[Nagios-users] timing of passive check results

2011-12-14 Thread Marco Borsani
Hi all

I have more than 400 passive service checks in the main Nagios server, but
15 of them are updated only 1 time a day (always at the same time, 5:36 in
the morning).

In the remote servers the checks run every 5 minutes and in the main server
all the passive services have same configuration.

 

Any idea ?

Thanks

Marco

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Cluster with Load Balancing and High Availability

2011-12-14 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 12/14/2011 07:19 AM, Aravind M D wrote:
 Quoting Andreas Ericsson a...@op5.se:
 On 08/26/2011 11:05 AM, Aravind M D wrote:
  Hi
 
  I need to configure two physical servers as active-active cluster and
  configure Loadbalancing with High availabiltiy for Nagios.
 
  Can somebody help me how to achieve this.
 
  I have checked some of loadbalancing modules like mod_gearmen, merlin and
  DNX. If any one knows about the difference between these modules please 
  let
  me know.
 
 
  If you want loadbalancing with takeover capabilities, Merlin is your only
  choice. The other two rely on a single Nagios instance to do scheduling and
  notifications. If that instance crashes, mod_gearman and DNX can't help you
  get any info at all.
 
  It might be possible to couple them so that mod_gearman and Merlin work
  together, but you'd be entering unknown territory with that mix and I would
  be quite surprised if it worked completely without problems the first time
  you try it.
 

 I like to use merlin for laodbalancing and high availability Nagios setup.
 I have checked the Merlin webpage i can see last release was on 2010-06-18
 after that no new releases. But when i checked the git repository i can
 see latest version is v1.1.12 whether i can use this version for
 producation environment if so how can i get this version.
 

Our marketing people are ridiculously slow in updating stuff that doesn't
shine, blink, make noises or do all of the above. I'll bash them over the
head a bit.

http://git.op5.org/git/ has instructions on how to use git to clone a repo
from our public git repositories.

From http://git.op5.org/git/?p=nagios/merlin.git;a=summary you click any
of the snapshot links to get a tarball containing the desired version of
Merlin. Using latest tagged version is usually recommended. As of this
writing, that's 1.1.13-beta1.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson   andreas.erics...@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


Re: [Nagios-users] timing of passive check results

2011-12-14 Thread Andreas Ericsson
On 12/14/2011 10:09 AM, Marco Borsani wrote:
 Hi all
 
 I have more than 400 passive service checks in the main Nagios server, but
 15 of them are updated only 1 time a day (always at the same time, 5:36 in
 the morning).
 
 In the remote servers the checks run every 5 minutes and in the main server
 all the passive services have same configuration.
 

I'm guessing you have configured passive checks in more than one place on
the remote servers and just overlooked the fact. Things like this doesn't
happen by itself.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson   andreas.erics...@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Graph not displaying correct values

2011-12-14 Thread James Osbourn
I tried adding this map but it did not remove the orginal values from the graph 
and I could not find where they are stored.  I do not think that the problem is 
related to 100 vs 1024 as some manual calculations do not match again the value 
that I am seeing on the graph.

It has been a while since I have played with RRD and I would of expected a 
standard check command from Nagios to graph correctly.  It just seems to be the 
RRD interpolation of the performance data as the check command is outputting 
the correct performance data values.

James

From: Claudio Kuenzler [mailto:c...@claudiokuenzler.com]
Sent: 13 December 2011 15:43
To: Nagios Users List
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Graph not displaying correct values

Some of the default Nagiosgraph map entries are strange and behave not as 
expected.
I basically replaced all the existing entries by own ones.

