Re: [Nagios-users-br] MPLS
Marcelo, On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Marcelo Joy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Preciso monitorar o status de várias vpn's MPLS, e gostaria de saber se com o Nagios 3.x é possível realizar tal tarefa, se possível com referência ou exemplo. O Nagios funciona como um agendador de checagens, vc pode usá-lo com os plugins padrões ou pode criar o seu próprio plugin, desde que obedeça o guideline para tal. Portanto, tudo que for possível codificar para testar conexões TCP, pode ser adequado para se tornar um plugin, basta saber como. Ou, se deseja monitorar o status do processo que cuida dessas conexões, pode-se utilizar o plugin check_proc. Ou ainda, se apenas um telnet na porta é suficiente para determinar se o processo está ok, utilize o plugin check_tcp. Ou ainda, se precisar realizar um teste funcional, com autenticação e tudo mais, pode criar um plugin que faça a tarefa completa. Enfim, o Nagios é capaz de atender o requisito. Não tenho exemplos pra te dar, porque não monitoro vpns mpls, mas monitoro processos, sockets, conexões. Se precisar de exemplos para isso, sugiro que vc leia a documentação antes. Att, Marcel - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki
[Nagios-users] Help : NDOUtils not able to find mysql
Hi All I have installed mysql in /usr/bin/mysql now when i try to install ndo utils it gives me the error *** MySQL include file could not be located... ** You chose to compile NDBXT with MySQL support, but I was unable to locate mysql/mysql.h on your system. If the include file is installed, use the --with-mysql-inc argument to specify the location of the MySQL include file. I have checked , mysql is installed and running succesfully when i type this command sudo netstat -tap | grep mysql i get o/p tcp0 0 localhost.localdomain:mysql *:* LISTEN - Please help. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/monitoring/ndoutils-1.4b7# ./configure --with-mysql-lib=/usr/bin/mysql checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking arpa/inet.h usability... yes checking arpa/inet.h presence... yes checking for arpa/inet.h... yes checking ctype.h usability... yes checking ctype.h presence... yes checking for ctype.h... yes checking dirent.h usability... yes checking dirent.h presence... yes checking for dirent.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking errno.h usability... yes checking errno.h presence... yes checking for errno.h... yes checking fcntl.h usability... yes checking fcntl.h presence... yes checking for fcntl.h... yes checking float.h usability... yes checking float.h presence... yes checking for float.h... yes checking getopt.h usability... yes checking getopt.h presence... yes checking for getopt.h... yes checking grp.h usability... yes checking grp.h presence... yes checking for grp.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes checking limits.h usability... yes checking limits.h presence... yes checking for limits.h... yes checking ltdl.h usability... no checking ltdl.h presence... no checking for ltdl.h... no checking math.h usability... yes checking math.h presence... yes checking for math.h... yes checking netdb.h usability... yes checking netdb.h presence... yes checking for netdb.h... yes checking netinet/in.h usability... yes checking netinet/in.h presence... yes checking for netinet/in.h... yes checking pthread.h usability... yes checking pthread.h presence... yes checking for pthread.h... yes checking pwd.h usability... yes checking pwd.h presence... yes checking for pwd.h... yes checking regex.h usability... yes checking regex.h presence... yes checking for regex.h... yes checking signal.h usability... yes checking signal.h presence... yes checking for signal.h... yes checking socket.h usability... no checking socket.h presence... no checking for socket.h... no checking stdarg.h usability... yes checking stdarg.h presence... yes checking for stdarg.h... yes checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes checking for string.h... (cached) yes checking for strings.h... (cached) yes checking sys/ipc.h usability... yes checking sys/ipc.h presence... yes checking for sys/ipc.h... yes checking sys/mman.h usability... yes checking sys/mman.h presence... yes checking for sys/mman.h... yes checking sys/msg.h usability... yes checking sys/msg.h presence... yes checking for sys/msg.h... yes checking sys/poll.h usability... yes checking sys/poll.h presence... yes checking for sys/poll.h... yes checking sys/resource.h usability... yes checking sys/resource.h presence... yes checking for sys/resource.h... yes checking sys/sendfile.h usability... yes checking sys/sendfile.h presence... yes checking for sys/sendfile.h... yes checking sys/socket.h usability... yes checking sys/socket.h presence... yes checking for sys/socket.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) yes checking sys/time.h usability... yes checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking sys/timeb.h usability... yes checking sys/timeb.h presence... yes checking for sys/timeb.h... yes checking for
Re: [Nagios-users] Help : NDOUtils not able to find mysql
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: *** MySQL include file could not be located... ** Install mysql-devel or mysql-dev. The files are needed to add mysql-Support when compiling other apps like ndo-utils. Greetz, Marcus - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Configuring tricky escalations
