Re: [MLO] Re: goodbye everyone

2012-07-13 Thread Lisa Stroyan
You can get away with mostly free apps on android, which I don't think is the 
case for iPhone. You might be surprised at how little money you would have to 
spend on apps to switch over. If you want specific apps, like MLO  obviously, 
you have to pay. But for a lot of purposes I just use whichever app is best of 
the free in that category.

Lisa 

"João Melo"  wrote:

>Hello,
>
>First, i want to thank you for your incredible concern and rich
>response. 
>I'm felling very flattered that you and the other guys/girls took some
>time 
>to talk to me. 
>
>I didn't know that the app for android could do more. You described a
>nice 
>way to add tasks and bring me back to a temptation that i have from
>time to 
>time: switch to the android plataform -- the main point is probably
>Itunes. 
>But i am a old user of iphone and ipad, and my wife came aboard to
>iphone 
>and ipad too last year. I have some money invested in apps along the
>years 
>and now shared by both of us. I dread to search and buy all that apps
>again 
>and lose the benefits to have all the family with the same mobile 
>plataform. 
>
>Thanks again,
>João
>
>On Friday, July 13, 2012 3:58:45 AM UTC-3, CTenorman wrote:
>>
>> Joao, If I could make a suggestion, try MLO on Android. I used to
>have an 
>> iPhone, and I occasionally pick the old thing (3GS) up just to see
>what's 
>> doing in the apple world. Compared to the android app, the iphone app
>
>> really lacks a lot of the power for context filtering, views,
>zooming-in, 
>> and far more. I'd even go so far as to say it's worth switching
>platforms 
>> for if you're a heavy MLO user. With the galaxy nexus running at $350
>
>> off-contract in the google play store, it's worth it if productivity
>in a 
>> mobile environment is really important to you. If you're the sort of
>user 
>> to loves to take advantage of the kind of power that MLO offers,
>you'd 
>> probably love android as a platform, you can make it do pretty much 
>> anything with very little effort. 
>>
>> For example, on iPhone the fastest way for me to add a task was to
>turn on 
>> the phone, swipe to unlock, press the home button to exit the current
>app, 
>> swipe over to the MLO app, click on the app, and when it finally
>loaded up 
>> hit the add button and then type in what I wanted to enter.
>Unfortunately, 
>> on iOS, there's just no way to make that process faster unless you 
>> jailbreak. On android I turn on my phone, press the microphone MLO
>shortcut 
>> and say what I want to enter. 5-7 seconds vs 0.5 seconds from start
>to go. 
>> It's just stuff like that all over the place that makes the android 
>> experience outstanding if you want to really juice your productivity 
>> experience. As a huge evernote user, I also find the evernote app far
>more 
>> robust, particularly because of widgets and integration with
>Android's full 
>> file system for attaching any kind of file to an evernote note, etc.
>>
>> If you're really heavily invested in the iOS platform, then maybe
>other 
>> apps will do more of what you're looking for, though I ended up using
>MLO 
>> anyway. However, if you're not absolutely tied to the iOS ecosystem,
>I'd 
>> strongly consider giving the android platform and the MLO android
>client a 
>> try, it's really potent. I'm not sure exactly how it works (I haven't
>used 
>> it myself), but if you were curious if it could work for you, give 
>> Bluestacks a try, it lets you run Android on you PC.
>>
>> Holmes, the iOS client does lack a few of the things that Joao
>probably 
>> wanted, so I can understand his comment a bit. I remember the
>inability to 
>> look at what was due by date as a particularly tricky thing to work
>around 
>> - until I got an android device and I grinned from ear to ear at the
>view 
>> options. :) However, for android, I think you've hit the nail on the
>head. 
>> I've done some pretty maniacal searching to find something with more
>juice 
>> for Android+Windows, and nothing I've looked at comes even close. I
>too 
>> would be interested if there was something else out there that had
>that 
>> kind of cross-platform power, but after trying to use quite a few
>they all 
>> seem to come up short. Though to be honest, even just looking at the 
>> android client, I'd be hard-pressed to find anything that could
>better it 
>> for raw power and usability when you've got a lot to manage. I only
>wish 
>> the mobile version had more features because I've seen them exist on
>the 
>> desktop version, not because I've seen them exist on other android
>apps. 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 18:48:51 UTC-4, Holmes245 wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the main reason though why I've seen some developers stay
>with 
>>> one platform and have decided not to try and develop for every known
>
>>> platform. I know one who develops task management software. He only 
>>> develops for Windows. You get so many people all who want a version
>of that 
>>> software on their platform or device, it almost 

[MLO] Re: goodbye everyone

2012-07-13 Thread João Melo
Hello,

First, i want to thank you for your incredible concern and rich response. 
I'm felling very flattered that you and the other guys/girls took some time 
to talk to me. 