If you like you can use the following one:

# Service Type: check_disk
# Nagiosgraph regex by Claudio Kuenzler
# Check: /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk -w 20% -c 10% -p /
# Output: DISK OK - free space: / 235120 MB (66% inode=95%):
# Perfdata: /=119211MB;298635;335964;0;373294
/perfdata:(.*)=(\d+)MB;(\d+);(\d+);(\d+);(\d+).*/
#/perfdata:(\W)=(\d+)MB;(\d+);(\d+);(\d+);(\d+).*/ # only / partition
and push @s, [diskusage,
['used', GAUGE, $2*1000**2 ],
['total', GAUGE, $6*1000**2 ] ];

Note that this is a very basic graph which shows the total and current 
partition usage. Feel free to modify it :-)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:41 AM, James Osbourn 
james.osbo...@citrix.commailto:james.osbo...@citrix.com wrote:
I have a weird situation where the Nagios Graph values are not the actual 
values for a filesystem

Eg I have a filesystem and if I run a df I get

$ df -h .
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
filer01:/vol/data1443G  400G   44G  91% /mnt/filer01_data1

If I run the Nagios check_disk command I get the correct values

# ../libexec/check_disk -w 10% -c 5% -p /usr/groups/sources
DISK WARNING - free space: /usr/groups/sources 44073 MB (9% inode=48%);| 
/usr/groups/sources=409354MB;408084;430755;0;453427

But when you look at the graph the figures are all wrong


Has anyone else seen this?  I was going to look at the usage to try and 
forecast usage but it will now be very hard.  I have just installed Nagios 
Graph based on the default installation and using the default check_disk plugin.

Thanks

James



--
Systems Optimization Self Assessment
Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and
improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization
Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.netmailto:Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] R: timing of passive check results

2011-12-14 Thread Marco Borsani
I have 2 remote servers, both with same configuration.

The remote server that does not send information (or could be the main that
does not process them?!!?) have about 50 services ... only 15 of them
(always the same, from same hosts) have this problem.

I use obsess method to send info from remote to main server and set an
higher timeout (ocsp_timeout=20)

Marco

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:a...@op5.se] 
Inviato: mercoledì 14 dicembre 2011 11:12
A: Nagios Users List
Cc: Marco Borsani
Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] timing of passive check results

On 12/14/2011 10:09 AM, Marco Borsani wrote:
 Hi all
 
 I have more than 400 passive service checks in the main Nagios server, 
 but
 15 of them are updated only 1 time a day (always at the same time, 
 5:36 in the morning).
 
 In the remote servers the checks run every 5 minutes and in the main 
 server all the passive services have same configuration.
 

I'm guessing you have configured passive checks in more than one place on
the remote servers and just overlooked the fact. Things like this doesn't
happen by itself.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson   andreas.erics...@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror,
I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace.


--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Graph not displaying correct values

2011-12-14 Thread Claudio Kuenzler
You need to delete the already created RRD file. Once the RRD file was
written, you can't change it anymore (at least not easily).
Find the rrd file for your disk service and delete it, e.g. in
/usr/local/nagiosgraph/rrd
You can find the path to your rrd files in the nagiosgraph.conf file or you
search for the rrd files on your system.
The rrd file should then be recreated with the new map configuration.

Oh just one more thing: You need to remove the old map entry for check_disk
from your map file. Otherwise this one will continue to write the rrd
instead of the new map entry.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, James Osbourn james.osbo...@citrix.comwrote:

 I tried adding this map but it did not remove the orginal values from the
 graph and I could not find where they are stored.  I do not think that the
 problem is related to 100 vs 1024 as some manual calculations do not match
 again the value that I am seeing on the graph.

 ** **

 It has been a while since I have played with RRD and I would of expected a
 standard check command from Nagios to graph correctly.  It just seems to be
 the RRD interpolation of the performance data as the check command is
 outputting the correct performance data values.

 ** **

 James

 ** **

 *From:* Claudio Kuenzler [mailto:c...@claudiokuenzler.com]
 *Sent:* 13 December 2011 15:43
 *To:* Nagios Users List
 *Subject:* Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Graph not displaying correct values**
 **

 ** **

 Some of the default Nagiosgraph map entries are strange and behave not as
 expected.
 I basically replaced all the existing entries by own ones.