Thank you ! I was stuck in the escalation oriented mindset, of course it works with adding more specific contacts. Julien. On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Edgar Matzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Julien, This is working just fine. Now the tricky part : we would like to send notification for DF WARNINGS only during workhours, and the rest (u,c,r) in the 24x7 period. I tried to create more escalations, specific with timeperiod and escalation_options but I can't make it. Will you find the solution ? thanks in advance for your help. you have to specify in the contacts or contacts group the notification period, i.e. when *they* want to be notified. HTH, cu l8r, Edgar. -- |\ /| :: Addr: Valid Eindhoven B.V. / | \/ | : Edgar R. Matzinger : t.a.v. E.R. Matzinger / || :: Paradijslaan 36 \ /| /\| :: 5611 KN Eindhoven \/ / \ : Valid Eindhoven BV : \ /\ / :: \/ |\/ :: |:: Disclaimer: Any comments, opinions made are mine, etc ... - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Help : NDOUtils not able to find mysql
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: How to do that ? as i could not find any packages apt-cache search mysql-dev Pallav, please keep it on the list. The packet on my ubuntu-system is libmysqlclient15-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude search mysql | grep dev [ ... ] v libmysqlclient-dev - i libmysqlclient15-dev- MySQL database development files Greetz, Marcus - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
Hello, (using 3.0.1) I've a list of hosts, these hosts are not available for ping, but normal service checks (SSH, SMTP, ...) work. Nagios reports theses hosts beeing down! Ugly! If I remember well, older nagios versions knew that's enough to see one service on a host to know this host has to be up. The host check_command is the normale 'check-host-alive' (which is pinging), the check_interval is 0 -- why does nagios want to check that host? The check_command is inherited from some template, if I try to override it with no value, nagios complains: Error: Host check command '(null)' specified for host 'diwi/diw' is not defined anywhere So - please, could anybody point to my stupidity? Thanks. Best regards from Dresden Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet unix support - Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B --- gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B - signature.asc Description: Digital signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Help : NDOUtils not able to find mysql
Thanks Marcus it worked !!! Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/08/2008 03:33 PM To nagios nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject Re: [Nagios-users] Help : NDOUtils not able to find mysql [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: How to do that ? as i could not find any packages apt-cache search mysql-dev Pallav, please keep it on the list. The packet on my ubuntu-system is libmysqlclient15-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# aptitude search mysql | grep dev [ ... ] v libmysqlclient-dev - i libmysqlclient15-dev- MySQL database development files Greetz, Marcus - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should return it to the sender immediately. Please note that while we scan all e-mails for viruses we cannot guarantee that any e-mail is virus-free and accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.image/gif- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
Dnia 08-04-2008 o 14:21:08 Heiko Schlittermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): Hello, Valdinger, Stephen (DOV, MSX) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Di 08 Apr 2008 13:58:36 CEST): Just rewrite the check-host-alive plugin for the unpingable hosts to something bogus like check_null for some bogus output. Or use a different check command other than a ping for the check-host alive. Thank you for your response. But - a bogus check returning OK would be wrong too, because the host *can* be down. The host should assumed to be UP if *any* service check on this host was successful. The host should assumed to be DOWN, if all service checks failed. Any suggestion anybody? That one would be non-trivial, but perhaps the check command could read current status for the host and only do test if there are no services currently in OK state? Otherwise it would return the host is UP. -- Wojciech Kocjan - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
Hello, Valdinger, Stephen (DOV, MSX) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Di 08 Apr 2008 13:58:36 CEST): Just rewrite the check-host-alive plugin for the unpingable hosts to something bogus like check_null for some bogus output. Or use a different check command other than a ping for the check-host alive. Thank you for your response. But - a bogus check returning OK would be wrong too, because the host *can* be down. The host should assumed to be UP if *any* service check on this host was successful. The host should assumed to be DOWN, if all service checks failed. Any suggestion anybody? Best regards from Dresden Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet unix support - Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B --- gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B - signature.asc Description: Digital signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
