Re: to headers to lists
Well, no Suresh. But the fact is that when I'm in lugroma folder I just type 'r' or 'm' and in the to field appears the account of the list. This doesn't happen with mutt-users for instance. Vittorio Suresh Ramasubramanian [mutt-users] 24/06/01 07:35 +0530: Victor [mutt-users] 24/06/01 00:39 +: My mutt is almost well configured with emacs as my favourite composer. Almost because when I send or reply to a message in one of the lists I've subscribed (lugroma) I get the list account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the to field automatically, Do you use L (list reply to) when replying to lists? -suresh -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
Re: to headers to lists
Am 2001-06-24 schrieb Victor: Well, no Suresh. But the fact is that when I'm in lugroma folder I just type 'r' or 'm' and in the to field appears the account of the list. This doesn't happen with mutt-users for instance. Vittorio Do you use L (list reply to) when replying to lists? -suresh - Does lugroma change the Reply-To: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then perhaps you should define (or undefine, just try it) the following: set ignore_list_reply_to - Have you defined the following line in your muttrc: lists lugroma mutt-users with all your mailinglists (use the part left from @ for every list) Georg -- * Hiermit widerspreche ich einer gewerblichen Nutzung meiner Daten * * gemäß § 1 UWG und §823 BGB. Zuwiderhandlungen werden verfolgt. * -- / // Georg Herberg /___/ ___ ___ /__ ___ ___ ___ Marinesiedlung 10 b, D 29348 Eschede / / /__/ / / / / /__/ / / / / Ph: +49 5142 41 63 93; Fax: 41 63 95 / / /__ //__/ /__ //__/ Cellular/GSM: +49 1 70 / 2 32 81 19 __/ -- * CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This e-mail communication may contain information that is confidential and privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee please note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. PGP signature
matching random headers in score/color commands
I'm trying to figure out how to make changes to color and/or scoring based on the contents of the Importance: header (this seems to be what Outlook uses to flag messages as high/low priority). It seems that the color and score commands can't use ~h, however. Is there any way around this limitation? I can understand why matching the message body might be verboten, but I thought mutt had to read the whole message header anyway; does it only store parts of the header in memory? I'd gladly live with the increased memory requirements if I could match arbitrary header fields. jafager -- Beware the featureless cube of indestructible metal.
Re: matching random headers in score/color commands
On 2001.06.24, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jason A. Fager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to figure out how to make changes to color and/or scoring based on the contents of the Importance: header (this seems to be what Outlook uses to flag messages as high/low priority). It seems that the color and score commands can't use ~h, however. Is there any way around this limitation? I can understand why matching the Procmail. ### ## If the mail seems important, make sure that Mutt knows # :0 f * ^(Importance: High|Priority: Urgent) | formail -I X-Status: F message body might be verboten, but I thought mutt had to read the whole message header anyway; does it only store parts of the header in memory? I'd gladly live with the increased memory requirements if I could match arbitrary header fields. Mutt reads whole headers when the mailbox is scanned, but retains only certain fields indefinitely. It would be nice to be able to configure a list of searchable (and cached) header fields, though. For example: cache_header priority: received: x- could allow header searches to match Priority:, Received:, X-Foo:, and X-Bar: headers by caching any fields which match in a linked list off the ENVELOPE structure -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
Re: How many mailboxes can one set?
I'm sure this can be done a better way but for a quick hack to give the usual mailboxes appearance try: mailboxes ! `/bin/ls ~/Mail | sed s/[A-Za-z0-9_-]/=/ | xargs echo` -Ross -- On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 11:31:55AM -0400, Mr. Wade wrote: mailboxes ! `echo $HOME/Mail/IN*` - End of Original Message -