 If you like you can use the following one:

 # Service Type: check_disk
 # Nagiosgraph regex by Claudio Kuenzler
 # Check: /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_disk -w 20% -c 10% -p /
 # Output: DISK OK - free space: / 235120 MB (66% inode=95%):
 # Perfdata: /=119211MB;298635;335964;0;373294
 /perfdata:(.*)=(\d+)MB;(\d+);(\d+);(\d+);(\d+).*/
 #/perfdata:(\W)=(\d+)MB;(\d+);(\d+);(\d+);(\d+).*/ # only / partition
 and push @s, [diskusage,
 ['used', GAUGE, $2*1000**2 ],
 ['total', GAUGE, $6*1000**2 ] ];

 Note that this is a very basic graph which shows the total and current
 partition usage. Feel free to modify it :-)

 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:41 AM, James Osbourn james.osbo...@citrix.com
 wrote:

 I have a weird situation where the Nagios Graph values are not the actual
 values for a filesystem

  

 Eg I have a filesystem and if I run a df I get

  

 $ df -h .

 FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on

 filer01:/vol/data1443G  400G   44G  91% /mnt/filer01_data1

  

 If I run the Nagios check_disk command I get the correct values

  

 # ../libexec/check_disk -w 10% -c 5% -p /usr/groups/sources

 DISK WARNING - free space: /usr/groups/sources 44073 MB (9% inode=48%);|
 /usr/groups/sources=409354MB;408084;430755;0;453427

  

 But when you look at the graph the figures are all wrong

  

 

  

 Has anyone else seen this?  I was going to look at the usage to try and
 forecast usage but it will now be very hard.  I have just installed Nagios
 Graph based on the default installation and using the default check_disk
 plugin.

  

 Thanks

  

 James

  

  



 --
 Systems Optimization Self Assessment
 Improve efficiency and utilization of IT resources. Drive out cost and
 improve service delivery. Take 5 minutes to use this Systems Optimization
 Self Assessment. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51450054/
 ___
 Nagios-users mailing list
 Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
 ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
 reporting any issue.
 ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

 ** **


 --
 Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
 This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits?
 Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
 http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
 ___
 Nagios-users mailing list
 Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
 ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
 reporting any issue.
 ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?

Re: [Nagios-users] R: timing of passive check results

2011-12-14 Thread Marcel Galke - Trans4mation
Hey,

have you tried to debug the problem?
Try to re-schedule the check on the remote servers and look into the debug 
file, what does nagios after execution of the check? Is the ocsp command 
executed?
Is anything logged on either of the servers?

Do you have actually access to the remote servers?


Marcel


-Original Message-
From: Marco Borsani [mailto:m.bors...@it.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 11:46 AM
To: 'Andreas Ericsson'; 'Nagios Users List'
Subject: [Nagios-users] R: timing of passive check results

I have 2 remote servers, both with same configuration.

The remote server that does not send information (or could be the main that
does not process them?!!?) have about 50 services ... only 15 of them
(always the same, from same hosts) have this problem.

I use obsess method to send info from remote to main server and set an
higher timeout (ocsp_timeout=20)

Marco

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:a...@op5.se] 
Inviato: mercoledì 14 dicembre 2011 11:12
A: Nagios Users List
Cc: Marco Borsani
Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] timing of passive check results

On 12/14/2011 10:09 AM, Marco Borsani wrote:
 Hi all
 
 I have more than 400 passive service checks in the main Nagios server, 
 but
 15 of them are updated only 1 time a day (always at the same time, 
 5:36 in the morning).
 
 In the remote servers the checks run every 5 minutes and in the main 
 server all the passive services have same configuration.
 

I'm guessing you have configured passive checks in more than one place on
the remote servers and just overlooked the fact. Things like this doesn't
happen by itself.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson   andreas.erics...@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror,
I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace.


--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


[Nagios-users] Nagios directory ownership

2011-12-14 Thread Marco Borsani
Hi all

May you tell with which are you ownership in the Nagios directory and
subdirectory ?

 

Especially the :

nagios/etc … (and subdir)

nagios/var … (and subdir)

 

regards

 

Marco Borsani

Unix and Monitoring Sysadmin

Technical Operations Dpt.

tel: +39 010 4310115

fax: +39 02 30130311

cell: +39 329 5953944

ITnet Srl

Società con socio unico

Direzione e Coordinamento di …

 

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] R: R: timing of passive check results

2011-12-14 Thread Marco Borsani
Yes , I am tring.

