On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:43:27PM -0500, Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back?
> It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I
> like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today,
> with hide_missing set, I see something like this
>
> ?-?-?-?-?-?-?->Re: foo
> `-?->Re: foo
>
> The string of leading ?'s takes up a lot of space and, IMHO,
> doesn't convey much useful information. Instead, I'd like to see
>
> ?->Re: foo
> `-?->Re: foo
>
> This is more compact, but I can still tell how the two messages
> relate to one another. This used to be the behavior when
> hide_missing was unset, correct? Is this no longer possible?
This is currently impossible, because a lot of people didn't want to see
any of the question marks. I mean to get back to some threading loose
ends in the next few days, so I'll add a $hide_missing_parents option, or
some such. Should be easy to do.
-Daniel
--
Daniel E. Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We should go forth on the shortest walk perchance, in the spirit of
undying adventure, never to return,--prepared to send back our embalmed
hearts only as relics to our desolate kingdoms."
--Henry David Thoreau, "Walking"
