Re: Converting table to InnoDB

2006-01-02 Thread Jigal van Hemert

Jonathan Chong wrote:

I have a table on my forum that's frequently accessing with reads and
writes. On a busy day, the table is locked when people are posting
messages and the page hangs when you try to read a topic.

Is it worth me converting the table to InnoDB, as I've heard that
InnoDB doesn't lock tables during I/O access.


InnoDB has row-level locking (i.e. it basically only locks the rows that 
might be changed by the query). InnoDB is generally speaking a good 
choice in 'high concurrency' situations (many reads and writes at the 
same time); for small read-only or write-only tables InnoDB is usually 
slower than MyISAM.


In your situation it might solve the locking problem. Do read the online 
manual carefully since there are a lot of differences between MyISAM and 
InnoDB (the way data is stored, the way indexes are stored, some 
differences in handling statements and functions,etc.)


Regards, Jigal.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Converting table to InnoDB

2005-12-30 Thread Jonathan Chong
I have a table on my forum that's frequently accessing with reads and
writes. On a busy day, the table is locked when people are posting
messages and the page hangs when you try to read a topic.

Is it worth me converting the table to InnoDB, as I've heard that
InnoDB doesn't lock tables during I/O access.

I'm running an AMD64 3000+ with 1GB of memory.
--
Jonathan Chong

http://www.arsenal-now.com/
http://www.arsenal-mania.com/
http://www.ashburrn.com/
http://www.jonathan-chong.com/

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]