I didn't know that the app for android could do more. You described a nice 
way to add tasks and bring me back to a temptation that i have from time to 
time: switch to the android plataform -- the main point is probably Itunes. 
But i am a old user of iphone and ipad, and my wife came aboard to iphone 
and ipad too last year. I have some money invested in apps along the years 
and now shared by both of us. I dread to search and buy all that apps again 
and lose the benefits to have all the family with the same mobile 
plataform. 

Thanks again,
João

On Friday, July 13, 2012 3:58:45 AM UTC-3, CTenorman wrote:
>
> Joao, If I could make a suggestion, try MLO on Android. I used to have an 
> iPhone, and I occasionally pick the old thing (3GS) up just to see what's 
> doing in the apple world. Compared to the android app, the iphone app 
> really lacks a lot of the power for context filtering, views, zooming-in, 
> and far more. I'd even go so far as to say it's worth switching platforms 
> for if you're a heavy MLO user. With the galaxy nexus running at $350 
> off-contract in the google play store, it's worth it if productivity in a 
> mobile environment is really important to you. If you're the sort of user 
> to loves to take advantage of the kind of power that MLO offers, you'd 
> probably love android as a platform, you can make it do pretty much 
> anything with very little effort. 
>
> For example, on iPhone the fastest way for me to add a task was to turn on 
> the phone, swipe to unlock, press the home button to exit the current app, 
> swipe over to the MLO app, click on the app, and when it finally loaded up 
> hit the add button and then type in what I wanted to enter. Unfortunately, 
> on iOS, there's just no way to make that process faster unless you 
> jailbreak. On android I turn on my phone, press the microphone MLO shortcut 
> and say what I want to enter. 5-7 seconds vs 0.5 seconds from start to go. 
> It's just stuff like that all over the place that makes the android 
> experience outstanding if you want to really juice your productivity 
> experience. As a huge evernote user, I also find the evernote app far more 
> robust, particularly because of widgets and integration with Android's full 
> file system for attaching any kind of file to an evernote note, etc.
>
> If you're really heavily invested in the iOS platform, then maybe other 
> apps will do more of what you're looking for, though I ended up using MLO 
> anyway. However, if you're not absolutely tied to the iOS ecosystem, I'd 
> strongly consider giving the android platform and the MLO android client a 
> try, it's really potent. I'm not sure exactly how it works (I haven't used 
> it myself), but if you were curious if it could work for you, give 
> Bluestacks a try, it lets you run Android on you PC.
>
> Holmes, the iOS client does lack a few of the things that Joao probably 
> wanted, so I can understand his comment a bit. I remember the inability to 
> look at what was due by date as a particularly tricky thing to work around 
> - until I got an android device and I grinned from ear to ear at the view 
> options. :) However, for android, I think you've hit the nail on the head. 
> I've done some pretty maniacal searching to find something with more juice 
> for Android+Windows, and nothing I've looked at comes even close. I too 
> would be interested if there was something else out there that had that 
> kind of cross-platform power, but after trying to use quite a few they all 
> seem to come up short. Though to be honest, even just looking at the 
> android client, I'd be hard-pressed to find anything that could better it 
> for raw power and usability when you've got a lot to manage. I only wish 
> the mobile version had more features because I've seen them exist on the 
> desktop version, not because I've seen them exist on other android apps. 
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 11 July 2012 18:48:51 UTC-4, Holmes245 wrote:
>>
>> This is the main reason though why I've seen some developers stay with 
>> one platform and have decided not to try and develop for every known 
>> platform. I know one who develops task management software. He only 
>> develops for Windows. You get so many people all who want a version of that 
>> software on their platform or device, it almost becomes impossible for 
>> programmers with small shops to please everyone. This is why I can't 
>> complain. I'm happy with my Windows/Android setup and if I wasn't, I would 
>> be hard pressed to find anything that comes close to what MLO can do 
>> regardless. That's why I'm puzzled by the, "MLO was great but I'm moving 
>> on". If you're moving on, what are you moving on to that DOES DO what 
>> you're wanting? I would think one would not be using MLO if he/she had 
>> found it which lea

[MLO] Re: goodbye everyone

2012-07-13 Thread João Melo
Hi,

I think we can always have a good talk about our needs and solutions. In my 
view is not complaining but a way to learn from each others experiences. 
Many times i have multiple needs that are not addressed by a single 
solution, but disperse. That's why something can be great and  we can still 
move on. The new solution doesn't have all the stuff we need just a better 
trade-off. 

In my case, i have a strong need that my software can run on linux, ios and 
windows (two web interfaces can do the job just fine) without have to 
remember to press buttons. In a very close priority, the need to fulltext 
search and flexible querys. I didn't find all this in one solution. That's 
why i still think MLO is great in the windows desktop.

In the end i'm agreeing with you, don't you think?