If I run manually the command it will run.

I still receive more than 30 passive checks, but not the others.
All the checks run actively in the remote server every 5 minutes.

Marco

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Marcel Galke - Trans4mation [mailto:marcel.ga...@trans4mation.de] 
Inviato: mercoledì 14 dicembre 2011 16:03
A: Nagios Users List
Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] R: timing of passive check results

Hey,

have you tried to debug the problem?
Try to re-schedule the check on the remote servers and look into the debug
file, what does nagios after execution of the check? Is the ocsp command
executed?
Is anything logged on either of the servers?

Do you have actually access to the remote servers?


Marcel


-Original Message-
From: Marco Borsani [mailto:m.bors...@it.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 11:46 AM
To: 'Andreas Ericsson'; 'Nagios Users List'
Subject: [Nagios-users] R: timing of passive check results

I have 2 remote servers, both with same configuration.

The remote server that does not send information (or could be the main 
that does not process them?!!?) have about 50 services ... only 15 of 
them (always the same, from same hosts) have this problem.

I use obsess method to send info from remote to main server and set an 
higher timeout (ocsp_timeout=20)

Marco

-Messaggio originale-
Da: Andreas Ericsson [mailto:a...@op5.se]
Inviato: mercoledì 14 dicembre 2011 11:12
A: Nagios Users List
Cc: Marco Borsani
Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] timing of passive check results

On 12/14/2011 10:09 AM, Marco Borsani wrote:
 Hi all
 
 I have more than 400 passive service checks in the main Nagios server, 
 but
 15 of them are updated only 1 time a day (always at the same time,
 5:36 in the morning).
 
 In the remote servers the checks run every 5 minutes and in the main 
 server all the passive services have same configuration.
 

I'm guessing you have configured passive checks in more than one place on
the remote servers and just overlooked the fact. Things like this doesn't
happen by itself.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson   andreas.erics...@op5.se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror,
I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace.



--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios directory ownership

2011-12-14 Thread Claudio Kuenzler
I guess you ran into a problem when some folders were not created. You
installed the current version 3.3.1 from source? I also had the problem
that some folders (in var) weren't created.

I'll show you my conf:

Everything in etc is nagios:nagios

Everything in var is nagios:nagios except the folder rw:

pmoinfr01:/usr/local/nagios/var # ll
total 4688
drwxr-xr-x 2 nagios nagios4096 Dec 14 00:00 archives
-rw-r--r-- 1 nagios nagios   5 Dec  9 14:32 nagios.lock
-rw-rw-r-- 1 nagios nagios  186216 Dec 14 17:02 nagios.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 nagios nagios 1105810 Dec 14 14:28 objects.cache
-rw--- 1 nagios nagios 1721471 Dec 14 16:28 retention.dat
drwxrwsr-x 2 nagios nagcmd4096 Dec 14 14:28 rw
drwxr-xr-x 3 nagios nagios4096 Nov 14 15:21 spool
-rw-rw-r-- 1 nagios nagios 1712042 Dec 14 17:08 status.dat

Subfolders and files in archives and spool are also nagios:nagios.
Files in rw are nagios:nagcmd.

Where nagios=Nagios user, nagcmd=Nagios Command User.


On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Marco Borsani m.bors...@it.net wrote:

 Hi all

 May you tell with which are you ownership in the Nagios directory and
 subdirectory ?

 ** **

 Especially the :

 nagios/etc … (and subdir)

 nagios/var … (and subdir)

 ** **

 regards

 ** **

 Marco Borsani

 *Unix and Monitoring Sysadmin*

 *Technical Operations Dpt.*

 tel: +39 010 4310115

 fax: +39 02 30130311

 cell: +39 329 5953944

 ITnet Srl

 Società con socio unico

 Direzione e Coordinamento di …

 ** **


 --
 Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
 This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits?
 Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
 http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
 ___
 Nagios-users mailing list
 Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
 ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
 reporting any issue.
 ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Help with AD component for XI

2011-12-14 Thread Robert J Molerio
Anyone have a quick setup for this?