Wojciech Kocjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Di 08 Apr 2008 14:34:38 CEST): Dnia 08-04-2008 o 14:21:08 Heiko Schlittermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a): That one would be non-trivial, but perhaps the check command could read current status for the host and only do test if there are no services currently in OK state? Otherwise it would return the host is UP. That's it. Is there any easy to access interface where I can read the status of service checks of the host in question? Best regards from Dresden Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet unix support - Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B --- gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B - signature.asc Description: Digital signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heiko Schlittermann That one would be non-trivial, but perhaps the check command could read current status for the host and only do test if there are no services currently in OK state? Otherwise it would return the host is UP. That's it. Is there any easy to access interface where I can read the status of service checks of the host in question? Using the check_cluster(2) plugin for your host check perhaps? I don't use the plugin myself but the concepts are the same... -- Marc - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring Windows Servers - [New domain name for nsclient++]
-Original Message- From: Michael Medin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:59 PM To: Frater, Greg J Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring Windows Servers - [New domain name for nsclient++] (found here: http://trac.nakednuns.org/nscp - don't ask me about the URL I don't know why it is what it is - it seems safe though) LOL, everyone seems to mention this lately, well, here is my official apology to anyone who has taken offense for the domain name *SORRY* Anyways, try: http://NSCLIENT.ORG, http://nsclient.com or http://nsclient.net hopefully these are better (if anyone want to know the reason for using the old one there is a post on the forum about it http://nsclient.org/nscp/discussion/2/120 ) All I know is I got a visit from our security guy asking for an explanation of my visits to that site. The preferable domain is nsclient.ORG but since go-daddy was so damn cheep (anyone know why? I pay 10 times as much for my previous domains) I got the others when I was at it... Excellent, I will use the new domain (though I must admit nakednuns is pretty memorable). And if any apache2 configure gurus knows how to combine location (I use a location with mod python inside it to call trac) and mod_rewrite let me know cause I would have preferred to drop the trailing /nscp but alas apache was giving me attitude... I would not be of much help here, I'm not an Apache guy. -greg - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] nagios 3.01 and NDOUtils
I have nagios 3.01 and the latest version of ndoutils, nagvis and pnp4nagios installed on redhat 5.1. Everything runs on the same server including mysql . After a restart of nagios everything runs fine for about 5 minutes then I get the dreaded message NDO claims that nagios did no status Update for more than 180 seconds. Make sure that nagios and ndo2db are running. The only way to get it back and running is do rm /usr/local/nagios/var/ndo.sock and then restart and again it works for about 5 minutes. I have double and triple check the config files in ndoutils, but I fear the issue is actually in nagios itself, because if I tail /usr/local/nagios/var/nagios.log I see a bunch stale service checks being queued up. Any help would be greatly appreciated - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] nagios 3.01 and NDOUtils
There is a thread about creating some indexes, search on. On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Rusty Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have nagios 3.01 and the latest version of ndoutils, nagvis and pnp4nagios installed on redhat 5.1. Everything runs on the same server including mysql . After a restart of nagios everything runs fine for about 5 minutes then I get the dreaded message *NDO claims that nagios did no status Update for more than 180 seconds. Make sure that nagios and ndo2db are running*. The only way to get it back and running is do rm /usr/local/nagios/var/ndo.sock and then restart and again it works for about 5 minutes. I have double and triple check the config files in ndoutils, but I fear the issue is actually in nagios itself, because if I tail /usr/local/nagios/var/nagios.log I see a bunch stale service checks being queued up. Any help would be greatly appreciated - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: Hello, (using 3.0.1) I've a list of hosts, these hosts are not available for ping, but normal service checks (SSH, SMTP, ...) work. Nagios reports theses hosts beeing down! Ugly! If I remember well, older nagios versions knew that's enough to see one service on a host to know this host has to be up. To a degree, yes- if you aren't actively checking the host (as would appear to be the case from your next paragraph), then as long as all services on the host are listed as ok, nagios assumes the host is still ok (at least once running, I don't know how it behaves on the initial check). However, should any of the services go into a non-ok state, nagios will immediately check the host (using the host check_command), wherupon, in your case, it would determine the host to be down since it can't ping. The state of the other services does not affect this