RE: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Jay Cornell
Hello,  I have been researching the wintv-150 and I am confused about
the drivers.  It doesn't look like ivtv is going to build one for it.  I
appologize if I've got the info wrong (newbie), but I am trying to
configure my first mythtv system and am still gathering HW specs.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Templeton
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 3:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion about mythtv
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner


On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:06:39AM +0100, Rolf Zwart wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Is there anybody who has already got the (dual-tuner) new PVR-500 card

 from Hauppage working with MythTV? As I understand it is already being

 sold in Amercia i.e.??
 

It's mostly a slot-saver right now, which of course is important if you
have a SFF computer or micro-atx, but the cheapest I see that card out
for is around $135-$140, and the PVR-150-MCE can be had for $62
according to froogle, so it's actually cheaper to buy two of those.  Of
course this won't last and I suspect this card will become the normal
purchase.

Of course, I have lived happily on a 1 tuner Tivo before trying to build
my mythbox which will have two tuners, a pcHDTV and a wintv-150.  I sort
of feel that a scheduling conflict is god's way of telling me I watch
too much TV.

(Of course, if you have a Canadian satellite dish, you will not get many
scheduling conflicts, since they give you local channels from 5 zones of
Canada as well as U.S. EST and PST, so most shows are on more than
enough times to eliminate any trouble.  Unfortunately Expressvu switched
satellites in August and so the south and west USA can't see about 1/3rd
of the channels, you should go to Starchoice instead.  Cheaper than any
US satellite as well.)


___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


RE: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread John Harvey
Work has been done on the 150. The last i heard was
that if you use the 0.3.1 drivers then it can capture
video but not audio at the moment.

You should check the ivtv-dev list for more accurate
information or look at the Changelog in the latest
driver.

John
 --- Jay Cornell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hello,  I have been researching the wintv-150 and I
 am confused about
 the drivers.  It doesn't look like ivtv is going to
 build one for it.  I
 appologize if I've got the info wrong (newbie), but
 I am trying to
 configure my first mythtv system and am still
 gathering HW specs.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
 Of Brad Templeton
 Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 3:16 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion about mythtv
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner
 
 
 On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:06:39AM +0100, Rolf Zwart
 wrote:
  Hello,
  
  Is there anybody who has already got the
 (dual-tuner) new PVR-500 card
 
  from Hauppage working with MythTV? As I understand
 it is already being
 
  sold in Amercia i.e.??
  
 
 It's mostly a slot-saver right now, which of course
 is important if you
 have a SFF computer or micro-atx, but the cheapest I
 see that card out
 for is around $135-$140, and the PVR-150-MCE can be
 had for $62
 according to froogle, so it's actually cheaper to
 buy two of those.  Of
 course this won't last and I suspect this card will
 become the normal
 purchase.
 
 Of course, I have lived happily on a 1 tuner Tivo
 before trying to build
 my mythbox which will have two tuners, a pcHDTV and
 a wintv-150.  I sort
 of feel that a scheduling conflict is god's way of
 telling me I watch
 too much TV.
 
 (Of course, if you have a Canadian satellite dish,
 you will not get many
 scheduling conflicts, since they give you local
 channels from 5 zones of
 Canada as well as U.S. EST and PST, so most shows
 are on more than
 enough times to eliminate any trouble. 
 Unfortunately Expressvu switched
 satellites in August and so the south and west USA
 can't see about 1/3rd
 of the channels, you should go to Starchoice
 instead.  Cheaper than any
 US satellite as well.)
 
 
  ___
 mythtv-users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
  
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


RE: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Jan Johansson
 Hello,  I have been researching the wintv-150 and I am confused about
 the drivers.  It doesn't look like ivtv is going to build one for it.
I
 appologize if I've got the info wrong (newbie), but I am trying to
 configure my first mythtv system and am still gathering HW specs.

As it is now, you can use 250 and 350. But not 150.


.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: RE: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Rolf Zwart
And How about the MCE versions? Is that a problem?

Rolf.



 Message date : 02-12-2004 13:18
 From : Jan Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To : Discussion about mythtv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Copy to : 
 Subject : RE: [mythtv-users]  PVR-500 Dual Tuner
 
  Hello,  I have been researching the wintv-150 and I am confused about
  the drivers.  It doesn't look like ivtv is going to build one for it.
 I
  appologize if I've got the info wrong (newbie), but I am trying to
  configure my first mythtv system and am still gathering HW specs.
 
 As it is now, you can use 250 and 350. But not 150.
 
 
 .
 
