Re: [mb-style] Catalog numbers for releases with multiple media
On 03/07/2012 03:46 PM, Per Starbäck wrote: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Release/Catalog_Number says that [...] Is that still true now that a release can consist of several discs? Wouldn't it be better to use the catalog number that goes for the whole release instead? related thread @ http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?id=3316 Thanks. So many people think it should be changed, and some people act as if it was changed. But will it change? ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
[mb-style] Catalog numbers for releases with multiple media
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Release/Catalog_Number says that # 4. Some box sets will have a separate cat number for each disc, and then an overall number that appears # on the outer packaging. It is recommended that the catalog number to be entered on MBz matches each # individual disc. The number for the overall package can be noted in the release annotation if desired. Is that still true now that a release can consist of several discs? Wouldn't it be better to use the catalog number that goes for the whole release instead? If that is so, and is changed, would it be good to store catalog numbers for individual discs somewhere too? (Same goes for barcodes.) ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] Catalog numbers for releases with multiple media
On 03/07/2012 03:46 PM, Per Starbäck wrote: http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Release/Catalog_Number says that # 4. Some box sets will have a separate cat number for each disc, and then an overall number that appears # on the outer packaging. It is recommended that the catalog number to be entered on MBz matches each # individual disc. The number for the overall package can be noted in the release annotation if desired. Is that still true now that a release can consist of several discs? Wouldn't it be better to use the catalog number that goes for the whole release instead? If that is so, and is changed, would it be good to store catalog numbers for individual discs somewhere too? (Same goes for barcodes.) related thread @ http://forums.musicbrainz.org/viewtopic.php?id=3316 Alex / caller#6 ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