process, so any other services do not change state. The host check_command is the normale 'check-host-alive' (which is pinging), the check_interval is 0 -- why does nagios want to check that host? Because at some point one or more of the services went into a non-ok state. The check_command is inherited from some template, if I try to override it with no value, nagios complains: Error: Host check command '(null)' specified for host 'diwi/diw' is not defined anywhere Yep- you can't have no value in the check_command directive. If you just want to assume the host is up all the time, you can use the check_dummy plugin (after defining a check_dummy command in your checkcommands.cfg, naturally). Otherwise you'll need to figure out some check Nagios can perform to determine if the host is running, even if that check is just checking one of the services again or something. --- Israel Brewster Computer Support Technician Frontier Flying Service Inc. 5245 Airport Industrial Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 450-7250 x293 --- So - please, could anybody point to my stupidity? Thanks. Best regards from Dresden Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de internet unix support - Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B --- gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B - - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] nagios to monitor several switch ports
I would like to have Nagios alert on the status of individual switch ports - link up/down, traffic, etc. Is there a way to do this other than creating a separate host or service for each port. There are 1000's of ports on our network and this doesn't seem practical. What I would like is for a host switch to show as warning (or critical) if one or more switch port is down / exceeding a traffic limit and showing ok only if ALL ports are up, etc. - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] nagios to monitor several switch ports
Am Dienstag 08 April 2008 schrieb Kevin Manuel: I would like to have Nagios alert on the status of individual switch ports - link up/down, traffic, etc. Is there a way to do this other than creating a separate host or service for each port. There are 1000's of ports on our network and this doesn't seem practical. What kind of switches do you have? I don't know if there is a plugin for such a test, but I think it can easily be written using SNMP and a scriptinglanguage of your choice. What I would like is for a host switch to show as warning (or critical) if one or more switch port is down / exceeding a traffic limit and showing ok only if ALL ports are up, etc. Even if I don't understand why you want to monitor that, SNMP is your friend here. You just need the according MIB according to your switch. Greetings, -- Christian Schneemann - SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D - 90409 Nürnberg Phone: +49 (0)911 - 740 53 0 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
Hello Israel, Israel Brewster [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Di 08 Apr 2008 19:32:25 CEST): On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: Hello, (using 3.0.1) I've a list of hosts, these hosts are not available for ping, but normal service checks (SSH, SMTP, ...) work. Nagios reports theses hosts beeing down! Ugly! If I remember well, older nagios versions knew that's enough to see one service on a host to know this host has to be up. To a degree, yes- if you aren't actively checking the host (as would appear to be the case from your next paragraph), then as long as all services on the host are listed as ok, nagios assumes the host is still ok (at least once running, I don't know how it behaves on the initial check). However, should any of the services go into a non-ok state, nagios will immediately check the host (using the host check_command), wherupon, in your case, it would determine the host to be down since it can't ping. The state of the other services does not affect this process, so any other services do not change state. That's an interesting detail: if ANY of the service checks fails, a host scheck is scheduled. This would explain why the host check takes place and fails (if it's using ping). But - my question here, why is *any* failing service a trigger of a host check? Shouldn't be the failure of *all* services this trigger? -- Heiko signature.asc Description: Digital signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] stability of ndoutils-1.4b7 (ndomod and ndo2db)?
Hi, I've just started using ndomod and ndo2db on a development server to have status checks logged to a MySQL database instead of flat files. I am using Nagios v. 2.10 on the development server, v. 2.7 on the production server. The one on production can probably be upgraded to 2.10… Anyway, the readme file in the ndoutils-1.4b7 says: This code is still an alpha/beta quality, so expect problems if you intend to use it. Make sure that you aren't using it with your only production installation of Nagios, or it could take down the Nagios process if the NDOMOD module segfaults. Nagios could segfault silently and you might never know that Nagios crashed... However, I see from the SourceForge site that this code hasn't been changed since 10/31/2007. Is this add-on relatively stable? Are other folks using it in production? Is there anything in particular I should be aware of? Thanks! -Frank - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] stability of ndoutils-1.4b7 (ndomod and ndo2db)?
