Re: [mb-style] Vinyl: Single vs. EP

2006-03-25 Thread Schika
999 wrote:

 I added a lot of vinyl releases and often I don't know if it is an EP
 or a single.
 What do you think it should be, here are some examples:

 1. 7'', TrackA / TrackB
 2. 12'', TrackA / TrackB1, TrackB2
 3. 12'', 2 tracks on each side

 I've come across 2 track releases that are labeled EPs and singles
 with 4 tracks. But want a general answer, because most releases don't
 have the word EP in their title.

 Sandor (Nine99/darkshyne)


Since I'm collecting vinyls (1987) that's how I got it told from other
DJ's and how it is used in common for electronic music:

A Single release containes only one single track (and maybe with
various mixes/versions of this track).
A EP release containes at least two different tracks.
A Remix release containes only remixed/reworked tracks.

The format of a release (7, 10, 12, tape, CD, DAT, MD...) doesn't
matter !

A clean/simple artist entry with examples for above mentioned release
types -
http://musicbrainz.org/artist/a77f6f2f-19a2-4648-9018-3ad3aa4c1b9b.html -

Schika


___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style


Re: [mb-style] Vinyl: Single vs. EP

2006-03-24 Thread PRAEst76
On Friday 24 March 2006 04:20, 999 wrote:

 I've come across 2 track releases that are labeled EPs and singles with
 4 tracks. But want a general answer, because most releases don't have
 the word EP in their title.

There is no general answer here I think. EP has become a marketing phrase, a 
bit like Limited Edition which i think is the reason the guideline says to 
mark a release as EP if it says so in the title. The length of the release 
doesn't seem to matter, I have 12 singles here that push album length and 
EPs that aren't even 10 minutes long.

Ultimately it depends on how the release was marketed and the intent of the 
artist and something that can only really be decided on a per-release basis 
but generally proper EPs are relatively rare.

I usually look upon an ep as being intended as a mini-album itself rather than 
an A track with supporting material, but there are exceptions even to this.

-- 
PRAEst76
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style


Re: [mb-style] Vinyl: Single vs. EP

2006-03-24 Thread Simon Tucker



There is no general answer here I think. EP has become a 
marketing phrase, a bit like Limited Edition which i think 
is the reason the guideline says to mark a release as EP if 
it says so in the title. 
   



That's not true with vinyl though. EP was a specific size. SP was 7, EP was
10 (I actually remember 2 different sizes but I think 10 was more common)
and LP was 12 which is why early 12 mixes were called long play singles
way back when.
 



This isn't true either - EPs were generally 7 singles way back when. 
10s were largely Shellac 78s. EPs were singles which were too long to 
be eligible for chart entry (until about '67 when EPs were included in 
the singles charts). I think in later years the 10 just embodied the 
too long for single, not long enough for album idea because of their 
size. 12s released from about the 80s onwards which had more than two 
tracks were generally called Maxi-Singles but I think this was in the US 
only?


Laters
Simon
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style


Re: [mb-style] Vinyl: Single vs. EP

2006-03-24 Thread PRAEst76
On Friday 24 March 2006 13:55, Cristov Russell wrote:

 That's not true with vinyl though. EP was a specific size. SP was 7, EP
 was 10 (I actually remember 2 different sizes but I think 10 was more
 common) and LP was 12 which is why early 12 mixes were called long play
 singles way back when.

I've a few 10 vinyls here and none of them are EPs. Most of the vinyl EPs I 
have are extended 7 discs, sometimes 33rpm. My knowledge and collection only 
goes back to the late 70s though.

There is an article on wikipedia concerning the EP at 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_play though I don't totally agree with 
some of it.

-- 
PRAEst76
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style


[mb-style] Vinyl: Single vs. EP

2006-03-23 Thread 999
I added a lot of vinyl releases and often I don't know if it is an EP or 
a single.

What do you think it should be, here are some examples:

1. 7'', TrackA / TrackB
2. 12'', TrackA / TrackB1, TrackB2
3. 12'', 2 tracks on each side

I've come across 2 track releases that are labeled EPs and singles with 
4 tracks. But want a general answer, because most releases don't have 
the word EP in their title.


Sandor (Nine99/darkshyne)
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style


RE: [mb-style] Vinyl: Single vs. EP

2006-03-23 Thread g0llum
Please put the format of the release into the annotation, then we'll have
the information available once we're able to specify the physical media
beyond the current album attributes. Currently, we're loosing lots of
information if we try to fit the real ones into our limited scheme.

  regards, g0llum 

 While there are 12 singles vinyl EPs were actually a 
 different size (10 i think) and in some case were just 
 singles too long for a standard play (7) and too short for 
 LP (12). I'd say the same rules should apply and number of 
 tracks isn't relevant but distinctive tracks are. If in 
 example 3 several of the tracks are just remixes, I'd treat 
 it as a single but if all of them are completly different I'd 
 say EP. 1  2 I'd say are Single.


___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style