Re: Mailcap entry for inline BMP?

2001-03-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

malcolm.boekhoff proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

> Unfortunately I can't use procmail because there it isn't in Cygwin yet and
> it don't compile OOTB (I am Cygwin on NT4).
 
 Try maildrop instead - i think that does compile

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin



Re: Procmail & user+ext@bla.com addresses

2001-03-30 Thread Lars Hecking


> I think he was looking for a somewhat more general solution:) Maybe:
> 
> :0:
> * ^TO_user+\/.*@her\.com
> `echo $MATCH | sed "s/@.*//"`
> 
> Untested, of course. (You might have to escape the "+" in the second
> line, cannot remember the procmail regex syntax right now, too late:)

 Yes, you have to.

 Ralf and I exchanged some more email and finally settled on

:0
* ^Delivered-To: copymail\+\/[^@]*
/copymail/Maildir/$MATCH/

 as he cannot use the From: header. No locking is required for maildir
 delivery.




Re: Mailcap entry for inline BMP?

2001-03-30 Thread Enoch Wu

If you use cygwin, take a look at my .mailcap entry below:

application/vnd.ms-excel; //N/PROGS/OFFICE97/Office/excel.exe `cygpath --windows %s`; 
copiousoutput
application/zip;cp %s . 
text/html; "//C/Program\ Files/Netscape/Communicator/Program/netscape.exe" `cygpath 
--windows %s`

Just add a new line starting with "application/vnd.ms-xxx" in place of
text/html. 

Hope that helps.
EW


On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 08:00:41AM +, malcolm.boekhoff wrote:
> On 2001-03-29 12:11:57, Bob Bell wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately I can't use procmail because there it isn't in Cygwin yet and it don't 
>compile OOTB (I am Cygwin on NT4).
> 
> > You might try using emil in your procmailrc to convert uuencoded
> > files into MIME attachments.  If that works, you should then be able to
> > deal with the BMP as a MIME attachments.  As things currently stand, it
> > would just be treated as part of the message.
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 04:08:18PM +, malcolm.boekhoff 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can some clever person please post a mailcap entry to deal with messages from
> > > Microsoft Outlook Express, where the sender has attached a BMP.
> > > 
> > > The BMP kind of gets in-lined into the message, so that if you were reading it
> > > with OE you would see the picture (some kind of OLE stuff, I think). I.e. you
> > > don't have to explicitly open the attachment, you can see it in the preview
> > > window.
> > > 
> > > The properties you get from OE are:
> > > 
> > > --> Message properties start here <--
> > > Received: from boekhoffm (BOEKHOFF_M [10.16.92.39]) by 
>cloisters-exch.actfs.co.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 
>Version 5.5.2650.21)
> > >   id G683370T; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:55:34 +0100
> > > Message-ID: <000801c0b869$0bc7bc50$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > From: "Malcolm Boekhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: etst
> > > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:58:06 +0100
> > > X-Priority: 3
> > > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
> > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > begin 600 1.bmp
> > > M0DU6$@H``#8HD`$``"8"```!`!@``"`2"@#$#@``Q`X`
> > > M
> > > M
> > > M
> > > M
> > > M
> > > M
> > > M
> > > 
> > > .. and loads more.
> > > --> Message properties end here <--
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > -
> >  "Linux represents a best-of-breed Unix, that is trusted in mission
> >   critical applications, and -- due to it's open source code -- has
> >   a long term credibility which exceeds many other competitive OS's."
> >-- Microsoft "Halloween" Document
> 



too many messages saturates slow link

2001-03-30 Thread Carlos Puchol


hi, when i connect via a slow link to my box, i get this
when i type mutt:

Reading /var/spool/mail/me... 1869 (33%)

this saturates my modem line for a little while.
because (it seems) there is a lot of redraws printing
the message count (one line per message?).

is there some way to turn it
off or just make it show the XX% part (assuming
it is not printed at every message)?

thanks,

-c




Mutt with vvv-nntp-patch

2001-03-30 Thread amutt

Hi to all...

I have to debian mashines, one with potato as router an one as my
workstation with woody.

On woody, I have a selfcompiled mutt 1.3.15i with several vvv- Patches
including the nntp-patch.

I installed leafnode on my router an I am able to read news with. It works
fine. 

But I'm not able to post messages, I tried it serveral time, an I got only
an message as this:

<<<<<<<
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. The following address(es) failed:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unknown local-part "de.comp.os.unix.sinix" in domain "billgotchy.de"
<<<<<<<

My MTA is exim 3.12. Where is the error, where I have to look for?

Thnx
Jan


-- 
One time, you all will be emulated by linux!


Jan- Hendrik Palic
Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de"
E-Mail: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"




/etc/hosts and mutt

2001-03-30 Thread Dave Murray

What are the ramifications on mutt & sendmail if I edit
/etc/hosts?

It currently is:
  127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain

If I were to change it to:
  127.0.0.1 bozo clown.circus

What will it mess up, make better, cause me to change?

