Re: send-hook and my_hdr
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 02:53:29PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: >>See that header in this mail. That is from a send-hook. Problem >>is that once that hook is activated, the header ends up in all >>mails (like this one). >>How to fix? > Add a hook matching all messages which unmy_hdrs the entry in > question. That won't work in all cases. If i set unmy_hdr in a sent-hook, all from-headers set by a folder-hook are removed too, and not only the hooks which were set by send-hooks. Is there any way to use folder-hooks *and* send-hooks together to modify the From-headers in a way that i want? Some days ago i've described this problem in greater detail in d.c.s.mailreader.misc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> but got no solution for it. If somebody has a workaround i would greatly appreciate to hear it. Greetings - Lars.
Re: send-hook and my_hdr
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:28:20AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: >>That won't work in all cases. If i set unmy_hdr in a sent-hook, >>all from-headers set by a folder-hook are removed too, and not >>only the hooks which were set by send-hooks. > I'd set the $from variable from folder-hooks and use my_hdr from > send-hooks to override it from case to case. Thanks Thomas. This works great! Greetings - Lars.
Re: send-hook and my_hdr
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:44:12PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > folder-hook . unhook send-hook > folder-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:' > folder-hook folder1 send-hook . 'my_hdr From: default_for_folder1' > folder-hook folder2 send-hook . 'my_hdr From: default_for_folder2' > folder-hook . 'send-hook "~t person1" "my_hdr From: for_person1"' > > In this example, send-hooks and "my_hdr From:" settings are first > cleared when any folder is entered. Then any folder-specific "my_hdr > From:" settings are made as default send-hooks. Finally, any special > send-hooks are set, either for all folders as shown, or as a function of > the folder. Thanks. It's an interesting solution. However i have sticked to Thomas suggestion since i'm also using "set reverse_name" which also works if i set the from-header with "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Of course i haven't told you therefore you couldn't know it. Greetings - Lars.
Minor annoyance with fcc-save-hooks
Hi all,
i've set up a lot of fcc-save-hooks to set the default folders
for certain people ("~L pattern folder"). This works quite good
if there's only one recipient in the headers or one person to whom
i send mail. If there are many recipients in the headers or me doing
a group-reply, the hook matches one (the first it seems) of them and
set the fcc or save-folder accordingly.
If i prepend the pattern with "^" then the fcc-hooks won't match
if there is more than one recipient, so the fcc's are going to my
default send-mail-folder, which is fine. The save-hook of course
also won't match and mutt will present me the default-save-folder,
which isn't the behaviour i want.
Is there any chance in a future version that the behaviour
of fcc-save-hooks with the ~L-patterns will get modified to
address this issue? I know it's possible to reach my goal if
i use save-hooks and fcc-hooks instead of fcc-save-hooks.
The disadvantage of this is clear: i (and any other mutt
user) will have to set two hooks for every correspondent.
With some 50+ correspondents in the configuration file it
becomes quite intricate.
regards
- Lars.
Trouble with macros
Hi everybody, i've got some problems with setting the attributions lines in dependence of the folder and the reply-function used (e.g. reply, group-reply and list-reply). My goal is to set up separate attributions for replies to personal mails (which should be personalised), for group-replies (which of course should name the sender to whoms mail i replied) in the adequate language - which is the problem. The macros... | macro index g ':set attribution="%n schrieb am %[%d.%m.%Y]:\n" \ |' | macro index r ':set attribution="Hallo %v,\n" \ |' ... work as expected. Then i tried the following: | folder-hook . "macro index L 'set attribution="%n schrieb \ |am %[%d.%m.%Y]:\n"'" It doesn't work. Then after a suggestion from Rocco i tried to source the macros from separate files: | folder-hook . "source /home/lars/.mutt/.attributions" | folder-hook %personal "source /home/lars/.mutt/.attributions.personal" | folder-hook %englishlists "source /home/lars/.mutt/.attributions.english" Again it didn't worked out as i hoped. Has anybody an idea? Is it possible? I tried other ways too, for example checking for multiple recipients with a send-hook | send-hook "~C @.+@" 'set attribution="%n schrieb am %[%d.%m.%Y]:\n"' It doesn't do it. I guess it's because mutt checks every recipient against the regexp and not the whole to/cc-header? TIA. regards, - Lars.
