Re: [Nagios-users] Help required on Nagios Setup
lol! On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 00:02 -0400, Max Schubert wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:28 PM, sunilang...@rediffmail.com wrote: Hi All Let me introduce myself. My name is Sunil Angane and I am working with Softenger (I) Pvt. Ltd., an IT Infrastructure Management Services company. We are doing Nagios setup at one of our prestigious client in Mumbai to cover OS and DB monitoring. As we are doing this for the first time, we need guidance from you all on this. Under OS part we are covering AIX, LINUX, SOLARIS and WINDOWS, under DB part ORACLE, SQL, SYBASE and DB2. Kindly share the installation / configuration documents related to above listed OS and DB flavors. Kindly let me know if anyone from negios user is residing in Mumbai or India so that it will be easier for me to contact. Do you really expect the community to execute your contract for you? Interesting! Start here! http://wiki.nagios.org/index.php/Main_Page If you have directed questions that show you have done some reading and educated yourself you will get useful answers from the group. - Max -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] IPv6 support
Or why not use DNS. or /etc/hosts
Then its up 2 the plugin setup i guess.
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 15:03 +0200, Patrik Båt wrote:
Why not just have a /usr/local/nagios/etc/ipv6.txt
and a ping.sh that look in this file for the ipv4 address and get a ipv6
andress and ping6 that address?
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 13:05 +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
On 06/09/2011 08:07 PM, Michael Friedrich wrote:
Original Message
If this patch had been accompanied by something to make conditional
macros and command_line arguments work, I'd have cheered all the way
though.
I don't really get it what you mean - can you explain that a bit more?
Sure. If there was some way to configure Nagios so that certain command
arguments were only expanded if the number of arguments to the check
matches a certain criteria, one could write checks that don't pass half
baked argument strings to the plugins, and the complexity would be
handled in one place. That would actually gain something, rather than
making address6 an official variable, which gains nothing compared
to using a custom variable, but breaks the abi even so.
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
___ Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include
Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. :::
Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] IPv6 support
YEAH finally something good in this thread!!! Ah well. We live and we learn. Now it's time for me to learn how much wine I can drink on a friday night without passing out. I'm looking forward to that particular experiment. Cheerios :) Join winehq for a drink and a wine wow.exe maybe ?! :P Over and out! On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 14:48 +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: On 06/10/2011 02:31 PM, Michael Friedrich wrote: Original Message Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] IPv6 support From: Andreas Ericsson a...@op5.se To: Nagios Users List nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: 2011-06-10 14:09 So give _address6 official status *in the ui*. Or make a config item that lets users specify which custom variables to show in the UI. Or show all of them by default. That's a change that actually makes sense, would have been far less intrusive and would have made very nearly everyone happy (especially the configure which you want to see, with a general switch to show all and then include/exclude parameters to filter passwords and whatnot out of the UI). Wasn't that the real reason behind the patches in the first place? That's at least the only real unique benefit from this over using custom vars. The problem here is actually laziness and possibly poor maintenance. When presented with the patch, you need to ask the submitter; What purpose does this patch serve and why is it so generally important that we have to break the ABI? Given some prodding, you would have found out that the user really just wants to see a special custom variable in the web-interface. Achieving that is basically peanuts, given half a day and a junior coder fresh out of kindergarten, so it's quite likely the submitter could have been persuaded to rewrite the patch like that so it would have been easy to maintain it. It would also have made it acceptable in the Nagios core and would have made life easier for those broker module authors that actually care about supporting Icinga and for the users that use modules with it. That turned a bit harsh there. Sorry about that. conclusion - you won't accept such patches, I won't accept patches that break things when there are easier ways to achieve what the user desires that doesn't break things. i can live with the extra work they will cause. even with addons staying compatible with icinga but not supprting the address6 field. everything else still remains compatible and tested. but that's not the point within nagios related stuff. there are other nagios patches pending, still breaking the abi (see some of opsviews patches and those from nagios-devel) which will make a change happen somewhere in the future. so maybe after a while users demand (even those from your customers), and it will hit nagios too. until then, let's just ask people out there what they really want and how *they* would achieve that. either live with it, patch it or even pay for it. Yup. That's what major releases are for. I guess I'm just a bit whiny because I'd hoped Icinga would stay compatible with Nagios in all possible ways as was promised from the beginning. Ah well. We live and we learn. Now it's time for me to learn how much wine I can drink on a friday night without passing out. I'm looking forward to that particular experiment. Cheerios :) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] IPv6 support
Why not just have a /usr/local/nagios/etc/ipv6.txt and a ping.sh that look in this file for the ipv4 address and get a ipv6 andress and ping6 that address? On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 13:05 +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: On 06/09/2011 08:07 PM, Michael Friedrich wrote: Original Message If this patch had been accompanied by something to make conditional macros and command_line arguments work, I'd have cheered all the way though. I don't really get it what you mean - can you explain that a bit more? Sure. If there was some way to configure Nagios so that certain command arguments were only expanded if the number of arguments to the check matches a certain criteria, one could write checks that don't pass half baked argument strings to the plugins, and the complexity would be handled in one place. That would actually gain something, rather than making address6 an official variable, which gains nothing compared to using a custom variable, but breaks the abi even so. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] IPv6 support
Hello! How is the IPv6 support in Nagios Core? with macros, and address6 ? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] IPv6 support
Ok, thanks all for clearing out this! On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:14 +0200, nap wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Mark Elsen mark.el...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andreas Ericsson a...@op5.se wrote: That's probably not completely true, because the config files allow you to specify IP addresses, if so desired. If IPv6 aware, these should, at least,be parsed correctly ? Hi, In fact no. Like Andreas said, Nagios do not even understand what an IP is. It's just a string for it to be pass to plugins as a macro (still a string). It will not parse it. Jean M. -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] Q: Service Escalation Recovery Notifications.