For logging nagios status to mysql, one could also use the import-script fom NagiosDigger: http://www.vanheusden.com/nagiosdigger/ (yes I wrote that). On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 03:48:42PM -0400, Frank J. Gómez wrote: Hi, I've just started using ndomod and ndo2db on a development server to have status checks logged to a MySQL database instead of flat files. I am using Nagios v. 2.10 on the development server, v. 2.7 on the production server. The one on production can probably be upgraded to 2.10? Anyway, the readme file in the ndoutils-1.4b7 says: This code is still an alpha/beta quality, so expect problems if you intend to use it. Make sure that you aren't using it with your only production installation of Nagios, or it could take down the Nagios process if the NDOMOD module segfaults. Nagios could segfault silently and you might never know that Nagios crashed... However, I see from the SourceForge site that this code hasn't been changed since 10/31/2007. Is this add-on relatively stable? Are other folks using it in production? Is there anything in particular I should be aware of? Thanks! -Frank - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null Folkert van Heusden -- www.vanheusden.com/multitail - win een vlaai van multivlaai! zorg ervoor dat multitail opgenomen wordt in Fedora Core, AIX, Solaris of HP/UX en win een vlaai naar keuze -- Phone: +31-6-41278122, PGP-key: 1F28D8AE, www.vanheusden.com - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
Moin Heiko! Heiko Schlittermann schrieb am Tuesday, den 08. April 2008: But - my question here, why is *any* failing service a trigger of a host check? Shouldn't be the failure of *all* services this trigger? This is so that if the outage of a service is caused by the host being down, you are notified that the host is down, and not the service. If Nagios waited for every service to fail first, you'd get a lot of alerts you probably don't want. - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heiko Schlittermann Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 2:44 PM To: Israel Brewster But - my question here, why is *any* failing service a trigger of a host check? Shouldn't be the failure of *all* services this trigger? Service A gets checked every 5 minutes. Service B gets checked once a day. Do you _really_ want to wait to know if the host is down until Service B is checked and fails? The problem you're experiencing is an artifact of your configuration methodology. If you don't want hosts checked, ever, do not specify a host check_command (i.e. leave the entire line out). The fact that you have it included in a template applied to the host is why it's being checked. Use a template that doesn't specify a host check_command. -- Marc - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] nagios to monitor several switch ports
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Schneemann Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 2:14 PM To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] nagios to monitor several switch ports Am Dienstag 08 April 2008 schrieb Kevin Manuel: I would like to have Nagios alert on the status of individual switch ports - link up/down, traffic, etc. Is there a way to do this other than creating a separate host or service for each port. There are 1000's of ports on our network and this doesn't seem practical. What I would like is for a host switch to show as warning (or critical) if one or more switch port is down / exceeding a traffic limit and showing ok only if ALL ports are up, etc. I think that the reason this kind of thing doesn't exist is that it's more practical to do it on the server. I.E. monitor the network status and traffic from your server's point of view. It's more practical because it's easier to maintain a list of your servers than to keep Nagios configured to know which switch ports should be active. Also set up the switch (should be the default) to send link up/down traps and have Nagios watch for them so you can quickly correlate your server network status and know if the switch is the problem when the server alarms. Andy Ford Wachovia Securities Information Security 314-955-6647 Wachovia Securities, LLC's outgoing and incoming e-mails are electronically archived and subject to review and/or disclosure to someone other than the recipient. A.G. Edwards, a division of Wachovia Securities, LLC - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] How do I display multiple line check results forNSCA?