-- 
Thank you,

Bob Molerio
Systems Administrator
New York University
ITS Computer Facilities Services/Infrastructure
Level C-2
75 Third Avenue
New York NY 10003-5527
office: 212-998-1110
email:robert.mole...@nyu.edu robert.mole...@nyu.edu
--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

Re: [Nagios-users] Help with AD component for XI

2011-12-14 Thread Mike Guthrie

Hey Robert,

Can you post this to the XI forum?
http://support.nagios.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=6


On 12/14/2011 10:16 AM, Robert J Molerio wrote:

Anyone have a quick setup for this?

--
Thank you,

Bob Molerio
Systems Administrator
New York University
ITS Computer Facilities Services/Infrastructure
Level C-2
75 Third Avenue
New York NY 10003-5527
office: 212-998-1110
email:robert.mole...@nyu.edu mailto:robert.mole...@nyu.edu



--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits?
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/


___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null



--


Mike Guthrie
Technical Team
___
Nagios Enterprises, LLC
Email:  mguth...@nagios.com
Web:www.nagios.com

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] (no subject)

2011-12-14 Thread mohd mustaquim
OMG! It’s the easiest way to stop your problems!... 
http://pyzark.com/p.google.php?uaolid=88u9

--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits? 
Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] inconsistent plugin behavior ec2

2011-12-14 Thread Julie S. Lin
Hi

I have a check that works on my nagios client (ec2 node), it takes 90  
seconds to run
I have set my nagios server (physical machine) to check every 5 min,  
and to wait 2 min between checks

however, this plugin behaves very inconsistently 

one check will return OK
the very next check will return CHECK_NRPE: No output returned from  
daemon. 

can anyone provide a little guidance as to where I should look?


Julie S. Lin
System Administrator
j...@livescribe.com
(510) 553 4912 (o)
(510) 367 5772 (c)



--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many needs.  
But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity 
while improving strategic productivity.  Learn More! 
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Cluster with Load Balancing and High Availability

2011-12-14 Thread Aravind M D

Quoting Andreas Ericsson a...@op5.se:

On 12/14/2011 07:19 AM, Aravind M D wrote:

   Quoting Andreas Ericsson a...@op5.se:
   On 08/26/2011 11:05 AM, Aravind M D wrote:
Hi
   
I need to configure two physical servers as active-active
cluster and
configure Loadbalancing with High availabiltiy for Nagios.
   
Can somebody help me how to achieve this.
   
I have checked some of loadbalancing modules like mod_gearmen,
   merlin and
DNX. If any one knows about the difference between these modules
   please let
me know.
   
   
If you want loadbalancing with takeover capabilities, Merlin
is your only
choice. The other two rely on a single Nagios instance to do
   scheduling and
notifications. If that instance crashes, mod_gearman and DNX
   can't help you
get any info at all.
   
It might be possible to couple them so that mod_gearman and
Merlin work
together, but you'd be entering unknown territory with that mix
   and I would
be quite surprised if it worked completely without problems the
   first time
you try it.
   
  
   I like to use merlin for laodbalancing and high availability
Nagios setup.
   I have checked the Merlin webpage i can see last release was on
2010-06-18
   after that no new releases. But when i checked the git repository i can
   see latest version is v1.1.12 whether i can use this version for
   producation environment if so how can i get this version.
  
  
   Our marketing people are ridiculously slow in updating stuff that doesn't
   shine, blink, make noises or do all of the above. I'll bash them over the
   head a bit.
  
   http://git.op5.org/git/ has instructions on how to use git to
clone a repo
   from our public git repositories.
  
   From http://git.op5.org/git/?p=nagios/merlin.git;a=summary you click any
   of the snapshot links to get a tarball containing the desired version of
   Merlin. Using latest tagged version is usually recommended. As of this
   writing, that's 1.1.13-beta1.
  
   --
   Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.erics...@op5.se
   OP5 AB                             www.op5.se[1]
   Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
  
   Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
   terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
   on peace.

Thanks Andreas




Links:
--
[1] http://www.op5.se
--
10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation
Server virtualization is being driven by many needs.  
But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity 
while improving strategic productivity.  Learn More! 
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null