.net.br
Phone: +44 (0) 7411 289880

MCP, MCSA Security, MCSE Security, MCTS, MCITP, MCT
www.thedesktopteam.com/raphael





Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the 
sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this 
email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; 
provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any 
digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included 
in any attachment.