Re: [Nagios-users] How often does Nagios need restarting? (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)

2009-06-29 Thread Kustner, Tom
Jamie, 

Sorry for the very tardy response - it's been busy.  Two responses to
all your good comments:

1.  The problems with Nagios slacking on the job were confirmed by the
Nagios administrator.  Permanently, he is looking to move the setup to a
box with more memory (it is currently a Red Hat box).  Temporarily, he
talked about using cron to restart it every night.  Since it's been more
responsive lately, I have a feeling he has done just that.  

I did ask if he thought whether upgrading the NSClient would help, since
we are currently using NSClient++ 0.3.1 and NSClient++ 0.3.6 was just
released, but while encouraging me to try out 0.3.6, he feels memory
constraints on the current box is the cause of the problem and nothing
else.

I didn't post any configs files because I am not the Nagios
administrator and don't have access to the configs or the box itself
except for what I am allowed to see for our hosts via http.  Thanks for
letting me know 2.9 is relatively stable and that it, in all likelihood,
is not the cause of the problem.

2. Thanks for pointing out that host checks are not always performed
unless a service has been detected has failing.  I value the service
checking, but I assumed it was also pinging the host on a regular basis
and that is apparently not the case.  I come from the background of
using products such as Insight Manager and OpenManage which are
vendor-specific solutions that have their limitations but which
automatically perform pinging on a regular basis.  I'll look at the
documentation for information on getting that set for us.  It explains
my frustration as to why a server can reboot and Nagios not detect it.

Thanks again for taking time.

Tom Kustner MCSE, CNE 
Inside: 68728 
Outside: 414-906-8728 
Mobile:  414-559-0889 

-Original Message-
From: James Pratt [mailto:jpr...@norwich.edu] 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 8:23 PM
To: Kustner, Tom
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] How often does Nagios need restarting?
(Quiscustodiet ipsos custodes?)

Hi Tom, I've tried to answer your questions to the best of my own
personal knowledge -I have replaced any  of your original * symbols
with my own on all my comments/thoughts below, since my MS outlook
client apparently just sucks, so this appears more readable.

Regards,
jamie

-Original Message-
From: Kustner, Tom [mailto:tom.kust...@retirementpartner.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 5:35 PM
To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] How often does Nagios need restarting?
(Quiscustodiet ipsos custodes?)

I am a Nagios user, not the administrator.  We are running Nagios 2.9 on
RHEL 4 or 5.  Overall, 200+ hosts with 3000 services being monitored. I
have access for monitoring a smaller number of hosts.

* ok, understood...

In another posting, I alluded to an issue where a host had gone down but
no alert was sent out.   The issue surfaced again today and as was done
the other time, Nagios was restarted to fix the problem.   I am
naturally concerned about the unreliability.  

* did you get any on-list or off-list replies at all? You have not
mentioned if you had it resolved or not, but it sound like the answer is
no to possibly both(?)

Any thoughts on this problem?Specifically:

What are best practices for making sure Nagios does not fall down on
the job?   Is there something not set right?

* Understanding your setup and the way nagios works is how you ensure it
stands up... a mis-config sounds likely, but who knows...

Are other Nagios administrators restarting Nagios on a weekly or
nightly basis to keep it on the job?

* Heck no! That's why we run it on Linux or Solaris! :)

Is this an issue specific to Nagios 2.9?  Was 2.9 a spotty version?

*Not to my knowledge - all stable releases have worked very reliably
here, especially 2.9 now that I look back...

For a given host, why would active checks be enabled, yet N/A
appears in the Next Active Check field?

* RTM - host checks are not always performed unless service checks fail,
and since I've been a manual-slacker myself, that may not even be the
true correct answer (Marc? :)

Thanks for any help.

