Re: can I just encrypt tables? what about the app?

2016-03-03 Thread shawn l.green



On 3/3/2016 10:40 AM, lejeczek wrote:

On 02/03/16 00:51, shawn l.green wrote:



On 3/1/2016 6:26 PM, lejeczek wrote:



On 29/02/16 21:35, shawn l.green wrote:



On 2/29/2016 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:



Am 29.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Gary Smith:

On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:


cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way better


Only to a degree.


no - not only to a degree - when the question is "not store anything
unencrypted on the disk" the is no degree, but or if


Once the disk is unencrypted, you've got access to the
filesystem. If you've got physical access to the machine, then
anything
which gives you console access gives you (potentially) access to the
underlying database files. If you can get those, it's trivial to get
access to the dataset that they contain.

However, if TDE is employed, then you've got another significant
obstacle to overcome: The data is only encrypted (aiui) once it's in
memory. At this point, you're needing to do attacks on RAM to get
access
to the data - and even then, you're unlikely to get 3 bars for a
jackpot
payout of the whole database schema, assuming a decent sized
database.


in theory

in reality you don't need to hack around in the RAM - mysqld needs to
have access to key for operate with the data and so you need to find
only that piece

the same for encryption on the application side before send data to
the
db-layer - see the start and subject of that thread how far people are
away from understanding how and on what layer things are encrypted and
what excatly is protected in which context

there is no "turn this on and you are safe" without deeper
understanding



Correct. As long as the key and the lock are on the same machine,
there will be some way of opening that lock. It's just a matter of how
hard can you make it to find that key. No data is perfectly safe. No
crypto is unbreakable. Ever.

Maybe the key only exists in memory while the daemon runs? You can
hack the memory to find the key.

Maybe the key is retrieved from another key service daemon. If you
have the credentials to impersonate a valid retriever, you are in the
money.

The purpose of any encryption system is not to make it impossible to
read the data. It's purpose is to make it impractically hard for any
unauthorized parties to read it.

taking your last line and making and assumption or two, notion of double
encryption arises - will it work?




A system called "Triple DES" does exactly what you propose and appears
to be in wide usage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_DES

The key to avoiding brute force attacks is not how many times you
scramble the data, but how long your key is. In the early days of
computers, keys were short because processing power was less. In
today's world, you must use longer keys just to stay ahead of Moore's
Law.

Quoting from
http://www.welivesecurity.com/2016/02/17/how-is-cryptography-incorporated-into-pos-terminals/


For example, DES with a 56-bit key (2^56 possible combinations) can
be broken in less than a day, since average computers can perform a
billion operations per second. However, the addition of more bits to
the string will exponentially increase the time required to crack it.



Most SSL keys (for example, those used to encrypt the information
exchanged when you visit "secure" web sites) should all have keys that
are 2048 bits or longer. If they don't already, I'll bet they are
upgrading their certificates soon.
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2012/09/10/minimum-rsa-public-key-lengths-guidelines-or-rules.html




how to backup in a way that this in-database-encryption will be taken
advantage of?
does any of present backup solutions can do it?
many thanks.



As the new encryption layer we are discussing (TDE) is between the 
storage engine and the physical file (the data in the file is 
encrypted), then any technique for doing safe file-level backups will 
preserve the encryption.


Examples:
  cold backups (copying off the files after stopping the daemon)
  FTWRL + wait for background threads to complete their queues + file 
system snapshot
  MySQL Enterprise Backup (coming soon for TDE tables; we are still 
working out some early bugs between TDE and MEB)


Any technique that reads the decrypted data and transcribes it to text 
would not be a backup technique that preserves that encryption.

Example: mysqldump


(NOTE: "FTWRL" is a shorthand for the command FLUSH TABLES WITH READ 
LOCK. It can save a lot of typing. )


--
Shawn Green
MySQL Senior Principal Technical Support Engineer
Oracle USA, Inc. - Integrated Cloud Applications & Platform Services
Office: Blountville, TN

Become certified in MySQL! Visit https://www.mysql.com/certification/ 
for details.


