Re: filter sent mail
* Javier Rojas jeroja...@devnull.li [2009-10-06 23:57 -0500]: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:39:08PM -0400, James Michael Fultz wrote: As a solution within Mutt, have you tried fcc-hooks? http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#fcc-hook No, but if I read that correctly, I would have to duplicate all of my procmail filters into mutt. Correct. procmail doesn't process mailboxes -- only messages. You would need something to split out messages from a mailbox and feed them to procmail for filtering. formail can split mbox files like this. However, procmail is unable to delete or otherwise alter the original messages in the original mailbox. You may be able to use $sendmail in your muttrc to build a pipeline calling procmail ahead of an MTA. This would mean that you would have to use an eternal MTA rather than Mutt's built-in SMTP if you are already using that. Somewhere like the procmail users list would be more appropriate for questions if you wished to attempt something like what I've just described.
Terminal for mutt (Poll)
Here's a quÑck poll: Which terminal do you prefer for mutt? - a/e/x/wterm - rxvt - rxvt-unicode - mrxvt - gnome terminal - xfce terminal (haven't tried tã²is one) - konsole - other? And why? And while I am at it, dark background or light background? I use konsole, its pretty slow compared to others, but with all the extra set of features + bells and whistles included, tabbing, and more importantly my mutt color settings just look so w0W in konsole, and like wise the fixed/smooth font is so readable... -- __ _The Lotus 78 (John Players Special) [ ]_.--'_'._ Notice the greater rake on the main bodywork `( o )_Lotus__(o)Z and the extension through to the rear wing.
Re: Terminal for mutt (Poll)
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:01:12PM -0500, Cooper T53 wrote: Which terminal do you prefer for mutt? - a/e/x/wterm - rxvt - rxvt-unicode - mrxvt - gnome terminal - xfce terminal (haven't tried tã²is one) - konsole - other? And why? And while I am at it, dark background or light background? xterm, since it's fast, slick, and no-nonsense (for me. May not hold for others). And, I always prefer a dark background since I believe it's easier on my eyes. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah
mailcap application/pgp-signature
For application/pgp-signature type not found record in mailcap file. set mailcap_path=~/.mailcap $ cat ~/.mailcap application/pgp-signature; gpg %s -- /Buzzer () кампания ascii ribbon - против писем в html формате /\ www.asciiribbon.org - против проприетарных вложений
Re: Terminal for mutt (Poll)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wednesday, October 7 at 09:01 PM, quoth Cooper T53: Which terminal do you prefer for mutt? I *prefer* xterm-unicode, but I typically use Apple's Terminal.app. And why? Xterm is blazing fast, full-featured, and very compatible with just about everything. Apple's Terminal.app, on the other hand, (when sufficiently customized to resemble Xterm) is less of a pain on OSX, has a nicer scroll bar, and works better with the copy/paste stuff. It used to be painfully slow, but it's gotten much better. And while I am at it, dark background or light background? Dark. ~Kyle - -- Anger is never without Reason, but seldom with a good One. -- Benjamin Franklin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKzVWMAAoJECuveozR/AWeVB4QAI4om2o6zqwas6V4f+oC4E1A TkypD2ll99BD3i2JO+Xc6zJyMGWxIky5yySpX6WsoqYytYw1CITtZhqHRCtVJRRa KfkOg+h62fgRM/vtYPM8Zg4r8QXy6vLy289gVvaNQNtHgI0n6FIK8H0/uYamvF81 nZnBwmYPKdA7QlUnrRZyZhzKNBaoMUcds0RpfM7n3KGf36w55QoEBs8dhodjVJ1p Fa7INBzt0+gP9YJqkmwmxoe9mdE6aYlY3xgF9KtPtfuggcA+/zGy35ga+mjxVRQ4 X7eeE/FcJQ47cppbDBjfG911zi/nykhfEp7DKEE2eOUB4cyf8C5+ptYfLXtUz8AI p1cDr8AxthIt9U0VCahZg2VAt7EsqOcpLJndXzO9G9JAALJ8YTA+cObR3JYYKbaQ x/fA1H7Brfd+fJnxRXI2rEl0iqFlqHkldIe0KG8JuIIBq3+z1aSyNPpk7huxZddN R5emCHNiW9E2kNFesZg5XncG4/7qbsHKKc5S9cP8SblT4txuCfJ4dpWcJV6g5t2B 6nTpuqpmTYCISqGbIJ6DhTKO/KdIhH1pLPCZDNkDYDwmi556ildNdlP9j0iRRttS 8JIiEoETDc2hSq4V9G7N141tU+lc8K09sMQ5f7qACP1j9UVTSTgwE/LnexM5NOta Vy9iB6y0GL+GAky+ayJ9 =d1AU -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Terminal for mutt (Poll)
On 07Oct2009 21:59, Kyle Wheeler kyle-m...@memoryhole.net wrote: | On Wednesday, October 7 at 09:01 PM, quoth Cooper T53: | Which terminal do you prefer for mutt? | | I *prefer* xterm-unicode, but I typically use Apple's Terminal.app. I prefer rxvt-unicode, but I typically use Apple's Terminal.app. | And why? | | Xterm is blazing fast, full-featured, and very compatible with just | about everything. Apple's Terminal.app, on the other hand, (when | sufficiently customized to resemble Xterm) is less of a pain on OSX, | has a nicer scroll bar, and works better with the copy/paste stuff. It | used to be painfully slow, but it's gotten much better. rxvt-unicode is pretty flexible about looking for other fonts if the default font lacks coverage for certain characters and lets you run a urxvtd to manage all the terminal windows, and use urxvtc to request a fresh terminal; lighter on the process list. I confess I've never used xterm-unicode; I have found xterm itself very fast, much faster that iTerm and maybe Terminal even under X11 on a Mac. So's rxvt-unicode on a Mac. I'd like to be using iTerm instead of Terminal (better tab support, tab labelling, cut/paste lets me skip the annoying cmd-C step). But iTerm has big performance issues with lots of (even several) terminals or long terminal histories; I suspect some of this may be memory footprint and the lack of RAM in this MacBook Air - it gets very stupid when it starts to page. | And while I am at it, dark background or light background? | | Dark. Dark. -- Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ Mac OS X. Because making Unix user-friendly is easier than debugging Windows. - Mike Dawson, Macintosh Systems Administrator and Consultation. mdaw...@mac.com http://herowars.onestop.net
Re: Terminal for mutt (Poll)
On Wed 07 Oct 2009 at 19:01:12 PDT Cooper T53 wrote: Here's a quÑck poll: Which terminal do you prefer for mutt? - a/e/x/wterm - rxvt - rxvt-unicode - mrxvt - gnome terminal - xfce terminal (haven't tried tã²is one) - konsole - other? On my Mac, I use iTerm. I started using it back when Apple's terminal.app didn't have tabs, and haven't seen any reason to change. On my FreeBSD machine, I use the xfce terminal. I used to use xterm, but a while ago I was setting up a new machine and just didn't feel like going through the usual rigamarole to set the xterm font to the one I like. I've since switched the window manager on that machine to musca, but I'm still using the xfce terminal. It's reasonably lighweight and does what I want. And why? And while I am at it, dark background or light background? Light background. I'm 58, and my old eyes have trouble resolving light text on a dark background. Especially if I'm reading a lot of text for a long period of time. You didn't ask, but all of my books have black text on white paper too. ;-)
Re: Terminal for mutt (Poll)
On 2009-10-07, Cooper T53 ana...@gmx.net wrote: Here's a quÑck poll: Which terminal do you prefer for mutt? - a/e/x/wterm - rxvt - rxvt-unicode - mrxvt - gnome terminal - xfce terminal (haven't tried tã²is one) - konsole - other? And why? xterm on Linux at work. It's there; it just works. I've used xterm with mutt on HP-UX and Solaris, too. Until I started using Linux, I built xterm myself on those systems so I'd have an up to date version with color. rxvt on Cygwin and Windows XP at home. When I started using Cygwin it was the only terminal available that didn't require X. I've just stuck with it. And while I am at it, dark background or light background? Dark background. Black or very close. Light gray normal text. It doesn't seem as glaring or as harsh as black on white. Especially in a dark room. Some degree of habit, too. All the computers and terminals I used at first had only light text on dark backgrounds. I just like it. Regards, Gary
Re: Terminal for mutt (Poll)
* Cooper T53 schrieb am Mittwoch, den 07. Oktober 2009: Which terminal do you prefer for mutt? xterm and Gnome Terminal. And why? xterm is fast and very powerfull. And the Gnome Terminal has nice features like clickable links. And while I am at it, dark background or light background? ,[ .Xressources ]- | | xterm*background: AntiqueWhite | xterm*foreground: black ` Andreas