I was hoping for an answer on this one myself. I am also running distributed servers, but would like to start taking advantage of long host/service output. I had heard from somewhere a few months back that while Nagios and NRPE support long host output, NSCA still does not. Is this still correct? Are there plans to get this fixed? Thanks Mark From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of #ANG CHIN TECK# Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 5:39 AM To: nagios-users Subject: [Nagios-users] How do I display multiple line check results forNSCA? Hi all, I am using NSCA to do passive checks. Nagios web interface only displays the first line of the multiple-line results sent back to Nagios. But when i use nrpe to do active checks, all the lines are displayed. Is it possible to configure the external commands or NSCA to allow displaying of multiple line output? - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] nagios to monitor several switch ports
We have Nortel switches. Just to complicate things further, I am using RMON snmp traps to alert Nagios when an event occurs on one of the switches (i.e. broadcast packets exceed a certain threshold). A summary of my setup: - when a certain threshold is exceeded, the port will trigger an alarm and send an snmp trap to our management server - snmptrapd (a net-snmp daemon) is running on the management server and receives the trap and passes it to my Perl trap-handler script - the trap-handler script translates the snmp trap and updates Nagios according (through a passive check) The problem is, for example, say 3 ports go down on a single switch and only one comes back up, this clears the service alert in Nagios even though 2 ports are still down. One was around this would be to have a service for each port but as I mentioned previously, I'm hoping to figure out another way to do it. (I hope I explained that well enough but I'm sure I lost a lot of you ) -Original Message- From: Christian Schneemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April-08-08 4:14 PM To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] nagios to monitor several switch ports Am Dienstag 08 April 2008 schrieb Kevin Manuel: I would like to have Nagios alert on the status of individual switch ports - link up/down, traffic, etc. Is there a way to do this other than creating a separate host or service for each port. There are 1000's of ports on our network and this doesn't seem practical. What kind of switches do you have? I don't know if there is a plugin for such a test, but I think it can easily be written using SNMP and a scriptinglanguage of your choice. What I would like is for a host switch to show as warning (or critical) if one or more switch port is down / exceeding a traffic limit and showing ok only if ALL ports are up, etc. Even if I don't understand why you want to monitor that, SNMP is your friend here. You just need the according MIB according to your switch. Greetings, -- Christian Schneemann - SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D - 90409 Nürnberg Phone: +49 (0)911 - 740 53 0 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heiko Schlittermann wrote: | But - my question here, why is *any* failing service a trigger of a host | check? Shouldn't be the failure of *all* services this trigger? Well. If a service goes missing it might very well be an issue with the host or even further up the line. So The first thing to do is see if the host is still there. Then if the host is still there other service checks will go on. But if the host is down there is little point in sending out alerts on other missing services untill you got them all only to report a down host there. By doing an immediate host check you only have to send a host down notification and be done with it if the host is down. Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH++AIBvzDRVjxmYERAoSMAJ9aAfJzGwQ67xSUdtWS4NSolaqNWgCggmT/ dHTaLDuiRElOpkugiF0t0bY= =bHTn -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] nagios to monitor several switch ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Manuel wrote: | I would like to have Nagios alert on the status of individual switch | ports – link up/down, traffic, etc. Is there a way to do this other than | creating a separate host or service for each port. There are 1000’s of | ports on our network and this doesn’t seem practical. | | What I would like is for a host switch to show as “warning” (or | “critical”) if one or more switch port is down / exceeding a traffic | limit and showing “ok” only if ALL ports are up, etc. Don't you think this could create a big overhead that will be in excess of using a howitzer to hunt litlle flies? I do not think you want to know too much about individual switch ports. Why would nagios go ape everytime I reboot my laptop? I would monitor the hosts behind the switch ports that you care about. Perhaps trigger alerts on real odd errors on your switch. But trying to monitor it all will outweight the little benefits you might gain in effort and needless alerts. Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH++INBvzDRVjxmYERAoUuAKCJE7Fixdsq2BBJy+j2TmhRiba7hACgoWH9 Yow+ww5X05PWtldVUjGcUPE= =I4we -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
Folkert van Heusden [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Di 08 Apr 2008 23:16:55 CEST): | But - my question here, why is *any* failing service a trigger of a host | check? Shouldn't be the failure of *all* services this trigger? Sorry to drop-in (and maybe saying something stupid) but as far as i know the host may be down if it stopped responding to ping but still responds to service-checks. ?? How. Or I'm stupid? How should the host respond to service checks if it's down and doesn't respond to ping therefore? -- Heiko signature.asc Description: Digital signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Too stupid? Services are available, but nagios reports host to be down!
I've a list of hosts, these hosts are not available for ping, but normal service checks (SSH, SMTP, ...) work. Nagios reports theses hosts beeing down! Ugly! On our system, we too have a small subset of hosts which cannot be pinged. However, they can be SSH'ed. So, I defined a new test, check-host-alive-ssh which used an SSH connection rather than a ping, and define this as the host_check_command for the hosts in question. This allows Nagios to continue to work as expected. Steve - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios-users Digest, Vol 23, Issue 18
Message: 6 Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 12:15:34 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Nagios-users] monitoring windows NT workstation. To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi All I have some servers in NT 4 , in which nsclient++ can't be installed , So how can i make nagios to monitor those NT sytems. Pls help. Have you tried the old nsclient from http://nsclient.ready2run.nl/ ? It has WinNT binaries as well as Win2000 and XP, and provides a subset of the ++ version. I use it a lot and its pretty reliable. Regards, Greg King www.wgk-consulting.com You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