Are you sure about that?
The documentation says:
If, after three problem notifications, a recovery notification is sent
out for the service, who gets notified? The recovery is actually the
fourth notification that gets sent out. However, the escalation code is
smart enough to realize that only those people who were notified about
the problem on the third notification should be notified about the
recovery. In this case, the nt-admins and managers contact groups would
be notified of the recovery.
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 13:56 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
This works as long as the problem doesn't last longer than 3 notification
intervals. Recovery notifications that are numbered higher than 4 won't be
sent.
Patrik Båt wrote:
# SMS
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
# MAIL
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
# Recovery
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports
escalation_options r
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports
escalation_options r
This is working for me, to notify both via sms and email. eg 2 contacts.
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 22:22 +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
On 05/20/2011 06:05 PM, Max Schubert wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Andreas Ericssona...@op5.se wrote:
On 05/19/2011 03:32 PM, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
OK, but wouldn't it be nice if all contacts who got an error
notification were
able to get the recovery message instead of just the one last notified?
Is
there any way to do that? Setting up an explicit serviceescalation for
recovery notifications doesn't seem to work.
Max Schubert is working on a patch that does something similar to that.
If he doesn't complete it, I might take a look at adding it myself.
I will send out my partial patch to the list sometime today along with
an explanation of my thinking / approach for it - feel free to use it
or discard it as you see fit :)!
Rest assured, I will ;)
Our customers have raised voices about simplifying the notification
logic though. This discussion actually spawned that voice-raising,
which is nice. Either way, it might be that I end up either taking
your patch or implementing the everyone who gets problem notifications
also get recovery notifications.
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] Q: Service Escalation Recovery Notifications.
Why just send a recovery to someone who hasnt been informed of
problem? :P
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:43 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
I should have mentioned that whether this works depends on who the default,
non-escalated, contacts are for the host or service. In your case, since you
have last_notification set to 3, those contacts in your escalation will not
get a recovery notification that is numbered 5 or greater unless they also
happen to be the default contact for the host or service, which will get the
problem notification number 4 and all non-escalated notifications. If you
escalate a notification to a contact that is not assigned as a regular
contact
for the host or service, those contacts don't get the recovery notification
(unless they also got the previous problem notification) even if you set up a
separate escalation for the recovery notification that specifies all previous
contacts.
Patrik Båt wrote:
Are you sure about that?
The documentation says:
If, after three problem notifications, a recovery notification is sent
out for the service, who gets notified? The recovery is actually the
fourth notification that gets sent out. However, the escalation code is
smart enough to realize that only those people who were notified about
the problem on the third notification should be notified about the
recovery. In this case, the nt-admins and managers contact groups would
be notified of the recovery.
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 13:56 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
This works as long as the problem doesn't last longer than 3 notification
intervals. Recovery notifications that are numbered higher than 4 won't
be sent.
Patrik Båt wrote:
# SMS
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
# MAIL
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
# Recovery
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports
escalation_options r
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports
escalation_options r
This is working for me, to notify both via sms and email. eg 2 contacts.
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 22:22 +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
On 05/20/2011 06:05 PM, Max Schubert wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Andreas Ericssona...@op5.se
mailto:a...@op5.sewrote:
On 05/19/2011 03:32 PM, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
OK, but wouldn't it be nice if all contacts who got an error
notification were
able to get the recovery message instead of just the one last
notified? Is
there any way to do that? Setting up an explicit serviceescalation
for
recovery notifications doesn't seem to work.
