[Nagios-users] Discrpancy b/w NDOUtils DB and Nagios
Hello, i'm trying to make some sense out of the data in NDOUtils hostchecks table...Basically, I just want to test which hosts have ever been down at any time. There is large number of hosts whose host status, according to Nagios' web interface, has been in critical DOWN condition for quite some time. However, when I run the query on NDOUtils tables, only a very small subset of these hosts show up. (I.e. nagios shows that host X,Y,Z and W are down, but when I run the query on DNOUtils hostchecks data table, only Y and Z show up as having ever been down, which is *weird*). I've ensured that Nagios performs the checks every two minutes, that both nagios and ndoUtils have been running long enough, and that the Ndo2db is only trimmed once a week (so trimming could not be the cause of the missing records...) The query that I'm running is as follows: SELECT o.name1, o.object_id, h.host_object_id FROM nagios.nagios_objects o INNER JOIN nagios.nagios_hostchecks h ON o.object_id=h.host_object_id WHERE o.objecttype_id=1 AND h.state=1 AND is_raw_check=0; So can anybody suggest a reason why the hosts which are down (and critical) in Nagios' web interface are not recorded as such in NDOUtils' database ?? thanks alot for any suggestions : 0) --yana - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] check_snmp_storage fails on 2003 box, works manually
I'm having an issue with getting some SNMP commands to work.
When issuing the check_snmp_storage.pl manually, I get perfect results,
but once I put it in Nagios 3.0b5, I get critical alerts: (Return code
of 127 is out of bounds - plugin may be missing)
This is the manual command I enter and the result:
$ sudo ./check_snmp_storage.pl -H 192.168.1.200 -C pUBLIC -m C -w 80 -c 95
C:\ Label: Serial Number d0d8a583: 66%used(9055MB/13774MB) (80%) : OK
This is how I defined the command and service:
define command{
command_namecheck_snmp_storage_windrive
command_line$USER1$/check_snmp_storage -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C
$ARG1$ -m $ARG2$ -w $ARG3$ -c $ARG4$
}
define service{
use generic-service
host_name Bunker01_Win2003-01
service_description Check Drive C Memory
check_command
check_snmp_storage_windrive!pUBLIC!^C!90!100!
}
The host is running Ubuntu 7.x and Nagios 3.0b5
Chris Serafin
Security Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_snmp_storage fails on 2003 box, works manually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
chris serafin wrote:
I'm having an issue with getting some SNMP commands to work.
When issuing the check_snmp_storage.pl manually, I get perfect results,
but once I put it in Nagios 3.0b5, I get critical alerts: (Return code
of 127 is out of bounds - plugin may be missing)
This is the manual command I enter and the result:
$ sudo ./check_snmp_storage.pl -H 192.168.1.200 -C pUBLIC -m C -w 80 -c 95
Great for root. But what about the account that Nagios is running as?
Did you test it too? And where did you put check_snmp_storage.pl exactly?
./ is a rather relative distinction. But I think it does not matter
This is how I defined the command and service:
define command{
command_namecheck_snmp_storage_windrive
command_line$USER1$/check_snmp_storage -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C
$ARG1$ -m $ARG2$ -w $ARG3$ -c $ARG4$
Hold on. Why are you afraid to come out and tell nagios it is a perl script?
$USER1$/check_snmp_storage !!= ./check_snmp_storage.pl
For those unaware of pseudo code: !!= stands for 'is most definitly
NOT'. Pretty much as !~= stands for 'almost but not quite unlike`;-)
Hugo.
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHN/mgBvzDRVjxmYERAmt3AKCD35Rz1k7aT3POzEvQPYUNEQXo4ACfUa0H
Mg/Qj9Pt1/o0/6T4xxwwxZg=
=GD0Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
