See, for the UK, on that date, 2am to 2:59 inclusive do not officially
exist - hence, 3am to 3:59 for GMT+1, etc. I couldn't quite figure why 3am
was being rejected until now. I'm impressed that MySQL knows that {:v)

--
Jason Teagle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ricardas.S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 March 2006 14:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Timestamp problem in mysql5.0.18
>
>
> Yes, I think you are right, it should be the main reason of
> insert failure.
> Thank you for good idea.
>
> Ricka
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Teagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ricardas.S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 14:55
> Subject: RE: Timestamp problem in mysql5.0.18
>
>
> > > All other date or hour values I tried, works good, but this one
> > > is not accepted. UPDATE statement behaves the same.
> > > Server time zone is GMT+2.
> > > I tried 5.0.18nt and two linux versions, result is the same.
> > > I tried to change time zone, and noticed that mysql server does
> > > not accept 2006-03-26 date with hour values which are equals GMT
> > > offset + 1.
> > > When I tried with ALLOW_INVALID_DATES option enabled, then server
> > > simply changes hour upward to 04.
> > >
> > > Is it mysql bug?
> >
> > I believe that the clocks go forward in the UK (and possibly other
> > countries) on the 26th - 2am suddenly becomes 3am. I wonder if
> this is part
> > of the problem? Seems a bit of a coincidence, especially as you
> say it went
> > to 4am.
> >
> > --
> > Jason Teagle
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to