Thanks,
João

On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:48:51 PM UTC-3, Holmes245 wrote:
>
> This is the main reason though why I've seen some developers stay with one 
> platform and have decided not to try and develop for every known platform. 
> I know one who develops task management software. He only develops for 
> Windows. You get so many people all who want a version of that software on 
> their platform or device, it almost becomes impossible for programmers with 
> small shops to please everyone. This is why I can't complain. I'm happy 
> with my Windows/Android setup and if I wasn't, I would be hard pressed to 
> find anything that comes close to what MLO can do regardless. That's why 
> I'm puzzled by the, "MLO was great but I'm moving on". If you're moving on, 
> what are you moving on to that DOES DO what you're wanting? I would think 
> one would not be using MLO if he/she had found it which leads me to think 
> Joao hasn't. Joao, if you're reading this then by all means prove me wrong.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:30:39 PM UTC-4, chuckdevee wrote:
>>
>> I'd be interested also to find out if you've found something that works 
>> as well. I understand your frustrations about the mobile version.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/_bXnKbwmercJ.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.



Re: [MLO] RTM users! A useful transformation feature!

2012-07-13 Thread natG
Neat.
Thanks.
-nat

On Friday, July 13, 2012 12:41:40 AM UTC-4, Lisa S wrote:
>
> You could paste into the rapid task entry box too, if you want to 
> customize them with parsed fields.
>
> Lisa
>
> natG  wrote:
>>
>> I am a newbie with MLO, coming from RTM, Remember The Milk.
>> I just stumbled upon a neat trick and MLO feature that makes it real easy 
>> to re-create your rtm tasks in MLO. (By the way, this post is NOT intended 
>> as a discussion why I left RTM, or a feature comparison.)
>>
>> To quickly copy a complete RTM list of tasks as a list of subtasks in MLO:
>> In RTM:
>>RTM.1. In an RTM List, choose PRINT. This will merely generate the 
>> list in a new tab in the browser with a check box next to each task.
>>RTM.2. Highlight [all] the tasks you want to tranfer to MLO, and copy 
>> to clipboard.
>>RTM session complete-
>>
>> In MLO:
>>MLO.1. Paste the clipboard to any note (temporary step). this will 
>> REMOVE all the check boxes and leave a neat plain text list.
>>MLO.2. Highlight and copy the newer clean list to the clipboard.
>>MLO.3  Right click on the parent task/folder for this list of tasks, 
>> and choose: "Advanced" then "Paste text as subtasks".
>>MLO.3b. Optionally choose extra customization on the MLO dialog that 
>> pops up. Click OK. 
>>
>> Voila!!
>>
>> Happy to help.
>> natG
>>
>>
>>  
> Lisa
>
> -- 
> Sent from my phone. 
> Reply directly to me at mailto:lstro...@gmail.com
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/y1BNA0ImTIwJ.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.



[MLO] Re: goodbye everyone

2012-07-13 Thread João Melo
Hi Chuck,

I moved to Gqueues. The todo queries (they call smartqueues) are very very 
simpler compared to MLO. But the trade-off was better to me. What i do on 
my ipad in a meeting is waiting for me in my linux work pc. I can see them 
also in my windows notebook at home and during travels, or in my iphone 
during my constantly traffic jams here in Brasilia.

Since dropbox my mindset cannot operate with manualy sinc anymore. Of 
course, is a choice.

Thanks,
João



On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 7:30:39 PM UTC-3, chuckdevee wrote:
>
> I'd be interested also to find out if you've found something that works as 
> well. I understand your frustrations about the mobile version.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/jYzZIPF0758J.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.



[MLO] hyperlinks containing bracket characters

2012-07-13 Thread stochastic
Creating a link to a task and clicking it works fine within MLO. But if I 
copy the URL to any other app (try Firefox) MLO is triggered but gives a 
"File not found" error. In other apps like Word, the issue is with the 
curly brackets "{" and "}" which is not allowed as per RFC specs. Can these 
issues be fixed?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/3ny37bMBosgJ.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.



[MLO] Re: goodbye everyone

2012-07-13 Thread João Melo
Hello,

The point is that i felt nice thanking and saying goodbye to people from i 
learned so much. Sorry if i upset you.

Tks,
JM

On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:52:02 PM UTC-3, Holmes245 wrote:
>
> So why get on here to tell people you're leaving? Unless you were a 
> constant presence on the board and you're well known by at least several, 
> it's sort of pointless. Not trying to be mean but this is something I would 
> do if I was was upset with development not coming as fast as I wanted to 
> and I wanted to make a point about it. Joao, what out there does more and 
> has the features that you want that you're not finding in the Apple 
> versions of MLO?
>
> Joel
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:41:28 PM UTC-4, João Melo wrote:
>>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> What i think is really amazing in MLO is 
>> its powerful query capabilities in the todo. I did all kind of saved views 
>> and i loved it. It is because the mobile model that i'm leaving. I tried, 
>> but couldn't operate with manually syncs and the lack of customized views 
>> on both iphone and ipad.
>>
>> I want to thanks the MLO team and this incredible community,
>> Health and peace for you all,
>> João
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/Ve0FZ304FaUJ.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.