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



Re: can I just encrypt tables? what about the app?

2016-03-03 Thread Reindl Harald



Am 03.03.2016 um 16:40 schrieb lejeczek:

how to backup in a way that this in-database-encryption will be taken
advantage of?
does any of present backup solutions can do it?
many thanks


think once again what "transparent encryption" means

the most effective backup is anyways running slave connected to the 
master via TLS, stop the slave and rsync away the whole datadir because 
it is fast, efficient and scriptable (with ssh-keys even between networks)




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: can I just encrypt tables? what about the app?

2016-03-03 Thread lejeczek

On 02/03/16 00:51, shawn l.green wrote:



On 3/1/2016 6:26 PM, lejeczek wrote:



On 29/02/16 21:35, shawn l.green wrote:



On 2/29/2016 3:13 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:



Am 29.02.2016 um 20:54 schrieb Gary Smith:

On 29/02/2016 19:50, Reindl Harald wrote:


cryptsetup/luks can achieve that way better


Only to a degree.


no - not only to a degree - when the question is "not 
store anything

unencrypted on the disk" the is no degree, but or if


Once the disk is unencrypted, you've got access to the
filesystem. If you've got physical access to the 
machine, then anything
which gives you console access gives you (potentially) 
access to the
underlying database files. If you can get those, it's 
trivial to get

access to the dataset that they contain.

However, if TDE is employed, then you've got another 
significant
obstacle to overcome: The data is only encrypted 
(aiui) once it's in
memory. At this point, you're needing to do attacks on 
RAM to get

access
to the data - and even then, you're unlikely to get 3 
bars for a

jackpot
payout of the whole database schema, assuming a decent 
sized database.


in theory

in reality you don't need to hack around in the RAM - 
mysqld needs to
have access to key for operate with the data and so you 
need to find

only that piece

the same for encryption on the application side before 
send data to the
db-layer - see the start and subject of that thread how 
far people are
away from understanding how and on what layer things 
are encrypted and

what excatly is protected in which context

there is no "turn this on and you are safe" without 
deeper understanding




Correct. As long as the key and the lock are on the same 
machine,
there will be some way of opening that lock. It's just a 
matter of how
hard can you make it to find that key. No data is 
perfectly safe. No

crypto is unbreakable. Ever.

Maybe the key only exists in memory while the daemon 
runs? You can

hack the memory to find the key.

Maybe the key is retrieved from another key service 
daemon. If you
have the credentials to impersonate a valid retriever, 
you are in the

money.

The purpose of any encryption system is not to make it 
impossible to
read the data. It's purpose is to make it impractically 
hard for any

unauthorized parties to read it.
taking your last line and making and assumption or two, 
notion of double

encryption arises - will it work?




A system called "Triple DES" does exactly what you propose 
and appears to be in wide usage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_DES

The key to avoiding brute force attacks is not how many 
times you scramble the data, but how long your key is. In 
the early days of computers, keys were short because 
processing power was less. In today's world, you must use 
longer keys just to stay ahead of Moore's Law.


Quoting from
http://www.welivesecurity.com/2016/02/17/how-is-cryptography-incorporated-into-pos-terminals/ 

For example, DES with a 56-bit key (2^56 possible 
combinations) can be broken in less than a day, since 
average computers can perform a billion operations per 
second. However, the addition of more bits to the string 
will exponentially increase the time required to crack it.



Most SSL keys (for example, those used to encrypt the 
information exchanged when you visit "secure" web sites) 
should all have keys that are 2048 bits or longer. If they 
don't already, I'll bet they are upgrading their 
certificates soon.
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2012/09/10/minimum-rsa-public-key-lengths-guidelines-or-rules.html 




how to backup in a way that this in-database-encryption will 
be taken advantage of?

does any of present backup solutions can do it?
many thanks.


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql