Re: PGP signing range

2000-07-24 Thread horio shoichi

Thomas Roessler wrote:
> 
> On 2000-07-24 12:48:45 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > that is, subheader part is not crlf terminated (but the
> > intervening blank line is).
> 
> Have you tried to verify the signatures with NAI's pgp5 or pgp6?
> 
> My guess about the cause of the problem would be that gnupg
> mis-handles some of the canonical line endings.  mutt just pipes the
> MIME data into pgp (or gpg, for that matter), and relies on text
> mode to do line end canonicalization.
> 
> --
> Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I think I have solved the problem, except that how and why I could get
stuck into that bad dead end.

Thomas, your reply greatly helped me. My sincere thanks.


horio shoichi



Re: PGP signing range

2000-07-24 Thread Thomas Roessler

On 2000-07-24 12:48:45 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> that is, subheader part is not crlf terminated (but the
> intervening blank line is).

Have you tried to verify the signatures with NAI's pgp5 or pgp6?

My guess about the cause of the problem would be that gnupg
mis-handles some of the canonical line endings.  mutt just pipes the
MIME data into pgp (or gpg, for that matter), and relies on text
mode to do line end canonicalization.

-- 
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>