-Tom Kustner-

* Not to sound negative/condescending or anything like that, but your
install will truly only work as well as you have maintained
it/understand it. You should really look at your current config files
and read the manual on 2.9, or upgrade to 3.x and again rtm...  Also,
you have not sent anything specific related to your problematic
config(s) for anyone on this list to even guess either way whether or
not something is mis-configured. If you are concerned about posting your
configs/setup, change stuff properly to hide what you need to on-list.
(I apologize if I have missed your earlier posting. Many here try our
best to help people here when possible, but sometimes we are all busy at
the same time, who knows!?).

Cheers,
Jamie


The information contained in this message and any accompanying

[Nagios-users] Last check info seems stale (Nagios 2.9)

2009-06-19 Thread Kustner, Tom
I am a Nagios user, not the administrator.  We are running Nagios 2.9 on RHEL 4 
or 5.  Overall, 200+ hosts with 3000 services being monitored, but I have 
access for monitoring a smaller number of hosts.

In looking last week into an issue where a host had gone down but no alert was 
sent, I noticed that on the Host Status Details For All Host Groups screen, 
where it lists Hosts, Status, Last Check, etc., the Last Check date for some of 
the hosts went back almost two months.   I pointed this out to the 
administrator who didn't disagree with my statement but said the logs showed 
otherwise.  Nagios was restarted but even now, there is a host where the Last 
Check date still shows as 05-19-2009.  There are other hosts showing a last 
check date of June 5, June 9, June 10, and so on.  These hosts are definitely 
up.

Either Nagios is being tardy at checking things, is *not* being tardy but is 
displaying inaccurate information, or I am misunderstanding this field or what 
Nagios means by Last check.  Can anyone shed some light?

Tom Kustner MCSE, CNE



The information contained in this message and any accompanying attachments may 
contain privileged, private and/or confidential information protected by state 
and federal law.  Penalties may be assessed for unauthorized use and/or 
disclosure.  This message and any attachments are intended for the designated 
recipient only.  If you have received this information in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and return or destroy the information.

This e-mail transmission and any attachments are believed to have been sent 
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into 
which it is received and opened. It is, however, the recipient's responsibility 
to ensure that the e-mail transmission and any attachments are virus free, and 
the sender accepts no responsibility for any damage that may in any way arise 
from their use.

--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] How often does Nagios need restarting? (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)

2009-06-19 Thread Kustner, Tom
I am a Nagios user, not the administrator.  We are running Nagios 2.9 on
RHEL 4 or 5.  Overall, 200+ hosts with 3000 services being monitored. I
have access for monitoring a smaller number of hosts.

In another posting, I alluded to an issue where a host had gone down but
no alert was sent out.   The issue surfaced again today and as was done
the other time, Nagios was restarted to fix the problem.   I am
naturally concerned about the unreliability.  

Any thoughts on this problem?Specifically:

* What are best practices for making sure Nagios does not fall down on
the job?   Is there something not set right?

* Are other Nagios administrators restarting Nagios on a weekly or
nightly basis to keep it on the job?

* Is this an issue specific to Nagios 2.9?  Was 2.9 a spotty version?

* For a given host, why would active checks be enabled, yet N/A
appears in the Next Active Check field?

Thanks for any help.

-Tom Kustner-


The information contained in this message and any accompanying attachments may 
contain privileged, private and/or confidential information protected by state 
and federal law.  Penalties may be assessed for unauthorized use and/or 
disclosure.  This message and any attachments are intended for the designated 
recipient only.  If you have received this information in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and return or destroy the information.

This e-mail transmission and any attachments are believed to have been sent 
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into 
which it is received and opened. It is, however, the recipient's responsibility 
to ensure that the e-mail transmission and any attachments are virus free, and 
the sender accepts no responsibility for any damage that may in any way arise 
from their use.

--
Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null


[Nagios-users] Nagios and Windows DFS replication

2009-05-12 Thread Kustner, Tom
[Disclaimer: I am not the Nagios administrator, just an end-user]

We are using DFS-R on a number of Windows servers.  Nagios is already
being used to monitor these servers (NSCLIENT++ 0.3.1).   It is possible
to schedule some tasks to run a DFSRDIAG or DFSRADMIN report on the
status of the replication folders and e-mail the results, but I am
wondering if anyone is using Nagios to monitor DFS-R and, if so, how.