Regards,
Dave



Re: /etc/hosts and mutt

2001-03-30 Thread Christian Bell

On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Dave Murray wrote:

> If I were to change it to:
>   127.0.0.1 bozo clown.circus

I wouldn't do such a thing since 127.0.0.1 is _reserved_ for localhost.
Some programs (or scripts) might use localhost for some purpose. A simple
example would be connecting to localhost:80 to see if a http service is
active.

> What will it mess up, make better, cause me to change?

I think you should be looking hostname(1) to set your machine name or
changing the relevent documentation entries for mutt and/or sendmail.

Changing localhost is bad practice.



cheers,

//chris


-- 
"all humanity is passion; without passion, religion, history, novels, art would be 
ineffectual"
-- honoré de balzac



Re: /etc/hosts and mutt

2001-03-30 Thread Dave Murray

Christian Bell wrote on mutt-users:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Dave Murray wrote:
> 
> > If I were to change it to:
> >   127.0.0.1 bozo clown.circus
> 
> I wouldn't do such a thing since 127.0.0.1 is _reserved_ for localhost.
> Some programs (or scripts) might use localhost for some purpose. A simple
> example would be connecting to localhost:80 to see if a http service is
> active.
> 
> > What will it mess up, make better, cause me to change?
> 
> I think you should be looking hostname(1) to set your machine name or
> changing the relevent documentation entries for mutt and/or sendmail.
> 
> Changing localhost is bad practice.

Thanks, glad that I asked, but confused.  More reading for me I guess.

Dave



Re: too many messages saturates slow link

2001-03-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Carlos Puchol proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

> Reading /var/spool/mail/me... 1869 (33%)
 
> this saturates my modem line for a little while.

> is there some way to turn it
> off or just make it show the XX% part (assuming
> it is not printed at every message)?
 
 That's because mutt has to read the contents of your mbox format mailbox.
 Switch to (say) maildir.  Much faster (and better, if you handle large amounts
 of mail).
 
 You'd have to suggest this to your provider, if you dont run your own server.
 
-s (or pop the mails down with fetchmail and run maildir locally)

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin



Re: /etc/hosts and mutt

2001-03-30 Thread Duke Normandin

On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 06:58:03PM -0700, Dave Murray wrote:
> What are the ramifications on mutt & sendmail if I edit
> /etc/hosts?
> 
> It currently is:
>   127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
> 
> If I were to change it to:
>   127.0.0.1 bozo clown.circus
> 
> What will it mess up, make better, cause me to change?

You can use a "reserved" IP, e.g.,

10.0.0.1 bozo.clown.circus bozo
-- 
-duke

Calgary, Alberta, Canada




Re: too many messages saturates slow link

2001-03-30 Thread David Champion

On 2001.03.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos Puchol proclaimed on mutt-users that: 
> 
> > Reading /var/spool/mail/me... 1869 (33%)
>  
> > this saturates my modem line for a little while.
> 
> > is there some way to turn it
> > off or just make it show the XX% part (assuming
> > it is not printed at every message)?
>  
>  That's because mutt has to read the contents of your mbox format mailbox.
>  Switch to (say) maildir.  Much faster (and better, if you handle large amounts
>  of mail).

I get a lot of mail, and don't need to use maildir for performance
reasons.  Mbox works fine.  Changing to maildir won't solve this
problem, either, unless for some odd reason maildir switches out the
progress report.

What you probably want is to set the read_inc variable, or to make it
larger than it is already.  $read_inc indicates how often to update the
status report line whlie reading a mailbox.  For example, setting it
to 50 makes the status line update every 50 messages, instead of with
each message.

-- 
 -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago




Re: too many messages saturates slow link

2001-03-30 Thread Wade A. Mosely

Carlos Puchol wrote:
> this saturates my modem line for a little while.
> because (it seems) there is a lot of redraws printing
> the message count (one line per message?).
> 
> is there some way to turn it
> off or just make it show the XX% part (assuming
> it is not printed at every message)?

Have you tried setting $read_inc and $write_inc to greater
values?  Perhaps that would help.

-- 
Linux: The Choice of the GNU Generation





gnupg

2001-03-30 Thread Tony Collins

G'day all

Please forgive what's probably a dumb question, but how do you make mutt
sign or encrypt mails with GnuPG?

Re

Tony

-- 
Is that an African or European swallow?
My local LUG:  http://luv.asn.au
Sick of AOL owned Instant Messaging?  Try http://www.jabber.org



Integrating abook and mutt

2001-03-30 Thread Brian Foley


Hey All,
  I wrote a perl script that allows you to add aliases to the mutt
alias file and an abook addressbook at the same time.  You just bind
the script to "a" and use as normal.  When you have finished with the
mutt aliases it will ask you if you want to save the address to abook,
if you do it will then prompt you for telephone numbers etc. for the
person.
  If you think this is useful, it is available at:
   http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~brianf/Setup/abookadd.pl.txt
  Enjoy,
Brian.

-- 
Brian Foley -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- www.maths.tcd.ie/~brianf
Visit the Intervarsity Track & Field web-site:  www.iv2001.com