Re: coloring headers
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:13:40PM -0700, you (Ravi Uday) wrote: Hi Ravi, > 1. In the header of the recvd mail, how to make each mail address > different color and >reflect the same color in the body of the mail if it(the > name/address) appears there. ? > # coloring of the header # - color header white green "From" color header white red "X-Spam-Level" color header white yellow "Subject" color header white blue "Date" color header white magenta "Reply-To" # email addresses color body brightmagenta black "((@(([0-9a-z-]+\\.)*[0-9a-z-]+\\.?|#[0-9]+|\\[[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\]),)*@(([0-9a-z-]+\\.)*[0-9a-z-]+\\.?|#[0-9]+|\\[[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-9]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\]):)?[0-9a-z_.+%$-]+@(([0-9a-z-]+\\.)*[0-9a-z-]+\\.?|#[0-9]+|\\[[0-2]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-2]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-2]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\.[0-2]?[0-9]?[0-9]\\])" That's how I color my mails. However it only highlights email addresses - it does not color matching emails in the same color. What I would try is something like (untested!) # mark the bosses messages in red: color index red black "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" # some guy color index red white "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and replace the index with the name of the view where you wanna see the coloring (pager, ) > 2. When we reply ('g'/'r'), oriiginal mail will prepend each line with > '>', how to make it show > '-->' instead > set indent_string="> " # prefix for quoted messages is what you may be looking for. Hope that helps, Cheers, Markus -- Please note that this email-transaction has been logged due to German laws. To ensure the privacy of further communication please encrypt your message using the following KeyID = 694F9952 A. Lincoln: "Those who give a little bit of liberty to gain more safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." signature.asc Description: Digital signature
New mail -> 'un-collapses' thread ... Can I stop this ?
Hi all, I have the following folder-hook: folder-hook . \ "set sort=reverse-threads ;\ set sort_aux=last-date-received ;\ push '' ;\ set index_format='%3N %4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4c) %?M?%M> ?%s' ;\ set display_filter='t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass'" As well as this I have the following defined: set collapse_unread=yes My problem: My INBOX will be open all day within a terminal as per usual and as soon as a new message for a particular thread arrives the thread un-collapses. Is it possible to stop threads un-collaping as new mail arrives ? -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
Re: Change unread mark without open the message
On 4/28/08, Marianne Promberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 04/28/08 18:26, hce wrote: > > > > > But for old messages which have already marked with "O", I want to > > change it back to "N". I tried to use tag as you suggested above to > > change all "O" messages to "N". But did not work. Please explain more > > details how can I use the tag to change all "O" state to "N" state in > > one go. > > > I don't recall what the previously suggested solutions were. > > But this works perfectly fine for me: > > (press in sequence:) > T to tag matching the following pattern > ~O the pattern (all "O" messages should now be tagged) > ; apply the following to all tagged messages (*) > N set "N" flag on tagged messages > > (*) you should be able to omit this step if you've got "set > auto_tag=yes" in your .muttrc AFAIK. Thank you. That works fine. > I don't know why your 'set mark_old=no' doesn't work. Do you possibly > have a folder-hook somewhere that overrides it? No, there is no other setting to overrides it. >From comments from Vladimir, is it a bug in mutt? I installed mutt binary in Debian box. Seems I have to install a source package then to make change as Vladimir suggested. Thank you all. Kind Regards, Jim
coloring headers
Hi, 1. In the header of the recvd mail, how to make each mail address different color and reflect the same color in the body of the mail if it(the name/address) appears there. ? 2. When we reply ('g'/'r'), oriiginal mail will prepend each line with '>', how to make it show '-->' instead Sorry if these questions are asked before ! Ravi
Re: Change unread mark without open the message
> I don't know why your 'set mark_old=no' doesn't work. Do you possibly > have a folder-hook somewhere that overrides it? mark_old also does not work for IMAP. I'm attaching patch fixing the annoyance. -- Vlad IMAP mark_old patch diff --git a/imap/command.c b/imap/command.c --- a/imap/command.c +++ b/imap/command.c @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ dprint (3, (debugfile, "Found %s in buffy list (OV: %d ON: %d U: %d)\n", mailbox, olduv, oldun, status->unseen)); -if (olduv && olduv == status->uidvalidity) +if (olduv && olduv == status->uidvalidity && option(OPTMARKOLD)) { if (oldun < status->uidnext) inc->new = status->unseen; pgp0y0KY5hTIl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Change unread mark without open the message
On 04/28/08 18:26, hce wrote: > > But for old messages which have already marked with "O", I want to > change it back to "N". I tried to use tag as you suggested above to > change all "O" messages to "N". But did not work. Please explain more > details how can I use the tag to change all "O" state to "N" state in > one go. I don't recall what the previously suggested solutions were. But this works perfectly fine for me: (press in sequence:) T to tag matching the following pattern ~O the pattern (all "O" messages should now be tagged) ; apply the following to all tagged messages (*) N set "N" flag on tagged messages (*) you should be able to omit this step if you've got "set auto_tag=yes" in your .muttrc AFAIK. I don't know why your 'set mark_old=no' doesn't work. Do you possibly have a folder-hook somewhere that overrides it? m.
