Re: [mb-style] Veto - DVD in album titles
On Mar 6, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Robert Kaye wrote: I'm currently mulling it over -- I'll re-read the threads and figure out our next step later today/tomorrow. OK, that obviously didn't happen. :-( Just to let you know, its near the top of my TODO list and you will hear from me on this soon. -- --ruaok Somewhere in Texas a village is *still* missing its idiot. Robert Kaye -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --http://mayhem-chaos.net ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] Re: Re: Instrument/vocal member of on TEST
I agree with earlier comments that we don't need to duplicate the artist
information here. Other than that, I prefer the second option.
Cristov (wolfsong)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ZaphodBeeblebrox formerly known as mo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [mb-style] Re: Re: Instrument/vocal member of on TEST
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:54:24 +0100
as this has been in limbo for a whole week I now ask for additional input and
veto:
we currently have
[artist] is/was a{additional:n additional} {instrument} performing member of
[artist]
[artist] has/had {instrument} performing member [artist]
[artist] is/was a{additional:n additional} {vocal} vocal performing member of
[artist]
[artist] has/had {additional} {vocal} vocal performing member [artist]
-- OR--
[artist] performed {instrument} as member of [artist]
(no reverse link phrase?)
[artist] performed {vocal} as member of [artist]
(no reverse link phrase?)
(g0llum could you come up with a reverse phrase please?)
personally I'm fine with either. as long as it is implemented.
as for the actual *work* of implementing it, I am fine with doing this task.
~mo
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
RE: [mb-style] Re: Re: Instrument/vocal member of on TEST
-- OR--
[artist] performed {instrument} as member of [artist]
(no reverse link phrase?)
[artist] performed {vocal} as member of [artist]
(no reverse link phrase?)
(g0llum could you come up with a reverse phrase please?)
The reverse phrase is even easier, I think:
[artist b] has {instrument} performed by [artist]
[artist b] has {vocal} performed by [artist]
Because the vocal AR types now include the word vocal,
we do not need to duplicate it in the phrase. Is that correct?
It would be very nice if these attributes could be in
the plural form (e.g. has vocals), but that can't be done
in a generic way which fits all cases.
g0llum
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