[ (Geen naam gevonden) (0.2 Kb) ]
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Markey
Brad Templeton wrote:
...
Of course, I have lived happily on a 1 tuner Tivo before trying to build
my mythbox which will have two tuners, a pcHDTV and a wintv-150.  I
sort of feel that a scheduling conflict is god's way of telling me I
watch too much TV.
God probably didn't tell networks to pit shows that appeal to
the same demographic against each other in order to undermine
the Nielsen ratings of their competitors =).
We tend to get complacent after adapting to resources. In the
early '80s Compute's Gazette questioned the need for 64k in
new computers from Commodore and Atari because people wouldn't
type in BASIC programs that large. Having watched TV all our
lives, and even with one VCR or one DVR, we're accustomed to
the idea that we have to decide which one of the things that is
on at 8:00pm Tuesday we most want to watch. However, there may
be four things on at 8pm Tue that I'd prefer over almost anything
else on at any other time of the week. So the advantage of
multiple tuners isn't so you can watch twice as much TV ;-) but
so that you can choose all the titles that you would like to
see regardless of when they are scheduled. The result should be
that during the time you spend looking at the tube, you're more
likely to watch things you'd really like to see and less time on
secondary filler.
Back when I had a single tuner DVR I thought that a second tuner
would solve most of the problems and that's pretty much true. I
now normally have three tuners on-line for myth and can add two
more slaves when needed for up to five recordings at a time. I'm
surprised how often things come in clusters. Take a couple networks
competing for an audience like me, add a baseball playoff game
and an early season basketball game and I'm full. I can watch
the sports that night and the other shows over the course of the
next few days. Looking at my current schedule, I have nothing from
10am Sat until 3pm Sun but ten shows in primetime Tue with three
more postponed to record a later showing. I have plenty of things
I still want to see this weekend even though I'm not recording
anything new. I wouldn't have as many good choices if I'd only
had one tuner.
So even though multiple tuners sound like overkill, the result
can be a better use of your TV time rather than just more wasted
time. No need to feel guilty =).
--  bjm
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Brad Templeton
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:15:52PM -0800, Bruce Markey wrote:
 Brad Templeton wrote:
 ...
 Of course, I have lived happily on a 1 tuner Tivo before trying to build
 my mythbox which will have two tuners, a pcHDTV and a wintv-150.  I
 sort of feel that a scheduling conflict is god's way of telling me I
 watch too much TV.
 
 God probably didn't tell networks to pit shows that appeal to
 the same demographic against each other in order to undermine
 the Nielsen ratings of their competitors =).
 
 on at 8:00pm Tuesday we most want to watch. However, there may
 be four things on at 8pm Tue that I'd prefer over almost anything
 else on at any other time of the week. So the advantage of


This can be true in theory, and sometimes in practice, but how true
is it really?   Sometimes I feel the right answer is to just accept
it, and that week watch only one thing.  You should never watch an
inferior thing to fill your time just because you couldn't record
a superior thing.  Chances are, it will come on again (if it's not
a sporting event.)   A clever PVR might even notice when it failed
to record something due to conflicts, and remember to grab it for
you in summer reruns (while not recording all the other reruns.)  Ie.
add it to a permanent wishlist of sorts.

But I'm not like many.  When I got my Tivo I did watch more TV,
even accounting for the fact that I could watch TV in 30% less time
due to commercial skip.  It took effort to bring it back down.  Tivo
suggestions are an interesting feature but can contribute to more
watching.  On the other hand you can be bothered by the lack of variety
without them and start surfing, which is of course bad (and very slow
with digital TV.)

But for example, I deliberately don't get HBO, even though it has shows
I would like to see, because I know I would watch more of it than I
should.  (This decision was reinforced when comcast switched to requiring
digital cable to get pay channels.  PVRs work much better with broadband
RF style cable than with set top boxes, as we all know.)

So I agree, sometimes multiple tuners will give you better quality
TV.  But they will also make you -- at least if you are weak like me --
from thinking about the decisions over what you really want to watch.

One thing multiple tuners can do though is facilitate automatic padding.
All PVRs should automatically pad a few minutes extra before and after
each program.   The before-padding would be invisible -- the cursor would
start at the programmed start time, and a few minutes of rewind would be
available.  The post-padding of course is not watched because you manually
stop at the end. 

This is an obvious win, but harder to do on a single tuner.  The Tivo does
it terribly.  Padding is manual and if you add it, the one minute overlap
with another show counts as a conflict rather than a no padding in
this instance

Multiple tuners can give you full padding on all shows, which is a useful
feature, but reduces your ability to use multiple tuners to avoid conflicts
if you also have abutting shows.

Many people seem to want multiple tuners so they can watch live TV while
recording.  They haven't realized the error of their ways in wanting to
watch live TV. :-)

Ideally, when given a variable length event (sports, news, academy awards etc.)
a PVR would always do tons of padding in available free disk space.  As much
as an hour.  Then it would mark this extra hour as delete this if you need
space, starting at the end.   Thus, if you watched reasonably soon after
the event, you would not find it cut off.

