Re: Howto run a command in message hooks (was: Re: How to send a

[Patrick Schoenfeld]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:39:17PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> ls -la ~/.mutt/return_receipt

You should work on you ability to _read_ mails others write _properly_.
I told you, that the file _is_ executable. And as you eventually noticed
someone else already pointed the right solution out to me, which were
not a missing executable flag.

-Patrick

Re: encrypt to self with gpgme?

[Alexander Dahl]

> I have a self configured mutt 1.5.16 with encryption via gpgme:

Is there at least anyone but me who uses gpgme instead of classic method
with this error-prone commandline config? ;)

Greets
Alex

-- 
Freiheit statt Angst -- Für die Grundrechte!
Bundesweite, dezentrale Demos gegen die Vorratsdatenspeicherung
06.11. in Magdeburg, Haltestelle Goldschmiedebrücke 16:00 bis 19:00 Uhr
- Bringt Laternen, Kerzen und Grundgesetze mit! -
Letzte Chance vor der Verabschiedung durch den Bundestag:
http://www.freiheitstattangst.de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: The strange case of the vanishing mailing list posts...

[Arthur Dent]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:10:58PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
> =- Arthur Dent wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 11:02:09 +0100 -=
> > I am curious to see if this message to this list shows up (I am
> > not cc-ing myself on this one).
> 
> Did it?

Well actually it did. So that would suggest that there is nothing wrong with
my Mutt setup. 

> 
> Many ML let you configure not to Cc: you for own posts.
> Check your preferences on each ML personal config.

Yes, someone else suggested (off list) that:
>If the mailing list software is Mailman, you might want to check
>that "Receive your own posts to the list?" is set to "yes" and
>"Avoid duplicate copies of messages?" to "no".

When I checked I found that the RKH mailing list (on sourceforge) is indeed a
Mailman list, but my personal settings already had "Receive your own posts"
set to "Yes".
"Avoid duplicates" however was set to yes. I have changed it now, but have not
since posted to that list. I am not sure that that was the problem however. If
I quote the Mailman text exactly for this option it states:

" When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list message,
you can opt to not receive another copy from the mailing list. Select Yes to
avoid receiving copies from the mailing list; select No to receive copies.

If the list has member personalized messages enabled, and you elect to receive
copies, every copy will have a X-Mailman-Copy: yes header added to it. "

Which, to me, would suggest that a reply *to* me would be affected by this
option but a post *from* me would not. Nevertheless I have changed it and will
see what happens.

If the problem persists I remain mystified

Thanks for your help so far...

AD


pgppmlhShFhLb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks (was: Re: How to send a

[Patrick Shanahan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 11:01]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
> > configuration just to ask why one specific message-hook (which I 
> > presentated)
> > is not working?
> 
> There is only one information that I see that I really missed to presentate:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % mutt -v
> Mutt 1.5.16 (2007-06-11)

ls -la ~/.mutt/return_receipt


- -- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHH4NEClSjbQz1U5oRAjceAJ4pOlmi7x1qRmA272w2bSVtP6XHwgCdHGKT
0PpyO/5MVyxTTnGMcFRy2No=
=AO9N
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Rado S]

=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 17:18:54 +0200 -=

> and waits for an input ("read yn"), but mutt adds its "Press any
> key to continue...". So it seems that mutt already answers the
> question (what it shouldn't do). Also if I do press return to that
> question, it restarts the script and the game starts from the
> beginning. Endless, until i somehow force it to quit (not that
> easy).

As you've already learned, script doesn't wait for your input, it
already got it from STDIN (EOT). What you see is only the prompt
echo thrown into your regular mutt screen, while it actually already
has returned to mutt. When you press  again, why should it be
any different from your first execution? Use q or x to see the
difference.

-- 
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks (was: Re: How to send a

[Rado S]

=- Patrick Schoenfeld wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 16:40:33 +0200 -=

> Why? According to what I read this works for macros, why shouldn't
> it work for message hooks?

