Re: Replying with headers

1999-05-31 Thread Byrial Jensen

On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 13:32:34 -0400, Rob Reid wrote:
> At  5:39 AM EDT on May 31 Byrial Jensen sent off:
> > If you like, I could make a patch for you with a new $reply_weed
> > configuration variable -- it would only take a few minutes.
> 
> Maybe it'd be easier to set editor to something like
> 
>   sed "magic for deleting unwanted header lines" | your_regular_editor

It depends on who you are. It is easier for me to patch mutt than
to make a sed scrict. All the necessary source code exists, you
just need to change the flags passed from include_reply() to
mutt_copy_message().

But yes, anyone less familiar with mutt's source than me might
prefer to do the thing by so other means (sed, perl, editor
macros or whatever he is familiar with).

-- 
Byrial



Re: Where to download urlview

1999-05-31 Thread Steve Crane

On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 06:44:26PM -0600, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
 
> MASTER_SITES=   ftp://ftp.cs.hmc.edu/pub/me/ \

This site does not appear to allow anonymous access

> ftp://ftp.cs.tu-berlin.de/pub/net/mail/mutt/ \

but I got it from here.

Thanks.
-- 
Steve Crane
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.datapro.co.za/~stevec



Re: Replying with headers

1999-05-31 Thread Rob Reid

At  5:39 AM EDT on May 31 Byrial Jensen sent off:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 15:28:01 +0200, Gerrit Holl wrote:
> > I mean that if I reply, I see the specified headers by the
> > previous mail. I've "header" turned on now, but if I reply, I see
> > _all_ headers quoted, including the ones I ignored. The ones I
> > ignore are only ignored when reading mail...
> 
> If you like, I could make a patch for you with a new $reply_weed
> configuration variable -- it would only take a few minutes.

Maybe it'd be easier to set editor to something like

  sed "magic for deleting unwanted header lines" | your_regular_editor



I thought my sig chooser was random, but sometimes it surprises me...

-- 
"...cheap tricks are less expensive than costly tricks." - Larry Wall
Robert I. Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/
PGP Key: http://astro.utoronto.ca/~reid/pgp.html



Re: "special delete" solution

1999-05-31 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE


Hi

this works fine:
folder-hook +work 'bind index d save-message'
folder-hook +work 'save-hook .* =work-done'

but I have another problem now. When I change folder =work to another bindings
are still same as in =work folder.

I here an elegance solution to get my "default" bindings back or I must redefine
them?
-- 
Keso
Our Pussys, Our Choice
 just like a suicide



Re: "special delete"

1999-05-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre

On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 16:41:50 +0200, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote:
> I'm trying to setup one special folder (=work) for my bussines
> things. I'd like to bind 'd' to 'save-message', but with parameter
> =work-done. I try put
> folder-hook +work 'bind index d save-message =work-done'
> into my .muttrc but mutt say "to many parameters"

Usage for bind is:

  Usage: bind map key function

You can't use a parameter for the function. Use macro instead of bind.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - PhD student in Computer Science
Web:  or  - 100%
validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International
des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, Faits divers insolites, etc.



"special delete"

1999-05-31 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE

hi

I'm trying to setup one special folder (=work) for my bussines things. I'd like
to bind 'd' to 'save-message', but with parameter =work-done. I try put 
folder-hook +work 'bind index d save-message =work-done'
into my .muttrc but mutt say "to many parameters"

any suggestions ?
-- 
Keso
Our Pussys, Our Choice
 just like a suicide



Re: Replying with headers

1999-05-31 Thread Byrial Jensen

On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 15:28:01 +0200, Gerrit Holl wrote:
> I mean that if I reply, I see the specified headers by the previous mail. I've
> "header" turned on now, but if I reply, I see _all_
> headers quoted, including the ones I ignored. The ones I ignore are only
> ignored when reading mail...

It is still unclear to me what you want to do, but I think that
you maybe wish to quote some of headers, but not all of them in
your replies. If this is the case, then the answer is that you
can't. You can quote all headers (by setting $header) or no
headers (by unsetting $header) in replies, but there is no
equivalent to $forward_weed when replying.

If you like, I could make a patch for you with a new $reply_weed
configuration variable -- it would only take a few minutes.

-- 
Byrial