Tom Kustner MCSE, CNE 
Inside: 68728 
Outside: 414-906-8728 
Mobile:  414-559-0889 




The information contained in this message and any accompanying attachments may 
contain privileged, private and/or confidential information protected by state 
and federal law.  Penalties may be assessed for unauthorized use and/or 
disclosure.  This message and any attachments are intended for the designated 
recipient only.  If you have received this information in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and return or destroy the information.

This e-mail transmission and any attachments are believed to have been sent 
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into 
which it is received and opened. It is, however, the recipient's responsibility 
to ensure that the e-mail transmission and any attachments are virus free, and 
the sender accepts no responsibility for any damage that may in any way arise 
from their use.
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] After switching to Nagios 2.9, Nagios Checker always asking for credentials

2008-10-03 Thread Kustner, Tom
Disclaimer: I'm a Nagios user, not the administrator.

*   Problem: When I was using the Nagios Checker version .13 against
our old Nagios 1.2 system, there were no problems.  However, since
switching to a newer Nagios 2.9 system, Nagios is always asking for
credentials whenever it wants to check.  If I have configured Nagios to
check five minutes, I am asked every five minutes for credentials.
*   This has apparently been bugged at
http://code.google.com/p/nagioschecker/issues/detail?id=56colspec=Stars
%20ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Summary%20Opened%20Modified%20Closed.
However, this does not mean that the problem is ultimately in the
plug-in itself.  Perhaps I need to configure things differently.  Does
something need changing on the Nagios box itself?
*   I have tried various modifications of Nagios Checker
configurations to resolve the issue but with no luck.   Somehow, Nagios
used to cache my credentials but isn't now, perhaps?  

Any suggestions?

-Tom Kustner-




The information contained in this message and any accompanying attachments may 
contain privileged, private and/or confidential information protected by state 
and federal law.  Penalties may be assessed for unauthorized use and/or 
disclosure.  This message and any attachments are intended for the designated 
recipient only.  If you have received this information in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and return or destroy the information.

This e-mail transmission and any attachments are believed to have been sent 
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into 
which it is received and opened. It is, however, the recipient's responsibility 
to ensure that the e-mail transmission and any attachments are virus free, and 
the sender accepts no responsibility for any damage that may in any way arise 
from their use.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK  win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null

[Nagios-users] Monitoring ARCserve services

2007-11-02 Thread Kustner, Tom
[Note that I am a Nagios end-user, not the administrator.  Someone at HQ
runs the box.]

We currently use Nagios 1.2.  We have a Windows Server 2003 server
running the latest ARCserve (11.5 SP3).  We have basic monitoring of the
box via Nagios but are looking for a way to monitor the
ARCserve-specific services, including:

   [Running]CA BrightStor Database Engine
   [Running]CA BrightStor Discovery Service
   [Running]CA BrightStor Job Engine
   [Running]CA BrightStor Message Engine
   [Running]CA BrightStor Service Controller
   [Running]CA BrightStor Tape Engine
   [Running]CA BrightStor Domain Server

This is not about an ARCserve trap for detecting failed jobs.  Rather,
we just want to be alerted when these specific services go down or up.
Any suggestions?  What could I pass on to our Nagios admin?


Tom Kustner MCSE, CNE 
Systems Administrator 
Inside: 68728 
Outside: 414-906-8728 
Mobile: 414-559-0889 




The information contained in this message and any accompanying attachments may 
contain privileged, private and/or confidential information protected by state 
and federal law.  Penalties may be assessed for unauthorized use and/or 
disclosure.  This message and any attachments are intended for the designated 
recipient only.  If you have received this information in error, please notify 
the sender immediately and return or destroy the information.

This e-mail transmission and any attachments are believed to have been sent 
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into 
which it is received and opened. It is, however, the recipient's responsibility 
to ensure that the e-mail transmission and any attachments are virus free, and 
the sender accepts no responsibility for any damage that may in any way arise 
from their use.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting 
any issue. 
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null