Because macros operate on functions, while hooks operate on muttrc
commands. See http://WIKI.mutt.org/ -> MuttGuide -> Syntax for
details.

-- 
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.

Re: The strange case of the vanishing mailing list posts...

[Rado S]

=- Arthur Dent wrote on Wed 24.Oct'07 at 11:02:09 +0100 -=

> Yesterday I made my first post to one of them. It never showed up.
> Except that I know it did because someone replied to it and their
> reply (quoting my message) did appear in my mailbox.
> 
> The result is always the same. My message never appears in my
> mailbox, replies to it do. I have resorted to adding myself as a
> "cc".
> I am curious to see if this message to this list shows up (I am
> not cc-ing myself on this one).

Did it?

Many ML let you configure not to Cc: you for own posts.
Check your preferences on each ML personal config.

-- 
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Dave Evans]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:38:55PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > If you have used  I think your stdin has changed to the
> > messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> > So you might try explicitly setting your tty with read yn  
> Okay, that might be an explanation why it does immedetiately print those
> mutt press any key message (btw. is it possible to suppress this message
> when calling the script?), but why does it recall and recall the script
> endlessly?

Just a guess, but maybe after running an external script, mutt re-runs the
hooks; after all, it is still "Before  mutt  displays (or formats for replying
or forwarding) a message".  The muttrc man page, at least, is not very
specific (AFAICT) about when the hooks get run.

In any case you'll presumably want some way of /not/ prompting the user to
send the receipt if one has already been sent for this message; ideally some
way that's "built in" to mutt, i.e. doesn't require an external script.

-- 
Dave Evans
http://djce.org.uk/
http://djce.org.uk/pgpkey


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Christian Brabandt]

Hi Patrick!

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > If you have used  I think your stdin has changed to the
> > messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> > So you might try explicitly setting your tty with read yn  
> Okay, that might be an explanation why it does immedetiately print those
> mutt press any key message (btw. is it possible to suppress this message
> when calling the script?), 

set wait_key=no

> but why does it recall and recall the script endlessly?

I don't know.

regards,
Christian
-- 
Everything can be filed under "miscellaneous".

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Patrick Schoenfeld]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:30:45PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> If you have used  I think your stdin has changed to the
> messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
> So you might try explicitly setting your tty with read yn 

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Christian Brabandt]

Hi Patrick!

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?
> 
> no, thats no problem.
> 
> > Depending on what your want try either  or 
> 
> Hm. That and what Dave Evans wrote works, at least partially. Now the
> script is launched, but it does not work as expected.  It starts the
> script which outputs:
> 
> User has asked for a return receipt. Send one? ([yes]/no): 
> 
> and waits for an input ("read yn"), but mutt adds its "Press any key to
> continue...". So it seems that mutt already answers the question (what
> it shouldn't do). Also if I do press return to that question, it
> restarts the script and the game starts from the beginning. Endless,
> until i somehow force it to quit (not that easy).
> 
> The (for now very basic script):
> #!/bin/sh
> 
> TEMP="`mktemp`"
> trap "rm -f $TEMP" INT ABRT EXIT
> tee > $TEMP
> 
> QUESTION="User has asked for a return receipt. Send one? ([yes]/no): "
> echo -n $QUESTION
> read yn
> 
> (I know that this is far from beeing complete, but to test how things
> would work it is enough)

If you have used  I think your stdin has changed to the
messages you piped. And read expects your answer from that filehandle.
So you might try explicitly setting your tty with read yn 

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

[Matthias Apitz]

El día Wednesday, October 24, 2007 a las 09:21:43AM -0600, Joseph escribió:

> On 10/24/07 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >Nice work. Now we need someone who could bring a subset of the
> >Reference Card onto a coffee mug. I've already have one for the most
> >used 'vi' commands which was sold for ~10 euros years ago :-)>
> 
> To try to  squeeze even 1/3 of mutt commands on a mug we would need 
> 1-Litter mug :-)

No problem, this is what we use here in Baviera (South of Germany)
as 'beer mug' in which fits one litter exactly and made of stone
as well like the coffee mug we're talking :-)

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz
e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - w http://www.oclcpica.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/
b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

[Joseph]

On 10/24/07 07:24, Matthias Apitz wrote:

Nice work. Now we need someone who could bring a subset of the
Reference Card onto a coffee mug. I've already have one for the most
used 'vi' commands which was sold for ~10 euros years ago :-)>


To try to  squeeze even 1/3 of mutt commands on a mug we would need 1-Litter 
mug :-)

--
#Joseph
GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Christian Brabandt]

Hi Patrick!

Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> I want to write a script that _asks_ the user, if he wants to send a
> return receipt (note how that differs from your assumption that a
> macro would be suffice. For me it wouldn't because w/o the question
> _I_ would forget to send the return receipt). Something like this
> can automatically be triggered only by message hooks. But as the
> solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from within the
> message hook? I added a hook like this:
> 
> message-hook "~h Return-Receipt-To:"
> "|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt"
> 
> And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt
> says (when I open this mail in the pager):
> 
> |/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt: Unknown command

Depending on what your want try either  or 


regards,
Christian
-- 
f y cn rd ths thn y cn hv grt jb n cmptr prgrmmng

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Patrick Schoenfeld]

Hi Christian,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Do you mind formating your message with a width < 80 chars?

no, thats no problem.

> Depending on what your want try either  or 

Hm. That and what Dave Evans wrote works, at least partially. Now the
script is launched, but it does not work as expected.  It starts the
script which outputs:

User has asked for a return receipt. Send one? ([yes]/no): 

and waits for an input ("read yn"), but mutt adds its "Press any key to
continue...". So it seems that mutt already answers the question (what
it shouldn't do). Also if I do press return to that question, it
restarts the script and the game starts from the beginning. Endless,
until i somehow force it to quit (not that easy).

The (for now very basic script):
#!/bin/sh

TEMP="`mktemp`"
trap "rm -f $TEMP" INT ABRT EXIT
tee > $TEMP

QUESTION="User has asked for a return receipt. Send one? ([yes]/no): "
echo -n $QUESTION
read yn

(I know that this is far from beeing complete, but to test how things
would work it is enough)

Any hints?

Regards,
Patrick

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks (was: Re: How to send a

[Patrick Schoenfeld]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:53:23PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
> configuration just to ask why one specific message-hook (which I presentated)
> is not working?

There is only one information that I see that I really missed to presentate:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % mutt -v
Mutt 1.5.16 (2007-06-11)

-Patrick

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks

[Dave Evans]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:40:33PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> message-hook "~h Return-Receipt-To:" "|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt"
> 
> And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says 
> (when
> I open this mail in the pager):
> 
> |/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt: Unknown command

I don't think there is a mutt command called
"|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt".  Maybe you wanted the "push"
command?

-- 
Dave Evans
http://djce.org.uk/
http://djce.org.uk/pgpkey


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks (was: Re: How to send a

[Patrick Schoenfeld]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:47:58AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 10:42]:
> > And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says 
> > (when
> > I open this mail in the pager):
>
> first *guess* w/b that ~/.mutt/return_receipt script was not

Whats so hard to understand about ".. is a valid executable script .. "?

> executable, but you have really presented little information.

What information do you expect me to presentate? Eventually my whole mutt
configuration just to ask why one specific message-hook (which I presentated)
is not working?

-Patrick

Re: Howto run a command in message hooks (was: Re: How to send a return receipt)

[Patrick Shanahan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 10:42]:
> I want to write a script that _asks_ the user, if he wants to send a return
> receipt (note how that differs from your assumption that a macro would be
> suffice. For me it wouldn't because w/o the question _I_ would forget to send
> the return receipt). Something like this can automatically be triggered only 
> by message
> hooks. But as the solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from 
> within
> the message hook? I added a hook like this:
> 
> message-hook "~h Return-Receipt-To:" "|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt"
> 
> And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says 
> (when
> I open this mail in the pager):
> 
> |/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt: Unknown command

first *guess* w/b that ~/.mutt/return_receipt script was not
executable, but you have really presented little information.
- -- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHH1sdClSjbQz1U5oRAoShAJ0RkvztBrLo1jW8fqfKCWtR1EgaaQCgpm9x
7rhYW+Z8Cfdy2Tku3GQovZU=
=uIe1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Howto run a command in message hooks (was: Re: How to send a return receipt)

[Patrick Schoenfeld]

Hi,

as it does not seem to be integrated into mutt upstream (at least not in
a forseeable timeline) I'm currently trying to
figure who a scripted solution to my problem would look like.

