Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

[Kevin Ray]

thanks guys for your suggestions!!

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Paul Winstanley 
wrote:

>
> Exactly. When I'm thinking workstation Dp I'm thinking along the lines of
> desktop o/s which wouldn't cater for the PXE ;-)
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 19:30, Marable, Mike 
> wrote:
>
>> Very true Paul.  I forgot Kevin was asking about workstation DPs as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> You also don’t necessarily need to use server-class hardware.  You can
>> use a workstation-class desktop.  That is something that we are looking at
>> for some of our remote sites (50-200 clients).  Take and HP z-series
>> workstation, install Server 2016 on it and configure it as a DP.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: * on behalf of "
>> pwinstan...@gmail.com" 
>> *Reply-To: *"mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
>> *Date: *Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM
>> *To: *"mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
>>
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines
>>
>>
>>
>> However workstation Dp won't allow PXE but you can use boot media.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 12:00, Marable, Mike 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Good morning Kevin,
>>
>>
>>
>> Personally I would put a DP in the remote sites.  You have a decent
>> number of machines in each location so pulling content across the WAN for
>> everything probably would not be the best way of utilizing that connection.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you are going to be doing OSD in those locations having a DP with the
>> content locally is going to be your best bet.  Otherwise trying to PXE boot
>> across the Pacific Ocean, while sounding cool, probably would be a painful
>> experience.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
>> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Ray
>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 9, 2017 10:06 PM
>> *To:* mssms 
>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines
>>
>>
>>
>> Any help
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Ray 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>>
>>
>> i have a sccm infra in across the globe ..USA (500 machines), Japan
>> (300), Korea(50-300) ,Canada(100-300)
>>
>>
>>
>> so WAN speed is 10 MBPS from other offices to Head quaters USA.
>>
>>
>>
>> as of now SCCM infra is Standalone primary server...
>>
>>
>>
>> so if i want to manage the other regions, should I just install the
>> Standard DP is fine in all locations ?
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to use the features are Inventory,Patching, OSD (with PXE and
>> USB),Complience management,app/package deployment..
>>
>>
>>
>> Also If i dont want the PXE based OSD.. Can i go with workstation DP ?
>> (any technet document for this like Workstation DP is supprted)
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm with SCCM 1610.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **
>> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not
>> be used for urgent or sensitive issues
>>
>>
>>
>> **
>> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not
>> be used for urgent or sensitive issues
>>
>
>

[mssms] RE: Delta Download Startup Issues

[Beardsley, James]

I disabled it and its now been two weeks with multiple syncs and nothing has 
changed as far as package sizes. I guess there is no way to reverse that. We’ll 
see what the sizes look like in a few days on patch Tuesday.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 1:09 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Delta Download Startup Issues

Let me know what happens when you disable it. I disabled mine and then 
performed a full sync thinking it would reduce the package size back to 
pre-express updates but it did not. I was actually going to ask the question to 
this group or reddit/sccm to try and understand how I get back to my normal 
package size.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 12:13 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Delta Download Startup Issues

That’s unfortunate to hear. So you think I should just turn off this setting 
until future notice? Like Carl said, my package sizes jumped up to about 25GB 
per month so if those express updates aren’t being used properly, I’ll disable 
it.

We’re on client version 5.00.8498.1008. I do not have the 1702 Hotfix Rollup 
installed yet.

[cid:image002.png@01D2EB50.C27F0120]

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Phil Wilcock
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:15 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Delta Download Startup Issues

Yep, don’t bother just yet. We’re informed that there are significant 
improvements arriving in 1706. And it is Friday tomorrow 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: 22 June 2017 14:56
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Delta Download Startup Issues

IMHO Express files in SCCM are not ready for primetime at this point, I 
wouldn’t bother. It literally takes 4 hours to download the W10 cumulative with 
Express updates enabled. My patch package grew from 13GB to nearly 44GB in size.

With that said I assume you are on the latest 1703 client ? 5.00.8498.xxx ?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Delta Download Startup Issues

I’m having trouble implementing express updates for some reason. The “task” is 
not starting on any of my machines. Anyone have a solution to this?

This 
post
 on TechNet forums indicates that the machine must have the April 2017 patches 
installed. This particular machine where I took this screenshot has all of the 
latest cumulative updates installed already so I don’t know what update I could 
be missing.

