Message not marked with 'r' although replied
Hi, when you got a message and reply to it, mutt should mark it with an 'r' in the index. But I noticed that some messages which I have replied to are not marked as such. Can anyone tell me why? Has anyone detected the same? Although the sent message gets the right References: and In-Reply-To: the received message doesn't always get a line 'X-Status: A'. I dont't know how to reproduce it right now... I'm running Mutt 1.5.13. Any idea someone? TIA + regards Til
Re: Message not marked with 'r' although replied
Mutt will only set the "replied" flag in the current folder. So if you start a separate mutt instance, or finish a postponed reply while another folder is open, that flag won't be set. I don't think anybody has so far felt like correcting this limitation, though it might be reasonably easy by just keeping some information about messages that were replied to in an external database file. Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 2007-06-23 13:58:35 +0200, Til Schubbe wrote: > From: Til Schubbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: mutt-users@mutt.org > Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:58:35 +0200 > Subject: Message not marked with 'r' although replied > X-Spam-Level: > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.00, version=1.1.5 > > Hi, > > when you got a message and reply to it, mutt should mark it with an > 'r' in the index. But I noticed that some messages which I have > replied to are not marked as such. Can anyone tell me why? Has > anyone detected the same? > > Although the sent message gets the right References: and In-Reply-To: > the received message doesn't always get a line 'X-Status: A'. > > I dont't know how to reproduce it right now... > > I'm running Mutt 1.5.13. > > Any idea someone? > > TIA + regards > Til > >
Re: Message not marked with 'r' although replied
=- Til Schubbe wrote on Sat 23.Jun'07 at 13:58:35 +0200 -= > when you got a message and reply to it, mutt should mark it with > an 'r' in the index. But I noticed that some messages which I have > replied to are not marked as such. Can anyone tell me why? Has > anyone detected the same? When you postpone but complete it in a different folder, then mutt doesn't know where the original msg is to flag it. You might ask for keeping track of the folder, but this would mean to suspend the currently opened folder to manipulate the oridiginal and return to the current one. With big boxes this can mean quite some load for a little flag, which you could have right by continuing the postponed msg in the right folder. -- © Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal! EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude. You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.
Re: Message not marked with 'r' although replied
Am 2007-06-23 13:58 +0200 schrieb Til Schubbe: > replied to are not marked as such. Can anyone tell me why? Has > anyone detected the same? No, don't know why, I have the same Problem. http://marc.info/?t=11798238284&r=1&w=2 Konsti -- GPG KeyID EF62FCEF Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF
Re: Message not marked with 'r' although replied
Am 2007-06-23 14:44 +0200 schrieb Rado S: > When you postpone but complete it in a different folder, then mutt > doesn't know where the original msg is to flag it. In my case not postpone or whatsoever. The message gets the r after replying (even the N flag when read is concerned) and then I change Folders to browse my imap tree. When I come back to the Folder or leave mutt in other Folders the flags are reset. Do you or Thomas mean such of these cases? But in my case the plain answer/read and leave mutt with correct Flags and when invoking the resetted flags is annoying herei. I use mutt for years now and this is a new issue with unchanged using behaviour. Regards, Konsti -- GPG KeyID EF62FCEF Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF