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 06:14:48PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
> It appears complex to you, but in fact it _is_ simple.

If thats true, then the problem I am currently stuck on should be fairly simple
to solve. So some explanations, then my question:

I want to write a script that _asks_ the user, if he wants to send a return
receipt (note how that differs from your assumption that a macro would be
suffice. For me it wouldn't because w/o the question _I_ would forget to send
the return receipt). Something like this can automatically be triggered only by 
message
hooks. But as the solution is extern (= a script), how do i call it from within
the message hook? I added a hook like this:

message-hook "~h Return-Receipt-To:" "|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt"

And even though the specified file is a valid executable script mutt says (when
I open this mail in the pager):

|/home/schoenfeld/.mutt/return_receipt: Unknown command

Why? According to what I read this works for macros, why shouldn't it work for
message hooks?

Regards
Patrick

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

[Joseph]

On 10/24/07 11:33, Christian Brabandt wrote:

Would it be possible to add commandline parameters? If I have time, I
can contribute.


regards,
Christian


It shouldn't be difficult, which one are they on in mutt manual?
Or just send in a spreadsheet format, command on one column explanation on the 
next column.


--
#Joseph
GPG KeyID: ED0E1FB7

Re: account-hook, imap_pass not used ?

[Nicolas KOWALSKI]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:25:02PM +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> I am trying to use multiple IMAP accounts. Following the Wiki, I use 
> these settings:
> 
> account-hook . 'unset imap_pass'
> account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="secret"'
> account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="anothersecret"'
> 
> set spoolfile="imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX"
> 
> 
> But when I start mutt, it always asks for a password. The "imap_pass" 
> variable does not seem to be used.
> 
> What am I doing wrong ?

Cough cough... :-(

The above hooks are fine, as long as they are not squeezed later in the 
configuration by an "unhook *" ! 

Sorry for the noise, and 
Thanks to the two Patrick for their help.

-- 
Nicolas

Re: account-hook, imap_pass not used ?

[Patrick Shanahan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Nicolas KOWALSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 09:31]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:55:58AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > remove the quote marks enclosing the password:
> > account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass=secret'
> 
> Unfortunately, this does not work. 

then try following which "works for me  :^)":

account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_user niko imap_pass=secret'

if that fails, set:

mailboxes 'imap://niko:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX'

and go there as you would any other folder, selecting it from the list.

- -- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHH0tvClSjbQz1U5oRAsYqAJsF+0tMCF0Sjp57e6nGn7E9XJ0vkQCdGRlV
tHYtiB3mQLI+IKb9COwHyZQ=
=rQXw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: account-hook, imap_pass not used ?

[Nicolas KOWALSKI]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:55:58AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Nicolas KOWALSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 06:26]:
> > I am trying to use multiple IMAP accounts. Following the Wiki, I use
> > these settings:
> > 
> > account-hook . 'unset imap_pass'
> > account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="secret"'
> > account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="anothersecret"'
> > 
> > set spoolfile="imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX"
> 
> remove the quote marks enclosing the password:
> account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass=secret'

Unfortunately, this does not work. 

Thanks for your suggestion,
-- 
Nicolas

Re: account-hook, imap_pass not used ?

[Patrick Schoenfeld]

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> I am trying to use multiple IMAP accounts. Following the Wiki, I use
> these settings:

I have not yet used this multiple IMAP accounts, so I don't know this for
certain, but..