[cid:image003.png@01D2EB50.C27F0120]



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.





Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 

RE: [mssms] Windows Store for Business and Azure AD

[DonPick]

Several helpful blog posts here

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/teju_shyamsundar/

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: janus...@gmx.net
Sent: Monday, 10 July 2017 7:54 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Windows Store for Business and Azure AD

Hi,

I’d like to use the windows store with configmanager, offline aps are fine, but 
I’ve never dealt with azure.

What kind of subscription would I need?
What account should I use for Azure AD? Not a personal one as that one would be 
permanently linked to it right?

Cheers, roland

Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

[Paul Winstanley]

Exactly. When I'm thinking workstation Dp I'm thinking along the lines of
desktop o/s which wouldn't cater for the PXE ;-)

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 19:30, Marable, Mike  wrote:

> Very true Paul.  I forgot Kevin was asking about workstation DPs as well.
>
>
>
> You also don’t necessarily need to use server-class hardware.  You can use
> a workstation-class desktop.  That is something that we are looking at for
> some of our remote sites (50-200 clients).  Take and HP z-series
> workstation, install Server 2016 on it and configure it as a DP.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of "
> pwinstan...@gmail.com" 
> *Reply-To: *"mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
> *Date: *Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM
> *To: *"mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines
>
>
>
> However workstation Dp won't allow PXE but you can use boot media.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 12:00, Marable, Mike 
> wrote:
>
> Good morning Kevin,
>
>
>
> Personally I would put a DP in the remote sites.  You have a decent number
> of machines in each location so pulling content across the WAN for
> everything probably would not be the best way of utilizing that connection.
>
>
>
> If you are going to be doing OSD in those locations having a DP with the
> content locally is going to be your best bet.  Otherwise trying to PXE boot
> across the Pacific Ocean, while sounding cool, probably would be a painful
> experience.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Ray
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 9, 2017 10:06 PM
> *To:* mssms 
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines
>
>
>
> Any help
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Ray  wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> i have a sccm infra in across the globe ..USA (500 machines), Japan (300),
> Korea(50-300) ,Canada(100-300)
>
>
>
> so WAN speed is 10 MBPS from other offices to Head quaters USA.
>
>
>
> as of now SCCM infra is Standalone primary server...
>
>
>
> so if i want to manage the other regions, should I just install the
> Standard DP is fine in all locations ?
>
>
>
> I want to use the features are Inventory,Patching, OSD (with PXE and
> USB),Complience management,app/package deployment..
>
>
>
> Also If i dont want the PXE based OSD.. Can i go with workstation DP ?
> (any technet document for this like Workstation DP is supprted)
>
>
>
> I'm with SCCM 1610.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not
> be used for urgent or sensitive issues
>
>
>
> **
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not
> be used for urgent or sensitive issues
>

Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

[Marable, Mike]

Very true Paul.  I forgot Kevin was asking about workstation DPs as well.

You also don’t necessarily need to use server-class hardware.  You can use a 
workstation-class desktop.  That is something that we are looking at for some 
of our remote sites (50-200 clients).  Take and HP z-series workstation, 
install Server 2016 on it and configure it as a DP.

Mike




From:  on behalf of "pwinstan...@gmail.com" 

Reply-To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
Date: Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM
To: "mssms@lists.myitforum.com" 
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

However workstation Dp won't allow PXE but you can use boot media.


On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 12:00, Marable, Mike 
> wrote:
Good morning Kevin,

Personally I would put a DP in the remote sites.  You have a decent number of 
machines in each location so pulling content across the WAN for everything 
probably would not be the best way of utilizing that connection.

If you are going to be doing OSD in those locations having a DP with the 
content locally is going to be your best bet.  Otherwise trying to PXE boot 
across the Pacific Ocean, while sounding cool, probably would be a painful 
experience.

Thanks
Mike


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Kevin Ray
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 10:06 PM
To: mssms >
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

Any help

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Ray 
> wrote:
Hi Team,

i have a sccm infra in across the globe ..USA (500 machines), Japan (300), 
Korea(50-300) ,Canada(100-300)

so WAN speed is 10 MBPS from other offices to Head quaters USA.

as of now SCCM infra is Standalone primary server...

so if i want to manage the other regions, should I just install the Standard DP 
is fine in all locations ?

I want to use the features are Inventory,Patching, OSD (with PXE and 
USB),Complience management,app/package deployment..