Re: Change unread mark without open the message
On 28 Apr 2008 18:26 +1000, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (hce): > I tried to "set mark_old=no" > > But it did not work, it still marked N to O after exiting mutt. > > What was wrong for the "set mark_old=no"? There should be nothing wrong with it. Are you certain that it took? (Try `:' followed by `set ?mark_old', Enter and see what it says.) > change it back to "N". I tried to use tag as you suggested above to > change all "O" messages to "N". But did not work. Please explain more > details how can I use the tag to change all "O" state to "N" state in > one go. If all messages marked old should be changed to new: * Press T (upper case T) for * At the prompt, input the pattern ~O, which matches all "old" messages, and press Enter * Press ; (semicolon) for * Press w (lower case W) for * Press N for new * Optionally, press $ to commit the changes to disk Done. If only some messages should have the flag changed, replace the first two steps above with manually tagging the relevant messages using "t" (lower case T). -- Michael Kjörling .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. http://michael.kjorling.se * . No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings . * * ENCRYPTED email preferred -- OpenPGP key ID: 0x 758F8749 BDE9ADA6 * * ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, proprietary attachments * signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Change unread mark without open the message
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Michael Kjorling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27 Apr 2008 11:42 +1000, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (hce): > > > But I have to check the "O" old state message manually to see if the > > message is truly a new messageI did not read before of if the message > > was read before but marked to unread state after messages > > Is there a problem with the approach I suggested in > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? I tried but did not work well. I guess I may not understand your tag procedure well, or I did not explain my intention clearly. I am doing following two steps: 1. Config muttrc not to mark unread message from N (new) to O (old). I tried to "set mark_old=no" But it did not work, it still marked N to O after exiting mutt. What was wrong for the "set mark_old=no"? 2. Change already marked "O" messages to "N" If "set mark_old=no" works, all new messages will be mark to N so that I can use key N to change message state without open the mails in index. But for old messages which have already marked with "O", I want to change it back to "N". I tried to use tag as you suggested above to change all "O" messages to "N". But did not work. Please explain more details how can I use the tag to change all "O" state to "N" state in one go. Thank you. Kind Regards, Jim
Re: Setting mutt on FC7
Thanks for all responses, the problem has been resolved. It was an error in my muttrc file. Thank you. Kind Regards. Jim On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:44 PM, hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Michael Kjorling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 25 Apr 2008 16:50 +1000, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (hce): > > > > >>> 1. The receiving mail seems ok, but I could not post mails. On the > > >>> menu, there is a o:Mail, but when I pressed the o key, it always print > > >>> out "Aborted unmodified message.", it did not bring me to the edit > > >>> page, the same when I pressed "r" key for replying. How can I fix it? > > > > > > > > I am using vim on xterm, and I set up the editor at muttrc: > > > > > > set editor="vim +':set textwidth=77' +':set wrap' +\`awk '/^$/ {print > > > i+2; exit} {i++}' %s\` %s" > > > > For one thing, backticks are expanded at config parse time. Without > > having tried, this would seem likely to cause problems in your > > case. With an editor invocation like that, you could try trimming it > > down to the bare essentials (so just "vim" to start with), or moving > > it to a script that does whatever argument processing etc. you want > > and then launches the actual editor. > > Alright, let me remove all but just leave the vim as I've tried following: > > set editor="vim" > > It came to the same error "Aborted unmodified message." after pressing > the "o" key for Mailing. I am not so sure that the problem was caused > by the editor setup, or doesn't? > > > > Thank you. > > Kind Regards, > > Jim >