> account-hook . 'unset imap_pass'

... my instinct tells me that this is the reason, because it is a default hook,
causing set imap_pass to be unset. Is your default account listed with an own
account-hook?

Sorry, if I may be wrong.

Regards,
Patrick

Re: account-hook, imap_pass not used ?

[Patrick Shanahan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

* Nicolas KOWALSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 06:26]:
> I am trying to use multiple IMAP accounts. Following the Wiki, I use
> these settings:
> 
> account-hook . 'unset imap_pass'
> account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="secret"'
> account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="anothersecret"'
> 
> set spoolfile="imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX"

remove the quote marks enclosing the password:
account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass=secret'

- -- 
Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHHyS+ClSjbQz1U5oRAj5gAJ95FgJv8JWUkdQw1R7bHAF2MYZxmACfYXp4
WmBqxs+RcZ3oxxsfVdaWatY=
=YoZy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

account-hook, imap_pass not used ?

[Nicolas KOWALSKI]

Hello,

I am trying to use multiple IMAP accounts. Following the Wiki, I use
these settings:

account-hook . 'unset imap_pass'
account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="secret"'
account-hook imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ 'set imap_pass="anothersecret"'

set spoolfile="imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/INBOX"


But when I start mutt, it always asks for a password. The "imap_pass" 
variable does not seem to be used.

What am I doing wrong ?

Thanks.


PS: 

if I remove the above hooks, to only use my primary account, it works 
well. This is with these settings:

set spoolfile="imap://petole.dyndns.org/INBOX"
set imap_user=niko
set imap_pass=secret


-- 
Nicolas

The strange case of the vanishing mailing list posts...

[Arthur Dent]

Hello all,

I have no idea if this is even a Mutt problem. All I can say with any
certainty is that I used Mutt to produce the emails concerned.

As well as this mailing list I am subscribed to some others. Yesterday I made
my first post to one of them. It never showed up. Except that I know it did
because someone replied to it and their reply (quoting my message) did appear
in my mailbox.

I do use folder hooks so that I can create a specific identity for each
mailing list:
# Mailing list folder hooks:
# This one ensures that all mail to the Mutt-users mailing list is sent by "MT 
Lists"
send-hook '~C @mutt.org' 'my_hdr From: Arthur Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
send-hook '~C @mutt.org' 'set pgp_sign_as=FDE78872'

# This one ensures that all mail to the RKHunter mailing list is sent by "RKH 
List"
send-hook '~C rkhunter' 'my_hdr From: Arthur Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
send-hook '~C rkhunter' 'set pgp_sign_as=FDE78872'

When I sent my first mail to the RKH list I had forgotten to add it to my 
"lists"
list - but it was a new post and not a reply so I simply typed in the "To" 
address
anyway. Subsequently I added it to my "lists" and hit "L" to reply to the 
replies to
my post.

The result is always the same. My message never appears in my mailbox, replies 
to it
do. I have resorted to adding myself as a "cc".

I am curious to see if this message to this list shows up (I am not cc-ing 
myself on
this one).

Thanks in advance for your help

AD



pgpSI3VqdLoIi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from Markus Miedaner)

[Christian Brabandt]

Hi Joseph!

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Joseph wrote:

> Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 - updated.
> http://www.sys-concept.com/Mutt_connections.html
> 

nice.

Would it be possible to add commandline parameters? If I have time, I
can contribute.


regards,
Christian
-- 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.
   -- RFC 1925

Re: [OT] vi mugs [Was: Mutt Quick Reference v.1.03 (addition from

[Pete Johns]

On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 08:56:30 +0200, Michael Tatge sent:
>* On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 Przemyslaw Gawronski (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>muttered: [vi cofee mug]
>>Any shot of that one to take a look? :)
>
>http://www.cafepress.com/geekcheat.11507711
>
>(I'm not associated with that company in any way.)
>
http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/mugs/7bbe/ is also very cool.
Worth reading the description!

--paj [not affiliated with thinkgeek.com]

-- 
Pete Johns   
Contact Information  
Any which way  
How Much?   


pgpLJhblYxz7L.pgp
Description: PGP signature