Re: difficult-to-obtain smtppush

2002-01-22 Thread boris karlov

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:06:30 -0500, David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> % 
> % can anyone give me a link to smtppush (by Michael Elkins)?
> % niether http://www.sigpipe.org/~me/smtppush/
> 
> Try sigpipe.org:8080, IIRC.

-- exactly. 404.
but: have been found at http://kldp.org/~eunjea/mutt.php#sendmail
10x to Im Eunjea ;-)

> 
> 
> % nor http://www.toesinperil.com/~me/smtppush/ does not work.
> % Michael? ;-)



difficult-to-obtain smtppush

2002-01-22 Thread boris karlov

can anyone give me a link to smtppush (by Michael Elkins)?
niether http://www.sigpipe.org/~me/smtppush/
nor http://www.toesinperil.com/~me/smtppush/ does not work.
Michael? ;-)

10x, karlov.



Re: charset in text/plain attachments: how to tune?

2002-01-15 Thread boris karlov

On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:55:55 +0100, Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> boris karlov muttered:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > > Well, "" is a charset too, isn't it?
> > 
> > i've tried this already. but, unfortunately, it does not work:
> > :charset-hook "" koi8-r\n
> > empty (sub)expression
> 
> Strange canAt reproduce this with 1.2.5:
> 
> $ ./mutt -v
> Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28)
> 
> mutt -F /dev/null
> :charset-hook "" koi8-r
> 
> no error message.
> 

-- i permanently get such an error with FreeBSD 3 and 4 (both STABLE).
forget-about, i've found suitable regexp ;-)

10x, karlov.



Re: For messages without charset specified

2002-01-11 Thread boris karlov

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:05:19 +0800, Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, Boris.
> 
> But that's weird for your case. If you have attachment, your header
> should have only 'Content-Type: multipart/...' instead of 'text/plain'
> or 'text/html'.

-- but every attachment has its own `Content-Type:' header. e.g. text/plain

> 
> For my cases, they have the latter content-type and no attachment. They
> send me inline 8-bit muitibyte (big5) text. Mutt will depend on the
> charset specified in Content-Type: filed.

-- it doesn't matter. attachments were the first thing i've noticed. inline
data looks the same.

> 
> charset-hook:
> 
> This doesn't look matching my problem. If a message speicifies a strange
> charset, it can map it. But for my case, messages miss 'charset=big5'
> and mutt thinks to use some DEFAULT that I don't know where it comes from.

-- read referred thread (especially Michael Tatge's comments) thoroughly
;-)

> 
> My locale is LANG=zh_TW.big5. And my mutt has 'set charset=big5'. I
> don't know what is missing.

-- charset part in header is missing ;-). and mutt assumes us-ascii in this
case (check this by , usually is bound to v).

10x, karlov.

> 
> best,
> charlie
> 
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:41:38PM +0300, boris karlov wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:48:30 +0800, Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In our country, I used to receive messages without 'charset' specifed in
> > > Content-Type:, while the text body is encoded in big5.
> > >
> > > I have my mutt "set charset=big5" but the pager just display '?'s for
> > > such messages (other charset-tagged messages are OK).
> >
> > -- i have the same problem. check by  for assumed charset
> > - is it us-ascii? i have the last one if there's no charset part in header.
> >
> > >
> > > How can I do it in mutt? "set charset=big5" looks not working.
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > in thread `charset in text/plain attachments: how to tune?' has supposed to
> > use  (e.g. charset-hook "" big5). i have `empty
> > (sub)expression' error in this case, but Michael does not. it's worth a try
> >
> > 10x, karlov.





Re: error sending message

2002-01-11 Thread boris karlov

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:30:04 +0100, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Hi 
> I'm getting this odd error when sending to a particular address.
> 
> :error sending message, child exited 67 (User unkown)

-- imho, that's MTA report.

10x, karlov.



Re: For messages without charset specified

2002-01-10 Thread boris karlov

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:48:30 +0800, Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In our country, I used to receive messages without 'charset' specifed in
> Content-Type:, while the text body is encoded in big5.
> 
> I have my mutt "set charset=big5" but the pager just display '?'s for
> such messages (other charset-tagged messages are OK).

-- i have the same problem. check by  for assumed charset
- is it us-ascii? i have the last one if there's no charset part in header.

> 
> In Mozilla, I can have the following settings for 'Message Display':
> 
> [v] Apply default to all messages (ignore character coding specified
> by MIME header)

-- mutt is more heuristic ;-)

> 
> How can I do it in mutt? "set charset=big5" looks not working.

On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in thread `charset in text/plain attachments: how to tune?' has supposed to
use  (e.g. charset-hook "" big5). i have `empty
(sub)expression' error in this case, but Michael does not. it's worth a try

10x, karlov.



saving attach [was: Re: Attachment umask]

2002-01-09 Thread boris karlov

On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:18:19 +0100, Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..skip..]
> 022? Is it also possible to define a path in the configuration?

-- from http://www.mutt.org/changes.html ;-)
macro attach s "~/" "Pre-pend ~/ when saving attachments"

> 
> I want to save all attachments in ~/attachments and export
> this dir via nfs onto my workstation/webserver.



Re: Saving attachments with "unusual" names

2002-01-09 Thread boris karlov

On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 17:01:30 +0100, Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..skip..]
> 
> But isn't it possible that mutt detects the correct/intended filename to
> save the file "Datei Volker Moll 1.jpg" instead the file
> "?iso-8859-1?Q?Datei=5FVolker_M=F6ll=5F1.jpg?=" in the $folder directory
> ("=")?
[..skip..]

-- man muttrc(5). search for `rfc2047_parameters'.
10x, karlov.



Re: strange TABs in header

2002-01-09 Thread boris karlov

On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:04:15 -0500, Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Mutters,
> 
> I suspect that it doesn't have anything to do with mutt, but I don't know
> who else to ask.  The thing is that all of a sudden all mails from a friend
> of mine (who also uses mutt) have TABs in these three header lines:
>  From:name etc
>  To:name etc
>  Date:date
> 
> We have no idea why this happened.  So far I didn't even notice it, but now
> that I use SpamAssassin to filter out my spams (works great!) it complained
> that these TABs weren't RFC822 compatible.
> 
> Anyone has seen this before or knows where it could come from?

-- imho, that's MTA deal. i have such a TABs in headers with certain ZMailer Server.
10x, karlov.



Re: charset in text/plain attachments: how to tune?

2001-12-28 Thread boris karlov

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> boris karlov muttered:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > > boris karlov muttered:
> > > > i have charset="koi8-r" but mutt always assumes that my text/plain
> > > > attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain charset
> > > > record in `Content-Type:' field.
> > > > do you know how to avoid such a behaviour of 1.2.5?
> > > 
> > > Look for charset-hook in the manual.
> > > 
> > charset-hook alias charset
> >   This command defines an alias for a character  set.
> >   This  is  useful to properly display messages which
> >   are tagged with a character set name not  known  to
> >   mutt.
> > 
> > ...messages which _are_tagged_ with a character set name not to mutt...
> > but i mean attachments with "Content-Type: text/plain", there is no charset
> > part _at_all_.
> 
> Well, "" is a charset too, isn't it?

-- i've tried this already. but, unfortunately, it does not work:
:charset-hook "" koi8-r\n
empty (sub)expression

gonna try `charset-hook another_regexp koi8-r' (e.g. `charset-hook .* koi8-r' ;-))
Michael, 10x.

> 
> charset "" kio8-r or the matching ISO-whatever
> 
> does what you want. I use
> 
> charset-hook "" iso-8859-1
> 
> for the very same reason. Mutt assumes us-ascii, if nothing is specified
> - according to the relevant RFCs, I presume. I often get mail with
> German umlauts from people with broken mailers and the above helps me
> reading those messages a lot. :)
> 



Re: charset in text/plain attachments: how to tune?

2001-12-28 Thread boris karlov

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 03:04:41PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> boris karlov muttered:
> > i have charset="koi8-r" but mutt always assumes that my text/plain
> > attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain charset
> > record in `Content-Type:' field.
> > do you know how to avoid such a behaviour of 1.2.5?
> 
> Look for charset-hook in the manual.
> 

-- in muttrc(5) i've seen:
charset-hook alias charset
  This command defines an alias for a character  set.
  This  is  useful to properly display messages which
  are tagged with a character set name not  known  to
  mutt.

...messages which _are_tagged_ with a character set name not to mutt...
but i mean attachments with "Content-Type: text/plain", there is no charset
part _at_all_.

10x in advance,
~borman



charset in text/plain attachments: how to tune?

2001-12-28 Thread boris karlov

mutt-1.2.5i
i have charset="koi8-r" in .muttrc, but mutt always assumes that my
text/plain attachments are in us-ascii charset if there is no certain
charset record in `Content-Type:' field. so i need to edit-type or manually
recode affected attachments :-(.
mutt-1.0i works more suitable ;-) using charset from user locale (or may be
$MM_CHARSET) while display attachments _without_ charset specified in
`Content-Type:' field.
do you know how to avoid such a behaviour of 1.2.5?

10x in advance,
~borman