A really smart PVR would use shared knowledge from other viewers to figure
out when the event actually ended (ie. almost everybody quit and deleted at 3
hours 22 minutes) and then retroactively queue that space for re-use.
(But it should never delete until actually needed.)   Or transcode the extra
space really small.

Can you tell I have been frustrated to miss the end of a program?

___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Randy Carpenter

So does anyone have an idea as to whether or not the PVR-500 is supported? 
Is it too early to tell?

-Randy

___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Ryan A. Carris
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:37:12 -0500 (EST), Randy Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 So does anyone have an idea as to whether or not the PVR-500 is supported?
 Is it too early to tell?
 
 -Randy


Not yet.
___
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users


Re: [mythtv-users] PVR-500 Dual Tuner

2004-12-02 Thread Bruce Markey
Brad Templeton wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:15:52PM -0800, Bruce Markey wrote:
Brad Templeton wrote:
...
Of course, I have lived happily on a 1 tuner Tivo before trying to build
my mythbox which will have two tuners, a pcHDTV and a wintv-150.  I
sort of feel that a scheduling conflict is god's way of telling me I
watch too much TV.
God probably didn't tell networks to pit shows that appeal to
the same demographic against each other in order to undermine
the Nielsen ratings of their competitors =).
on at 8:00pm Tuesday we most want to watch. However, there may
be four things on at 8pm Tue that I'd prefer over almost anything
else on at any other time of the week. So the advantage of

This can be true in theory, and sometimes in practice, but how true
is it really?
That's a good question and one that surprised me once I had
several tuners. 

   Sometimes I feel the right answer is to just accept
it, and that week watch only one thing.  You should never watch an
inferior thing to fill your time just because you couldn't record
a superior thing.
Agreed. Following that line of reasoning, it turns out that
most of the time there isn't anything on that I really need
to see and often superior things are on at the same time.
The question changes from 'what will fit in the schedule' to
'what are the things I'd most like to see'. If that means that
several things are recorded on Tuesday and nothing on Friday,
so be it.
  Chances are, it will come on again (if it's not
a sporting event.)   A clever PVR might even notice when it failed
to record something due to conflicts, and remember to grab it for
you in summer reruns (while not recording all the other reruns.)  Ie.
add it to a permanent wishlist of sorts.
Myth shines here because unlike the system you are familiar with
where previously recorded shows are only remembered for 5 or 6
weeks and a first run feature is used to block reruns, myth keeps
it's previously recorded entries. It will remember which ones
you've seen before and only record the ones that were missed.
It's also a little smarted about letting you block out a showing
but still allowing that same episode to be recorded at another
time.
But I'm not like many.  When I got my Tivo I did watch more TV,
even accounting for the fact that I could watch TV in 30% less time
due to commercial skip.  It took effort to bring it back down.  Tivo
suggestions are an interesting feature but can contribute to more
watching.  On the other hand you can be bothered by the lack of variety
without them and start surfing, which is of course bad (and very slow
with digital TV.)
Variety is a good question or at least seems like a good question
when watching recordings rather than channel surfing. I thought
the suggestions were an interesting feature at first as well as
the promotional lists. However, The first week I said I liked
Letterman and it suggested another talk show, Oprah. I said no to
Oprah and a week later it recommended Letterman and not Oprah.
Three months later Letterman yes, Oprah no. I'm fairly confident
of it's talk show recommendations for next year.
But I found that I kept looking at these lists and came to realize
that what I was looking for was not the regular series that I'd
already formed an opinion about but the new titles I hadn't heard
of before(!). This lead to the What's New list now in Schedule
Recordings-Search Lists-New Titles. This is a slightly different
approach where there is a table of all the titles that have been
in the listings in the past (up to 11 months) then the New Titles
show all the future titles in the current listings that are not
in that list. So this is all the stuff that hasn't been on before.
Further, by using the view keys, Home and End by default, you
can see the list broken down by Movies, Series and Specials.
I've found many more interesting, unexpected things by looking
at these lists than I ever found in the suggestions. I also
believe I find more interesting things here than by channel
surfing because you only find things that happen to be on during
the times that you surf and even then you start watching from
somewhere in the middle.
But for example, I deliberately don't get HBO, even though it has shows
I would like to see, because I know I would watch more of it than I
should.  (This decision was reinforced when comcast switched to requiring
digital cable to get pay channels.  PVRs work much better with broadband
RF style cable than with set top boxes, as we all know.)
I agree that they do but I'm not sure everyone knows that ;-).
So I agree, sometimes multiple tuners will give you better quality
TV.  But they will also make you -- at least if you are weak like me --
from thinking about the decisions over what you really want to watch.
Glad you said that because it shows that I failed to express the
key point. Shortly before I had a DVR I was in the habit of watching
Dragnet at 6:30 before dinner. As I scheduled things on the DVR I
of course added Dragnet and