[t-prot] display_filter not getting exec()'d ...
Hi all, I am *really* wanting to use t-prot [http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/]. However, addng the following to my mutt config seems have no effect what so ever on any messages. set display_filter='t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass' Can someone please assist me with confirming whether mutt is actually executing t-prot. Chers -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
Re: [t-prot] display_filter not getting exec()'d ...
On Sun, May 06, 2007 20:01:15 PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: However, addng the following to my mutt config seems have no effect what so ever on any messages. set display_filter='t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass' Can someone please assist me with confirming whether mutt is actually executing t-prot. Very likely, it is a path problem. Instead of just t-prot, try to use: set display_filter='/the/complete/path/where/you/placed/t-prot... etc HTH, Marco -- Help *everybody* to love Free Standards and Free Software! http://digifreedom.net/node/80
Re: [t-prot] display_filter not getting exec()'d ...
0n Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:34:42PM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote: Very likely, it is a path problem. Instead of just t-prot, try to use: set display_filter='/the/complete/path/where/you/placed/t-prot... etc set display_filter='/usr/local/bin/t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass' Still does nothing :( And by the way the version is: Mutt 1.5.14 (2007-02-12) I'm not sure if this is the best way to test from the CLI, but as you can see t-prot doesn't seem to alter the message at all. This was a fake message a created for testing: #cat /var/tmp/test.txt | /usr/local/bin/t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 13:20:07 +0800 From: Wilkinson, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Wilkinson, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FW: Gotta love this girl GOLD ! -aW 0n Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:14:35PM +0800, Leibhardt, Bruce wrote: For all Who Work With Rude Customers. An award should go to the Virgin Airlines gate attendant in Sydney some months ago for being smart and funny, while making her point, when confronted with a passenger who probably deserved to fly as cargo. A crowded Virgin flight was cancelled after Virgin's 767s had been withdrawn from service. A single attendant was re-booking a long line of inconvenienced travellers Suddenly an angry passenger pushed his way to the desk. He slapped his ticket down on the counter and said, I HAVE to be on this flight and it HAS to be FIRST CLASS. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can I run mutt in 'debugging mode' somehow to see what it is actually doing ? -aW
Re: [t-prot] display_filter not getting exec()'d ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, May 6 at 08:44 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex: I'm not sure if this is the best way to test from the CLI, It is. but as you can see t-prot doesn't seem to alter the message at all. Aha! Well, there you have it; not a mutt config problem, but a t-prot config problem. This was a fake message a created for testing: #cat /var/tmp/test.txt | /usr/local/bin/t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass I use t-prot like this: t-prot -cemtwk -M=mutt Things I observe about how you're using t-prot: - You're using -a, but you're not using -A, which t-prot requires (see its documentation) - You're using -l, but you're not using -L, which t-prot requires (see its documentation) I don't know if those are critical, but you should probably fix them. Can I run mutt in 'debugging mode' somehow to see what it is actually doing ? I'm pretty sure mutt is using t-prot here; but if t-prot won't alter the message, there's very little mutt can do about that. ~Kyle - -- Last comes the beverage of the Orient shore, Mocha, far off, the fragrant berries bore. Taste the dark fluid with a dainty lip, Digestion waits on pleasure as you sip. -- Pope Leo XII -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iD8DBQFGPehzBkIOoMqOI14RApOYAKDFCHP+DxFcEO68gRkFkEeuU8hK+ACg6b+c qBP0CRUpqB/Rozsv+eEcB0c= =II+s -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [t-prot] display_filter not getting exec()'d ...
0n Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:38:43AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Sunday, May 6 at 08:44 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex: I'm not sure if this is the best way to test from the CLI, It is. but as you can see t-prot doesn't seem to alter the message at all. Aha! Well, there you have it; not a mutt config problem, but a t-prot config problem. This was a fake message a created for testing: #cat /var/tmp/test.txt | /usr/local/bin/t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass I use t-prot like this: t-prot -cemtwk -M=mutt Things I observe about how you're using t-prot: - You're using -a, but you're not using -A, which t-prot requires (see its documentation) - You're using -l, but you're not using -L, which t-prot requires (see its documentation) Yup, you're right. t-prot is actually doing something. I have changed my t-prot settings to: set display_filter='/usr/local/bin/t-prot -cemtwkS -M=mutt --spass And all is now good. -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
t-prot
Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted footers, etc. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30706/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: t-prot
* Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020905 12:32]: Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted footers, etc. I use it, I like it, but the version I'm using has two flaws. - messages forwarded from say, Outlook, will be hidden - messages from Outlook users who try to respond to quoted material in-line but fail to remove Outlook attribution will be hidden I am willing to accept both of these, as I can do v+enter to see these parts anyway. Regards, -Johan -- Johan Almqvist http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
Re: t-prot
Hello, On 05 Sep 2002, Johan Almqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use it, I like it, but the version I'm using has two flaws. Which version do you use? - messages forwarded from say, Outlook, will be hidden - messages from Outlook users who try to respond to quoted material in-line but fail to remove Outlook attribution will be hidden This might be already fixed in v0.67/r1.77. If not, and if you can get me sample messages that enable me to reproduce the misbehaviour, I'll be happy to dig into this and upload a fixed version as soon as possible. Greetings, Jochen. -- Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. -- Douglas Adams