Also If i dont want the PXE based OSD.. Can i go with workstation DP ? (any 
technet document for this like Workstation DP is supprted)

I'm with SCCM 1610.


Thanks
Kevin




**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues



**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues 

[mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

[Kent, Mark]

These are the latest:
https://github.com/OfficeDev/Office-IT-Pro-Deployment-Scripts/tree/master/Office-ProPlus-Deployment/Remove-PreviousOfficeInstalls



Mark Kent
Manager, Client Systems Engineering
Technology Support Services
Resources for Information, Technology and Education (RITE)
http://rite.buffalostate.edu

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Thelen, Chris
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:44 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab

Never got the .diagcab to run silently, but a lot of people, including myself, 
just ripped out the scrub scripts (vbs scripts that actually perform the 
uninstall) from it and scripted an uninstall in PowerShell.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab

Thanks for confirming, James. Hoping someone had a chance to get some support 
from Microsoft on it . . .

Cordell
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: July 10, 2017 12:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab

I attempted to get this same thing working at one time and never could. I ran 
into the same issue that you're experiencing. I could never find the mini cab 
file it required. I ended up going back to the scrub files and had to use logic 
in my script to detect which version of Office they had and run the appropriate 
scrub vbs.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

Rather than using the version specific Office Scrub vbs files the 
updated
 automated solution uses PS scripts.

Anyone know the way to run such .diagcab solutions silently? Sending it 
parameters or answerfile?

At the bottom of the page at this link IT Professionals: Microsoft easy fix 
unattended 
installation,
 Microsoft provides guidance for solutions with the extension: .diagcab for 
silent deployment throughout an enterprise IT environment.

When I try and run their suggestion with the new Office removal 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab, the log file says it is looking for a mini.diagcab 
(which is what their sample shows too).

Cordell



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.

[mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

[Thelen, Chris]

Never got the .diagcab to run silently, but a lot of people, including myself, 
just ripped out the scrub scripts (vbs scripts that actually perform the 
uninstall) from it and scripted an uninstall in PowerShell.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab

Thanks for confirming, James. Hoping someone had a chance to get some support 
from Microsoft on it . . .

Cordell
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: July 10, 2017 12:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab

I attempted to get this same thing working at one time and never could. I ran 
into the same issue that you're experiencing. I could never find the mini cab 
file it required. I ended up going back to the scrub files and had to use logic 
in my script to detect which version of Office they had and run the appropriate 
scrub vbs.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

Rather than using the version specific Office Scrub vbs files the 
updated
 automated solution uses PS scripts.

Anyone know the way to run such .diagcab solutions silently? Sending it 
parameters or answerfile?

At the bottom of the page at this link IT Professionals: Microsoft easy fix 
unattended 
installation,
 Microsoft provides guidance for solutions with the extension: .diagcab for 
silent deployment throughout an enterprise IT environment.

When I try and run their suggestion with the new Office removal 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab, the log file says it is looking for a mini.diagcab 
(which is what their sample shows too).

Cordell



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.

[mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

[Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)]

Thanks for confirming, James. Hoping someone had a chance to get some support 
from Microsoft on it . . .

Cordell
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: July 10, 2017 12:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab

I attempted to get this same thing working at one time and never could. I ran 
into the same issue that you're experiencing. I could never find the mini cab 
file it required. I ended up going back to the scrub files and had to use logic 
in my script to detect which version of Office they had and run the appropriate 
scrub vbs.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

Rather than using the version specific Office Scrub vbs files the 
updated
 automated solution uses PS scripts.

Anyone know the way to run such .diagcab solutions silently? Sending it 
parameters or answerfile?

At the bottom of the page at this link IT Professionals: Microsoft easy fix 
unattended 
installation,
 Microsoft provides guidance for solutions with the extension: .diagcab for 
silent deployment throughout an enterprise IT environment.

When I try and run their suggestion with the new Office removal 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab, the log file says it is looking for a mini.diagcab 
(which is what their sample shows too).

Cordell



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.

[mssms] RE: Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

[Beardsley, James]

I attempted to get this same thing working at one time and never could. I ran 
into the same issue that you're experiencing. I could never find the mini cab 
file it required. I ended up going back to the scrub files and had to use logic 
in my script to detect which version of Office they had and run the appropriate 
scrub vbs.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 11:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

Rather than using the version specific Office Scrub vbs files the 
updated
 automated solution uses PS scripts.

Anyone know the way to run such .diagcab solutions silently? Sending it 
parameters or answerfile?

At the bottom of the page at this link IT Professionals: Microsoft easy fix 
unattended 
installation,
 Microsoft provides guidance for solutions with the extension: .diagcab for 
silent deployment throughout an enterprise IT environment.

When I try and run their suggestion with the new Office removal 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab, the log file says it is looking for a mini.diagcab 
(which is what their sample shows too).

Cordell



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.

[mssms] Unattended installation of Microsoft's o15-ctrremove.diagcab

[Melin, Cordell (BAC/LAC)]

Rather than using the version specific Office Scrub vbs files the 
updated
 automated solution uses PS scripts.

Anyone know the way to run such .diagcab solutions silently? Sending it 
parameters or answerfile?

At the bottom of the page at this link IT Professionals: Microsoft easy fix 
unattended 
installation,
 Microsoft provides guidance for solutions with the extension: .diagcab for 
silent deployment throughout an enterprise IT environment.

When I try and run their suggestion with the new Office removal 
o15-ctrremove.diagcab, the log file says it is looking for a mini.diagcab 
(which is what their sample shows too).

Cordell

Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

[Paul Winstanley]

However workstation Dp won't allow PXE but you can use boot media.


On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 12:00, Marable, Mike  wrote:

> Good morning Kevin,
>
>
>
> Personally I would put a DP in the remote sites.  You have a decent number
> of machines in each location so pulling content across the WAN for
> everything probably would not be the best way of utilizing that connection.
>
>
>
> If you are going to be doing OSD in those locations having a DP with the
> content locally is going to be your best bet.  Otherwise trying to PXE boot
> across the Pacific Ocean, while sounding cool, probably would be a painful
> experience.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Ray
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 9, 2017 10:06 PM
> *To:* mssms 
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines
>
>
>
> Any help
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Ray  wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> i have a sccm infra in across the globe ..USA (500 machines), Japan (300),
> Korea(50-300) ,Canada(100-300)
>
>
>
> so WAN speed is 10 MBPS from other offices to Head quaters USA.
>
>
>
> as of now SCCM infra is Standalone primary server...
>
>
>
> so if i want to manage the other regions, should I just install the
> Standard DP is fine in all locations ?
>
>
>
> I want to use the features are Inventory,Patching, OSD (with PXE and
> USB),Complience management,app/package deployment..
>
>
>
> Also If i dont want the PXE based OSD.. Can i go with workstation DP ?
> (any technet document for this like Workstation DP is supprted)
>
>
>
> I'm with SCCM 1610.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not
> be used for urgent or sensitive issues
>
>

RE: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

[Marable, Mike]

Good morning Kevin,

Personally I would put a DP in the remote sites.  You have a decent number of 
machines in each location so pulling content across the WAN for everything 
probably would not be the best way of utilizing that connection.

If you are going to be doing OSD in those locations having a DP with the 
content locally is going to be your best bet.  Otherwise trying to PXE boot 
across the Pacific Ocean, while sounding cool, probably would be a painful 
experience.

Thanks
Mike


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kevin Ray
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 10:06 PM
To: mssms 
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Design query for small number of machines

Any help

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Ray 
> wrote:
Hi Team,

i have a sccm infra in across the globe ..USA (500 machines), Japan (300), 
Korea(50-300) ,Canada(100-300)

so WAN speed is 10 MBPS from other offices to Head quaters USA.

as of now SCCM infra is Standalone primary server...

so if i want to manage the other regions, should I just install the Standard DP 
is fine in all locations ?

I want to use the features are Inventory,Patching, OSD (with PXE and 
USB),Complience management,app/package deployment..

Also If i dont want the PXE based OSD.. Can i go with workstation DP ? (any 
technet document for this like Workstation DP is supprted)

I'm with SCCM 1610.


Thanks
Kevin



**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues 

[mssms] Windows Store for Business and Azure AD

[janusro1]

Hi,

 

I'd like to use the windows store with configmanager, offline aps are fine,
but I've never dealt with azure.

 

What kind of subscription would I need?

What account should I use for Azure AD? Not a personal one as that one would
be permanently linked to it right?

 

Cheers, roland