Max Schubert is working on a patch that does something similar to
that.
If he doesn't complete it, I might take a look at adding it myself.
I will send out my partial patch to the list sometime today along with
an explanation of my thinking / approach for it - feel free to use it
or discard it as you see fit :)!
Rest assured, I will ;)
Our customers have raised voices about simplifying the notification
logic though. This discussion actually spawned that voice-raising,
which is nice. Either way, it might be that I end up either taking
your patch or implementing theeveryone who gets problem notifications
also get recovery notifications.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest
Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] Q: Service Escalation Recovery Notifications.
Strange, as i understand the documentation, nagios is suppose to do that. But maybe thats the fix andreas was talking about, if there is a bug in nagios? On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:57 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote: Because they HAVE been informed of the problem by earlier notifications, but not the one notification prior to the recovery. It leaves those contacts wondering if the problem was ever fixed. Patrik Båt wrote: Why just send a recovery to someone who hasnt been informed of problem? :P On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:43 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote: I should have mentioned that whether this works depends on who the default, non-escalated, contacts are for the host or service. In your case, since you have last_notification set to 3, those contacts in your escalation will not get a recovery notification that is numbered 5 or greater unless they also happen to be the default contact for the host or service, which will get the problem notification number 4 and all non-escalated notifications. If you escalate a notification to a contact that is not assigned as a regular contact for the host or service, those contacts don't get the recovery notification (unless they also got the previous problem notification) even if you set up a separate escalation for the recovery notification that specifies all previous contacts. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] [Nagios-devel] Q: Service Escalation Recovery Notifications.
# SMS
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
# MAIL
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
# Recovery
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports
escalation_options r
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports
escalation_options r
This is working for me, to notify both via sms and email. eg 2 contacts.
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 22:22 +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
On 05/20/2011 06:05 PM, Max Schubert wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Andreas Ericssona...@op5.se wrote:
On 05/19/2011 03:32 PM, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
OK, but wouldn't it be nice if all contacts who got an error notification
were
able to get the recovery message instead of just the one last notified?
Is
there any way to do that? Setting up an explicit serviceescalation for
recovery notifications doesn't seem to work.
Max Schubert is working on a patch that does something similar to that.
If he doesn't complete it, I might take a look at adding it myself.
I will send out my partial patch to the list sometime today along with
an explanation of my thinking / approach for it - feel free to use it
or discard it as you see fit :)!
Rest assured, I will ;)
Our customers have raised voices about simplifying the notification
logic though. This discussion actually spawned that voice-raising,
which is nice. Either way, it might be that I end up either taking
your patch or implementing the everyone who gets problem notifications
also get recovery notifications.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] OpenNMS has REARMED value
Hello! OpenNMS has a rearmed value, if you set this lower than the alarm value, you will get something nice out of it. but the question is, can Nagios have a WARNING value and a OK value ? Best Regards Patrik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Correct syntax to check paging file usage on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit server
Hello, NSClient 2.0.
Just try updating to nsclient++ version 3.8
http://files.nsclient.org/x-0.3.x/NSClient%2B%2B-0.3.8-x64.msi
It has alot of features.
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 13:05 -0400, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
Hi there --
I am running Nagios 3.1.2 with OpMon, formally NSClient, agent 2.0
installed on a Windows 2008 R2 64-bit system. I have several
counters that are being monitored on the client including CPU Load,
Disk Usage, Memory Usage, Server Uptime, and Paging File Usage.
All counters except Paging File Usage appear to be running without
issue.
The error message that I am seeing with Paging File Usage is the
following:
NSClient - ERROR INVALID COUNTER - PagingFile(_Total)% Usage - ERROR
CODE: 0xCBB8 -
I have a Windows 2003 R2 64-bit server that is being monitored with
the same counters, and the Paging File Usage counter does not
return an error. The syntax for the command in question, taken from
the commands.cfg file, is shown below:
# 'check_nt_pagingfile' command
define command{
command_namecheck_nt_pagingfile
command_line$USER1$/check_nt -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -p 5667 -v
COUNTER -l \\PagingFile(_Total)\\% Usage,Paging Fileusage is %.2f%
% -w $ARG1$ -c $ARG2$
}
Does anyone know what change(s) are needed to the above command,
assuming it can still be used, in order for it to accurately
keep track of the paging file in the Windows 2008 server?
Thanks.
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
___ Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include
Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. :::
Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] (no subject)
Crying out load ? Spam via nagios-users ?! On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 17:14 -0700, Christian Iñiguez wrote: I think that losing weight is very simple now due to wonderful weight-loss complex!.. http://www.moncheptel.fr/page.php?exSID=88az4 -- Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Escalating notifications
Hello mailinglist!
im trying to get a notification like this:
in first hardstate, email staff. (notication 1)
at the other notification (notification 2) im sending a SMS to the
oncall.
But the problem is, that on recovery im only getting a SMS due to the
sms escalation is in use.
Anyone have any good way to get this to work?
1. MAIL Problem
2. SMS Problem
On recovery:
1. Mail Recovery
2. SMS Recovery
with 2 escalations, i get like this:
1. Mail problem
2. Mail problem, SMS problem
recovery:
1. SMS recovery.
Config:
# SMS
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
# MAIL
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
i have tried with diffrent last_notifications and so on, but with no
luck.
Regards Patrik Båt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Escalating notifications
Smart thinking there, works perfectly!
Thanks alot!
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:49 -0400, Paul M. Dubuc wrote:
Patrik Båt wrote:
Hello mailinglist!
im trying to get a notification like this:
in first hardstate, email staff. (notication 1)
at the other notification (notification 2) im sending a SMS to the
oncall.
But the problem is, that on recovery im only getting a SMS due to the
sms escalation is in use.
Anyone have any good way to get this to work?
1. MAIL Problem
2. SMS Problem
On recovery:
1. Mail Recovery
2. SMS Recovery
with 2 escalations, i get like this:
1. Mail problem
2. Mail problem, SMS problem
recovery:
1. SMS recovery.
Config:
# SMS
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 2
last_notification 3
notification_interval 0
contacts oncall
}
# MAIL
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 1
last_notification 1
notification_interval 10
contacts sysadmin.reports
}
i have tried with diffrent last_notifications and so on, but with no
luck.
Regards Patrik BÃ¥t.
Try using a separate escalation for the recovery events. The recovery event
is the last numbered event so it's hard to catch without a specific
escalation. Example:
define serviceescalation {
host_name *
service_description *
first_notification 1
last_notification 0
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports,oncall
escalation_options r
}
define hostescalation {
host_name *
first_notification 1
last_notification 0
notification_interval 0
contacts sysadmin.reports,oncall
escalation_options r
}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_procs high frequency Plugin timed out after 10 seconds
How is your timeouts, is this nrpe who reports timeout or nagios ? - Sincerely, Patrik Båt UNIX System Administrator _ Cypoint IT Services AB Sehlstedtsgatan 9 SE-100 52 Stockholm http://www.cypoint.sehttp://www.cypoint.se/ Phone: +46 (0)8 545 87 300 Direct: +46 (0)8 545 87 326 Mobile: +46 (0)73 32 07 326 E-mail: patrik@cypoint.semailto:patrik@cypoint.se Från: Watanabe, Kazuo [deep.sea.odys...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 17 september 2010 08:01 Till: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Ämne: [Nagios-users] check_procs high frequency Plugin timed out after 10 seconds Hi, I am using check_procs for crond processes monitoring via NRPE. The plugin has been reporting Plugin timed out after 10 senconds many times. Sometimes OK, Sometimes above. The target system resource: no high load The crond process: working normally Checking ps command manually: showing crond process normally Other monitoring: CPU, MEM, DISK works well Other machines using same plugin: no problem Error log: I could not find any error log The target machine OS: RHEL3 x86 Kernel: 2.4.21-20.ELsmp Nrpe: 1.2.5 Plugin: check_procs v1758 (nagios-plugins 1.4.11) nrpe.cfg: check_procs -c 1:10 -a crond normal check interval: 5min max retry attempt: 3 retry check interval: 5min I would like to know what is the root cause and the solution for this situation. Regards. Kaz -- Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] host escalation!
Hello, im trying to get host escalation on a host_group, but its not working at
all, I get all alarms from all hosts and the first notification.
This is my escalation config:
define hostescalation{
hostgroup_name hg_monitor
first_notification 2
last_notification 5
notification_interval 10
contactspatrikba-esc
}
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] host escalation!
Yes, that is correct, notice that when I was removing the escalation.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Martin Melin [mailto:mme...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 29 juli 2010 12:06
Till: Nagios Users List
Ämne: Re: [Nagios-users] host escalation!
Escalations don't overwrite the standard notification behavior. My bet is that
you 1) have your contact included in a contact_group that's in a template used
by all hosts or 2) that your email address is in another contact definition as
well.
Best regards
Martin Melin
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Patrik Båt patrik@cypoint.se wrote:
Hello, im trying to get host escalation on a host_group, but its not
working at all, I get all alarms from all hosts and the first notification.
This is my escalation config:
define hostescalation{
hostgroup_name hg_monitor
first_notification 2
last_notification 5
notification_interval 10
contacts patrikba-esc
}
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development
Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP
Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
